Title: Very best ISQI CTFL-AcT Dumps - By Most Secure System [Print This Page] Author: jamesmi994 Time: before yesterday 04:44 Title: Very best ISQI CTFL-AcT Dumps - By Most Secure System The ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing (CTFL-AcT) practice exam consists of a ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing (CTFL-AcT) PDF dumps format, Desktop-based CTFL-AcT practice test software and a Web-based ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing (CTFL-AcT) practice exam. Each of the ActualTestsIT ISQI CTFL-AcT Exam Dumps formats excels in its way and carries actual ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing (CTFL-AcT) exam questions for optimal preparation.
ISQI CTFL-AcT (ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing) Certification Exam is a globally recognized certification program that is designed for professionals who want to gain expertise in acceptance testing. CTFL-AcT exam is an entry-level certification program that is ideal for individuals who want to start their career in software testing or for those who want to enhance their existing software testing skills. ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing certification program is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of acceptance testing and its importance in the software development life cycle.
CTFL-AcT Test Simulates & CTFL-AcT Training Materials & CTFL-AcT Key ContentWe provide 3 versions of our CTFL-AcT exam torrent and they include PDF version, PC version, APP online version. Each version's functions and using method are different and you can choose the most convenient version which is suitable for your practical situation. For example, the PDF version is convenient for you to download and print our CTFL-AcT Test Torrent and is suitable for browsing learning. If you use the PDF version you can print our CTFL-AcT guide torrent on the papers. The PC version of our CTFL-AcT exam questions can stimulate the real exam's environment.
The CTFL-AcT certification exam covers various topics, including the principles of acceptance testing, the different types of acceptance testing, and the role of acceptance testing in software development. CTFL-AcT exam also covers the various techniques and tools used in acceptance testing and how to use them effectively. Individuals who pass the CTFL-AcT Certification Exam will have a comprehensive understanding of acceptance testing and will be able to apply this knowledge to improve the quality of software applications. ISQI ISTQB Foundation Level - Acceptance Testing Sample Questions (Q40-Q45):NEW QUESTION # 40
What is considered as good practice regarding business process modeling?
A. Links to requirements or risks should be well separated from the workflow description.
B. BPMN diagrams and DMN tables should include information such as traceability to user stories.
C. Business analysts should finalize their process models before showing them to acceptance testers.
D. Keeping all model element in one diagram considerably improves the readability of BMPN models.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Traceability is a key principle in requirements and test management. It ensures that all features, requirements, and tests are linked and accounted for. Including traceability to user stories in BPMN diagrams or DMN tables supports transparency, auditability, and maintenance.
Option B is correct because embedding or referencing traceability information within business models improves communication across stakeholders, ensures proper test coverage, and helps during change impact analysis.
Let's evaluate other options:
Option A is incorrect. Trying to place all model elements in one diagram can lead to cluttered and unreadable models.
Option C is misleading. While separation of concerns is useful, traceability (links to requirements, risks) should be integrated or closely accessible from the models.
Option D is incorrect. Acceptance testers should be involved early to collaborate and review models. Waiting until models are finalized contradicts agile and ATDD principles.
B). BPMN diagrams and DMN tables should include information such as traceability to user stories.
NEW QUESTION # 41
Which one of the following statements describes correctly how acceptance testing may be augmented with other test techniques or approaches?
A. In a model-based testing approach, acceptance tests are generated from graphical or textual models.
B. In a black-box testing approach, acceptance test scenarios follow the implemented sequence of function calls in the code.
C. In a priority-based testing approach, prioritization of acceptance tests depends on identified product risks.
D. In a risk-based testing approach, acceptance criteria are derived from the tester's experience and intuition.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 42
Which one of the following statements regarding ATDD / BDD is true?
A. In Acceptance-Test Driven Development (ATDD., test cases are written prior to the acceptance criteria.
B. In both Acceptance-Test Driven Development (ATDD. and Behavior-Driven Development (BDD., test cases provide examples of product use.
C. In both Acceptance-Test Driven Development (ATDD. and Behavior-Driven Development (BDD., acceptance test cases are written by a test automation engineer as test automation code.
D. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD. considers acceptance test design as an activity to be handled by the test team after requirements have been finalized.
