CGSS問題集無料 & CGSS無料過去問試験準備のための学習資料を見つけている場合、当社の資料は検索を終了します。私たちのCGSS試験トレントは、あなたが期待できない高品質を持っています。 CGSS試験トレントは時間を大幅に節約するのに役立ち、あなたがやりたいことをする自由時間が増えると思います。私たちのCGSSテスト問題集の使用について後悔がないことを保証できます。アクションの時間が来たら、思考を止めて、入って、私たちのCGSS試験トレントを試してください。CGSS試験に合格し、短時間で証明書を取得する必要があります。 ACAMS Certified Global Sanctions Specialist 認定 CGSS 試験問題 (Q62-Q67):質問 # 62
What is the primary purpose of Rule 11?
A. Deal with unnecessary complaints
B. Deal with crime
C. Prevent legal malpractice
D. Deal with corruption
E. Deal with unnecessary filings
正解：A、C、E
質問 # 63
A data quality review will often attempt to identify which issues? (Select Three.)
A. Default values for date fields
B. Hispanic names with both paternal and maternal last names
C. Data using all upper case letters instead of mixed case
D. Use of separate first and last name fields
E. Data placed in incorrect fields, such as names placed in address fields
F. Duplicate records
正解：A、E、F
解説：
Data quality reviews focus on errors that negatively impact sanctions screening accuracy, such as:
* Incorrect field placement (e.g., names in address fields), which causes screening failures.
* Default or missing date values, which undermine proper identity matching.
* Duplicate records, which complicate alert resolution and distort screening results.
Use of separate name fields, uppercase text, or cultural naming conventions are not data errors but normal formatting variations.
Reference:
Data field integrity requirements.
Importance of accurate dates and non-duplicated entries.
Data quality controls supporting sanctions screening systems.
質問 # 64
Why threatening to change the exchange pattern in an existing economic relationship is often insufficient to guarantee the power of negotiation between states?
A. The sender must be willing to sacrifice some of its gains from trade
B. If an exchange is taking place between two rational economic actors, then the terms of exchange can be assumed to be Pareto optimal
C. The sender can derive political leverage from the target's dependence on the gains from a trading relationship
D. It may impact the raw material needed for manufacturing products.
E. It will domestically impact the sender economy
正解：A、B、C
質問 # 65
EU Restrictive Measures apply: (Select Two.)
A. on a vessel under the jurisdiction of an EU Member State.
B. within a non-EU country, which has a double taxation convention with all EU Member States.
C. to a company outside the territory of the EU, which is incorporated or constituted under the law of an EU Member State.
D. to a company incorporated under the law of a non-EU country, that is 45% owned by a national of an EU Member State.
E. within a non-EU country which is part of the Customs Union agreement with the EU.
正解：A、C
解説：
EU Restrictive Measures apply to all persons and entities within the territory of the EU, including airspace and territorial waters, and to any vessel or aircraft under the jurisdiction of an EU Member State. This establishes that sanctions obligations extend to vessels registered under EU jurisdictions regardless of location.
EU sanctions also apply to all legal persons, entities, and bodies incorporated or constituted under the law of an EU Member State, even when those entities operate entirely outside EU territory. Legal incorporation under EU law creates an ongoing obligation to comply with EU sanctions.
EU ownership by itself does not trigger sanctions applicability, so a non-EU company that is 45% owned by an EU national does not fall under EU Restrictive Measures. Additionally, arrangements such as double-taxation conventions or participation in customs union agreements do not extend the territorial or legal applicability of EU sanctions to non-EU jurisdictions.
Reference from Sanctions and Compliance Domains:
Territorial applicability of EU sanctions, including vessels and aircraft under Member State jurisdiction.
Applicability to companies incorporated under EU Member State law regardless of geographic operations.
Legal and territorial definitions outlining the scope of EU Restrictive Measures.
質問 # 66
The screening process identifies that a wire payment is received from a shipping company registered in a high-risk jurisdiction, and the funds are temporarily held. An invoice forwarded via the intermediary bank indicates that the payment was made on behalf of an apparent shell company. Which action would be most appropriate from a sanctions risk standpoint?
A. Request further information regarding the payment, shell company, and beneficiary before proceeding.
B. Proceed with the payment if the originator, shell company, and beneficiary are not present on a sanctions list.
C. Report the payment to the appropriate governmental authority due to sanctions concerns.
D. Freeze/block the payment.
正解：A
解説：
Sanctions and Compliance Domains specify that when a transaction presents multiple risk indicators-such as a high-risk jurisdiction, shell company involvement, and unclear payment purpose-the appropriate response is to seek additional information before releasing or rejecting funds.
Financial institutions are required to conduct deeper review when the transaction indicators suggest possible sanctions exposure, even if the names involved do not appear on sanctions lists. Obtaining supporting documentation helps determine whether the payment involves sanctioned parties, prohibited shipping routes, disguised ownership, or goods subject to restrictions.
Freezing/blocking is only appropriate when the institution has identified a match to a designated party or prohibited conduct. Reporting to authorities must follow a confirmed sanctions nexus, not preliminary suspicion.
Reference from Sanctions and Compliance Domains:
Requirements to obtain underlying documents when shell companies or high-risk jurisdictions appear in a payment.
Investigation obligations prior to rejecting or blocking a payment.
Risk-based approach to suspicious or unclear maritime/shipping transactions.