Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Workday-Pro-Integrationsテキスト & Workday-Pro-Integrations資格練習 [Print This Page]

Author: rickgre288    Time: yesterday 16:39
Title: Workday-Pro-Integrationsテキスト & Workday-Pro-Integrations資格練習
BONUS!!! Jpexam Workday-Pro-Integrationsダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1q_n2_BCYrG2xnPM2VVKfcZLxu8P6coKx
誰もが良い仕事とまともな収入を望んでいます。 しかし、彼らが優れた能力と優れた主要な知識を持っていない場合、彼らはまともな仕事を見つけるのは難しいです。 WorkdayテストWorkday-Pro-Integrations認定に合格すると、夢を実現し、満足のいく仕事を見つけることができます。 Workday-Pro-Integrations学習教材は、Workday-Pro-IntegrationsのWorkday Pro Integrations Certification Exam試験に簡単に合格するのに役立つ優れたツールです。 時間をかけて学習する必要はありません。 Workday-Pro-Integrations試験ガイドは高品質であり、当社Workdayの製品を使用する場合、Workday-Pro-Integrations試験に合格する可能性は99%〜100%と非常に高くなっています。
Workday-Pro-Integrationsの学習教材で20〜30時間準備したと主張することができます。Workday-Pro-Integrations試験に簡単に合格して、期待されるスコアを取得できます。 またWorkday、Workday-Pro-Integrations試験問題の無料デモを提供しており、Workday-Pro-Integrationsトレーニング資料の有効性と正確性を確認できます。Jpexam やって来てみてください! Workday-Pro-Integrationsトレーニング資料の高い精度に驚かれることでしょう。 そして、Workday-Pro-Integrations練習問題集の高い合格率は99%から100%なので、Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam試験に簡単に合格します。
>> Workday-Pro-Integrationsテキスト <<
Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations資格練習、Workday-Pro-Integrations模擬問題集Jpexamの WorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations試験トレーニング資料を選ぶなら、君がWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations認定試験に合格するのを保証します。一人あたりは自分の選択によって、成功する可能性があります。Jpexamを選ぶのは成功に導く鍵を選ぶのに等しいです。長年の努力を通じて、JpexamのWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations認定試験の合格率が100パーセントになっていました。Jpexamを選ぶのは、成功を選ぶのに等しいと言えます。
Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam 認定 Workday-Pro-Integrations 試験問題 (Q44-Q49):質問 # 44
You have been asked to refine a report which outputs one row per worker and is being used in an integration that sends worker data to one of your third-party systems. The integration should only send workers who have been hired in the last 30 days. Where in the custom report definition can you specify a condition that would include only workers who have been hired in the last 30 days?
正解:C
解説:
In Workday, when refining a custom report to include specific conditions such as limiting the output to workers hired in the last 30 days, the appropriate place to specify this condition is within theFiltertab of the custom report definition. The Filter tab allows you to define criteria that determine which instances of the primary business object (in this case, "Worker") are included in the report output. This is critical for integrations, as the filtered data ensures that only relevant records are sent to the third-party system.
The requirement here is to restrict the report to workers hired within the last 30 days. In Workday reporting, this can be achieved by adding a filter condition on the "Hire Date" field of the Worker business object.
Specifically, you would configure the filter to compare the "Hire Date" against a dynamic date range, such as
"Current Date minus 30 days" to "Current Date." This ensures the report dynamically adjusts to include only workers hired in the last 30 days each time it runs, which aligns with the needs of an integration sending real- time data to a third-party system.
Here's why the other options are incorrect:
* A. Subfilter: Subfilters in Workday are used to further refine data within a related business object or a subset of data already filtered by the primary filter. They are not the primary mechanism for applying a condition to the main dataset (e.g., all workers). For this scenario, asubfilter would be unnecessary since the condition applies directly to the Worker business object, not a related object.
* B. Output: The Output section of a custom report definition controls how the report is displayed or delivered (e.g., file format, scheduling), not the data selection criteria. It does not allow for specifying conditions like hire date ranges.
* C. Columns: The Columns tab defines which fields are displayed in the report output (e.g., Worker ID, Name, Hire Date). While you can add the "Hire Date" field here for visibility, it does not control which workers are included in the report-that is the role of the Filter tab.
To implement this in practice:
* In the custom report definition, go to theFiltertab.
* Add a new filter condition.
* Select the "Hire Date" field from the Worker business object.
* Set the operator to "in the range" and define the range as "Current Date - 30 days" to "Current Date" (using dynamic date functions available in Workday).
* Save and test the report to ensure it returns only workers hired within the last 30 days.
This filtered report can then be enabled as a web service (via the Advanced tab) or used in an Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) or Workday Studio integration to send the data to the third-party system, meeting the integration requirement.
References from Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide:
* Workday Report Writer Fundamentals: Section on "Creating and Managing Filters" explains how filters are used to limit report data based on specific conditions, such as date ranges.
* Integration System Fundamentals: Discusses how custom reports serve as data sources for integrations and the importance of filters in defining the dataset.
* Core Connectors & Document Transformation: Highlights the use of filtered custom reports in outbound integrations to third-party systems.

