FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6必殺問題集、FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6関連日本語版問題集私たちは皆、ほとんどの候補者が製品の品質を心配することを知っていました。FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6学習教材の品質を保証するために、会社のすべての労働者は、共通の目標のために、 ; FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6試験問題です。 FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6ガイドトレントを購入すると、高品質の製品、リーズナブルな価格、アフターサービスを提供することが保証されます。私たちのFCP_FAZ_AN-7.6テストトレントは、他の学習教材よりもあなたにとってより良い選択だと思います。 Fortinet FCP - FortiAnalyzer 7.6 Analyst 認定 FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6 試験問題 (Q40-Q45):質問 # 40
Which log will generate an event with the status Contained?
A. An AV log with action=quarantine.
B. An IPS log with action=pass.
C. An AppControl log with action=blocked.
D. A WebFilter log will action=dropped.
正解:A
質問 # 41
Which FortiAnalyzer feature allows you to use a proactive approach when managing your network security?
A. Threat hunting
B. Outbreak alert services
C. FortiView Monitor
D. Incidents dashboard
正解:A
解説:
FortiAnalyzer offers several features for monitoring, alerting, and incident management, each serving different purposes. Let's examine each option to determine which one best supports a proactive security approach.
* Option A - FortiView Monitor:
* FortiView is a visualization tool that provides real-time and historical insights into network traffic, threats, and logs. While it gives visibility into network activity, it is generally more reactive than proactive, as it relies on existing log data and incidents.
* Conclusion: Incorrect.
* Option B - Outbreak Alert Services:
* Outbreak Alert Services in FortiAnalyzer notify administrators of emerging threats and outbreaks based on FortiGuard intelligence. This is beneficial for awareness of potential threats but does not offer a hands-on, investigative approach. It's more of a notification service rather than an active, proactive investigation tool.
* Conclusion: Incorrect.
* Option C - Incidents Dashboard:
* The Incidents Dashboard provides a summary of incidents and current security statuses within the network. While it assists with ongoing incident response, it is used to manage and track existing incidents rather than proactively identifying new threats.
* Conclusion: Incorrect.
* Option D - Threat Hunting:
* Threat Hunting in FortiAnalyzer enables security analysts to actively search for hidden threats or malicious activities within the network by leveraging historical data, analytics, and intelligence.
This is a proactive approach as it allows analysts to seek out threats before they escalate into incidents.
* Conclusion: Correct.
Conclusion:
* Correct Answer: D. Threat hunting
* Threat hunting is the most proactive feature among the options, as it involves actively searching for threats within the network rather than reacting to already detected incidents.
References:
FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on Threat Hunting and proactive security measures.
質問 # 42
Refer to the exhibit with partial output:
Your colleague exported a playbook and has sent it to you for review. You open the file in a text editor and observer the output as shown in the exhibit.
Which statement about the export is true?
A. Your colleague put a password on the export.
B. The export data type is zipped.
C. The option to include the connector was not selected.
D. The playbook is misconfigured.
正解:B
解説:
In the exhibit, the data structure shows a checksum field and a data field with a long, seemingly encoded string. This format is indicative of a file that has been compressed or encoded for storage and transfer.
Export Data Type:
The data field is likely a base64-encoded string, which is commonly used to represent binary data in text format. Base64 encoding is often applied to data that has been compressed (zipped) for easier handling and transfer. The checksum field, with an MD5 hash, provides a way to verify the integrity of the data after decompression.
質問 # 43
Refer to the exhibit. What does the data point at 12:20 indicate?
A. The sqiplugind service is caught up with the logs
B. FortiAnalyzer is using its cache to avoid dropping logs.
C. The performance of FortiAnalyzer is below the baseline.
D. The log insert log time is increasing.
正解:D
解説:
Insert Rate vs. Receive Rate is a graph that shows the rate at which raw logs reach the FortiAnalyzer (receive rate) and the rate at which they are indexed (insert rate) by the SQL database and the sqlplugind daemon. At minimum, the difference between these parameters should be generally consistent.
Log Insert Lag Time shows the amount of time between when a log was received and when it was indexed. Ideally, this parameter should be as small as possible with the occasional spikes according to the network activity being logged. A good baseline should be created to allow for the identification of possible performance issues.
質問 # 44
Exhibit.
What is the analyst trying to create?
A. The analyst is trying to create a trigger variable to the used in the playbook.
B. The analyst is trying to create an output variable to be used in the playbook.
C. The analyst is trying to create a SOC report in the playbook.
D. The analyst is trying to create a report in the playbook.
正解:B
解説:
In the exhibit, the playbook configuration shows the analyst working with the "Attach Data" action within a playbook. Here's a breakdown of key aspects:
* Incident ID: This field is linked to the "Playbook Starter," which indicates that the playbook will attach data to an existing incident.
* Attachment: The analyst is configuring an attachment by selecting Run_REPORT with a placeholder ID for report_uuid. This suggests that the report's UUID will dynamically populate as part of the playbook execution.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A - Creating a Trigger Variable:
* A trigger variable would typically be set up in the playbook starter or initiation configuration, not within the "Attach Data" action. The setup here does not indicate a trigger, as it's focusing on data attachment.
* Conclusion: Incorrect.
* Option B - Creating an Output Variable:
* The field Attachment with a report_uuid placeholder suggests that the analyst is defining an output variable that will store the report data or ID, allowing it to be attached to the incident. This variable can then be referenced or passed within the playbook for further actions or reporting.
* Conclusion: Correct.
* Option C - Creating a Report in the Playbook:
* While Run_REPORT is selected, it appears to be an attachment action rather than a report generation task. The purpose here is to attach an existing or dynamically generated report to an incident, not to create the report itself.
* Conclusion: Incorrect.
* Option D - Creating a SOC Report:
* Similarly, this configuration is focused on attaching data, not specifically generating a SOC report. SOC reports are generally predefined and generated outside the playbook.
* Conclusion: Incorrect.
Conclusion:
* Correct Answer: B. The analyst is trying to create an output variable to be used in the playbook.
* The setup allows the playbook to dynamically assign the report_uuid as an output variable, which can then be used in further actions within the playbook.
References:
FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on playbook configurations, output variables, and data attachment functionalities.