有難いF5CAB5対応受験試験-試験の準備方法-素敵なF5CAB5日本語版サンプル当社の学習システムは、すべてのお客様に最高の学習教材を提供します。当社のF5CAB5最新の質問を購入すると、当社のすべてのF5CAB5認定トレーニング資料を楽しむ権利があります。さらに重要なことに、当社には多くの専門家がいます。これらの専門家の最初の義務は、すべてのお客様のために昼夜を問わず当社の学習システムを更新することです。 F5CAB5トレーニング資料の学習システムを更新することにより、当社がF5CAB5試験に関する最新情報をすべての人に提供できることを保証できます。 F5 BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting 認定 F5CAB5 試験問題 (Q39-Q44):質問 # 39
A device group is currently in the Changes Pending sync status. How can the BIG-IP Administrator determine which member of the device group has the most recent configuration? (Choose one answer)
A. System > High Availability
B. Device Management > Device Groups
C. Device Management > Overview
D. Device Management > Devices
正解：B
解説：
When a BIG-IP device group shows a Changes Pending status, it indicates that one or more devices in the group have configuration changes that have not yet been synchronized to the other members. To identify which device has the most recent (authoritative) configuration, the administrator must view the detailed synchronization status at the device group level.
The correct location is Device Management > Device Groups (Option D). Within this menu, the BIG-IP Configuration Utility displays each device group along with its synchronization status and provides details about which device has pending changes. From this view, the administrator can clearly see which device is marked as having changes pending, making it the source device that should be used to initiate a Sync to Group operation.
The other options do not provide the required level of detail:
Device Management > Overview (Option A) shows general HA status but not configuration ownership.
Device Management > Devices (Option B) lists devices but does not clearly identify which one holds unsynchronized changes.
System > High Availability (Option C) focuses on failover and traffic groups, not configuration sync state.
This workflow aligns with BIG-IP best practices for configuration synchronization and ensures changes are propagated correctly without overwriting newer configurations.
質問 # 40
A BIG-IP Administrator receives reports from users that SSL connections to the BIG-IP device are failing. Upon checking the log files, the administrator notices: SSL transaction (TPS) rate limit reached. stats show a maximum of 1200 client-side SSL TPS and 800 server-side SSL TPS. What is the minimum SSL license limit required to handle this peak?
A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 3
正解：B
解説：
Troubleshooting failed SSL handshakes involves interpreting the resource limits defined by the system's license8888. The log message SSL transaction (TPS) rate limit reached indicates the BIG-IP is dropping SSL connections because it has exceeded its licensed "Transactions Per Second" capacity. When analyzing stats to determine the correct license level, the administrator must focus on "Client-side" SSL TPS. This represents the initial encrypted handshakes between users and the BIG-IP virtual servers91. In this scenario, the peak client-side demand is 1200 TPS. While the 800 server-side transactions represent re-encryption toward the backend, F5's primary SSL TPS license limits typically apply to the client-facing side of the traffic flow. Therefore, to resolve the intermittent connectivity issues and ensure the virtual server works reliably during peaks, the license must be upgraded to at least 1200 TPS949596969696. 9798Confirming this peak via statistics and comparing it to the current license is a standard troubleshooting step for SSL performance issues.
質問 # 41
A BIG-IP Administrator notices that one of the servers that runs an application is NOT receiving any traffic. The BIG-IP Administrator examines the configuration status of the application and observes the displayed monitor configuration and affected pool member status.
What is the possible cause of this issue? (Choose one answer)
A. The BIG-IP device is NOT able to reach the pool.
B. HTTP 1.1 is NOT appropriate for monitoring purposes.
C. The application is NOT responding with the expected Receive String.
D. The node health monitor is NOT responding.
正解：D
解説：
The key clue in the exhibit is the pool member's availability showing "Offline (Enabled) - Parent down". In BIG-IP terminology, a pool member inherits the status of its parent node. If the node is marked down (for example, by a node-level monitor or a default "node is down" condition), then all pool members using that node IP will also be marked down and will not receive any traffic, even if the application service on the member port might be healthy.
While the HTTPS monitor configuration (send/receive strings) is displayed, the status specifically indicates a node (parent) failure, not a service-level failure. If the problem were the application not matching the receive string, you would typically see the member down due to the member's monitor failing (and the status would reflect monitor failure details), rather than "parent down." Option D is too broad; BIG-IP can generally reach the subnet (other servers work), and this symptom points to a specific node condition. Option C is incorrect because HTTP/1.1 is commonly used for monitoring and is valid when properly formatted (especially with a Host header). Therefore, the most likely cause is that the node health monitor is not responding, causing the node-and consequently the member-to be marked down.
質問 # 42
Users report that traffic is negatively affected every time a BIG-IP device fails over. The traffic becomes stabilized after a few minutes. What should the BIG-IP Administrator do to reduce the impact of future failovers?
