Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Why Choose Actual4test for PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions Prepar [Print This Page]
Author: gregsto438    Time: 11 hour before
Title: Why Choose Actual4test for PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions Prepar
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Actual4test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iv0Y18way8pWKRNSINpUkpQkYV7BIvtW
Are you an ambitious person and do you want to make your life better right now? If the answer is yes, then you just need to make use of your spare time to finish learning our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam materials and we can promise that your decision will change your life. So your normal life will not be disturbed. Please witness your growth after the professional guidance of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials. In short, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor real exam will bring good luck to your life.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Information Security Management System (ISMS): In this exam section, candidates are tested for their knowledge of vital Information security management system (ISMS) principles.
Topic 2
  • Managing an ISO
  • IEC 27001 audit program: This section of the exam covers managing the internal audit activity and assessment of plans.
Topic 3
  • Preparation of an ISO
  • IEC 27001 audit: In this exam section, candidates are tested for their knowledge of preparing for stage 2 audit and other audit processes.
Topic 4
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: Exam-takers are tested in this section about basic audit concepts and rules.
Topic 5
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 27001 audit: In this section, exam-takers are tested for their knowledge of drafting audit findings and nonconformity reports, reviewing the quality of the audit, its documentation process, and how to close it.
Topic 6
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of Information Security Management System (ISMS): This section of the exam covers topics such as the most fundamental concepts and rules related to information security.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification is a globally recognized credential that confirms your expertise in information security management systems auditing. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is ideal for professionals who wish to enhance their career prospects and credibility in the industry. It is also beneficial for those who are responsible for conducting ISMS audits in their organizations or for those who wish to become independent auditors.
>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Guide Online <<
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Exercise, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PreparationIn this Desktop-based PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice exam software, you will enjoy the opportunity to self-exam your preparation. The chance to customize the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice exams according to the time and types of PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice test questions will contribute to your ease. This format operates only on Windows-based devices. But what is helpful is that it functions without an active internet connection. It copies the exact pattern and style of the real PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam to make your preparation productive and relevant.
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q302-Q307):NEW QUESTION # 302
Scenario 4
SendPay is a financial services company specializing in global money transfers through a network of agents and institutions. As a new company in the market, SendPay aims to deliver top-quality services with its fee- free digital platform, launched last year, enabling clients to send and receive money anytime via smartphones and laptops. At that time, SendPay outsourced software operations to an external team, which also managed the company's technology infrastructure.
Recently, the company applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification after having an ISMS in place for almost a year.
During the audit, the auditors focused on reviewing SendPay's outsourced operations, specifically looking at the software development and technology infrastructure maintenance handled by the outsourced company.
They followed a structured approach, which included reviewing and evaluating SendPay's processes for monitoring the quality of these outsourced operations. This included verifying if the company met its contractual obligations, ensuring proper governance procedures for engaging outsourced entities, and assessing SendPay's plans in case of expected or unexpected termination of outsourcing agreements.
However, the auditors subtly noted that SendPay's protocols did not fully address contingencies for unanticipated cancellations of outsourcing agreements. Additionally, a technical expert appointed by SendPay assisted the auditors, providing specific knowledge and expertise related to the outsourced operations being audited.
The audit team calculated the number of training hours employees received on ISMS to ensure alignment with established objectives. They also computed the average resolution time of information security incidents based on a sample taken during the audit, which provided valuable insights into SendPay's incident management practices. In addition, the auditors evaluated the reliability of the evidence collected during the audit. They considered several factors influencing the reliability of audit evidence. For example, evidence from surveillance cameras provided more objective proof compared to photos. Timing also played a crucial role in reliability, with mechanisms like transaction recording enhancing the credibility of the evidence.
SendPay uses cloud-based platforms to make its operations more efficient and scalable. However, during the audit, the auditors did not request SendPay to provide an inventory of their cloud activities due to resource limitations, relying instead on SendPay's representations.
Question
Which type of evidence did the auditors utilize to validate various aspects of SendPay's ISMS during the audit process? Refer to Scenario 4.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is Analytical evidence, because the auditors relied heavily on analysis, calculations, and evaluation of performance data to validate the effectiveness of SendPay's ISMS. Analytical evidence involves examining trends, metrics, ratios, averages, and performance indicators to draw conclusions about how well processes are functioning.
In the scenario, the auditors calculated the number of training hours employees received on ISMS topics and computed the average resolution time of information security incidents based on sampled data. These activities are clear examples of analytical techniques, as they involve processing numerical and performance- related information to assess alignment with objectives and effectiveness of controls. Additionally, the auditors assessed the reliability of evidence by comparing different sources and considering timing factors, which further supports the use of analytical judgment rather than purely technical inspection.
Option B is incorrect because mathematical evidence is not a recognized audit evidence category under ISO standards. While calculations were performed, the purpose was analytical evaluation, not mathematical proof.
Option C is incorrect because technical evidence would primarily involve direct inspection of systems, configurations, or infrastructure, such as firewall rule reviews or system settings. While some technical elements existed in the audit, the question focuses on the type of evidence used to validate ISMS performance broadly, which was predominantly analytical.
Therefore, analytical evidence best describes the evidence utilized by the auditors during SendPay's audit.

