2026ハイパスレート-最高のFCSS_SOC_AN-7.4テスト内容試験-試験の準備方法FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4合格体験談FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4テスト資料を購入したすべてのお客様を大切にしています。お客様との協力を継続したいと考えています。 FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4テストの質問は常に更新および改善されているため、必要な情報を入手してより良い体験を得ることができます。 FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4のテストの質問は、デジタル化のペースに従い、絶えず改装し、新しいものを追加しています。 FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4試験準備がお客様に誠実に役立つことを実感していただければ幸いです。また、FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4トレーニングガイドの合格率は99％から100％であり、FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4試験に高いスコアで合格することができます。 Fortinet FCSS - Security Operations 7.4 Analyst 認定 FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 試験問題 (Q22-Q27):質問 # 22
When configuring a FortiAnalyzer to act as a collector device, which two steps must you perform?(Choose two.)
A. Enable log compression.
B. Configure log forwarding to a FortiAnalyzer in analyzer mode.
C. Configure Fabric authorization on the connecting interface.
D. Configure the data policy to focus on archiving.
正解：B、C
解説：
* Understanding FortiAnalyzer Roles:
* FortiAnalyzer can operate in two primary modes: collector mode and analyzer mode.
* Collector Mode: Gathers logs from various devices and forwards them to another FortiAnalyzer operating in analyzer mode for detailed analysis.
* Analyzer Mode: Provides detailed log analysis, reporting, and incident management.
* Steps to Configure FortiAnalyzer as a Collector Device:
* A. Enable Log Compression:
* While enabling log compression can help save storage space, it is not a mandatory step specifically required for configuring FortiAnalyzer in collector mode.
* Not selected as it is optional and not directly related to the collector configuration process.
* B. Configure Log Forwarding to a FortiAnalyzer in Analyzer Mode:
* Essential for ensuring that logs collected by the collector FortiAnalyzer are sent to the analyzer FortiAnalyzer for detailed processing.
* Selected as it is a critical step in configuring a FortiAnalyzer as a collector device.
* Step 1: Access the FortiAnalyzer interface and navigate to log forwarding settings.
* Step 2: Configure log forwarding by specifying the IP address and necessary credentials of the FortiAnalyzer in analyzer mode.
質問 # 23
While monitoring your network, you discover that one FortiGate device is sending significantly more logs to FortiAnalyzer than all of the other FortiGate devices in the topology.
Additionally, the ADOM that the FortiGate devices are registered to consistently exceeds its quota.
What are two possible solutions? (Choose two.)
A. Configure data selectors to filter the data sent by the first FortiGate device.
B. Increase the storage space quota for the first FortiGate device.
C. Reconfigure the first FortiGate device to reduce the number of logs it forwards to FortiAnalyzer.
D. Create a separate ADOM for the first FortiGate device and configure a different set of storage policies.
正解：C、D
解説：
Understanding the Problem:
One FortiGate device is generating a significantly higher volume of logs compared to other devices, causing the ADOM to exceed its storage quota.
This can lead to performance issues and difficulties in managing logs effectively within FortiAnalyzer.
Possible Solutions:
The goal is to manage the volume of logs and ensure that the ADOM does not exceed its quota, while still maintaining effective log analysis and monitoring.
Solution A: Increase the Storage Space Quota for the First FortiGate Device:
While increasing the storage space quota might provide a temporary relief, it does not address the root cause of the issue, which is the excessive log volume.
This solution might not be sustainable in the long term as log volume could continue to grow.
Not selected as it does not provide a long-term, efficient solution.
Solution B: Create a Separate ADOM for the First FortiGate Device and Configure a Different Set of Storage Policies:
Creating a separate ADOM allows for tailored storage policies and management specifically for the high-log-volume device.
This can help in distributing the storage load and applying more stringent or customized retention and storage policies.
Selected as it effectively manages the storage and organization of logs.
Solution C: Reconfigure the First FortiGate Device to Reduce the Number of Logs it Forwards to FortiAnalyzer:
By adjusting the logging settings on the FortiGate device, you can reduce the volume of logs forwarded to FortiAnalyzer.
This can include disabling unnecessary logging, reducing the logging level, or filtering out less critical logs.
