Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Realistic Plat-Arch-204 Valid Test Review每Pass Plat-Arch-204 First Attempt [Print This Page]
Author: samsmit142    Time: yesterday 06:29
Title: Realistic Plat-Arch-204 Valid Test Review每Pass Plat-Arch-204 First Attempt
In order to save a lot of unnecessary trouble to users, we have completed our Plat-Arch-204 study questions research and development of online learning platform, users do not need to download and install, only need your digital devices have a browser, can be done online operation of the Plat-Arch-204 test guide. This kind of learning method is very convenient for the user, especially in the time of our fast pace to get Plat-Arch-204 Certification. When using our Plat-Arch-204 training materials, all the operations of the Plat-Arch-204 learning material of can be applied perfectly.
As everybody knows, competitions appear ubiquitously in current society. In order to live a better live, people improve themselves by furthering their study, as well as increase their professional Plat-Arch-204 skills. With so many methods can boost individual competitiveness, people may be confused, which can really bring them a glamorous work or brighter future? We are here to tell you that a Plat-Arch-204 Certification definitively has everything to gain and nothing to lose for everyone. And our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions are the best choice to help you pass the Plat-Arch-204 exam and get the certification.
>> Plat-Arch-204 Valid Test Review <<
2026 100% Free Plat-Arch-204 每High Hit-Rate 100% Free Valid Test Review | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Latest Braindumps QuestionsThis Salesforce braindump study package contains Plat-Arch-204 latest questions and answers from the real Plat-Arch-204 exam. These questions and answers are verified by a team of professionals and the content of this Plat-Arch-204 braindump is taken from the real exam. Since we are 100% sure of the content we provide a Money Back Guarantee offer! We belive taht Plat-Arch-204 Braindumps can help you pass your Plat-Arch-204 exam with minimal effort.
Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q119-Q124):NEW QUESTION # 119
A company's cloud-based single page application consolidates data local to the application with data from on-premise and Third-party systems. The diagram below typifies the application's combined use of synchronous and asynchronous calls. The company wants to use the average response time of its application's user interface as a basis for certain alerts. For this purpose, the following occurs:
Log every call start and finish date and time to a central analytics data store.
Compute response time uniformly as the difference between the start and finish date and time (A to H in the diagram).

Which computation represents the end-to-end response time from the user's perspective?
Answer: C

NEW QUESTION # 120
A customer's enterprise architect has identified requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. Which recommendation should the integration architect make?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When an enterprise architect identifies complex infrastructure needs such as caching, queuing, and sophisticated event routing, it signals that a point-to-point integration architecture is insufficient. In such cases, the Integration Architect should recommend a Middleware-mediated architecture.
Middleware tools, such as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) or an iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service), are specifically designed to fulfill these complex "Quality of Service" (QoS) requirements. In a publish/subscribe scenario, the middleware acts as the central orchestrator. It can receive a single "Fire and Forget" event from a publisher (like Salesforce) and then manage the technical complexities of routing that message to multiple active subscribers.
Middleware handles infrastructure-level tasks such as message queuing for offline systems, automatic retries with exponential backoff, and error handling with alerts-capabilities that are either unavailable or difficult to scale within Salesforce natively. Performing message transformation and protocol translation (e.g., SOAP to REST) within the middleware layer also protects Salesforce's Apex CPU limits. By leveraging middleware for these concerns, the architect ensures that Salesforce remains a performant engagement layer while the middleware provides the robust technical backbone for a resilient enterprise landscape.

NEW QUESTION # 121
A customer is evaluating the Platform Events solution and would like help in comparing/contrasting it with Outbound Messaging for real-time/near-real time needs. They expect 3,000 customers to view messages in Salesforce. What should be evaluated and highlighted when deciding between the solutions?12
Answer: C
Explanation:
When comparing Platform Events and Outbound Messaging for a near-real-time architecture, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must evaluate fundamental differences in their delivery models and governance. While both provide declarative, asynchronous "Fire-and-Forget" capabilities, their technical constraints differ significantly, particularly regarding scalability and platform limits.
The key architectural highlight in this scenario is that Platform Events operate on a specialized event bus with specific Event Publishing and Event Delivery limits. Unlike Outbound Messaging, which is governed by more general daily outbound call limits (often tied to user licenses), Platform Events have a dedicated allocation for the number of events that can be published per hour and delivered in a 24-hour period to external clients via the Pub/Sub API or CometD. For example, the number of concurrent subscribers to a Platform Event channel is typically capped at 2,000 for standard configurations. Since the customer expects 3,000 customers to view these messages, this limit is a critical evaluation point; the architecture would need to account for this gap, perhaps by using middleware to fan out messages to the larger audience.
In contrast, Outbound Messaging does not have an "Event Delivery" limit in the same sense. It is a point-to-point SOAP-based push mechanism where Salesforce manages retries for up to 24 hours if the receiving endpoint is unavailable. However, it is less flexible for multi-consumer scenarios because it requires a separate configuration for every unique destination.
Regarding the other options: Option A is incorrect because neither system strictly guarantees "exactly-once" delivery without the possibility of duplicates; in fact, Outbound Messaging may deliver a message more than once if it doesn't receive a timely acknowledgment. Option B is incorrect because Platform Events do not have built-in "fault recovery" handled by Salesforce in the same way as Outbound Messaging's automatic retry queue; with Platform Events, it is the subscriber's responsibility to use a Replay ID to retrieve missed events within the 72-hour retention window. Therefore, highlighting the unique delivery and publishing limits is the most vital step for the architect.

