素晴らしいHybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoring試験勉強過去問 & 合格スムーズHybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoring真実試験 | ハイパスレートのHybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoring日本語版サンプルさまざまな人々がさまざまな学習習慣を持っているという事実を踏まえて、3つのHybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoringトレーニング質問バージョンをご案内します。さらに、Hybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoring学習教材のデモを自由にダウンロードして検討することもできます。そのような試用に追加料金は発生しないことをお約束します。逆に、Hybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoring試験問題のデモを試して、十分な内容を選択することを心からお勧めします。 Hybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoringトレーニングガイドは、時間とお金をかけて購入する価値があります。 SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability Network Monitoring Exam 認定 Hybrid-Cloud-Observability-Network-Monitoring 試験問題 (Q93-Q98):質問 # 93
The fan of a network device has failed; however, the status shows as "up" on the current hardware health resource in the node details view. Which two of the following causes could be creating the issue? (Choose two.)
A. resource is showing outdated information
B. wrong MIB being used for polling
C. threshold of the fan sensor has been forced
D. hardware sensors are disabled
正解：A、B
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Resource is showing outdated information: If polling intervals are too long or if there is a communication problem, the hardware health resource may not update promptly, resulting in inaccurate status display.
Wrong MIB being used for polling: If SolarWinds is using an incorrect or generic MIB, it may not retrieve accurate hardware health data for the specific fan sensor, causing the status to incorrectly display as "up" even when failed.
While disabled sensors and forced thresholds may impact alerting or monitoring, they are less likely to cause this direct display inconsistency.
References:
NPM Administrator Guide: Troubleshooting Hardware Health Inaccuracies
Official SolarWinds KB: Hardware Health Sensor Status Issues
質問 # 94
Which two of the following requirements must be met to detect duplex mismatches? (Choose two.)
A. nodes must be in 'warning' status
B. nodes must be in "up" status
C. nodes must be monitored
D. nodes must be described in MIB
正解：B、C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
To detect duplex mismatches:
The node must be monitored (i.e., managed in SolarWinds).
The node must be in "up" status, so SNMP data about interface status, speed, and errors can be polled and compared.
Description in MIB (A) is not necessary if the device is already SNMP-capable, and "warning" status (C) is a result, not a requirement.
Reference:
NPM Administrator Guide, "Requirements for Detecting Duplex Mismatches,"
"Only monitored and up-status nodes are eligible for duplex mismatch detection."
質問 # 95
It is noted in flow source view that some devices are showing "never received" in the last received flow column. It is verified that the flows are not being blocked by a firewall. What is the likely cause?
A. interface is no longer monitored by the network monitoring features
B. a primary field of data is missing and being dropped
C. flows are IPv6 and not supported by the network monitoring features
D. node is no longer monitored by the monitoring features
正解：D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
If the flow source view in SolarWinds NTA shows "never received" and firewall issues are ruled out, it is often because the device (node) is no longer monitored by SolarWinds. If a node is removed or its monitoring is disabled, the collector will not associate incoming flows from that node, resulting in "never received" status.
Reference:
"If a node is no longer monitored in SolarWinds, the NTA will not process any flows received from that node, and the flow source view will display 'never received'."
- (Network Performance Monitor Administrator Guide, NetFlow Troubleshooting and Monitoring Status section)
質問 # 96
A node is not able to calculate CPU load threshold. Where in SolarWinds' platform can a user confirm CPU load is included in the node status calculation?
A. core thresholds
B custom poller thresholds
B. polling settings
C. node status contributors
正解：B
質問 # 97
It is noted in flow source view that some devices are showing "never received" in the last received flow column. It is verified that the flows are not being blocked by a firewall. What is the likely cause?
A. interface is no longer monitored by the network monitoring features
B. a primary field of data is missing and being dropped
C. flows are IPv6 and not supported by the network monitoring features
D. node is no longer monitored by the monitoring features
