SecOps-Generalist考試資訊 & SecOps-Generalist證照指南我們Testpdf配置提供給你最優質的Palo Alto Networks的SecOps-Generalist考試考古題及答案，將你一步一步帶向成功，我們Testpdf Palo Alto Networks的SecOps-Generalist考試認證資料絕對提供給你一個真實的考前準備，我們針對性很強，就如同為你量身定做一般，你一定會成為一個有實力的IT專家，我們Testpdf Palo Alto Networks的SecOps-Generalist考試認證資料將是最適合你也是你最需要的培訓資料，趕緊註冊我們Testpdf網站，相信你會有意外的收穫。 最新的 Security Operations Generalist SecOps-Generalist 免費考試真題 (Q22-Q27):問題 #22
Prisma Access security processing nodes automatically receive dynamic updates (App-ID, Threat, URL, WildFire) from the Palo Alto Networks cloud. As an administrator managing Prisma Access, what is your primary responsibility regarding these dynamic updates?
A. Manually download and install each dynamic update package onto the Prisma Access nodes.
B. Define which specific signatures or threat intelligence feeds within the updates are active or inactive.
C. Configure the schedule for when the dynamic updates are downloaded and installed on the Prisma Access nodes.
D. Upload new custom dynamic update packages to the Prisma Access nodes.
E. Monitor the status of the dynamic updates to ensure they are current and troubleshoot any potential failures.
答案：E
解題說明：
As a cloud-delivered service, Palo Alto Networks manages the update process for Prisma Access security processing nodes. Option A, B, and E are incorrect; administrators do not manually download, schedule installation, or upload custom packages to the underlying Prisma Access infrastructure; this is handled by Palo Alto Networks. Option D is incorrect; while you configure actions based on threat IDs in profiles, you don't typically manage individual signature activation in CDSS. Option C is the administrator's role: to monitor the status of these automatic updates via the management console or Panorama to ensure they are being applied correctly and troubleshoot if the nodes fall behind.
問題 #23
A global company is implementing granular control over SaaS application usage using Palo Alto Networks Strata NGFWs at branch offices and Prisma Access for remote users. They have configured decryption policies to inspect SSL/TLS traffic for sanctioned SaaS applications like Office 365 and Salesforce. However, users accessing unsanctioned shadow IT applications via encrypted channels are still successfully bypassing security controls. Additionally, some legitimate applications are experiencing functionality issues after decryption is enabled. What are potential reasons for these issues and necessary steps to address them?
A. The security policy rules using App-ID are ordered incorrectly, allowing 'allow' rules for 'any' application to match encrypted traffic before the decryption policy is evaluated.
B. Application functionality issues may arise if the application uses client-side certificates, pinned certificates, or relies on specific SSL/TLS negotiation steps that are disrupted by the decryption proxy.
C. The applications identified by App-ID are not all being processed by the decryption policy before reaching security profiles.
D. The firewall/Prisma Access might be encountering SSL/TLS protocol versions or cipher suites that are not supported for decryption, leading to decryption failures and fallback to non-decrypted paths (potentially allowing unsanctioned apps).
E. Decryption is not properly configured for all relevant traffic zones, causing some encrypted traffic to pass through uninspected.
答案：B,D,E
解題說明：
This scenario highlights common challenges with decrypting encrypted traffic for application layer inspection. Option A is correct because decryption policies must apply to the correct zones and traffic flows; misconfiguration can cause traffic to bypass decryption. Option B is incorrect; App-ID identifies the application regardless of whether it's decrypted or not, although granular enforcement after identification often requires decryption for full Content-ID, Threat Prevention, etc. Option C is correct; the firewall/Prisma Access has limitations on supported SSL/TLS versions, cipher suites, and key exchange methods. If an application uses unsupported parameters, decryption will fail, and depending on the decryption profile's action for 'decryption errors', the session might be allowed without inspection. Option D is correct; applications using mechanisms like certificate pinning or client authentication can break when a decryption proxy intercepts and re-signs the certificate. Exclusions for such applications are often necessary. Option E is incorrect; Security policy rule evaluation happens after App-ID identification and typically after decryption policy evaluation (if decryption is enabled for the matched rule's traffic). Rule order primarily affects which policy is applied to the identified application, not whether decryption happens or fails beforehand.
