ISTQB CT-UT最新関連参考書、CT-UT前提条件GoShikenは、精巧にまとめられた非常に効率的な最高の有効なCT-UT試験問題を提供するWebサイトです。CT-UT学習ガイドで学習すると、時間と労力を節約できます。物事以外のいくつか。 CT-UTトレーニング資料の合格率とヒット率も非常に高く、数千人の候補者が当社のWebサイトを信頼し、CT-UT試験に合格しています。候補者には非常に多くの保証を提供しており、CT-UT学習教材を心配なく購入できます。 ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester 認定 CT-UT 試験問題 (Q10-Q15):質問 # 10
Why are positive usability findings of high importance? Which of the following statements is wrong?
A. Positive usability findings should be used to communicate to the development team which features should not be modified or deleted.
B. Positive usability findings make it easier to sell the need for correcting usability problems by giving a balanced view.
C. Positive usability findings allow a better view of the usability of the product.
D. Positive findings are of high importance because they can be used in the report to justify the costs of the test.
正解：D
解説：
Positive usability findings play a key role in reinforcing what is working well in the user interface. They help:
A: Build developer confidence and soften criticism when pointing out issues.
C: Provide a complete picture of usability strengths and weaknesses.
D: Inform developers what should remain unchanged during redesign.
However, B is incorrect because justifying usability test costs should not rely solely on positive findings. Cost justification should come from the overall impact of usability on user satisfaction, performance, and business outcomes-not just good results.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: Communicating Usability Findings
Usability.gov: Best Practices for Usability Reporting
ISO 25062 - Usability Test Report Content
#######################################################
質問 # 11
Your project manager asked you for your advice. A recent project failed because the users were not satisfied with the final product, although your project manager claimed that she followed the human-centered design process. She interviewed users at the start of the project, created a first prototype and evaluated that prototype.
Which part of the human-centered design process did she miss?
A. The "analyze"-part
B. The "evaluate"-part
C. The "design"-part
D. The "iterate"-part
正解：D
解説：
The human-centered design process emphasizes iterative development-testing and refining designs through multiple cycles. In the scenario, the project manager interviewed users and evaluated a prototype but did not iterate based on feedback. Skipping iteration likely resulted in unmet user needs. Human-centered design, per ISO 9241-210, includes: understanding context of use, specifying requirements, producing design solutions, and evaluating-repeated iteratively. Hence, option D ("iterate") is correct.
References:
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Human-Centered Design Processes
Usability.gov: Human-Centered Design Activities
Nielsen Norman Group: Iterative Design in UX
#######################################################
質問 # 12
Which of the following elements are addressed by the WCAG?
i. Resizability of text
ii. Visually appealing design
iii. Text alternatives
iv. Keyboard accessibility
v. Mouse input
A. i, ii, & iii are true, iv & v are false
B. iv & v are true, i, ii & iii are false
C. i, iii, iv & v are true, ii is false
D. i & iii are true, ii, iv & v are false
正解：C
解説：
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) provide standards to ensure websites are accessible to people with disabilities. They specifically address:
i. Text resizability (SC 1.4.4),
iii. Text alternatives for non-text content (SC 1.1.1),
iv. Keyboard accessibility (SC 2.1.1),
v. Device independence, which includes not relying solely on mouse input.
Visually appealing design (ii) is not an accessibility requirement and is thus not a WCAG focus. The correct answer is D: i, iii, iv & v are true; ii is false.
References:
WCAG 2.1 Guidelines by W3C (w3.org/WAI/WCAG21)
ISO/IEC 40500:2012 - WCAG 2.0
W3C: Understanding WCAG Success Criteria
#######################################################
質問 # 13
Which of the following are advantages of using a usability lab?
i. The context is natural
ii. Test sessions are easy to observe
iii. Inexpensive setup
iv. Similar conditions for all sessions
v. Easy recording of sessions
A. ii & iv are true, i, iii & v are false
B. i, ii & v are true, iii & iv are false
C. ii, iv & v are true, i & iii are false
D. iii, iv & v are true, i & ii are false
正解：C
解説：
Usability labs provide a controlled environment that offers several advantages for observing and recording usability test sessions. Specifically, they allow for easy observation of participants (ii), standardized conditions for each session (iv), and facilitate audio and video recording for detailed analysis (v). However, the context is not natural (i), because the lab is an artificial setting rather than the user's actual environment.
Also, setting up a professional usability lab is not inexpensive (iii); it typically involves significant costs for equipment, space, and staffing. Therefore, options ii, iv, and v are true, while i and iii are false.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: Usability Labs - Pros and Cons
ISO 25062:2006 - Usability Test Reporting
Usability.gov: Setting Up a Usability Lab
#######################################################
質問 # 14
What does the Equality Act address?
A. It obligates organizations to make sites accessible at all costs
B. It protects people from discrimination in the workplace and in wider society
C. It states that websites have to adhere to the WCAG conformity level AA
D. It states that websites have to adhere to the WCAG conformity level A
正解：B
解説：
The Equality Act 2010 (UK) is legislation designed to protect individuals from discrimination in various areas, including employment and access to goods and services-this includes digital products like websites.
While it does not directly mandate WCAG compliance levels (A or AA), it implies that digital services must be accessible to users with disabilities. Organizations are required to make "reasonable adjustments" to avoid discrimination. Therefore, the most accurate and comprehensive answer is B.
References:
UK Equality Act 2010 - Legislation.gov.uk
GOV.UK: Accessibility Requirements for Public Sector Bodies