L4M6受験料過去問 | 素晴らしい合格率のCIPS L4M6 | L4M6: CIPS Supplier RelationshipsTech4ExamがCIPS認証L4M6試験対策ツールのサイトで開発した問題集はとてもCIPS認証試験の受験生に適用します。Tech4Examが提供した研修ツールが対応性的なので君の貴重な時間とエネルギーを節約できます。
この試験は、サプライヤーの選択、評価、パフォーマンス管理などの様々なトピックをカバーしています。また、サプライヤーの開発や協力、契約管理、サプライヤー関係における倫理的問題なども含まれています。認定試験は、調達に新しく取り組んでいる人から、長年の経験を持つ人まで、あらゆるレベルの調達プロフェッショナルに適しています。全体的に、CIPS L4M6試験は、サプライヤー関係管理のスキルを開発し、戦略的な調達目標を達成するために調達プロフェッショナルが必要不可欠な認定資格です。 CIPS Supplier Relationships 認定 L4M6 試験問題 (Q80-Q85):質問 # 80
Beyond Say is a manufacturer of diamond rings. It sources a lot of different parts to create its products including diamonds, gold, cardboard boxes for the rings to go in, as well as stationary and copier paper for the offices. Although it doesn't buy many diamonds, these represent a large part of Beyond Say's spend. Which category of spend would diamonds represent?
A. Routine Spend
B. It isn't possible to tell
C. Operational Spend
D. Strategic Spend
正解：D
解説：
This is category 'A' spend in the ABC model - they represent a large value and a small number of purchases / suppliers. See p.17 for more information on the ABC Analysis
質問 # 81
Which of the following are advantages for the buyer in a partnership arrangement?
* Price stability
* Cost of relationship management
* Supplier complacency
* Cost savings achieved
A. 2 and 4 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 2 only
D. 1 and 4 only
正解：D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Partnership arrangements often lead to price stability, as both parties work collaboratively to manage costs and avoid market volatility. Additionally, such relationships can result in cost savings through joint process improvements, shared investments, and economies of scale. While managing a partnership does incur relationship management costs, these are typically offset by the benefits gained. Supplier complacency is a potential risk but not an inherent advantage of partnerships.
Reference:
CIPS L4M6 Study Guide
質問 # 82
One of the fist stages of designing a Partnership is to come up with joint KPIs. These should be:
A. Significant, measurable and achievable
B. Measurable, achievable and time-bound
C. Time bound, difficult and relevant
D. Relatable, specific and measurable
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is Measurable, achievable and time-bound. This is from SMART KPIs on p. 151. Smart stands for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound. In the exam they come up in different orders so be careful.
質問 # 83
Which of the following are typical examples of partnering between companies? Select the TWO that apply.
A. Strategic alliance
B. Joint venture
C. Sole trader
D. Limited company
E. Public limited company
正解：A、B
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Joint venturesandstrategic alliancesare common forms of partnerships between companies:
* Joint Venture:A business arrangement where two or more parties agree to pool their resources for a specific task, creating a new entity.
* Strategic Alliance:An agreement between companies to pursue objectives while remaining independent organizations.
"Sole trader," "limited company," and "public limited company" refer to business structures, not partnership arrangements.
Reference:
CIPS L4M6 Study Guide
質問 # 84
A procurement manager has established a project steering committee to undertake regular reviews and audits, and to ensure a successful buyer/supplier long-term partnership. The committee membership will comprise the procurement manager (chairperson), three of their cross-functional colleagues, the supplier's partnership project manager, and an independent member. Which of the following is a potential disadvantage of the proposed committee structure?
A. The size of the committee is too large as there should be a limit of three members
B. The supplier does not have equal membership in the committee
C. The procurement manager should not be the chairperson of the committee
D. The committee includes an independent member
正解：B
解説：
Effective partnership governance requires balanced representation from both buyer and supplier. If the supplier has fewer members than the buyer, decision-making power becomes unequal, potentially undermining collaboration.