Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Plat-Arch-204 Real Brain Dumps - Latest Plat-Arch-204 Test Camp [Print This Page]
Author: willgre569    Time: yesterday 13:20
Title: Plat-Arch-204 Real Brain Dumps - Latest Plat-Arch-204 Test Camp
Look at our Plat-Arch-204 study questions, you can easily find there are three varied versions: the PDF, Software and APP online. And no matter which version you buy, you will find that our system can support long time usage. The durability and persistence can stand the test of practice. All in all, the performance of our Plat-Arch-204 Learning Materials is excellent. Come to enjoy the pleasant learning process. It is no use if you do not try our Plat-Arch-204 exam braindumps by yourself.
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.
Topic 2
  • Translate Needs to Integration Requirements: This domain involves converting business needs into technical specifications by documenting systems and patterns, evaluating constraints, defining security requirements, and determining performance needs like volumes, response times, and latency.
Topic 3
  • Build Solution: This domain covers implementing integrations including API design considerations, choosing outbound methods, building scalable solutions, implementing error handling, creating security solutions, and ensuring resilience during system updates.

>> Plat-Arch-204 Real Brain Dumps <<
Ace Your Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam with Online Practice Test Engine Designed by ExpertsUsers of Prep4pass software can attempt multiple Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice exams to assess and improve preparation for the examination. Customers can view their previous attempts' scores and see their mistakes. It helps test takers take the final Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam without making mistakes. The web-based version of the Plat-Arch-204 practice exam can be taken online. It means you can take this mock test via any browser like MS Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Internet Explorer, and Safari.
Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q59-Q64):NEW QUESTION # 59
NTO is merging two orgs but needs the retiring org available for lead management (connected to web forms). New leads must be in the new instance within 30 minutes. Which approach requires the least amount of development effort?
Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 60
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to make synchronous callouts "available-to-promise" services to query product availability and reserve inventory during the customer checkout process. What should an integration architect consider when building a scalable integration solution?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a Synchronous Request-Reply pattern, the user's experience is directly tied to the performance of the external service. For a mission-critical "Available-to-Promise" (ATP) service during checkout, the most vital scalability consideration is the typical and worst-case historical response times of the target system.
Salesforce imposes strict Governor Limits on synchronous callouts to protect platform health. Specifically, if an ATP callout takes longer than 120 seconds, the transaction will time out. More importantly, Salesforce limits the number of long-running requests (those lasting longer than 5 seconds). If multiple users are checking out simultaneously and the external inventory system begins to respond slowly (worst-case), those requests can quickly occupy all available slots in the concurrent request queue, leading to "Concurrent Request Limit Exceeded" errors for all users in the org.
By analyzing historical response times, the architect can determine if the service is reliable enough for a synchronous callout. If the worst-case response time frequently exceeds 5 seconds, the architect should consider a more resilient pattern, such as the Continuation pattern or an asynchronous approach, to prevent blocking the UI thread and hitting platform limits. Options A and C are irrelevant to synchronous checkout performance; query cursors relate to database state, and batch jobs are asynchronous background processes that do not impact real-time user checkout latency.

NEW QUESTION # 61
Northern Trail Outfitters leverages Sales Cloud. When an opportunity has changed its status to "Closed/Won" and there are products attached, the details should be passed to the OMS for fulfillment operations. The callout from Salesforce to the OMS should be synchronous. What should an integration architect do to satisfy these requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
A synchronous requirement in Salesforce implies a Request-Reply pattern where the user waits for a response. To implement this correctly while adhering to platform constraints, the architect must initiate the callout from the User Interface (UI) layer.3 Option C is the correct architectural choice. By using a Lightning component and a button (or a Quick Act4ion), the callout is initiated directly from the user's session. The component calls an Apex controller, which performs the synchronous REST callout to the OMS. This allows the user to receive immediate feedback-such as a "Success" message or an "Error" notification from the OMS-directly on the Opportunity page.
Option A is incorrect because Apex Triggers are prohibited from making synchronous callouts. If a trigger initiates a callout, it must be asynchronous (using @future or Queueable Apex), which violates the business requirement for synchronicity. Making a synchronous call from a trigger would block the database transaction and could lead to "Uncommitted Work Pending" errors or system timeouts. Option B (Batch Apex) is inherently asynchronous and delayed; an hourly job would not provide the real-time, synchronous feedback required during the "Closed/Won" transition. Therefore, moving the integration logic to a UI-driven button is the only way to satisfy the synchronous requirement while staying within Salesforce's execution and transaction limits.

NEW QUESTION # 62
A large business-to-consumer (B2C) customer is planning to implement Salesforce CRM to become a customer-centric enterprise. Below is the B2C customer's current system landscape diagram.

