Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Valid PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Study Guide & Valid PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Test Blueprint [Print This Page]
Author: maxbrow714    Time: before yesterday 15:16
Title: Valid PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Study Guide & Valid PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Test Blueprint
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of TestKingFree PSE-Strata-Pro-24 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12hF5X-9rFGEGF4K7drDDNHDA74OelYg_
PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice test can be your optimum selection and useful tool to deal with the urgent challenge. With over a decade's striving, our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 training materials have become the most widely-lauded and much-anticipated products in industry. We have three versions of PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Questions by modernizing innovation mechanisms and fostering a strong pool of professionals. Therefore, rest assured of full technical support from our professional elites in planning and designing PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice test.
Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Deployment and Evaluation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Deployment Engineers and focuses on identifying the capabilities of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. Candidates will evaluate features that protect against both known and unknown threats. They will also explain identity management from a deployment perspective and describe the proof of value (PoV) process, which includes assessing the effectiveness of NGFW solutions.
Topic 2
  • Architecture and Planning: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Architects and emphasizes understanding customer requirements and designing suitable deployment architectures. Candidates must explain Palo Alto Networks' platform networking capabilities in detail and evaluate their suitability for various environments. Handling aspects like system sizing and fine-tuning is also a critical skill assessed in this domain.
Topic 3
  • Network Security Strategy and Best Practices: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Strategy Specialists and highlights the importance of the Palo Alto Networks five-step Zero Trust methodology. Candidates must understand how to approach and apply the Zero Trust model effectively while emphasizing best practices to ensure robust network security.
Topic 4
  • Business Value and Competitive Differentiators: This section of the exam measures the skills of Technical Business Value Analysts and focuses on identifying the value proposition of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs). Candidates will assess the technical business benefits of tools like Panorama and SCM. They will also recognize customer-relevant topics and align them with Palo Alto Networks' best solutions. Additionally, understanding Strata¡¯s unique differentiators is a key component of this domain.

>> Valid PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Study Guide <<
TestKingFree Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Practice Questions are Real and Verified By ExpertsThe world is changing rapidly and the requirements to the employees are higher than ever before. If you want to find an ideal job and earn a high income you must boost good working abilities and profound major knowledge. Passing PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification can help you realize your dreams. If you buy our product, we will provide you with the best PSE-Strata Professional study materials and it can help you obtain PSE-Strata-Pro-24certification. Our product is of high quality and our service is perfect.
Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q41-Q46):NEW QUESTION # 41
A systems engineer should create a profile that blocks which category to protect a customer from ransomware URLs by using Advanced URL Filtering?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When configuring Advanced URL Filtering on a Palo Alto Networks firewall, the "Ransomware" category should be explicitly blocked to protect customers from URLs associated with ransomware activities.
Ransomware URLs typically host malicious code or scripts designed to encrypt user data and demand a ransom. By blocking the "Ransomware" category, systems engineers can proactively prevent users from accessing such URLs.
* Why "Ransomware" (Correct Answer A)?The "Ransomware" category is specifically curated by Palo Alto Networks to include URLs known to deliver ransomware or support ransomware operations.
Blocking this category ensures that any URL categorized as part of this list will be inaccessible to end- users, significantly reducing the risk of ransomware attacks.
* Why not "High Risk" (Option B)?While the "High Risk" category includes potentially malicious sites, it is broader and less targeted. It may not always block ransomware-specific URLs. "High Risk" includes a range of websites that are flagged based on factors like bad reputation or hosting malicious content in general. It is less focused than the "Ransomware" category.
* Why not "Scanning Activity" (Option C)?The "Scanning Activity" category focuses on URLs used in vulnerability scans, automated probing, or reconnaissance by attackers. Although such activity could be a precursor to ransomware attacks, it does not directly block ransomware URLs.
* Why not "Command and Control" (Option D)?The "Command and Control" category is designed to block URLs used by malware or compromised systems to communicate with their operators. While some ransomware may utilize command-and-control (C2) servers, blocking C2 URLs alone does not directly target ransomware URLs themselves.
By using the Advanced URL Filtering profile and blocking the "Ransomware" category, the firewall applies targeted controls to mitigate ransomware-specific threats.

NEW QUESTION # 42
A systems engineer (SE) successfully demonstrates NGFW managed by Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) to a company. In the resulting planning phase of the proof of value (POV), the CISO requests a test that shows how the security policies are either meeting, or are progressing toward meeting, industry standards such as Critical Security Controls (CSC), and how the company can verify that it is effectively utilizing the functionality purchased.
During the POV testing timeline, how should the SE verify that the POV will meet the CISO's request?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The SE has demonstrated an NGFW managed by SCM, and the CISO now wants the POV to show progress toward industry standards (e.g., CSC) and verify effective use of purchased features (e.g., CDSS subscriptions like Advanced Threat Prevention). The SE must ensure the POV delivers measurable evidence during the testing timeline. Let's evaluate the options.
Step 1: Understand the CISO's Request
* Industry Standards (e.g., CSC): The Center for Internet Security's Critical Security Controls (e.g., CSC 1: Inventory of Devices, CSC 4: Secure Configuration) require visibility, threat prevention, and policy enforcement, which NGFW and SCM can address.
* Feature Utilization: Confirm that licensed functionalities (e.g., App-ID, Threat Prevention, URL Filtering) are active and effective.
* POV Goal: Provide verifiable progress and utilization metrics within the testing timeline.