NEW QUESTION # 303
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home called ABC that provides healthcare services.
The next step in your audit plan is to verify the information security on ABC's healthcare mobile app development, support, and lifecycle process. During the audit, you learned the organization outsourced the mobile app development to a professional software development company with CMMI Level 5, ITSM (ISO/IEC
20000-1), BCMS (ISO 22301) and ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001) certified. The IT Manager presented the software security management procedure and summarised the process as follows:
The mobile app development shall adopt "security-by-design" and "security-by-default" principles, as a minimum. The following security functions for personal data protection shall be available:
Access control.
Personal data encryption, i.e., Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm, key lengths: 256 bits; and Personal data pseudonymization.
Vulnerability checked and no security backdoor
You sample the latest Mobile App Test report - details as follows:

You ask the IT Manager why the organisation still uses the mobile app while personal data encryption and pseudonymization tests failed. Also, whether the Service Manager is authorized to approve the test.
The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure. The reason why the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra
150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That's why the Service Manager signed the approval.
You sample one of the medical staff's mobile and found that ABC's healthcare mobile app, version
1.01 is installed. You found that version 1.01 has no test record.
The IT Manager explains that because of frequent ransomware attacks, the outsourced mobile app development company gave a free minor update on the tested software, performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions. Based on his 20 years of information security experience, there is no need to re- test.
You are preparing the audit findings Select two options that are correct.
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001, organizations must control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes in order to ensure continued alignment with information security requirements. In this scenario, the organization failed to perform appropriate testing after an emergency update to the mobile app, which constitutes a nonconformity with clause 8.1 of the standard.
**Reference**:
- ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials
- PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO 27001 Lead Auditor
ISO/IEC 27001 requires that organizations adhere to their established procedures for software security management. The IT Manager's approval of the app despite failed security tests and lack of proper documentation for the new version indicates noncompliance with the procedure, thus reflecting a nonconformity.
**Reference**:
- ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials
- PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO 27001 Lead Auditor

NEW QUESTION # 304
An audit team leader is planning a follow-up audit after the completion of a third-party surveillance audit earlier in the year. They have decided they will verify the nonconformities that require corrections before they move on to consider corrective actions.
Based on the descriptions below, which four of the following are corrections for nonconformities identified at the surveillance?
Answer: A,B,C,H
Explanation:
According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, a correction is an action to eliminate a detected nonconformity, such as rework, repair, or replacement1. The examples of A, B, C, and E are corrections because they fix the errors or defects that caused the nonconformities, such as a missing signature, a missing guide, a wrong date, or a wrong colour code. The other examples (D, F, G, and H) are not corrections, but corrective actions, because they address the root causes of the nonconformities, such as inadequate training, poor planning, ineffective documentation, or unclear responsibility2. References: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 35, section 4.5.12: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 36, section 4.5.2.