Answer: B
Explanation:
ATDD and BDD are agile development approaches that emphasize collaboration among stakeholders (such as business analysts, developers, testers, and customers) to define clear and testable acceptance criteria before or as requirements are being finalized. Both techniques promote using concrete examples to drive development and validate understanding.
In ATDD, acceptance test cases are derived directly from user stories or requirements and written before the actual implementation starts. In BDD, scenarios are expressed in natural language (often using Gherkin syntax) to describe behaviors the system should exhibit under specific conditions. In both cases, these tests serve not only as validation tools but also as executable specifications - i.e., shared understanding expressed through concrete examples.
Option B is correct because both methodologies use examples (scenarios/test cases) to describe how a system should behave - serving as acceptance criteria.
Incorrect options:
Option A wrongly suggests BDD defers testing until after requirements are finalized - it actually promotes early collaboration.
Option C is false - in ATDD, test cases are based on predefined acceptance criteria, not written beforehand.
Option D is inaccurate - acceptance tests in ATDD and BDD may be automated but are collaboratively written first, not by test automation engineers alone.
Exact Reference - ISTQB CTFL Acceptance Testing Syllabus (Section 2.2):
"Both ATDD and BDD involve the collaborative definition of test cases before implementation to clarify requirements and serve as product usage examples."
NEW QUESTION # 43
In Agile an exploratory test session is conducted. Which one of the following concepts applies BEST?
A. refactoring
B. timeboxing Answer
C. pair programming
D. planning poker
Answer: B
Explanation:
Exploratory testing in Agile projects is a structured but unscripted testing approach where learning, test design, and execution occur simultaneously. Timeboxing is a key practice in managing exploratory testing sessions effectively.
A timebox is a fixed duration (e.g., 60-90 minutes) within which testers explore specific functionalities or risks. It encourages focus, documentation of findings, and prevents overrun or testing fatigue. After the session, testers often hold debriefs to review findings and determine next steps.
Option D is correct because timeboxing is essential for exploratory testing management.
Incorrect options:
A). Pair programming relates to development, not testing.
B). Refactoring is a development technique focused on improving code without changing behavior.
C). Planning poker is used in Agile for effort estimation, not directly related to exploratory testing.
Exact Reference - ISTQB CTFL Acceptance Testing Syllabus (Section 3.1):
"Exploratory testing is often conducted in time-boxed sessions, with a charter guiding the scope of the session."
NEW QUESTION # 44
The project team is currently facing a difficult situation originating from their difficulty in envisioning the future and the necessary steps to reach it together with a certain loss of motivation due to a strong feeling of stagnation. You try to unlock the situation by proposing a workshop. Which one would fit the best?
A. You organize a day out with challenging physical exercises practiced in teams followed by an afterwork dinner and drink. After all, nothing is best for motivation than hard times together, strong common objectives and a promise of good time.
B. You draw a staircase with 11 steps, each of them representing a major milestone of the project. The bottom of the stairs corresponds to the first day of the project and the upper step means that the project is released. You locate the present situation in the middle of the stairs. The team is asked to identify and discuss the major steps down and up.
C. You visualize all remaining major milestones of the project, starting with today and ending with project release. Then, you ask the team to identify and discuss the necessary actions to move forward from the present situation and to reach the milestones.
D. You ask two volunteers to play a part in front of the team. One will try to defend the project and propose positive arguments and ways forward. The other will do the opposite. You then recapitulate the major arguments of both sides and debate them openly with the team.
Answer: B
Explanation:
In situations where a team is demotivated or struggling with vision and direction, it's effective to use visualization workshops that help the team reflect on progress and visualize a path forward.
Option B describes a metaphorical workshop using a staircase to represent the project's journey - this is known as the "Stairway Retrospective" or "Timeline Workshop". It provides a shared mental model, identifies milestones, and encourages discussion around past progress and future steps. It's ideal for reigniting motivation and clarifying direction - which aligns with the issue described in the question.
Other options:
A can spark debate but may not be constructive or motivating in a stagnation scenario.
C may foster team bonding but doesn't directly address project direction or vision.
D focuses only on future milestones and lacks the reflective component essential when a team feels stuck.