Firefly Open Source Community

Title: Cert F5CAB3 Exam & Study F5CAB3 Plan [Print This Page]
Author: jamesbr116    Time: yesterday 18:17
Title: Cert F5CAB3 Exam & Study F5CAB3 Plan
Our F5CAB3 exam guide is suitable for everyone whether you are a business man or a student, because you just need 20-30 hours to practice it that you can attend to your exam. There is no doubt that you can get a great grade. If you follow our learning pace, you will get unexpected surprises. Only when you choose our F5CAB3 Guide Torrent will you find it easier to pass this significant F5CAB3 examination and have a sense of brand new experience of preparing the F5CAB3 exam.
F5 F5CAB3 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Apply procedural concepts required to modify and manage pools: This domain addresses managing server pools including health monitors, load balancing methods, priority groups, and service port configurations.
Topic 2
  • Apply procedural concepts required to modify and manage virtual servers: This domain covers managing virtual servers including applying persistence, encryption, and protocol profiles, identifying iApp objects, reporting iRules, and showing pool configurations.

>> Cert F5CAB3 Exam <<
BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration Actual Exam & F5CAB3 Practice Vce & BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration Updated TorrentPerhaps it was because of the work that there was not enough time to learn, or because the lack of the right method of learning led to a lot of time still failing to pass the F5CAB3 examination. Whether you are the first or the second or even more taking F5 examination, our F5CAB3 Exam Prep not only can help you to save much time and energy but also can help you pass the exam. In the other words, passing the exam once will no longer be a dream.
F5 BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration Sample Questions (Q63-Q68):NEW QUESTION # 63
A BIG-IP Administrator creates a new Virtual Server. The end user is unable to access the page. During troubleshooting, the administrator learns that the connection between the BIG-IP system and server is NOT set up correctly. What should the administrator do to solve this issue? (Choose one answer)
Answer: A
Explanation:
The issue described is a classic symptom of asymmetric routing, which frequently occurs when the BIG-IP system and the back-end servers reside on the same subnet (often referred to as a "one-arm" deployment).
* The Routing Problem: By default, the BIG-IP system preserves the original client source IP address when forwarding traffic to a pool member. If the server is in the same subnet as the client or if the server's default gateway is not the BIG-IP, the server will attempt to send its response directly back to the client's IP address, bypassing the BIG-IP.
* Stateful Failure: Since the BIG-IP is a Full Proxy, it maintains a state table. Because the response packet never returns through the BIG-IP, the system cannot complete the three-way handshake or manage the application session, resulting in a connection failure for the user.
* The Solution (SNAT): Enabling Source Network Address Translation (SNAT) solves this by changing the source IP address of the request to an IP address owned by the BIG-IP (typically a self-IP).
* Requirement for Subnet Alignment: To ensure the server sends the response back to the BIG-IP, the translation address must be reachable. By using a self-IP configured in the same subnet as the servers, the BIG-IP ensures that the server sees the request coming from a local "neighbor." The server will then naturally send the response back to that self-IP, allowing the BIG-IP to translate the packet back and forward it to the client.
Why other options are incorrect:
* A: Disabling address translation would ensure the server-side traffic uses the client IP, making asymmetric routing inevitable in this scenario.
* B: This is technically contradictory; "Auto Map" specifically uses existing self-IPs and does not require or use a "SNAT pool" configuration.
* C: While using a specific translation address can work, it does not inherently guarantee the Layer 2
/Layer 3 reachability mentioned in the scenario as effectively as ensuring the self-IP is correctly placed in the server's subnet.

