Firefly Open Source Community

Title: 100% Pass Quiz Salesforce - Newest Plat-Arch-204 - Salesforce Certified Platform [Print This Page]
Author: harrywa150    Time: 7 hour before
Title: 100% Pass Quiz Salesforce - Newest Plat-Arch-204 - Salesforce Certified Platform
With the aid of our Plat-Arch-204 exam preparation to improve your grade and change your states of life and get amazing changes in career, everything is possible. It all starts from our Plat-Arch-204 learning questions. Our Plat-Arch-204 training questions are the accumulation of professional knowledge worthy practicing and remembering. There are so many specialists who join together and contribute to the success of our Plat-Arch-204 Guide quiz just for your needs.
Our Plat-Arch-204 test questions are compiled by domestic first-rate experts and senior lecturer and the contents of them contain all the important information about the test and all the possible answers of the questions which maybe appear in the test. You can use the practice test software to check your learning outcomes. Our Plat-Arch-204 test practice guide¡¯ self-learning and self-evaluation functions, the statistics report function, the timing function and the function of stimulating the test could assist you to find your weak links, check your level, adjust the speed and have a warming up for the real exam. You will feel your choice to buy Plat-Arch-204 Exam Dump is too right.
>> Plat-Arch-204 Sample Exam <<
Valid Plat-Arch-204 Sample Exam - How to Prepare for Salesforce Plat-Arch-204: Salesforce Certified Platform Integration ArchitectWe have compiled the Plat-Arch-204 test guide for these candidates who are trouble in this exam, in order help they pass it easily, and we deeply believe that our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions can help you solve your problem. Believe it or not, if you buy our study materials and take it seriously consideration, we can promise that you will easily get the certification that you have always dreamed of. We believe that you will never regret to buy and practice our Plat-Arch-204 latest question.
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Design Integration Solutions: This domain centers on selecting integration patterns, designing complete solutions with appropriate components, understanding trade-offs and limitations, choosing correct Salesforce APIs, and determining required standards and security mechanisms.
Topic 2
  • Evaluate the Current System Landscape: This domain covers analyzing existing technical environments to understand current systems, their standards, protocols, limitations, and boundaries, while identifying constraints and authentication
  • authorization requirements.
Topic 3
  • Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.

Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q119-Q124):NEW QUESTION # 119
Northern Trail Outfitters is in the final stages of merging two Salesforce orgs, but needs to keep the retiring org available for a short period of time for lead management as it is connected to multiple public website forms. The sales department has requested that new leads are available in the new Salesforce instance within 30 minutes. Which approach requires the least amount of development effort?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In an org merger scenario, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must often design interim solutions that balance speed of delivery with minimal development overhead. The requirement here is for leads to be synced within a 30-minute window. This is a relatively low-latency requirement that does not strictly necessitate a real-time, event-driven architecture, which typically requires more complex infrastructure like Platform Events or middleware.
Option A, calling the Salesforce REST API to insert leads into the target system, represents the standard, most straightforward approach. Since both systems are Salesforce orgs, the retiring org can be configured to make an outbound REST call to the new org's standard Lead endpoint. This can be achieved with a small amount of Apex code (such as a trigger or an invocable method called by a Flow). This approach is considered the "least development effort" because it leverages the standard REST API, which is already enabled and authenticated via a Connected App in the target org. It requires no custom API development in the target system and uses standard JSON payloads.
Option B is incorrect because the Tooling API is intended for managing metadata, system settings, and developer tools, not for standard transactional data movement like Lead insertion. Option C, using the Composite REST API, is an optimization technique designed to group multiple requests into a single call to save on API limits. While efficient for high-volume scenarios, it introduces additional development complexity regarding payload construction and bulk error handling that exceeds the "least effort" requirement for a simple Lead sync. Therefore, a standard REST call is the most direct path to meeting the 30-minute SLA with minimal coding.

NEW QUESTION # 120
A company's security assessment noted vulnerabilities on the unmanaged packages in its Salesforce orgs; notably, secrets that are easily accessible and in plain text, such as usernames, passwords, and OAuth tokens used in callouts from Salesforce. Which persistence mechanisms should an integration architect require to be used to ensure that secrets are protected from deliberate or inadvertent exposure?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The scenario highlights vulnerabilities in unmanaged packages where secrets (usernames, passwords, OAuth tokens) are stored in plain text and easily accessible. The goal is to protect these secrets from exposure in callouts, especially in unpackaged or unmanaged code contexts.
Why A (Protected Custom Metadata Types and Named Credentials)?
Named Credentials is the primary Salesforce-recommended mechanism for securely storing authentication details (including passwords, tokens, and secrets) for HTTP callouts. Secrets are encrypted, not visible in debug logs, and Salesforce handles authentication without exposing them in Apex code.
However, in Named Credentials, admins with "Customize Application" permission can view/edit the secrets.
To further protect secrets (e.g., hide them completely from admins or in packaged scenarios), use Protected Custom Metadata Types (preferably in a managed package). These allow Apex code in the same namespace/package to access the secrets while hiding them from users, API queries, or subscriber orgs.
This combination addresses both standard callouts (via Named Credentials) and cases needing maximum obfuscation (via Protected Custom Metadata), directly mitigating plain-text exposure in unmanaged packages.
Why not B (Encrypted Custom Fields and Protected Custom Settings)?
Encrypted Custom Fields are suitable for sensitive data like PII (e.g., credit cards, SSNs) but explicitly not recommended for storing authentication secrets or credentials used in callouts (per Salesforce Secure Coding guidelines).
Protected Custom Settings offer similar protection to Protected Custom Metadata but are less preferred for configuration-like data (secrets are configuration). Custom Metadata is deployable as metadata, better for packaging and migrations.
Why not C (Named Credentials and Protected Custom Settings)?
While Named Credentials are ideal, pairing with Protected Custom Settings is valid but suboptimal. Salesforce documentation and Trailhead modules favor Protected Custom Metadata Types over Custom Settings for secret storage due to better deployability, caching, and metadata API support.
This aligns with Salesforce Trailhead ("Securely Store Secrets with Salesforce Features") and secure coding guidelines, emphasizing Named Credentials for callouts and Protected Custom Metadata for high-security secret storage in packages. For unmanaged code vulnerabilities, migrating to these mechanisms (ideally with packaging) prevents exposure.