NEW QUESTION # 122
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to make synchronous callouts "available-to-promise" services to query product availability and reserve inventory during the customer checkout process. What should an integration architect consider when building a scalable integration solution?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In a Synchronous Request-Reply pattern, the user's experience is directly tied to the performance of the external service. For a mission-critical "Available-to-Promise" (ATP) service during checkout, the most vital scalability consideration is the typical and worst-case historical response times of the target system.
Salesforce imposes strict Governor Limits on synchronous callouts to protect platform health. Specifically, if an ATP callout takes longer than 120 seconds, the transaction will time out. More importantly, Salesforce limits the number of long-running requests (those lasting longer than 5 seconds). If multiple users are checking out simultaneously and the external inventory system begins to respond slowly (worst-case), those requests can quickly occupy all available slots in the concurrent request queue, leading to "Concurrent Request Limit Exceeded" errors for all users in the org.
By analyzing historical response times, the architect can determine if the service is reliable enough for a synchronous callout. If the worst-case response time frequently exceeds 5 seconds, the architect should consider a more resilient pattern, such as the Continuation pattern or an asynchronous approach, to prevent blocking the UI thread and hitting platform limits. Options A and C are irrelevant to synchronous checkout performance; query cursors relate to database state, and batch jobs are asynchronous background processes that do not impact real-time user checkout latency.

NEW QUESTION # 123
Northern Trail Outfitters is creating a distributable Salesforce package. The package needs to call into a Custom Apex REST endpoint in the central org. The security team wants to ensure a specific integration account is used in the central org that they will authorize after installation. Which item should an architect recommend?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When building a distributable package (likely a Managed Package) that must securely communicate back to a central "Hub" org, the architect must use a framework that supports OAuth 2.0 flows. Storing plain-text or even encrypted passwords (Option B) is a security violation and is brittle across different environments.
The architecturally sound solution is to leverage the Authentication Provider and Named Credentials framework. In the central org, a Connected App is created to act as the OAuth endpoint. In the package, an Authentication Provider is configured using the Consumer Key and Consumer Secret from that Connected App. This setup allows the administrator in the "Subscriber" org (the org where the package is installed) to initiate an OAuth flow.
When the security team "authorizes" the integration after installation, they are essentially completing the OAuth handshake. This grants the subscriber org an Access Token and a Refresh Token associated with the specific integration user in the central org. This mechanism ensures:
Credential Security: No passwords are ever stored in the code or metadata.
Centralized Control: The security team in the central org can revoke the Refresh Token at any time to kill the integration.
Scalability: The same package can be distributed to hundreds of orgs, each with its own unique, secure connection to the central Hub.
By using an Authentication Provider combined with a Named Credential, the Apex code in the package can simply call the endpoint by its developer name, and Salesforce handles the entire authentication header injection automatically, ensuring a robust and secure cross-org integration.

NEW QUESTION # 124
......
The meaning of qualifying examinations is, in some ways, to prove the candidate's ability to obtain qualifications that show your ability in various fields of expertise. If you choose our Plat-Arch-204 learning guide materials, you can create more unlimited value in the limited study time, learn more knowledge, and take the Plat-Arch-204 Exam that you can take. Through qualifying examinations, this is our Plat-Arch-204 real questions and the common goal of every user, we are trustworthy helpers. The acquisition of Plat-Arch-204 qualification certificates can better meet the needs of users' career development.
Plat-Arch-204 Latest Braindumps Questions: https://www.pdfvce.com/Salesforce/Plat-Arch-204-exam-pdf-dumps.html
Once the update of Plat-Arch-204 exam dump releases, we will inform you the first time, On the one hand, our Plat-Arch-204 learning questions engage our working staff in understanding customers' diverse and evolving expectations and incorporate that understanding into our strategies, thus you can 100% trust our Plat-Arch-204 exam engine, But there are still lots of people struggling to attend the Plat-Arch-204 exam, because everyone attempts to get a better life and enjoy the happiness of high salary.
Top WordPress expert John LeMasney takes you under the hood with WordPress, Valid Plat-Arch-204 Exam Cost giving you the strong technical understanding you need to make themes, plugins, and methods work exactly the way you want.
Free Download Plat-Arch-204 Valid Test Review - Trustable Plat-Arch-204 Exam Tool Guarantee Purchasing SafetyAnonymous types can be used to initialize simple types like integers and strings but detract modestly from clarity and add little value, Once the update of Plat-Arch-204 Exam Dump releases, we will inform you the first time.
On the one hand, our Plat-Arch-204 learning questions engage our working staff in understanding customers' diverse and evolving expectations and incorporate that understanding into our strategies, thus you can 100% trust our Plat-Arch-204 exam engine.
But there are still lots of people struggling to attend the Plat-Arch-204 exam, because everyone attempts to get a better life and enjoy the happiness of high salary.
Plat-Arch-204 study material has the most authoritative test counseling platform, and each topic in Plat-Arch-204 study materials is carefully written by experts who are engaged Plat-Arch-204 Reliable Braindumps Ppt in researching in the field of professional qualification exams all the year round.
Fortunately, PDFVCE provides Plat-Arch-204 you with the most reliable practice exams to master it.




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1