NEW QUESTION # 64
In a pool there are 2 pool members (older servers) that can handle fewer connections than the other 3 newer servers.
Which load balancing method would allow more traffic to be directed to the newer servers? (Choose one answer)
Answer: D
Explanation:
This scenario requires unequal load distribution based on server capacity. The newer servers must receive more connections than the older ones, while still dynamically accounting for active connection counts.
According to BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:
* Weighted Least Connections (member) combines:
* Connection awareness (least connections)
* Administrator-defined weights (ratios) to reflect server capacity
* Pool members with higher weights receive proportionally more new connections than members with lower weights, even when using the same load balancing algorithm.
Why B is correct:
* Allows assigning higher weights to newer servers and lower weights to older servers
* Ensures smarter traffic distribution based on both capacity and real-time load Why the other options are incorrect:
* A. Global AvailabilityUsed for disaster recovery and site failover, not intra-pool load distribution.
* C. Round RobinDistributes connections evenly without considering server capacity.
* D. Least Connections (member)Balances only by current connection count and does not account for differences in server performance or capacity.
Correct Resolution:
Use Weighted Least Connections (member) and assign higher weights to newer servers so they receive more traffic while protecting older servers from overload.

NEW QUESTION # 65
A Standard Virtual Server for a web application is configured with SNAT Automap. The original client IP must be known by backend servers.
What should the BIG-IP Administrator configure?
Answer: C
Explanation:
X-Forwarded-For inserts the original client IP into HTTP headers while SNAT is enabled.

NEW QUESTION # 66
Which persistence profile would be the most appropriate to ensure an HTTP web request connects to the same pool member? (Choose one answer)
Answer: B
Explanation:
For HTTP-based applications, cookie persistence is the most appropriate and commonly recommended persistence method.
According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:
Cookie persistence inserts or uses an HTTP cookie to maintain session affinity.
It operates at Layer 7 (HTTP) and is application-aware.
It allows persistence to be maintained even when multiple clients are behind a NAT device.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A). Destination addressDestination address persistence is generally used for inbound traffic patterns such as firewall or proxy scenarios.
B). Hash persistenceHash persistence is less granular and not HTTP-specific.
C). SSL persistenceSSL persistence is typically used when SSL session IDs are reused and is less reliable than cookies for HTTP applications.
Correct Resolution:
Using cookie persistence ensures that HTTP web requests are consistently directed to the same pool member.

NEW QUESTION # 67
A BIG-IP Administrator creates an HTTP Virtual Server using an iApp template. After the Virtual Server is created, the user requests to change the destination IP addresses. The BIG-IP Administrator tries to change the destination IP address from 10.1.1.1 to 10.2.1.1 in Virtual Server settings, but receives the following error:
"The application service must be updated using an application management interface." What is causing this error?
Answer: D
Explanation:
In F5 BIG-IP administration, iApps are designed to manage complex application configurations as a single unit. When an iApp is deployed, it creates an "Application Service" object that owns all the associated LTM objects, such as Virtual Servers, Pools, and Nodes. By default, these iApps are created with Strict Updates enabled. Strict Updates is a safety mechanism that prevents administrators from making manual "out-of-band" changes to the individual objects created by the iApp. The system enforces this because manual changes would be overwritten the next time the iApp template is updated or re-entered.
When the administrator attempts to change the destination IP address directly on the Virtual Server object, the BIG-IP system checks the "Strict Updates" flag. If it is set to "Enabled," the system blocks the modification and generates the error message stating the service must be updated via the application management interface.
To resolve this, the administrator must navigate to the iApp >> Application Services menu, select the specific application service, and go to the "Reconfigure" tab. Within the iApp configuration form, the destination IP can be safely changed. Alternatively, if the administrator specifically wants to manage the objects manually and forgo the benefits of the iApp template management, they could disable "Strict Updates" in the iApp properties, though this is generally discouraged as it breaks the template's logic. The error is not related to subnetting or duplicate IPs, but strictly to the configuration authority assigned to the iApp service.

NEW QUESTION # 68
......
How to improve your IT ability and increase professional IT knowledge of F5CAB3 real exam in a short time? Obtaining valid training materials will accelerate the way of passing F5CAB3 actual test in your first attempt. It will just need to take one or two days to practice F5 F5CAB3 Test Questions and remember answers. You will free access to our test engine for review after payment.
Study F5CAB3 Plan: https://www.testsimulate.com/F5CAB3-study-materials.html




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1