NEW QUESTION # 43
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Step 1: Understand the Requirement and Context
* Customer Need: Segregate the internal network into unique BGP environments, suggesting multiple isolated or semi-isolated routing domains within a single organization.
* BGP Basics:
* BGP is a routing protocol used to exchange routing information between autonomous systems (ASes).
* eBGP: External BGP, used between different ASes.
* iBGP: Internal BGP, used within a single AS, typically requiring a full mesh of peers unless mitigated by techniques like confederations or route reflectors.
* Palo Alto NGFW: Supports BGP on virtual routers (VRs) within PAN-OS, enabling advanced routing capabilities for Strata hardware firewalls (e.g., PA-Series).
* References: "AN-OS supports BGP for dynamic routing and network segmentation" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
Option A: It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it
* Analysis:
* PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, confederations, and route reflectors, configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP."
* Features like multiple virtual routers and BGP allow network segregation and routing policy control.
* This statement contradicts documented capabilities.
* Verification:
* "Configure BGP on a virtual router for dynamic routing" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2
/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/configure-bgp).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation techniques.Not Applicable.
Option B: It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems
* Analysis:
* eBGP: Used between distinct ASes, each with a unique AS number (e.g., AS 65001, AS 65002).
* Within a single organization, creating multiple eBGP ASes would require:
* Assigning unique AS numbers (public or private) to each internal segment.
* Treating each segment as a separate AS, peering externally with other segments via eBGP.
* Challenges:
* Internally, this isn't practical for a single network-it's more suited to external peering (e.
g., with ISPs).
* Requires complex management and public/private AS number allocation, not ideal for internal segregation.
* Doesn't leverage iBGP or confederations, which are designed for internal AS management.
* PAN-OS supports eBGP, but this approach misaligns with the intent of internal network segregation.
* Verification:
* "eBGP peers connect different ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os- networking-admin/bgp/bgp-concepts).
* Conclusion: Possible but impractical and not the intended BGP solution for internal segregation.Not Optimal.
Option C: It can be addressed with BGP confederations
* Description: BGP confederations divide a single AS into sub-ASes (each with a private Confederation Member AS number), reducing the iBGP full-mesh requirement while maintaining a unified external AS.
* Analysis:
* How It Works:
* Single AS (e.g., AS 65000) is split into sub-ASes (e.g., 65001, 65002).
* Within each sub-AS, iBGP full mesh or route reflectors are used.
* Between sub-ASes, eBGP-like peering (confederation EBGP) connects them, but externally, it appears as one AS.
* Segregation:
* Each sub-AS can represent a unique BGP environment (e.g., department, site) with its own routing policies.
* Firewalls within a sub-AS peer via iBGP; across sub-ASes, they use confederation EBGP.
* PAN-OS Support:
* Configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP > Confederation" with a Confederation Member AS number.
* Ideal for large internal networks needing segmentation without multiple public AS numbers.
* Benefits:
* Simplifies internal BGP management.
* Aligns with the customer's need for unique internal BGP environments.
* Verification:
* "BGP confederations reduce full-mesh burden by dividing an AS into sub-ASes" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* "Supports unique internal routing domains" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
* Conclusion: Directly addresses the requirement with a supported, practical solution.Applicable.
Option D: It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work
* Analysis:
* iBGP Full Mesh: Traditional iBGP requires all routers in an AS to peer with each other, scaling poorly (n(n-1)/2 connections).
* Mitigation: PAN-OS supports alternatives:
* Route Reflectors: Centralize iBGP peering.
* Confederations: Divide the AS into sub-ASes (see Option C).
* This statement ignores these features, falsely claiming BGP's limitation prevents segregation.
* Verification:
* "Confederations and route reflectors eliminate full-mesh needs" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan- os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS overcomes full-mesh constraints.Not Applicable.
Step 3: Recommendation Justification
* Why Option C?
* Alignment: Confederations allow the internal network to be segregated into unique BGP environments (sub-ASes) while maintaining a single external AS, perfectly matching the customer's need.
* Scalability: Reduces iBGP full-mesh complexity, ideal for large or segmented internal networks.
* PAN-OS Support: Explicitly implemented in BGP configuration, validated by documentation.
* Why Not Others?
* A: False-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation.
* B: eBGP is for external ASes, not internal segregation; less practical thanconfederations.
* D: Misrepresents BGP capabilities; full mesh isn't required with confederations or route reflectors.
Step 4: Verified References
* BGP Confederations: "Divide an AS into sub-ASes for internal segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.
com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* PAN-OS BGP: "Supports eBGP, iBGP, and confederations for routing flexibility" (paloaltonetworks.
com, PAN-OS Networking Guide).
* Use Case: "Confederations suit large internal networks" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).

