Firefly Open Source Community

Title: ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験問題 & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語認定対策 [Print This Page]
Author: peterev350    Time: 14 hour before
Title: ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験問題 & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語認定対策
P.S.It-PassportsがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1s_E8hC3Gky6kfkSDqBiHzsCMFL14U-Nu
別の人の言い回しより自分の体験感じは大切なことです。我々の希望は誠意と専業化を感じられることですなので、お客様に無料のPECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor問題集デモを提供します。購買の後、行き届いたアフタサービスを続けて提供します。PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor問題集を更新しるなり、あなたのメールボックスに送付します。あなたは一年間での更新サービスを楽しみにします。
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • Managing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
トピック 2
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.
トピック 3
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
トピック 4
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
トピック 5
  • AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
  • IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.
トピック 6
  • Preparing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.

>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験問題 <<
信頼的なISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験問題 & 合格スムーズISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語認定対策 | 有効的なISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF問題サンプルIt-Passports10年以上のビジネスエクスペリエンスを備えたPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorテストトレントは、顧客の購入エクスペリエンスを非常に重視しました。 電子製品の購入速度を心配する必要はありません。 弊社では、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験準備の信頼性を長期間にわたって評価および評価し、保証された購入スキームを提案するために尽力しています。 必要な場合は、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorテストトレントを使用するためのリモートオンラインガイダンスも利用できます。 通常、購入後数分でISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam練習問題を効率よく取得できます。
PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam 認定 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 試験問題 (Q129-Q134):質問 # 129
Based on Scenario 7, what sampling method was used to assess TastyMade's adherence to some requirements of Clause 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context?
Scenario 7: TastyMade. headquartered in Hamburg, Germany, is an established company in the food manufacturing industry that applies Al technologies in its operations. It has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 to further strengthen its Al management and ensure compliance with international standards. As part of its commitment to excellence and continual improvement, TastyMade is undergoing an audit process to achieve certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
In preparation for the audit, TastyMade collaborated closely with the audit team leader to develop a detailed audit plan. This plan encompassed objectives, criteria, scope, and logistical arrangements for both on-site and remote audit activities. Recognizing the specialized nature of Al integration, a technical expert was brought in to support the audit team and ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant aspects. Upon discussion with the audit team leader, it was mutually decided that not every audit team member would need a guide throughout the audit process. At times, the TastyMade itself would assume the role of the guide, actively facilitating audit activities.
A formal opening meeting was held with TastyMade's management to provide an overview of the audit process and set expectations. During this meeting, key interested parties were briefed on the audit objectives and the methodologies that would be employed during the audit. Following the meeting, the audit team proceeded with their work, collecting information and conducting tests to evaluate the effectiveness of TastyMade's AIMS.
Daily evening meetings were held to review progress, discuss encountered issues, and facilitate collaboration among audit team members. The audit team leader adopted an open communication approach, encouraging all auditors to share their findings and challenges.
The communication regarding the progress of the audit
was informal, allowing for a fluid exchange of information and updates among team members.
To verify adherence to some requirements of clause 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context, the audit team arbitrarily selected for analysis a representative sample of Al management practices across different departments and functions within the company.
During the audit process, the technical expert uncovered certain technical and operational findings related to the integration and governance of Al systems.
Recognizing the significance of these findings, the expert promptly informed the audit team leader.
Understanding the need for further clarification and direct
communication, the audit team leader authorized the technical expert to address the findings directly with the auditee. However, to ensure proper oversight, the expert was supervised by one of the audit team members.
Throughout the audit, it became apparent that TastyMade promoted a culture of autonomy and decentralized decision-making in Al integration processes. Employees were empowered to set goals, allocate responsibilities, and devise methodologies independently, with management providing guidance and support as needed. This approach fostered innovation and agility within the company
正解：B
解説：
The scenario states:
"The audit team arbitrarily selected for analysis a representative sample of AI management practices across different departments and functions..." The term "arbitrarily selected" indicates a random sampling method. In audit terminology, random sampling means that the sample is chosen without a specific pattern, giving each unit an equal chance of selection. This is appropriate when assessing general compliance across diverse functions or areas.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.5 - Audit sampling techniques
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Section: Sampling Approaches
===========

質問 # 130
A social media platform wants to automatically detect and remove inappropriate content from images and videos uploaded by users. Which AI concept is most appropriate for this task?
正解：B
解説：
The most appropriate AI concept for analyzingimages and videosisComputer Vision. Computer Vision is a subfield of artificial intelligence that enables systems tointerpret and process visualdata, such as photos and video frames, which is exactly what is required in this scenario.
According to thePECB Lead Auditor Guide,Computer Visionis explicitly associated with tasks such as object recognition, content moderation, facial recognition, and image classification - all of which are relevant in detecting inappropriate content on platforms like social media.
WhileDeep Learningis often usedwithinComputer Vision (e.g., convolutional neural networks), thecorrect high-level conceptbeing asked here is Computer Vision, which encompasses the overall domain applicable to this scenario.
* NLPis used for analyzing text and language, not visual content.
* MLis a broader category under which Computer Vision models are trained, but is too general for this specific task.