問題 #24
A company is using Prisma Access for remote users and wants to enforce a policy where access to file-sharing applications (like Dropbox, Google Drive upload) is restricted to specific user groups, regardless of whether the destination is a sanctioned corporate account or a personal account. All other standard internet browsing should be allowed for everyone. How would this policy be implemented using Prisma Access Security and App-ID?
A. D Configure a Security Policy rule with 'Source User' set to the user groups that should not have access, 'Destination Zone' as 'Public', 'Application' set to the file- sharing App-IDs, and 'Action' as 'deny'. Place this rule above a general 'allow' rule.
B. Create a custom application signature for file-sharing applications based on port and protocol.
C. Configure a NAT policy rule to block traffic destined for file-sharing service IPs.
D. Configure a Security Policy rule with 'Source User' set to the allowed user group, 'Destination Zone' as 'Public', 'Application' set to the file-sharing App-IDs, and 'Action' as 'allow'. Place this rule above a more general 'allow' rule for other web browsing.
E. Use URL Filtering to block the category 'File Sharing and Storage' for all users except the allowed group.
答案：A,D
解題說明：
Controlling application access based on user identity is a core function of User-ID integrated with Security Policy and App-ID. - Option A (Correct): This is one valid approach. You define an explicit 'allow' rule specifically for the authorized user group, matching the file- sharing App-IDs (like 'dropbox-upload', 'google-drive-upload), and place this rule higher in the policy list. A subsequent, broader rule would allow general internet browsing (e.g., 'web-browsing') for a wider user group (or 'any' user). - Option B (Correct): This is the alternative, equally valid approach often preferred for restricting access. You define an explicit 'deny' rule matching the user groups who should not have access to the file- sharing App-IDs. Placing this deny rule above the general 'allow' rule ensures that prohibited users are blocked before the general browsing rule permits the traffic. Both A and B achieve the desired outcome by using App-ID and User-ID in explicit policy rules placed strategically. - Option C: URL Filtering operates on URL categories. While 'File Sharing and Storage' is a category, App-ID provides more granular control over the specific application activity (e.g., upload vs. download, authentication). Using App-ID is generally more precise for this type of control. Also, managing exceptions for a group via URL filtering alone can be less straightforward than using user groups in security policy. - Option D: NAT policy handles address translation, not access control based on applications or users. - Option E: App-ID automatically identifies many common file- sharing applications based on more than just port/protocol, making custom signatures usually unnecessary unless dealing with a very uncommon or internal application.
問題 #25
An administrator is investigating a security incident involving an internal host that accessed a suspicious external IP address. They need to review logs from the Palo Alto Networks firewall that show allowed and denied connections, including source/destination IPs, zones, applications, and policy actions. Which log type should they focus on for this investigation?
A. User-ID logs
B. Traffic logs
C. HIP Match logs
D. System logs
E. Configuration logs
答案：B
解題說明：
Traffic logs are the primary source for detailed information about network sessions passing through the firewall, including allowed/denied status, source/destination information, application ID, and policy rule hit. Option A tracks operational events. Option B tracks configuration changes. Option D logs device posture checks. Option E logs IP-to-user mappings.
問題 #26
When monitoring Prisma Access logs in Cortex Data Lake, what is the primary identifier used to correlate different log types (e.g., Traffic, Threat, URL Filtering, Data Filtering) related to the same user activity or connection?
A. The Session ID assigned by the firewall.
B. The username (if User-ID is enabled).
C. The App-ID of the application.
D. The destination URL or IP address.
E. The timestamp of the log entry.
F. The source IP address of the user.
答案：A
解題說明：
Each session flowing through a Palo Alto Networks firewall (including Prisma Access security processing nodes) is assigned a unique Session ID upon its creation. This Session ID is carried through different log types generated for that session (Traffic, Threat, URL, File, Data Filtering, Decryption). This allows administrators to easily correlate related events for the same connection. While User-ID, IP, URL, etc., are important filtering criteria, the Session ID is the definitive key for linking all log entries belonging to a single session.