Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Pass-Sure Hot ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Spot Questions - Updated Source of ISO- [Print This Page]
Author: robking495    Time: 3 hour before
Title: Pass-Sure Hot ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Spot Questions - Updated Source of ISO-
What's more, part of that Actualtests4sure ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1IsYCS_bTMebm1ztMgItoRrPq-WqRa6aE
The simplified information contained in our PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training guide is easy to understand without any difficulties. And our PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice materials enjoy a high reputation considered as the most topping practice materials in this career for the merit of high-effective. A great number of candidates have already been benefited from them.
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
Topic 2
  • Managing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
Topic 3
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.
Topic 4
  • Preparing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.

>> Hot ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Spot Questions <<
2026 Hot ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Spot Questions - Realistic Exam ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Actual Tests Free PDF QuizIf you're still learning from the traditional old ways and silently waiting for the test to come, you should be awake and ready to take the exam in a different way. Study our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials to write "test data" is the most suitable for your choice, after recent years show that the effect of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials has become a secret weapon of the examinee through qualification examination, a lot of the users of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials can get unexpected results in the examination.
PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q69-Q74):NEW QUESTION # 69
Scenario 9 (continued):
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewingSecurisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and uphold its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Roger followed up on action plans after the external audit at Securisai, but he was directly involved in strategic decision-making processes, potentially affecting his audit objectivity.
Question:
Based on Scenario 9, which principle of internal auditing did Roger violate?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Independenceis compromised when an auditor has direct involvement in the management or decision-making processes of the system being audited.
* ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5defines independence as:"The basis for the impartiality and objectivity of the audit conclusions."
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5reinforces that personnel auditing must be free from involvement in the area audited.
* By participating in strategic decision-making, Roger violated the independence principle.
Reference:ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5.

NEW QUESTION # 70
How are auditors expected to handle conflicts of interest during an audit?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct practice is:disclose any potential conflicts and avoid auditing the affected area.
ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 5.3 and Clause 6.3.2require auditors todeclare conflicts of interestand take steps topreserve impartiality. Failure to do so compromises the integrity andindependence of the audit.
According to thePECB Lead Auditor Guide, auditors shouldimmediately report any situation where their objectivity may be questioned, including past relationships, financial ties, or personal bias.

NEW QUESTION # 71
Scenario 6:
Scenario 6: HappilyAI is a pioneering enterprise dedicated to developing and deploying artificial intelligence Al solutions tailored toenhance customer service experiences across various industries. The company offers innovative products like virtual assistants,predictive analytics tools, and personalized customer interaction platforms. As part of its commitment to operational excellence andinnovation, HappilyAI has implemented a robust Al management system AIMS to oversee its Al operations effectively. Currently.HappilyAI is undergoing a comprehensive audit process of its AIMS to evaluate its compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Under the leadership of Jess, the audit team began the audit process with meticulous planning and coordination, setting the groundworkfor the extensive on-site activities of the stage 1 audit. This initial phase was marked by a comprehensive documentation review. Theaudit scope encompassed a critical review of HappilyAI's core departments, including Research and Development (R&D), CustomerService, and Data Security, aiming to assess the conformity of HappilyAI's AIMS to the requirements of ISO/IEC 42001.
Afterward, Jess and the team conducted a formal opening meeting with HappilyAI to introduce the audit team and outline the auditactivities. The meeting set a collaborative tone for the subsequent phases, where the team engaged in information collection, executedaudit tests, identified findings, and prepared draft nonconformity reports while maintaining a strict quality review process.
In gathering evidence, the audit team employed a sampling method, which involved dividing the population into homogeneous groups toensure a comprehensive and representative data collection by drawing samples from each segment. Furthermore, the team employedobservation to deepen their understanding of the Al management processes. They verified the availability of essential documentation,including Al-related policies, and evaluated the communication channels established for reporting incidents.
Additionally, they scrutinized specific monitoring tools designed to track the performance of data acquisition processes, ensuring thesetools effectively identify and respond to errors or anomalies. However, a notable challenge emerged as the team encountered a lack ofaccess to documented information that describes how tasks about AIMS are executed. In addition to this, the team identified a potentialnonconformity within the Sales Department. They decided not to record this as a nonconformity in the audit report but onlycommunicated it to the HappilyAI's representatives.
During the stage 2 audit, the certification body, in collaboration with HappilyAI, assigned the roles of technical experts within the auditteam. Recognized for their specialized knowledge and expertise in artificial intelligence and its applications, these technical experts aretasked with the thorough assessment of the AIMS framework to ensure its alignment with industry standards and best practices,focusing on areas such as data ethics, algorithmic transparency, and Al system security.
Question:
Which level of documented information could the audit team NOT access?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Level 3 documentationtypically includes detailed procedures, work instructions, and records explaining exactlyhow tasks are performed.
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.5.1requires organizations to maintain documented information necessary for the effective functioning of the AIMS.
* TheLead Auditor Study Guideexplains:"Level 3 documents are the operational and procedural records that detail the execution of management system activities."The team lacked access to task execution procedures - indicating missing Level 3 documentation.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.5.1; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.3.

