Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Plat-Arch-204 Test Simulator Free | Plat-Arch-204 Study Demo [Print This Page]
Author: carlhil115    Time: yesterday 13:59
Title: Plat-Arch-204 Test Simulator Free | Plat-Arch-204 Study Demo
According to personal propensity and various understanding level of exam candidates, we have three versions of Plat-Arch-204 practice materials for your reference. Here are the respective features and detailed disparities of our Plat-Arch-204 practice materials. Pdf version- it is legible to read and remember, and support customers¡¯ printing request, so you can have a print and practice in papers. Software version-It support simulation test system, and times of setup has no restriction. Remember this version support Windows system users only. App online version-Be suitable to all kinds of equipment or digital devices. Be supportive to offline exercise on the condition that you practice it without mobile data.
Our Plat-Arch-204 study materials are superior to other same kinds of study materials in many aspects. Our products¡¯ test bank covers the entire syllabus of the test and all the possible questions which may appear in the test. Each question and answer has been verified by the industry experts. The research and production of our Plat-Arch-204 Study Materials are undertaken by our first-tier expert team. The clients can have a free download and tryout of our Plat-Arch-204 study materials before they decide to buy our products.
>> Plat-Arch-204 Test Simulator Free <<
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Study Demo - Plat-Arch-204 Latest Learning MaterialsThe Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 desktop-based practice exam software is beneficial for you to evaluate and enhance your knowledge before taking the Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Exam Questions. All of the features of our online Plat-Arch-204 Practice Test software are included in our desktop windows-based Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 practice exam software.
Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q42-Q47):NEW QUESTION # 42
A global financial company with a core banking system processing 1 million transactions per day wants to build a community portal. Customers need to review their bank account details and transactions. What should an integration architect recommend to enable community users to view their financial transactions?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When dealing with high-volume data (1 million transactions per day) that does not need to be stored natively in Salesforce, the architect should recommend Data Virtualization via Salesforce Connect.
Salesforce Connect allows the company to display external data as External Objects. This approach provides several architectural advantages for a banking community:
No Data Storage: Transactions remain in the core banking system, avoiding the massive storage costs and complex synchronization logic required to house millions of records natively in Salesforce.
Real-Time Visibility: Because External Objects are queried on-demand via the OData protocol or a custom Apex adapter, customers see the most up-to-date transaction history every time they refresh the page.
While an Iframe (Option B) is technically possible, it is often discouraged due to security concerns (such as clickjacking) and a poor user experience, as the Iframe does not natively integrate with Salesforce UI components or reporting. Salesforce Connect provides a "seamless" look and feel, allowing External Objects to be used in related lists and Lightning components just like standard Salesforce records, while keeping the heavy data burden on the performant core banking system.

NEW QUESTION # 43
UC has an API-led architecture with three tiers. Requirement: return data to systems of engagement (mobile, web, Salesforce) in different formats and enforce different security protocols. What should the architect recommend?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a standard API-led connectivity model, the First Tier (Experience APIs) is responsible for tailoring data for specific systems of engagement.
The Experience APIs take the core data from the lower tiers and transform it into the specific return formats (e.g., JSON for mobile, XML for legacy web) and security protocols (e.g., OAuth for Salesforce, API Keys for web) required by each consumer. Option B correctly identifies that these transformations and security enforcements should happen at this outer layer. While an API Gateway (Option A) can provide generic security and rate limiting, it is the Experience API layer that provides the functional transformation and specific protocol requirements defined by the business needs of the engagement systems.

NEW QUESTION # 44
Northern Trail Outfitters requires an integration to be set up between one of its Salesforce orgs and an External Data Source using Salesforce Connect. The External Data Source supports Open Data Protocol. Which configuration should an integration architect recommend be implemented in order to secure requests coming from Salesforce?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In the context of Salesforce Connect, securing the integration depends heavily on how the platform authenticates with the external system. The Identity Type configuration is the fundamental security setting for an External Data Source.
The architect must choose between two Identity Types:
Named Principal: Salesforce uses the same set of credentials for all users to access the external system. This is simple to manage but does not allow the external system to distinguish between individual Salesforce users for auditing or permission purposes.
Per User: Each Salesforce user must have their own credentials for the external system. This is the most secure option as it ensures that the data visible in Salesforce respects the specific permissions the user has in the source system.
By correctly configuring the Identity Type, the architect ensures that the requests coming from Salesforce are properly authorized at the target system. Option B (CSRF Protection) is a security measure to prevent cross-site request forgery but is not the primary mechanism for authenticating the Salesforce service itself. Option A is a technical compatibility setting for non-standard OData implementations and does not directly relate to security. Therefore, recommending the appropriate Identity Type-typically "er User" for sensitive data-is the key step in securing the OData connection.

