Project-Planning-Design考試資料，Project-Planning-Design題庫更新NCARB的Project-Planning-Design考試認證肯定會導致你有更好的職業前景，通過NCARB的Project-Planning-Design考試認證不僅驗證你的技能，也證明你的證書和專業知識，KaoGuTi NCARB的Project-Planning-Design考試培訓資料是實踐檢驗的軟體，有了它你會得到的理解理論比以前任何時候都要好，將是和你最配備知識。在你決定購買之前，你可以嘗試一個免費的使用版本，這樣一來你就知道KaoGuTi NCARB的Project-Planning-Design考試培訓資料的品質，也是你最佳的選擇。 最新的 Architect Registration Examination Project-Planning-Design 免費考試真題 (Q74-Q79):問題 #74
When considering the IBC requirements, an architect can increase the number of options from which to select structural materials for an office building by doing which one of the following?
A. Increasing the efficiency ratio
B. Omitting 2-hour fire ratings
C. Increasing the occupant capacity
D. Limiting the area of the building
答案：D
解題說明：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Limiting the building area within allowable maximums based on occupancy and type increases the range of acceptable structural materials because larger buildings have stricter fire and structural requirements.
Increasing occupant capacity (A) increases code stringency.
Increasing efficiency ratio (B) is not an IBC classification.
Omitting 2-hour fire ratings (D) is not permitted and would reduce material options.
Thus, reducing building area allows more flexibility in structural material choices under IBC.
References:
ARE 5.0 PPD - Codes and Regulations, Building Materials and Fire Ratings The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition - Building Codes
問題 #75
A site has been engineered with a 1:20 grade.
Which of the following sidewalk designs would be the most cost-effective way to get from the top to the bottom and still be in compliance with the accessibility standards?
A. Cutting diagonally across the slope at 1:12 with no handrail
B. Switchback ramps at 1:12 with a handrail
C. At the same grade as the slope with no handrail
D. Cutting diagonally across the slope at 1:10 with a handrail
答案：A
解題說明：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
A 1:20 slope means a 5% grade (1 vertical unit per 20 horizontal units), which is slightly steeper than the ideal maximum slope for accessible ramps.
* Option C: Cutting diagonally across the slope at 1:12 (~8.33%) slope without a handrail is the most cost-effective design that still complies with accessibility standards. According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ICC A117.1, the maximum slope for an accessible ramp is 1:12. Handrails are required on ramps with a rise greater than 6 inches (150 mm). If the rise is less than 6 inches, handrails are not required.
Because the diagonal cut reduces the slope to 1:12 and the total rise is likely less than 6 inches given the gentle 1:20 original slope, handrails are not mandatory, making this solution economical and code compliant.
* Option A: Switchback ramps at 1:12 with handrails are compliant but more expensive due to increased construction complexity and space requirements.
* Option B: A 1:10 slope (10%) exceeds the maximum allowed slope for accessible ramps and requires handrails, thus non-compliant.
* Option D: Following the existing 1:20 slope without modification does not provide the maximum accessibility slope and may be acceptable but might not comply with certain stricter local codes for ramps.
Therefore, Option C balances accessibility, cost, and compliance optimally.
References:
ARE 5.0 Project Planning & Design Content Outline: Environmental Conditions and Context - Site Accessibility and Grading ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010) ICC A117.1 Accessibility Standards The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition, Chapter 7: Site Planning and Accessibility
問題 #76
An architect is working with a developer to determine which of three available sites should be the preferred location for a new office building that will primarily utilize passive energy systems. All three sites are located in a cold, northern climate with winter winds predominantly from the north and west.
Site descriptions:
Site A: Located at the top of a hill; small vegetation and brush; expansive views in all directions.
Site B: Located along a river; heavily wooded area on the north side; coniferous trees shading the southern face of the building.
Site C: Located on a rocky, south-facing slope; wooded on the eastern edge; native grasses on southern boundary.
Primary goal: maximize solar energy potential while maintaining winter wind protection.
Which site should be selected?
A. Site B
B. Site A
C. Site C
答案：C
解題說明：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Site C offers a south-facing slope, which maximizes solar exposure-crucial in cold climates for passive solar heating. The wooded eastern edge provides wind protection from cold morning winds, and native grasses on the south reduce erosion while minimally shading.
