Firefly Open Source Community

Title: PT-AM-CPE Reliable Braindumps Sheet, PT-AM-CPE Trustworthy Exam Content [Print This Page]
Author: simonta659    Time: yesterday 18:36
Title: PT-AM-CPE Reliable Braindumps Sheet, PT-AM-CPE Trustworthy Exam Content
We provide you the free download and tryout of our PT-AM-CPE study tool before your purchase our product and we provide the demo of the product to let the client know our product fully. We provide free update to the client within one year and after one year the client can enjoy 50% discount. If clients are old client, they can enjoy some certain discount. Our experts update the Certified Professional - PingAM Exam guide torrent each day and provide the latest update to the client. We provide discounts to the client and make them spend less money. If you are the old client you can enjoy the special discounts thus you can save money. So it is very worthy for you to buy our PT-AM-CPE Test Torrent.
Ping Identity PT-AM-CPE Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Federating Across Entities Using SAML2: This domain covers implementing single sign-on using SAML v2.0 and delegating authentication responsibilities between SAML2 entities.
Topic 2
  • Extending Services Using OAuth2-Based Protocols: This domain addresses integrating applications with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, securing OAuth2 clients with mutual TLS and proof-of-possession, transforming OAuth2 tokens, and implementing social authentication.
Topic 3
  • Installing and Deploying AM: This domain encompasses installing and upgrading PingAM, hardening security configurations, setting up clustered environments, and deploying PingOne Advanced Identity Platform to the cloud.
Topic 4
  • Improving Access Management Security: This domain focuses on strengthening authentication security, implementing context-aware authentication experiences, and establishing continuous risk monitoring throughout user sessions.
Topic 5
  • Enhancing Intelligent Access: This domain covers implementing authentication mechanisms, using PingGateway to protect websites, and establishing access control policies for resources.

>> PT-AM-CPE Reliable Braindumps Sheet <<
PT-AM-CPE Reliable Braindumps Sheet Exam | PT-AM-CPE Trustworthy Exam Content ¨C 100% freeItbraindumps is an experienced website with great reputation which offering Ping Identity dumps torrent and professional explanations. Our PT-AM-CPE test questions are created by our IT elites who pay great attention to the IT exam certification so we can ensure you the authority and reliability of our PT-AM-CPE Practice Test.
Ping Identity Certified Professional - PingAM Exam Sample Questions (Q100-Q105):NEW QUESTION # 100
Consider the following LDAP connection string:
DS1.example.com:389|01, DS2.example.com:389|01, DS2.example.com:389|02, DS1.example.com:389|02 This connection string can be used in:
A . Identity Store
B . Core Token Service
C . Configuration Data Store
Which of the above options are correct?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The connection string format HOSTORT|SERVERID|SITEID is a specific syntax used in PingAM 8.0.2 for Affinity Load Balancing, a feature almost exclusively associated with the Core Token Service (CTS). In high-volume deployments, the CTS handles thousands of session updates per second. To avoid replication lag issues-where an AM server might try to read a session token from a directory server (DS) before the update has replicated from another DS node-PingAM uses "Affinity."16 According to the "CtsDataStoreProperties" and "CTS Deployment Architectures" documentation, this specialized string allows the AM instance to prioritize connections based on the Server ID and Site ID.17 The pipe (|) characters signify the optional affinity parameters:
01/02: These represent the Server IDs of the underlying Directory Servers.
Affinity Logic: By providing these IDs, PingAM can ensure that it always routes requests for the same CTS token to the same directory server node.18 While standard Identity Stores (Option A) and the Configuration Data Store (Option C) use LDAP connection strings, they typically utilize a comma-separated list of host:port pairs or rely on a hardware load balancer. The specific use of server and site IDs within the connection string itself to manage LDAP request routing is a hallmark of the CTS affinity configuration.19 The documentation explicitly states that "Each connection string is composed as follows: HOSTORT[|SERVERID[|SITEID]]" within the context of CTS external store configuration.20 Therefore, this complex string is specifically designed for the Core Token Service to ensure data consistency and high performance in clustered environments.

NEW QUESTION # 101
What are the possible outcomes of the Push Result Verifier node?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The Push Result Verifier node is a core component of the "MFA: Push Authentication" journey in PingAM 8.0.2. Its primary function is to check the status of a push notification that was previously dispatched to a user's mobile device (usually via the Push Sender node).22 According to the "Authentication Node Reference" for version 8.0.2, the node evaluates the state of the push request and yields exactly four distinct outcomes:
Success: This path is followed if the user has actively approved the push notification on their registered device using the ForgeRock/Ping Authenticator app.
Failure: This path is taken if the user explicitly denies or rejects the push notification on their device, indicating a potential unauthorized login attempt.
Expired: This outcome occurs if the notification reaches its "Message Timeout" limit (defined in the Push Sender node) without any response from the user.23 In standard trees, this path often loops back to allow the user to try a different MFA method or resend the push.
Waiting: This outcome is triggered if a response has not yet been received but the timeout has not yet been reached. This is used in conjunction with a Push Wait or Polling mechanism to create a "check-and-loop" logic until a final result (Success, Failure, or Expired) is determined.
The Retry outcome (mentioned in other options) is notably absent from this specific node's metadata. While a "Retry" might be implemented in the overall tree logic (for example, by using a Retry Limit Decision node after an Expired outcome), the Push Result Verifier node itself only reports the state of the specific push transaction it is tracking. Understanding these four discrete states is vital for designing resilient authentication journeys that handle user delays or network issues gracefully.