A. Enable Failover Multicast Configuration
B. Configure MAC Masquerade
C. Set up Failover Method to HA Order
D. Configure a global SNAT Listener
正解：B
解説：
When traffic "stabilizes after a few minutes" following a failover, it points to a network-level performance issue involving ARP cache on upstream routers and switches. Each BIG-IP interface has a unique hardware MAC address. During failover, the Standby device takes over the floating IP address, but the upstream switch still associates that IP with the MAC of the now-offline device. Traffic is lost until the switch learns the new MAC or its ARP entry expires. "MAC Masquerading" solves this by creating a shared, virtual MAC address for the floating traffic group. This virtual MAC is used by whichever device is currently active. Because the MAC address for the virtual server IP never changes from the perspective of the network, the upstream devices do not need to update their ARP tables. This troubleshooting solution eliminates the delay associated with failover, providing a seamless transition and ensuring that application traffic flow is not disrupted when the BIG-IP HA state changes.
質問 # 43
A BIG-IP Administrator observes the following pool member status message:
Pool /Common/testpool member /Common/10.120.0.5:8090 monitor status down
[/Common/http: up, /Common/http2: down; last error:]
Why is this pool member being marked down? (Choose one answer)
A. The pool member is currently only serving HTTP traffic.
B. The pool member is currently only serving HTTPS traffic.
C. The pool member is currently only serving UDP traffic.
D. The pool member is currently only serving TCP traffic.
正解：A
解説：
The pool member is marked DOWN because it is monitored by multiple health monitors, specifically an HTTP monitor and an HTTP/2 monitor. The status message clearly shows that the HTTP monitor is UP, while the HTTP/2 monitor is DOWN. In BIG-IP, when multiple monitors are assigned to a pool member, the default behavior is AND logic, meaning all assigned monitors must succeed for the pool member to be considered healthy.
In this scenario, the server is responding successfully to standard HTTP (likely HTTP/1.1) requests but does not support or respond correctly to HTTP/2 requests. As a result, the HTTP/2 monitor fails, which causes the overall monitor status to be DOWN, even though HTTP traffic itself is working.
This behavior is expected and documented in BIG-IP monitoring logic. Unless the monitor rule is explicitly changed to "at least one of", a single failing monitor will mark the pool member down. Therefore, the correct conclusion is that the pool member is only serving HTTP traffic, not HTTP/2.
The resolution would be to either remove the HTTP/2 monitor, correct the application to support HTTP/2, or adjust the monitor rule to match the intended health-check logic.
質問 # 44
......
F5CAB5テスト準備は高品質です。合格率とヒット率は両方とも高いです。合格率は約98％-100％です。試験に合格する可能性が非常に高いことを保証できます。 F5CAB5ガイドトレントは、専門家によって編集され、豊富な経験を持つ専門家によって承認されています。 F5CAB5のJPNTest準備トレントは、高品質の製品であり、精巧にコンパイルされ、以前の試験の論文と業界で人気のある傾向に従って、厳密な分析と要約が行われました。 F5CAB5試験の教材の言語はシンプルで理解しやすいです。 F5CAB5日本語版サンプル: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/F5CAB5-mondaishu
F5 F5CAB5対応受験 短時間で試験知識を読み取り、F5 F5CAB5対応受験 さらに、弊社は不定期のディスカウントを与えます、F5 F5CAB5対応受験 美しい未来を有したいですか、F5 F5CAB5対応受験 きっと君に失望させないと信じています、もし、あなたもF5CAB5問題集を購入すれば、試験に合格できますよ、この問題集の合格率は高いので、多くのお客様からF5CAB5問題集への好評をもらいました、F5 F5CAB5対応受験 あなたに最も合理的な価格の製品を提供するチャンスを与えてください、すべてのF5CAB5日本語版サンプル - BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting認定試験勉強資料は、認定試験関連知識向けに研究する権威ある専門家は豊富な経験を有し、F5CAB5 日本語版サンプル - BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting試験の最新情報をよく知っていて作成されるものです。
エリ、お前は神子みこになりたいのに、その力をその身に大きく抱えているのに、ただ男というだけで、叶わぬF5CAB5、人間の糟（かす）から牛と馬が出来て、牛と馬の糞から猫が製造されたごとく考えるのは、自分の無智に心付かんで高慢な顔をする教師などにはありがちの事でもあろうが、はたから見てあまり見っともいい者じゃない。 実用的F5CAB5｜完璧なF5CAB5対応受験試験｜試験の準備方法BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting日本語版サンプル短時間で試験知識を読み取り、さらに、弊社は不定期のディスカウントを与えます、美しい未来を有したいですか、きっと君に失望させないと信じています、もし、あなたもF5CAB5問題集を購入すれば、試験に合格できますよ。