質問 # 45
You have been asked to create an integration using the Core Connector: Worker with DIS template. The vendor has requested that you only include employees who are based in the San Francisco area that are on leave.
How do you configure your integration so that only workers who meet the requirements are included in the output file?
正解:D
解説:
When using Core Connector: Worker with DIS, to restrict the population to employees who:
Are on leave, and
Are located in San Francisco
You must configure Population Eligibility, which is the only place to filter the worker population included in the connector output.
From Workday Pro documentation:
"The Population Eligibility section defines which workers are eligible for extraction in the integration based on location, status, organization, and other conditions. Boolean calculated fields can be used here to define complex eligibility criteria." In this case:
Create a Boolean calculated field that returns true for "On Leave AND Location = San Francisco" Use that field in Population Eligibility Why the others are incorrect:
A, D. Field Overrides and Field Attributes only modify what data is extracted-not who is included.
C . Integration Attributes don't control population filtering.

質問 # 46
What is the workflow to chain a Document Transformation system to a Connector integration for the purpose of transforming the output?
正解:C
解説:
To chain a Document Transformation system to a Connector Integration, you must configure the Connector Integration System's Business Process (BP) to include a "Service step of Fire Integration", which triggers the Document Transformation after the connector completes.
From Workday documentation:
"To execute a Document Transformation after a connector integration, use the Fire Integration service step in the connector's business process to trigger the Document Transformation integration." This allows Workday to chain multiple integrations, such as taking the output of a Core Connector and sending it through a transformation step (e.g., XSLT) before delivering to an endpoint.
Why other options are incorrect:
* A. Fire Integration in the DT BP is not used to call itself.
* B. "Integration step" in BP is not a valid step type.
* C. Same issue - DT's own BP doesn't call itself or other integrations.
Reference:Workday Pro: Document Transformation - Integration Chaining via Fire Integration StepWorkday Integration Certification Guide - Document Transformation and BP Chaining

質問 # 47
Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below.
You have configured a Core Connector: Worker integration, which utilizes the following basic configuration:
* Integration field attributes are configured to output the Position Title and Business Title fields from the Position Data section.
* Integration Population Eligibility uses the field Is Manager which returns true if the worker holds a manager role.
* Transaction Log service has been configured to Subscribe to specific Transaction Types: Position Edit Event.
You launch your integration with the following date launch parameters (Date format of MM/DD/YYYY):
* As of Entry Moment: 05/25/2024 12:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/25/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/23/2024 12:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/23/2024
To test your integration, you made a change to a worker named Jeff Gordon who is not assigned to the manager role. You perform an Edit Position on Jeff Gordon and update their business title to a new value. Jeff Gordon's worker history shows the Edit Position Event as being successfully completed with an effective date of 05/24/2024 and an Entry Moment of 05/24/2024 07:58:53 AM however Jeff Gordon does not show up in your output.
What configuration element would have to be modified for the integration to include Jeff Gordon in the output?
正解:C
解説:
The scenario describes a Core Connector: Worker integration with specific configurations, and a test case where Jeff Gordon's data doesn't appear in the output despite an Edit Position event. Let's analyze why Jeff Gordon is excluded and what needs to change:
Current Configuration:
Integration Field Attributes: Outputs Position Title and Business Title from Position Data.
Integration Population Eligibility: Filters workers where "Is Manager" = True (only managers).
Transaction Log Service: Subscribes to "Position Edit Event" transactions.
Launch Parameters:
As of Entry Moment: 05/25/2024 12:00:00 AM
Effective Date: 05/25/2024
Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/23/2024 12:00:00 AM
Last Successful Effective Date: 05/23/2024
Test Case:
Worker: Jeff Gordon (not a manager).
Action: Edit Position, updating Business Title.
Event Details: Effective Date 05/24/2024, Entry Moment 05/24/2024 07:58:53 AM.
Result: Jeff Gordon does not appear in the output.
Analysis:
Date Parameters: The integration captures changes between the Last Successful As of Entry Moment (05/23/2024 12:00:00 AM) and the current As of Entry Moment (05/25/2024 12:00:00 AM). Jeff's Edit Position event (Entry Moment 05/24/2024 07:58:53 AM) falls within this range, and its Effective Date (05/24/2024) is before the integration's Effective Date (05/25/2024), making it eligible from a date perspective.
Transaction Log: Subscribed to "Position Edit Event," which matches Jeff's action (Edit Position), so the event type is correctly captured.
Field Attributes: Outputs Position Title and Business Title, and Jeff's update to Business Title aligns with these fields.
Population Eligibility: Filters for "Is Manager" = True. Jeff Gordon is explicitly noted as "not assigned to the manager role," meaning "Is Manager" = False for him. This filter excludes Jeff from the population, regardless of the event or date eligibility.
Why Jeff is Excluded:The Integration Population Eligibility restriction ("Is Manager" = True) prevents Jeff Gordon from being included, as he isn't a manager. This filter applies to the entire worker population before events or fields are considered, overriding other conditions.
Option Analysis:
A . Transaction Log Subscription: Incorrect. The subscription already includes "Position Edit Event," which matches Jeff's action. Modifying this wouldn't address the population filter.
B . Integration Population Eligibility: Correct. Changing this to include non-managers (e.g., removing the "Is Manager" = True filter or adjusting it to include all employees) would allow Jeff Gordon to appear in the output.
C . Date Launch Parameters: Incorrect. Jeff's event (05/24/2024) falls within the date range, so the parameters are not the issue.
D . Integration Field Attributes: Incorrect. The attributes already include Business Title, which Jeff updated, so this configuration is irrelevant to his exclusion.
Modification Needed:Adjust the Integration Population Eligibility to either:
Remove the "Is Manager" = True filter to include all workers, or
Modify it to align with the scenario's intent (e.g., "Worker Type equals Employee") if managers were an unintended restriction.
Implementation:
Edit the Core Connector: Worker integration.
Use the related action Configure Integration Population Eligibility.
Remove or adjust the "Is Manager" = True condition.
Relaunch the integration and verify Jeff Gordon appears in the output.
Reference from Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide:
Core Connectors & Document Transformation: Section on "Configuring Integration Population Eligibility" explains how eligibility filters the worker population before event processing.
Integration System Fundamentals: Details how population scoping interacts with event subscriptions and launch parameters.