NEW QUESTION # 72
What does the 'Human-Centered Design' core element prioritize in AI development?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Human-Centered Designfocuses on designing AI systems thatrespect and enhance human well-being, align withuser needs and values, and promoteinclusive and accessible technologies.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clauses 4.2 and 6.1.2, and highlighted throughout thePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1, AI systems should beusable, inclusive, and ethically aligned, especially when intended for diverse or vulnerable user groups.
This principle ensures thathumans remain in control and benefitfrom the capabilities of AI.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 4.2 (Needs of interested parties), Clause 6.1.2 (Ethical impact and risk analysis) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Human-Centered Design and Trustworthy AI"

NEW QUESTION # 73
Scenario 2: OptiFlow is a logistics company located in New Delhi, India. The company has enhanced its operational efficiency and customer service by integrating AI across various domains, including route optimization, inventory management, and customer support. Recognizing the importance of AI in its operations, OptiFlow decided to implement an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS) based on ISO/IEC 42001 to oversee and optimize the use of AI technologies.
To address Clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of the standard, OptiFlow identified and analyzed internal and external issues and needs and expectations of interested parties. During this phase, it identified specific risks and opportunities related to AI deployment, considering the system's domain, application context, intended use, and internal and external environments. Central to this initiative was the establishment and maintenance of AI risk criteria, a foundational step that facilitated comprehensive AI risk assessments, effective risk treatment strategies, and precise evaluations of risk impacts. This implementation aimed to meet AIMS's objectives, minimize adverse effects, and promote continuous improvement. OptiFlow also planned and integrated strategies to address risks and opportunities into AIMS's processes and assessed their effectiveness.
OptiFlow set measurable AI objectives aligned with its AI policy across all organizational levels, ensuring they met applicable requirements and matched the company's vision. The company placed strong emphasis on the monitoring and communication of these objectives, ensuring they were updated annually or as needed to reflect changes in technology, market demands, or internal processes. It also documented the objectives, making them accessible across the company.
To guarantee a structured and consistent AI risk assessment process, OptiFlow emphasized alignment with its AI policy and objectives. The process included ensuring consistency and comparability, identifying, analyzing, and evaluating AI risks.
OptiFlow prioritizes its AIMS by allocating the necessary resources for its comprehensive development and continuous enhancement. The company carefully defines the competencies needed for personnel affecting AI performance, ensuring a high level of expertise and innovation.
OptiFlow also manages effective internal and external communications about its AIMS, aligning with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements by maintaining and controlling all required documented information. This documentation is meticulously identified, described, and updated to ensure its relevance and accessibility.
Through these strategic efforts, OptiFlow upholds a commitment to excellence and leadership in AI management practices.
To comply with Clause 9 of ISO/IEC 42001, the company determined what needs to be monitored and measured in the AIMS. It planned, established, implemented, and maintained an audit program, reviewed the AIMS at planned intervals, documented review results, and initiated a continuous feedback mechanism from all interested parties to identify areas of improvement and innovation within the AIMS.
Which of the following requirements of Clause 6.1.2 AI risk assessment did OptiFlow NOT consider?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Clause 6.1.2 of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 addresses AI risk assessment and includes requirements such as:
* Establishing and applying AI risk assessment criteria
* Identifying and analyzing risks and opportunities
* Evaluating AI risks
* Planning for AI risk treatment
* Documenting the process and outcomes to ensure traceability and repeatability In the scenario, OptiFlow:
* Established and maintained AI risk criteria.
* Performed identification, analysis, and evaluation of risks.
* Integrated AI risk treatment into its AIMS.
* Maintained documentation of objectives and internal communications as per the standard.
However, there is no reference in the scenario to cost minimization, either as a guiding factor or an outcome of the AI risk assessment process. While cost control may be a strategic or operational consideration for a business, it is not a core requirement under Clause 6.1.2 and is clearly not discussed in OptiFlow's implementation activities in the scenario.
Therefore, "Cost minimization" is the element NOT considered, making it the correct answer.
Reference:
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 6.1.2 - AI risk assessment
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Annex A - Guidance on AI risk identification and evaluation
* PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide, Section 6.1.2 - Interpretation of AI risk-based requirements
#############################################

NEW QUESTION # 74
......
In order to meet the requirements of our customers, Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor test questions carefully designed the automatic correcting system for customers. It is known to us that practicing the incorrect questions is very important for everyone, so our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam question provide the automatic correcting system to help customers understand and correct the errors. If you are finding a study material in order to get away from your exam, you can spend little time to know about our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Torrent, it must suit for you.
Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Actual Tests: https://www.actualtests4sure.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-test-questions.html
2026 Latest Actualtests4sure ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF Dumps and ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1IsYCS_bTMebm1ztMgItoRrPq-WqRa6aE




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1