Selected as it directly addresses the issue of excessive log volume.
Solution D: Configure Data Selectors to Filter the Data Sent by the First FortiGate Device:
Data selectors can be used to filter the logs sent to FortiAnalyzer, ensuring only relevant logs are forwarded.
This can help in reducing the volume of logs but might require detailed configuration and regular updates to ensure critical logs are not missed.
Not selected as it might not be as effective as reconfiguring logging settings directly on the FortiGate device.
Implementation Steps:
For Solution B:
Step 1: Access FortiAnalyzer and navigate to the ADOM management section.
Step 2: Create a new ADOM for the high-log-volume FortiGate device.
Step 3: Register the FortiGate device to this new ADOM.
Step 4: Configure specific storage policies for the new ADOM to manage log retention and storage.
For Solution C:
Step 1: Access the FortiGate device's configuration interface.
Step 2: Navigate to the logging settings.
Step 3: Adjust the logging level and disable unnecessary logs.
Step 4: Save the configuration and monitor the log volume sent to FortiAnalyzer.
Reference: Fortinet Documentation on FortiAnalyzer ADOMs and log management FortiAnalyzer Administration Guide Fortinet Knowledge Base on configuring log settings on FortiGate FortiGate Logging Guide By creating a separate ADOM for the high-log-volume FortiGate device and reconfiguring its logging settings, you can effectively manage the log volume and ensure the ADOM does not exceed its quota.
質問 # 24
In the context of threat hunting, which information feeds are most beneficial?
A. Stock market trends
B. Cyber threat intelligence
C. Corporate governance updates
D. Marketing data
正解：B
質問 # 25
Refer to Exhibit:
A SOC analyst is designing a playbook to filter for a high severity event and attach the event information to an incident.
Which local connector action must the analyst use in this scenario?
A. Attach Data to Incident
B. Update Incident
C. Update Asset and Identity
D. Get Events
正解：A
解説：
* Understanding the Playbook Requirements:
* The SOC analyst needs to design a playbook that filters for high severity events.
* The playbook must also attach the event information to an existing incident.
* Analyzing the Provided Exhibit:
* The exhibit shows the available actions for a local connector within the playbook.
* Actions listed include:
* Update Asset and Identity
* Get Events
* Get Endpoint Vulnerabilities
* Create Incident
* Update Incident
* Attach Data to Incident
* Run Report
* Get EPEU from Incident
* Evaluating the Options:
* Get Events:This action retrieves events but does not attach them to an incident.
* Update Incident:This action updates an existing incident but is not specifically for attaching event data.
* Update Asset and Identity:This action updates asset and identity information, not relevant for attaching event data to an incident.
* Attach Data to Incident:This action is explicitly designed to attach additional data, such as event information, to an existing incident.
* Conclusion:
* The correct action to use in the playbook for filtering high severity events and attaching the event information to an incident isAttach Data to Incident.
References:
* Fortinet Documentation on Playbook Actions and Connectors.
* Best Practices for Incident Management and Playbook Design in SOC Operations.
質問 # 26
According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cybersecurity framework, incident handling activities can be divided into phases.
In which incident handling phase do you quarantine a compromised host in order to prevent an adversary from using it as a stepping stone to the next phase of an attack?
A. Containment
B. Recovery
C. Analysis
D. Eradication
正解：A
解説：
* NIST Cybersecurity Framework Overview:
* The NIST Cybersecurity Framework provides a structured approach for managing and mitigating cybersecurity risks. Incident handling is divided into several phases to systematically address and resolve incidents.
* Incident Handling Phases:
* Preparation: Establishing and maintaining an incident response capability.
* Detection and Analysis: Identifying and investigating suspicious activities to confirm an incident.
* Containment, Eradication, and Recovery:
* Containment: Limiting the impact of the incident.
* Eradication: Removing the root cause of the incident.
* Recovery: Restoring systems to normal operation.
* Containment Phase:
* The primary goal of the containment phase is to prevent the incident from spreading and causing further damage.
* Quarantining a Compromised Host:
* Quarantining involves isolating the compromised host from the rest of the network to prevent adversaries from moving laterally and causing more harm.
* Techniques include network segmentation, disabling network interfaces, and applying access controls.