質問 # 48
You are creating a connector based integration where all fields are provided by the template. However, the vendor would also like the following configurations as well:
* A file name output to have the current date and integration run number
* Have internal values for a particular field transferred to their external values What workflow would you follow to create this integration?
正解:C
解説:
To create a connector-based integration with additional custom configurations such as dynamic file naming and internal-to-external value mapping, the following steps must be followed:
* Enable Needed Integration Services:
* This step involves activating the required integration services to ensure that the necessary API calls, security, and processing capabilities are available within Workday.
* Configure Integration Field Attributes:
* Integration Field Attributes allow customization of fields within the integration, enabling changes to formats, mappings, and transformations, such as including a dynamically generated file name with the current date and integration run number.
* Configure Integration Maps:
* Integration Maps are used to transform internal values into external values as per the vendor's requirements. This ensures that data fields in Workday align correctly with external system specifications.
* Configure Sequence Generator:
* The Sequence Generator is used to append unique identifiers to output files, ensuring each integration run produces a uniquely named file (e.g., including the current date and run number).
This workflow ensures that the integration is set up efficiently while meeting the vendor's additional configuration needs.
References: Workday Advanced Business Process documentation

質問 # 49
......
Jpexamが提供したWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrationsトレーニング資料を利用したら、WorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations認定試験に受かることはたやすくなります。Jpexamがデザインしたトレーニングツールはあなたが一回で試験に合格することにヘルプを差し上げられます。 JpexamのWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrationsトレーニング資料即ち問題と解答をダウンロードする限り、気楽に試験に受かることができるようになります。まだ困っていたら、我々の試用版を使ってみてください。ためらわずに速くあなたのショッピングカートに入れてください。でないと、絶対後悔しますよ。
Workday-Pro-Integrations資格練習: https://www.jpexam.com/Workday-Pro-Integrations_exam.html
Workday-Pro-Integrations Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam試験学習資料を購入する前に、私たちは製品の下のページで無料のデモを提供します、Workday-Pro-Integrations 認証試験は非常に人気がある試験です、Jpexam Workday-Pro-Integrations資格練習はまた一年間に無料なサービスを更新いたします、我々Workday-Pro-Integrations資格練習 - Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam資料は認定試験の改革に準じて更新していますから、お客様は改革での問題変更に心配するは全然ありません、、あなたはWorkday Workday-Pro-Integrations資格問題集からの学ぶことを記憶します、当社は、研究、革新、調査、生産、販売、アフターサービスを含むWorkday-Pro-Integrationsトレーニング資料のすべてのリンクを厳しく管理し、すべてのリンクが完璧に到達するよう努めています、Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations テキスト 全世界のお客様からいい評価をもらいました。
耳元で囁かれて、たくさん口づけられた夜、本当に、信じられないくらい気持ちよかった、Workday-Pro-Integrations Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam試験学習資料を購入する前に、私たちは製品の下のページで無料のデモを提供します、Workday-Pro-Integrations 認証試験は非常に人気がある試験です。
検証するWorkday-Pro-Integrationsテキスト & 合格スムーズWorkday-Pro-Integrations資格練習 | 更新するWorkday-Pro-Integrations模擬問題集Jpexamはまた一年間に無料なサービスを更新いたします、我々Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam資料は認定試験の改革に準じて更新していますから、お客様は改革での問題変更に心配するは全然ありません、、あなたはWorkday Workday-Pro-Integrations資格問題集からの学ぶことを記憶します。
BONUS!!! Jpexam Workday-Pro-Integrationsダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1q_n2_BCYrG2xnPM2VVKfcZLxu8P6coKx





Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1