NEW QUESTION # 305
You are performing an ISO 27001 ISMS surveillance audit at a residential nursing home, ABC Healthcare Services. ABC uses a healthcare mobile app designed and maintained by a supplier, WeCare, to monitor residents' well-being. During the audit, you learn that 90% of the residents' family members regularly receive medical device advertisements from WeCare, by email and SMS once a week. The service agreement between ABC and WeCare prohibits the supplier from using residents' personal data. ABC has received many complaints from residents and their family members.
The Service Manager says that the complaints were investigated as an information security incident which found that they were justified.
Corrective actions have been planned and implemented according to the nonconformity and corrective action management procedure.
You write a nonconformity "ABC failed to comply with information security control A.5.34 (Privacy and protection of PII) relating to the personal data of residents' and their family members. A supplier, WeCare, used residents' personal information to send advertisements to family members." Select three options of the corrections and corrective actions listed that you would expect ABC to make in response to the nonconformity.
Answer: A,C,D
Explanation:
Explanation
The three options of the corrections and corrective actions listed that you would expect ABC to make in response to the nonconformity are:
B: ABC cancels the service agreement with WeCare.
E: ABC introduces background checks on information security performance for all suppliers.
F: ABC periodically monitors compliance with all applicable legislation and contractual requirements involving third parties.
B: This option is a possible correction and corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. A correction is the action taken to eliminate a detected nonconformity, while a corrective action is the action taken to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent its recurrence1. By cancelling the service agreement with WeCare, ABC could stop the unauthorized use of residents' personal data and protect their privacy and rights. This could also prevent further complaints and legal issues from the residents and their family members. However, this option may also have some drawbacks, such as the loss of a service provider, the need to find an alternative solution, and the potential impact on the residents' well-being.
E: This option is a possible corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. By introducing background checks on information security performance for all suppliers, ABC could ensure that they select and work with reliable and trustworthy partners who respect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information they handle. This could also help ABC to comply with information security control A.15.1.1 (Information security policy for supplier relationships), which requires the organisation to agree and document information security requirements for mitigating the risks associated with supplier access to the organisation's assets2.
F: This option is a possible corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. By periodically monitoring compliance with all applicable legislation and contractual requirements involving third parties, ABC could verify that the suppliers are fulfilling their obligations and responsibilities regarding information security. This could also help ABC to comply with information security control A.18.1.1 (Identification of applicable legislation and contractual requirements), which requires the organisation to identify, document, and keep up to date the relevant legislative, regulatory, contractual, and other requirements to which the organisation is subject3.
References:
1: ISO 27000:2018 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Overview and vocabulary, clause 3.9 and 3.10 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology
- Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A,  control A.15.1.1 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A, control A.18.1.1

NEW QUESTION # 306
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services and are reviewing the Software Code Management (SCM) system. You found a total of 10 user accounts on the SCM.
You confirm that one of the users, Scott, resigned 9-months
ago. The SCM System Administrator confirmed Scott's last check-out of the source code was found 1 month ago. He was using one of the uthorized desktops from the local network in a secure area.
You check with the user de-registration procedure which states "Managers have to make sure of deregistration of the user account and authorisation immediately from the relevant ICT system and/or equipment after resignation approval." There was no deregistration record for user Scott.
The IT Security Manager explains that Scott still comes back to the office every month after he resigned to provide support on source code maintenance. That's why his account on SCM still exists.
You would like to investigate other areas further to collect more audit evidence. Select three options that would not be valid audit trails.
Answer: D,E,H
Explanation:
Explanation
The options B, D, and G are not valid audit trails because they are not directly related to the ISMS requirements or the audit criteria. They are more relevant to the human resource management or the contractual arrangements of the organization, which are outside the scope of the ISMS audit. The other options are valid audit trails because they can provide evidence of how the organization implements and maintains the ISMS controls related to access control, secure areas, and information security aspects of business continuity management. References:
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 16, section 4.2.1
* ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clauses A.5.3, A.5.15, A.5.35, A.6.1, A.6.2, A.6.5, A.8.4, A.17.1
* ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.2.2

NEW QUESTION # 307
......
Every day we are learning new knowledge, but also constantly forgotten knowledge before, can say that we have been in a process of memory and forger, but how to make our knowledge for a long time high quality stored in our minds? This requires a good memory approach, and the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study braindumps do it well. The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor prep guide adopt diversified such as text, images, graphics memory method, have to distinguish the markup to learn information, through comparing different color font, as well as the entire logical framework architecture, let users on the premise of grasping the overall layout, better clues to the formation of targeted long-term memory, and through the cycle of practice, let the knowledge more deeply printed in my mind. The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions are so scientific and reasonable that you can easily remember everything.
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Exercise: https://www.actual4test.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_examcollection.html
P.S. Free 2026 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Actual4test: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iv0Y18way8pWKRNSINpUkpQkYV7BIvtW




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1