NEW QUESTION # 102
What is a SAML2 artifact?
Answer: D
Explanation:
In SAML 2.0, an Artifact is a reference (a "pointer" or "ticket") used in the SAML Artifact Binding.5 This is an alternative to the more common POST or Redirect bindings where the actual XML assertion is sent through the user's browser.
According to the PingAM "SAML 2.0 Bindings" documentation:
When using the Artifact binding, the Identity Provider (IdP) does not send the full SAML Assertion through the browser.6 Instead, it sends a small, opaque string called the Artifact to the Service Provider (SP).
Issuance: The IdP stores the real assertion in its own local memory/cache and sends the Artifact to the SP via the browser redirect.
Resolution: The Service Provider receives the Artifact and then makes a direct, secure back-channel call (SOAP over HTTPS) to the IdP's Artifact Resolution Endpoint.
Exchange: The SP presents the Artifact, and the IdP returns the actual SAML Assertion.
Therefore, the Artifact is the value sent to retrieve the assertion (Option D). It is not the assertion itself (Option A), nor is it a binding name or an attribute name. The Artifact binding is often used for security reasons, as it prevents the sensitive assertion data from ever passing through the user's browser, thus mitigating certain types of interception attacks.

NEW QUESTION # 103
What should be configured in PingAM if you are using an LDAP directory service that does not support persistent search?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Persistent Search is an LDAP control that allows a client (like PingAM) to receive real-time notifications from the Directory Server (like PingDS) whenever a user record is modified. PingAM 8.0.2 uses this to maintain its User Data Cache.
According to the "Identity Store Configuration" and "Tuning AM" documentation:
When persistent search is supported, PingAM caches user profile data in memory to speed up authentication and authorization decisions. When a change happens in the LDAP store, the directory server "pushes" the update to AM via the persistent search connection, and AM updates its cache immediately.
If the LDAP directory does not support persistent search (common in some legacy or highly restricted environments):
Cache Inconsistency: If caching were enabled, PingAM would not know when a user's attribute (like a group membership) had changed in the back-end. The cache would become "stale," leading to incorrect authorization decisions.
Required Configuration: The administrator must Disable user data caching to ensure that every request results in a direct query to the LDAP server, ensuring "Read-through" accuracy.
Performance Impact: Disabling the cache has a negative impact on performance (Option D) because every policy evaluation or session check now requires a synchronous network round-trip to the LDAP server, increasing latency and putting higher CPU/IO load on the directory.
Therefore, for directories lacking persistent search, disabling the cache is necessary for data integrity but comes at a significant performance cost.

NEW QUESTION # 104
When a user undergoes a session upgrade, what is the outcome?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Session Upgrade in PingAM 8.0.2 is the mechanism by which a user's current authenticated session is "elevated" to a higher authentication level (Auth Level). This is commonly triggered by Step-up Authentication requirements, where a user attempts to access a highly sensitive resource that requires a stronger authentication method (such as MFA) than what was used for their initial login.
According to the PingAM documentation on "Session Upgrade Outcomes," the process is not merely a modification of the existing session. Instead, when a user successfully completes the additional authentication requirements (the "Advice"):
Creation of a New Session: PingAM generates a brand-new authenticated session. This new session is assigned a higher authentication level corresponding to the tree or module just completed.
Property Copying: To ensure a seamless user experience, PingAM copies the session properties (attributes, constants, and other metadata) from the original lower-level session into the new higher-level session. This ensures that information gathered during the initial login remains available to applications.
Token Replacement: Because the session ID is part of the session token (SSO Token), a new session implies a new token. PingAM hands the client a new session token to replace the original one. The client (browser or application) must then use this new token for subsequent requests.
If the realm is configured for server-side sessions, the new session is stored in the Core Token Service (CTS). If configured for client-side sessions, a new signed/encrypted JWT is sent to the client as a cookie. The key distinction is that the token changes, and properties are preserved through copying, which distinguishes Option B as the correct technical description of the internal AM lifecycle.

NEW QUESTION # 105
......
As we all know, the PT-AM-CPE certificate has a very high reputation in the global market and has a great influence. But how to get the certificate has become a headache for many people. Our PT-AM-CPElearning materials provide you with an opportunity. Once you choose our PT-AM-CPE Exam Practice, we will do our best to provide you with a full range of thoughtful services. Whenever you have questions about our PT-AM-CPE study guide, our service will give you the most professional advice.
PT-AM-CPE Trustworthy Exam Content: https://www.itbraindumps.com/PT-AM-CPE_exam.html




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1