NEW QUESTION # 44
Which three use cases are specific to Policy Optimizer? (Choose three.)
Answer: A,D,E
Explanation:
The question asks for three use cases specific to Policy Optimizer, a feature in PAN-OS designed to enhance security policy management on Palo Alto Networks Strata Hardware Firewalls. Policy Optimizer helps administrators refine firewall rules by leveraging App-ID technology, transitioning from legacy port-based policies to application-based policies, and optimizing rule efficiency. Below is a detailed explanation of why options A, C, and E are the correct use cases, verified against official Palo Alto Networks documentation.
Step 1: Understanding Policy Optimizer in PAN-OS
Policy Optimizer is a tool introduced in PAN-OS 9.0 and enhanced in subsequent versions (e.g., 11.1), accessible under Policies > Policy Optimizer in the web interface. It analyzes traffic logs to:
* Identify applications traversing the network.
* Suggest refinements to security rules (e.g., replacing ports with App-IDs).
* Provide insights into rule usage and optimization opportunities.
Its primary goal is to align policies with Palo Alto Networks' application-centric approach, improving security and manageability on Strata NGFWs.

NEW QUESTION # 45
A prospective customer is concerned about stopping data exfiltration, data infiltration, and command-and- control (C2) activities over port 53.
Which subscription(s) should the systems engineer recommend?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Option C: It can be addressed with BGP confederations
Description: BGP confederations divide a single AS into sub-ASes (each with a private Confederation Member AS number), reducing the iBGP full-mesh requirement while maintaining a unified external AS.
Analysis:
How It Works:
Single AS (e.g., AS 65000) is split into sub-ASes (e.g., 65001, 65002).
Within each sub-AS, iBGP full mesh or route reflectors are used.
Between sub-ASes, eBGP-like peering (confederation EBGP) connects them, but externally, it appears as one AS.
Segregation:
Each sub-AS can represent a unique BGP environment (e.g., department, site) with its own routing policies.
Firewalls within a sub-AS peer via iBGP; across sub-ASes, they use confederation EBGP.
PAN-OS Support:
Configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP > Confederation" with a Confederation Member AS number.
Ideal for large internal networks needing segmentation without multiple public AS numbers.
Benefits:
Simplifies internal BGP management.
Aligns with the customer's need for unique internal BGP environments.
Verification:
"BGP confederations reduce full-mesh burden by dividing an AS into sub-ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com
/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
"Supports unique internal routing domains" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
Conclusion: Directly addresses the requirement with a supported, practical solution. Applicable.
Option D: It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work Analysis:
iBGP Full Mesh: Traditional iBGP requires all routers in an AS to peer with each other, scaling poorly (n(n-
1)/2 connections).
Mitigation: PAN-OS supports alternatives:
Route Reflectors: Centralize iBGP peering.
Confederations: Divide the AS into sub-ASes (see Option C).
This statement ignores these features, falsely claiming BGP's limitation prevents segregation.
Verification:
"Confederations and route reflectors eliminate full-mesh needs" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan- os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS overcomes full-mesh constraints. Not Applicable.
Step 3: Recommendation Justification
Why Option C?
Alignment: Confederations allow the internal network to be segregated into unique BGP environments (sub- ASes) while maintaining a single external AS, perfectly matching the customer's need.
Scalability: Reduces iBGP full-mesh complexity, ideal for large or segmented internal networks.
PAN-OS Support: Explicitly implemented in BGP configuration, validated by documentation.
Why Not Others?
A: False-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation.
B: eBGP is for external ASes, not internal segregation; less practical than confederations.
D: Misrepresents BGP capabilities; full mesh isn't required with confederations or route reflectors.
Step 4: Verified References
BGP Confederations: "Divide an AS into sub-ASes for internal segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com
/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
PAN-OS BGP: "Supports eBGP, iBGP, and confederations for routing flexibility" (paloaltonetworks.com, PAN-OS Networking Guide).
Use Case: "Confederations suit large internal networks" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).

NEW QUESTION # 46
......
The actual Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam questions are in PDF format for the one who wants to study offline. The actual Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam questions are in simple PDF form. The PDF format is suitable both for smartphones as well as tablets. You can print documents and study anywhere. The plus point is that the PDF version is updated regularly to improve its PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Questions and reflect changes in the syllabus of the exam.
Valid PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Test Blueprint: https://www.testkingfree.com/Palo-Alto-Networks/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-practice-exam-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest TestKingFree PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12hF5X-9rFGEGF4K7drDDNHDA74OelYg_
Author: tonymil522    Time: yesterday 14:15
Your article made such a difference to me, I¡¯m really thankful. The 220-1201 free practice test exam test questions are shared for free. Good luck with your exam preparation!



Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1