NEW QUESTION # 121
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) uses different shipping services for each of the 34 countries it serves. Services are added and removed frequently. Sales representatives globally need to select between valid service(s) for the customer's country and request shipping estimates. Which solution should an architect propose?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When external services are highly volatile (added/removed frequently), the goal is to decouple the Salesforce UI from the underlying service logic. An Integration Architect should propose invoking a middleware service to retrieve the valid shipping methods.
By using middleware (such as an ESB or MuleSoft) as an abstraction layer, Salesforce doesn't need to "know" the details of the 34 different shipping providers. When a sales rep selects a country, Salesforce makes a single callout to the middleware. The middleware then performs the routing logic to identify which shippers are active for that region and returns a standardized list to Salesforce.
Option A is a "maintenance nightmare"; every time a shipping service changes in any of the 34 countries, an admin would need to manually update picklist values and dependencies in Salesforce, which is not scalable. Option C (Platfor31m Events) is an asynchronous pattern unsuitable for a real-time "request-reply" scenario where a rep is waiting for an estimate during a live customer interaction. Utilizing middleware centralizes the logic, simplifies Salesforce configuration, and allows NTO to change shipping providers without any code deployments or metadata updates in the Salesforce org.

NEW QUESTION # 122
A new Salesforce program has the following high-level abstract requirement: Business processes executed on Salesforce require data updates between some internal systems and Salesforce. Which relevant details should a Salesforce integration architect seek to specifically solve for the integration architecture needs of the program?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To translate abstract business needs into a functional Integration Architecture, an architect must move beyond "what" the business wants to "how" the data will technically flow. The details in Option B represent the fundamental building blocks of any integration design.
Source and Target Systems: Determining which systems are involved dictates the available APIs (REST, SOAP, Bulk) and required security protocols (OAuth, Mutual SSL).
Directionality: Knowing if the update is unidirectional or bidirectional is critical for record mastering, identifying the "System of Record," and preventing infinite data loops.
Data Volume: This is a primary driver for selecting the Integration Pattern. High volumes (millions of records) require the Bulk API, while low-volume, real-time updates are better suited for Streaming or REST APIs.
Transformation Complexity: If data must be heavily massaged or merged from multiple sources, it justifies the need for Middleware (ESB/iPaaS).
Option A focuses on user interface and licensing, which are implementation details rather than architectural integration requirements. Option C deals with project management and resource allocation. While these are important for the project's success, they do not help the architect decide between a Request-Reply or Fire-and-Forget pattern. By focusing on systems, data direction, and volume, the architect ensures that the proposed solution is technically viable, scalable, and adheres to Salesforce platform governor limits.

NEW QUESTION # 123
A company accepts payment requests 24/7. Once the company accepts a payment request, its service level agreement (SLA) r5equires it to make sure each payment request is processed by its Payment System. The co6mpany tracks payment requests using a globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The company's simplified flow is as shown in the diagram.

The company encounters intermittent update errors when two or more processes try to update the same Payment Request record at the same time.
Which recommendation should an integration architect make to improve the company's SLA and update conflict handling?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To fulfill the SLA of ensuring every payment is processed while simultaneously resolving the issue of intermittent update errors, the architect must introduce an orchestration layer capable of managing state and concurrency. In a high-volume payment environment, "Fire and Forget" messages (as seen in the provided diagram) can lead to race conditions if multiple threads attempt to update a single record simultaneously-a common challenge when scaling payment systems.
The recommendation to have Middleware coordinate request delivery and payment processing (Option C) transforms the architecture into a managed queueing system. By coordinating delivery, the middleware can act as a traffic controller, ensuring that requests are delivered sequentially or that appropriate locks are respected before an update is attempted. This orchestration allows the system to meet its SLA by implementing a "guaranteed delivery" pattern, where the middleware tracks the status of each payment and only "forgets" the message once the Payment System confirms successful processing.
Furthermore, the architect should emphasize idempotency by leveraging the globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The Payment System should be designed to use this identifier to check if a specific transaction has already been processed before attempting an update. This prevents duplicate entries and conflicting updates, even if the middleware retries a message due to a network timeout. While retries (Options A and B) are part of a resilient system, they do not solve the root cause of record contention; only the coordination and sequencing provided by the middleware can ensure a stable, conflict-free integration flow.78

NEW QUESTION # 124
......
We provide up-to-date Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam questions and study materials in three different formats. We have developed three variations of authentic Plat-Arch-204 exam questions to cater to different learning preferences, ensuring that all candidates can effectively prepare for the Plat-Arch-204 practice test. Itcertking offers Plat-Arch-204 Practice Questions in PDF format, browser-based practice exams, and desktop practice test software. Each version of our updated Plat-Arch-204 Questions has its own unique benefits, enabling you to confidently prepare for your certification test.
Plat-Arch-204 Answers Real Questions: https://www.itcertking.com/Plat-Arch-204_exam.html




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1