NEW QUESTION # 45
A customer is evaluating the Platform Events solution and would like help in comparing/contrasting it with Outbound Messaging for real-time/near-real time needs. They expect 3,000 customers to view messages in Salesforce. What should be evaluated and highlighted when deciding between the solutions?12
Answer: A
Explanation:
When comparing Platform Events and Outbound Messaging for a near-real-time architecture, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must evaluate fundamental differences in their delivery models and governance. While both provide declarative, asynchronous "Fire-and-Forget" capabilities, their technical constraints differ significantly, particularly regarding scalability and platform limits.
The key architectural highlight in this scenario is that Platform Events operate on a specialized event bus with specific Event Publishing and Event Delivery limits. Unlike Outbound Messaging, which is governed by more general daily outbound call limits (often tied to user licenses), Platform Events have a dedicated allocation for the number of events that can be published per hour and delivered in a 24-hour period to external clients via the Pub/Sub API or CometD. For example, the number of concurrent subscribers to a Platform Event channel is typically capped at 2,000 for standard configurations. Since the customer expects 3,000 customers to view these messages, this limit is a critical evaluation point; the architecture would need to account for this gap, perhaps by using middleware to fan out messages to the larger audience.
In contrast, Outbound Messaging does not have an "Event Delivery" limit in the same sense. It is a point-to-point SOAP-based push mechanism where Salesforce manages retries for up to 24 hours if the receiving endpoint is unavailable. However, it is less flexible for multi-consumer scenarios because it requires a separate configuration for every unique destination.
Regarding the other options: Option A is incorrect because neither system strictly guarantees "exactly-once" delivery without the possibility of duplicates; in fact, Outbound Messaging may deliver a message more than once if it doesn't receive a timely acknowledgment. Option B is incorrect because Platform Events do not have built-in "fault recovery" handled by Salesforce in the same way as Outbound Messaging's automatic retry queue; with Platform Events, it is the subscriber's responsibility to use a Replay ID to retrieve missed events within the 72-hour retention window. Therefore, highlighting the unique delivery and publishing limits is the most vital step for the architect.

NEW QUESTION # 46
A customer's enterprise architect has identified requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. The company has asked the integration architect to help fulfill such aspects with its Salesforce program. Which recommendation should the integration architect make?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When an enterprise architect identifies infrastructure-level requirements such as caching, queuing, and complex event handling, it signals a need for a dedicated integration layer. Salesforce is an engagement platform, not a dedicated message broker or Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). For complex event handling in a publish/subscribe scenario, the architect should recommend leveraging middleware to act as the central nervous system of the integration landscape.
The middleware provides a robust environment to manage the lifecycle of a message. It can receive a single event from a publisher (like Salesforce via Platform Events) and then route that message to multiple active subscribers. This decoupling ensures that Salesforce doesn't need to manage the connection state or retry logic for every downstream system. Middleware tools are specifically designed to handle "Quality of Service" (QoS) requirements like guaranteed delivery, message sequencing, and dead-letter queuing, which are difficult to manage natively at scale within Salesforce limits.
Option A is incorrect because shifting from Fire-and-Forget to Request-Reply generally decreases performance and scalability due to the synchronous nature of the wait time. Option C is also incorrect; protocol translation (e.g., SOAP to REST) and heavy message transformation are exactly what middleware tools are built for. By performing these tasks in middleware, you conserve Salesforce's Apex CPU limits and maintain a cleaner, more maintainable CRM environment. Therefore, using middleware for routing and event handling is the standard architectural recommendation for a mature enterprise program.

NEW QUESTION # 47
......
Keep making progress is a very good thing for all people. If you try your best to improve yourself continuously, you will that you will harvest a lot, including money, happiness and a good job and so on. The Plat-Arch-204 preparation exam from our company will help you keep making progress. Choosing our Plat-Arch-204 Study Material, you will find that it will be very easy for you to overcome your shortcomings and become a persistent person. Just come and buy our Plat-Arch-204 learning guide!
Plat-Arch-204 Study Demo: https://www.freepdfdump.top/Plat-Arch-204-valid-torrent.html
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Test Simulator Free You can fully realize your potential and find out what you really love, We are the best choice for candidates who are urgent to pass exams and acquire the IT certification, our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam torrent will assist you pass certificate exam certainly, Firstly, Plat-Arch-204 free demo is allowable for you to try before you buy, Hence one can see that the Plat-Arch-204 Study Demo - Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect learn tool compiled by our company are definitely the best choice for you.
I really can sure that this dump is enough for your exam, You can trust on Plat-Arch-204 it, Each way makes its own contribution to your understanding of the OS, You can fully realize your potential and find out what you really love.
Pass Guaranteed Quiz Salesforce - Plat-Arch-204 Fantastic Test Simulator FreeWe are the best choice for candidates who are urgent to pass exams and acquire the IT certification, our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Torrent will assist you pass certificate exam certainly.
Firstly, Plat-Arch-204 free demo is allowable for you to try before you buy, Hence one can see that the Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect learn tool compiled by our company are definitely the best choice for you.
It can be download in personal computer unlimited times.




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1