質問 # 131
What is one of the key objectives of conducting an audit according to ISO 19011?
正解：A
解説：
Theprimary objective of an audit, as defined inISO 19011:2018 - Clause 5.1, is toevaluate the extent to which the management system conforms to planned arrangements and is effectively implemented and maintained.
Audits arenot meant to issue certificates or impose penalties- they aretools for continual improvement, helping organizations assess theperformance and effectivenessof their systems.
This aligns with the purpose of internal audits described inISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 9.2, which is to verify theeffectiveness of the AIMS (Artificial Intelligence Management System).

質問 # 132
Scenario 3: Heala specializes in developing AI-driven solutions for the healthcare sector. With a keen focus on leveraging AI to revolutionize patient care, diagnostics, and treatment planning, the company has implemented an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS) based on ISO/IEC 42001. After a year of having the AIMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit.
It contracted a local certification body, who established the audit team and assigned the audit team leader.
Augustine, the designated audit team leader, has a wide range of skills relevant to various auditing domains.
His proficiency encompasses audit principles, processes, and methods, as well as standards for management systems and additional references. Furthermore, he is knowledgeable about Heala's context and relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
Augustine first gathered management review records, interested party feedback logs, and revision histories for Heala's AIMS. This crucial step laid the groundwork for a deeper investigation, which included conducting comprehensive interviews with key personnel to understand how feedback from interested parties directly influenced updates to the AIMS and its strategic direction. Augustine's thorough evaluation process aimed to verify Heala's commitment to integrating the needs and expectations of interested parties, a critical requirement of ISO/IEC 42001.
Augustine also integrated a sophisticated AI tool to analyze large datasets for patterns and anomalies, and thus have a more informed and data-driven audit process. This AI solution, known for its ability to sift through vast amounts of data with unparalleled speed and accuracy, enabled Augustine to identify irregularities and trends that would have been nearly impossible to detect through manual methods. The tool was also helpful in preparing hypotheses based on data.
During the audit, Augustine failed to fully consider Heala's critical processes, expectations, the complexity of audit tasks, and necessary resources beforehand. This oversight compromised the audit's integrity and reliability, reflecting a significant deviation from the diligence and informed judgment expected of auditors.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Did Augustine possess the knowledge and skills required to be appointed as an audit team leader?
正解：C
解説：
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (used for auditor competence requirements in management system certification), audit team leaders must demonstrate competence in:
Understanding of audit principles, processes, and methods
Knowledge of relevant standards (such as ISO/IEC 42001)
Familiarity with organizational context, statutory/regulatory frameworks, and management systems Ability to collect and evaluate objective evidence Communication and leadership skills Based on the scenario:
Augustine had deep knowledge of ISO/IEC 42001, audit principles, regulatory requirements, and Heala's context.
He reviewed strategic documents, conducted interviews, and applied AI tools effectively to enhance evidence- based auditing.
His oversight in audit planning (failing to evaluate complexity, resources, and expectations) reflects a lapse in planning diligence, not a lack of knowledge or qualification.
Therefore, Augustine met the knowledge and skill requirements of an auditor and audit team leader. His failure in audit planning relates to execution, not competency, so Option C is correct.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 7.2.5 - Competence of audit team leader
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Internal audit
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide, Chapter 5 - Auditor competencies and ethical conduct ChatGPT said:

質問 # 133
Scenario 8 (continued):
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, the audit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
InnovateSoft's corrective action plans described the detected issues and intended corrections but did not include the root causes.
Question:
Were InnovateSoft's action plans drafted appropriately?
正解：A
解説：
A complete corrective action planmust include:
* Description of the nonconformity
* Root cause analysis
* Correction
* Corrective action
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.2explicitly states:"The client shall analyze the cause of the nonconformity and describe the specific correction and corrective action taken."
* The absence ofroot cause analysisrenders the plan non-compliant.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.2; Lead Auditor Training Manual - Module 9 ("Corrective Action Management").

質問 # 134
......
21世紀の情報化時代の急流の到来につれて、人々はこの時代に適応できるようにいつも自分の知識を増加していてますが、まだずっと足りないです。IT業種について言えば、PECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor認定試験はIT業種で欠くことができない認証ですから、この試験に合格するのはとても必要です。この試験が難しいですから、試験に合格すれば国際的に認証され、受け入れられることができます。そうすると、美しい未来と高給をもらう仕事を持てるようになります。It-Passportsというサイトは世界で最も信頼できるIT認証トレーニング資料を持っていますから、It-Passportsを利用したらあなたがずっと期待している夢を実現することができるようになります。１００パーセントの合格率を保証しますから、PECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor認定試験を受ける受験生のあなたはまだ何を待っているのですか。速くIt-Passportsというサイトをクリックしてください。
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor日本語認定対策: https://www.it-passports.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor.html
2026年It-Passportsの最新ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDFダンプおよびISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1s_E8hC3Gky6kfkSDqBiHzsCMFL14U-Nu




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1