Site A, on a hilltop with sparse vegetation, lacks wind protection.
Site B has coniferous trees shading the southern face, reducing solar gain, which is counterproductive for passive solar design.
Thus, Site C optimizes both solar potential and wind protection.
References:
ARE 5.0 PPD - Environmental Conditions and Context, Passive Solar Design The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition - Sustainable Site Planning
問題 #77
Refer to the exhibit (stair connecting four stories, occupant load 100, not accessible exit).
Not including the permitted projection for handrails and stringers, what is the minimum clear width of the stair at dimension X?
A. 48 inches
B. 60 inches
C. 36 inches
D. 44 inches
答案：D
解題說明：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
For stairs serving 100 occupants, building codes such as IBC require a minimum clear width of 44 inches to accommodate occupant egress.
36 inches is typical minimum for stairs serving smaller occupant loads.
Wider widths like 48 or 60 inches are required for higher occupant loads.
Handrails and projections may reduce nominal width but are not included in minimum clear width measurements.
References:
ARE 5.0 PPD - Codes and Regulations, Egress Requirements
IBC 2018 Chapter 10 - Means of Egress
問題 #78
An architect has just received client approval of the Schematic Design documents for a three-story, outpatient medical clinic. The clinic is located within a mixed-use development governed by a City-approved Planned Development (PD) document. The medical clinic design utilizes standardized departmental layouts and includes outpatient clinics, as well as treatment spaces, administrative spaces and public/lobby spaces.
The site needs to accommodate four different vehicular traffic flows: patient traffic, staff traffic, service and delivery traffic, and emergency services traffic. In addition, a pedestrian plaza must connect to the mixed-use development sidewalks. The plaza must provide space for bicycle parking and will serve as the future bus stop.
The site design addresses several challenges related to building orientation. The southeast facade, with excellent visibility from the highway, is the location of all service equipment. The building entrance faces northwest, convenient to the parking but not visible from the highway.
The client believes future patient volumes will outgrow the clinic. The PD document allows for a planned Phase 2 development on the adjacent vacant site to the southwest. Phase 2 would include a second building (2 story, 80,000 BGSF) and/or a parking deck.
Other considerations for the project include:
* Protected tree requirements are defined in the PD document.
* Easy pedestrian access must be provided from Sycamore Boulevard.
* All required parking for the clinic must be accommodated on site.
* Programmed area includes 109,450 Departmental Gross Square Feet (DGSF) / 130,184 Building Gross Square Feet (BGSF).
* Exterior material percentages are dictated by the PD document and shall not exceed specific percentages for Primary and Secondary Finishes.
* All service equipment needs to be screened; see PD document for restrictions.
* Signage opportunities are important to the client.
* Acoustical privacy is a concern of the healthcare system.
The following resources are available for your reference:
* Drawings, including a perspective, plans, and exterior elevations
* Building Program, including client's departmental program and detailed program for Treatment 01 (Infusion)
* Exterior Material Cost Comparisons
* Planned Development Document
* IBC Excerpts, showing relevant code sections
* ADA Excerpts, showing relevant sections from the ADA Standards for Accessible Design The developer decides that the 4-inch terra cotta exterior veneer is too expensive, and wants to replace the terra cotta with an alternative finish in its entirety.
Which of the following alternative materials should the architect suggest to reduce cost and meet the Planned Development Document requirements? Check the two that apply.
A. Cultured Stone
B. Standard Brick
C. Low Priced Stone
D. Artisan Brick
E. Earth Tone EIFS
F. Metal Panels (Fluoropolymer finish)
答案：B,E
解題說明：
To reduce costs while complying with Planned Development (PD) document restrictions on exterior finishes, the architect should select materials that are less expensive than terra cotta yet meet aesthetic and code requirements:
Standard brick (C) is a cost-effective, durable alternative with broad acceptance.
Earth tone EIFS (E) (Exterior Insulation and Finish System) offers an economical and versatile finish that can replicate various textures and colors while reducing costs.
Low priced stone (A) and cultured stone (B) may still be costly or not permitted per PD document.
Artisan brick (D) and metal panels (F) may exceed allowed percentages or not fit aesthetic guidelines.
References:
Planned Development Document
ARE 5.0 PPD - Project Integration of Program and Systems
The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition - Exterior Finishes
