InsuranceSuite-Analyst試験感想、InsuranceSuite-Analyst模擬モード現在、市場でオンラインのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料はたくさんありますが、Tech4ExamのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料は絶対に最も良い資料です。我々Tech4Examはいつでも一番正確なGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst資料を提供するように定期的に更新しています。それに、Tech4ExamのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料が一年間の無料更新サービスを提供しますから、あなたはいつも最新の資料を持つことができます。 Guidewire Associate Certification - InsuranceSuite Analyst - Mammoth Proctored Exam 認定 InsuranceSuite-Analyst 試験問題 (Q65-Q70):質問 # 65
A typelist is:
A. Associated with a typekey field
B. A set of references to another entity
C. A set of values used as the source of drop-down lists
D. A set of fields or attributes related to an object
正解：A、C
解説：
In Guidewire InsuranceSuite, atypelistis a fundamental data modeling construct used to represent acontrolled set of allowable valuesfor a given business concept. The correct answers areOption B and Option D.
A typelist providesa predefined set of valuesthat are commonly used as the source fordrop-down listsin the user interface (Option B). Examples include policy statuses, coverage types, loss causes, or certification statuses. Using typelists ensures data consistency, reduces free-text entry errors, and supports standardization across the application.
Typelists areassociated with typekey fields(Option D). A typekey is the data type used in the Guidewire data model to reference a typelist. When an entity field is defined as a typekey, it can only store values from the associated typelist. This tight coupling between typelists and typekey fields enables consistent behavior across UI, rules, validations, and integrations.
The other options are incorrect. Option A describes entity relationships, not typelists. Option C refers to a group of fields or attributes, which is unrelated to the concept of a typelist.
For analysts, understanding typelists is critical when documenting requirements that involve selectable values.
Analysts often definenew typelist valuesor request new typelists when the out-of-the-box options do not meet business needs. This knowledge helps analysts communicate effectively with developers and avoid unnecessary custom data structures while following Guidewire's configure-over-customize principle.
質問 # 66
During the development phase of the project, what activities are completed in relationship to user stories? (Select two)
A. User stories are all evaluated for inclusion in project scope
B. User stories are initially prioritized for scheduling in sprints
C. User stories are checked into the production code branch by developers
D. User stories are tested by Quality Analysts against acceptance criteria
E. User story solutions are configured by developers
正解：D、E
解説：
Thedevelopment phaseof a Guidewire project is where approved and prioritized user stories are implemented and validated.
During this phase,developers configure solutionsfor user stories (Option C). This includes product model configuration, rules, UI changes, and integrations as required by the story.
At the same time,Quality Analysts test user stories against documented acceptance criteria(Option B).
This ensures the implemented solution meets business expectations and behaves correctly across scenarios.
The other options occur in different phases. Scope evaluation and prioritization happen during Inception, and code is promoted to production during Deployment.
質問 # 67
What are the likely impacts of unvalidated assumptions in the requirements-gathering process?
A. Higher sprint velocity
B. Increased unplanned downstream impacts
C. Longer code reviews
D. Increased developer unit test defects
E. Requirements in conflict
正解：B、E
解説：
In Guidewire InsuranceSuite implementations, validating assumptions during requirements gathering is essential to delivering predictable outcomes and business value.Unvalidated assumptionsoften occur when analysts or stakeholders presume system behavior, business rules, or data availability without confirmation through elaboration, demonstrations, or stakeholder review.
Two of the most common impacts of unvalidated assumptions arerequirements in conflictandincreased unplanned downstream impacts, makingOptions B and Dthe correct answers.
When assumptions are not validated, different stakeholders may interpret requirements differently. This frequently leads toconflicting requirements, such as incompatible workflows, contradictory business rules, or mismatched expectations across teams. These conflicts often surface later during development or testing, when changes are more costly to resolve.
Unvalidated assumptions also lead tounplanned downstream impacts. For example, an assumption about product behavior may later require changes to integrations, data models, or reporting. In Guidewire projects, such late discoveries can impact multiple components-rules, PCF, product model, and integrations-causing schedule delays and rework.
The remaining options are less directly related. Longer code reviews (Option A) and increased unit test defects (Option C) may occur indirectly but are not the primary or most likely impacts. Higher sprint velocity (Option E) is the opposite of what typically happens; velocity usually decreases due to rework and scope churn.
Validating assumptions early through elaboration, story huddles, and product demonstrations is a key Guidewire Analyst responsibility to minimize risk and protect delivery timelines.
質問 # 68
Preparation best practices to complete prior to the elaboration workshop include:
A. Create demonstration data necessary to demo functionality
B. Review deployment notes to ensure alignment
C. Identify customer's key business requirements
D. Write acceptance criteria for each story card used in the session
正解：A、C
解説：
Elaboration workshops are a critical activity in Guidewire projects, particularly during early phases such as Inception. Proper preparation ensures that these workshops are productive, focused, and aligned with business objectives. Two key preparation best practices areidentifying the customer's key business requirementsand creating demonstration data.
Identifying the customer'skey business requirements(Option B) is essential so the elaboration session focuses on the most important business scenarios. Analysts must understand priority workflows, regulatory constraints, and business goals before the session begins. This allows demonstrations to be relevant and helps stakeholders validate whether Guidewire out-of-the-box functionality meets their needs.
Creatingdemonstration data(Option C) is equally important. Elaboration workshops rely heavily on showing the system in action. Preconfigured demo data-such as sample policies, accounts, or claims-ensures that workflows can be demonstrated smoothly without delays or distractions. Well-prepared data allows participants to focus on functionality rather than setup issues.
Reviewing deployment notes (Option A) is not relevant prior to elaboration workshops, as deployment concerns occur much later in the project lifecycle. Writing detailed acceptance criteria for each story card (Option D) is typically done after elaboration, once stories are refined and prioritized for development.
By focusing on requirements clarity and effective demonstrations, analysts help ensure that elaboration workshops validate scope, uncover gaps early, and contribute meaningful updates to the project backlog.
質問 # 69
Which resource provides specific guidance to Business Analysts on how to document User Story Cards?
A. Miro - Business Analyst Handbook
B. SurePath collateral - User Story Handbook
C. SurePath collateral - User Story Guide
D. Miro - User Story Job Aid
正解：B
解説：
In Guidewire SurePath methodology, documenting high-qualityUser Story Cardsis a critical responsibility of the Business Analyst. To support this, Guidewire provides standardized collateral that defineshow stories should be written, structured, and refinedto ensure consistency and clarity across implementations. The correct resource for this purpose is theSurePath collateral - User Story Handbook, makingOption Bthe correct answer.
TheUser Story Handbookis specifically designed for Business Analysts working on Guidewire projects. It provides detailed guidance on how to document user stories, including recommended story formats, required elements, and examples aligned with Guidewire best practices. The handbook explains how to capture business intent, define scope boundaries, and write clear, testable acceptance criteria that support Agile delivery.
This resource also aligns user stories withGuidewire out-of-the-box (OOTB) functionality, helping analysts avoid unnecessary customization and ensuring that requirements are value-driven. It supports consistency across teams by establishing a shared understanding of what constitutes a "ready" story before it enters development.
The other options are incorrect. Miro-based resources (Options A and D) may be used as collaboration or visualization tools but are not official Guidewire guidance for documenting user stories. The "User Story Guide" (Option C) is not the recognized SurePath resource; theUser Story Handbookis the authoritative reference.
By using the SurePathUser Story Handbook, Business Analysts ensure that stories are well-structured, aligned with Agile principles, and ready for elaboration, story huddles, and successful implementation within Guidewire InsuranceSuite.