The goals for implementing Salesforce include:
Develop a 360-degree view of the customer.
Leverage Salesforce capabilities for marketing, sales, and service processes.
Reuse Enterprise capabilities built for quoting and order management processes.
Which three systems from the current system landscape can be retired with the implementation of Salesforce?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 250 to 350 words of Explanation From Salesforce Pl14atform Integration Architect documents: In the rol15e of a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect, evaluating a legacy landscape requires a clinical mapping of current system functions against Salesforce's native capabilities, while strictly adhering to the "Constraints and Goals" provided by the business. The objective here is to maximize the ROI of the Salesforce implementation by consolidating redundant systems into the core platform.
According to Goal 2, the business intends to utilize Salesforce for Marketing, Sales, and Service processes. Salesforce is architected to handle these three domains through its core clouds: Marketing Cloud (replacing the legacy Email Marketing System), Sales Cloud (replacing the Sales Activity System), and Service Cloud (replacing the Case Management System). By consolidating these three specific functions into Salesforce, the organization achieves Goal 1, which is the creation of a 360-degree view of the customer. When these activities occur on a single platform, the data is unified, eliminating the silos that existed in the previous landscape.
However, the architect must also respect the technical constraints defined in Goal 3, which explicitly states the need to reuse enterprise capabilities built for quoting and order management. In architectural design, this designates the "Quoting System" and the "Order Management System" as systems of record that must remain in the future-state landscape. These systems likely contain complex, proprietary logic or are tightly coupled with back-end ERP systems like SAP Business Suite, making them "non-negotiable" for retirement at this stage.
Therefore, because Email Marketing, Sales Activity, and Case Management map directly to Salesforce's primary strengths and are not excluded by the "reuse" requirement, they are the three systems that should be retired. This strategic retirement simplifies the integration architecture, allowing the architect to focus on building robust integration patterns (such as Request-Reply or Fire-and-Forget) between Salesforce and the remaining Quoting and Order Management systems.

NEW QUESTION # 63
A customer is evaluating the Platform Events solution and would like help in comparing/contrasting it with Outbound Messaging for real-time/near-real time needs. They expect 3,000 customers to view messages in Salesforce. What should be evaluated and highlighted when deciding between the solutions?12
Answer: C
Explanation:
When comparing Platform Events and Outbound Messaging for a near-real-time architecture, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must evaluate fundamental differences in their delivery models and governance. While both provide declarative, asynchronous "Fire-and-Forget" capabilities, their technical constraints differ significantly, particularly regarding scalability and platform limits.
The key architectural highlight in this scenario is that Platform Events operate on a specialized event bus with specific Event Publishing and Event Delivery limits. Unlike Outbound Messaging, which is governed by more general daily outbound call limits (often tied to user licenses), Platform Events have a dedicated allocation for the number of events that can be published per hour and delivered in a 24-hour period to external clients via the Pub/Sub API or CometD. For example, the number of concurrent subscribers to a Platform Event channel is typically capped at 2,000 for standard configurations. Since the customer expects 3,000 customers to view these messages, this limit is a critical evaluation point; the architecture would need to account for this gap, perhaps by using middleware to fan out messages to the larger audience.
In contrast, Outbound Messaging does not have an "Event Delivery" limit in the same sense. It is a point-to-point SOAP-based push mechanism where Salesforce manages retries for up to 24 hours if the receiving endpoint is unavailable. However, it is less flexible for multi-consumer scenarios because it requires a separate configuration for every unique destination.
Regarding the other options: Option A is incorrect because neither system strictly guarantees "exactly-once" delivery without the possibility of duplicates; in fact, Outbound Messaging may deliver a message more than once if it doesn't receive a timely acknowledgment. Option B is incorrect because Platform Events do not have built-in "fault recovery" handled by Salesforce in the same way as Outbound Messaging's automatic retry queue; with Platform Events, it is the subscriber's responsibility to use a Replay ID to retrieve missed events within the 72-hour retention window. Therefore, highlighting the unique delivery and publishing limits is the most vital step for the architect.

NEW QUESTION # 64
......
As the old saying goes people change with the times. People must constantly update their stocks of knowledge and improve their practical ability. Passing the test Plat-Arch-204 certification can help you achieve that and buying our Plat-Arch-204 test practice materials can help you pass the Plat-Arch-204 test smoothly. Our Plat-Arch-204 study question is superior to other same kinds of study materials in many aspects. Our Plat-Arch-204 test bank covers the entire syllabus of the test and all the possible questions which may appear in the test. You will pass the Plat-Arch-204 exam for sure.
Latest Plat-Arch-204 Test Camp: https://www.prep4pass.com/Plat-Arch-204_exam-braindumps.html




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1