Firefly Open Source Community

Title: 効果的なSD-WAN-Engineer復習対策試験-試験の準備方法-最新のSD-WAN-Engineer最新関連参考書 [Print This Page]
Author: alanhil616    Time: 2 hour before
Title: 効果的なSD-WAN-Engineer復習対策試験-試験の準備方法-最新のSD-WAN-Engineer最新関連参考書
BONUS！！！ JPNTest SD-WAN-Engineerダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Vo2zhlhH0a-kki1V4TNE7gXco7C0e4k8
JPNTestは、非常に信頼性の高いSD-WAN-Engineer実際の質問の回答を提供しています。 主な利点は次のとおりです。1.直接情報を取得します。 2. 1年間の無料アップデートを提供します。 3. 1年間のカスタマーサービスを提供します。 4.パス保証; 5.返金保証など。 SD-WAN-Engineerの実際の質問の回答を購入すると、安心してショッピングをお楽しみいただけます。 試験問題で試験に失敗した場合は、スキャンしたSD-WAN-Engineer失敗スコアをメールアドレスに送信するだけで、他の疑いもなくすぐに全額返金されます。
Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • 計画と設計: このドメインでは、デバイスの選択、帯域幅とライセンスの計画、ネットワーク評価、データセンターとブランチの構成、セキュリティ要件、高可用性、パス、セキュリティ、QoS、パフォーマンス、NAT のポリシー設計など、SD-WAN 計画の基礎をカバーします。
トピック 2
  • 統合 SASE: このドメインでは、Prisma Access との Prisma SD-WAN 統合、ADEM 構成、デバイス ID による IoT 接続、Cloud Identity Engine 統合、およびユーザー
  • グループベースのポリシー実装について説明します。
トピック 3
  • トラブルシューティング: このドメインでは、ネットワークの最適化とレポートのためのコパイロット データ分析と分析を使用して、接続、ルーティング、転送、アプリケーション パフォーマンス、およびポリシーの問題の解決に重点を置いています。
トピック 4
  • 展開と構成: このドメインでは、Prisma SD-WAN の展開手順、サイト固有の設定、さまざまな場所の構成テンプレート、ルーティング プロトコルの調整、およびネットワーク セグメンテーションのための VRF 実装に焦点を当てています。
トピック 5
  • 運用と監視: このドメインでは、デバイスの統計、コントローラー イベント、アラート、WAN Clarity レポート、リアルタイム ネットワーク可視性ツール、および SASE 関連のイベント管理の監視を扱います。

>> SD-WAN-Engineer復習対策 <<
Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer復習対策: Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN Engineer - JPNTest 試験を簡単に準備できますSD-WAN-Engineer模擬試験を購入すると、当社のウェブサイトはプロの技術を使用してすべてのユーザーのプライバシーを暗号化し、ハッカーの盗用を防ぎます。私たちは、ビジネスがお客様のために十分に考慮された場合にのみ継続できると考えているため、当社の評判を損なうような行為は一切行いません。 SD-WAN-Engineer試験問題に完全な信頼を寄せていただければ幸いです。失望することはありません。
Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN Engineer 認定 SD-WAN-Engineer 試験問題 (Q37-Q42):質問 # 37
In a Prisma SD-WAN deployment, what is the defining characteristic of a "Standard VPN" compared to a "Secure Fabric Link"?
正解：C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
In the Prisma SD-WAN architecture, the terminology distinguishes between "Native" automation and "Legacy" interoperability.
Secure Fabric Links: These are the proprietary, automated overlay tunnels created between two Prisma SD-WAN ION devices (e.g., Branch ION to Data Center ION). The controller automatically manages the IP addressing, key rotation, and routing for these links. You do not manually configure "Phase 1" or "Phase 2" parameters for Secure Fabric links.
Standard VPNs: These are traditional, standards-based IPSec tunnels configured to connect an ION device to a Non-ION endpoint (Third-Party Peer). This is used for "Data Center to Data Center" connections where one side is a legacy firewall (e.g., Cisco ASA, Palo Alto Networks NGFW) or for connecting to cloud security services (SSE) that do not have a specific CloudBlade integration. For a Standard VPN, the administrator must manually define the IKE/IPSec profiles, pre-shared keys, and peer IP addresses to match the third-party device's configuration.

質問 # 38
When deploying a branch gateway, secure fabric VPN tunnels are automatically established between which two site types? (Choose two.)
正解：A、D
解説：
In the Prisma SD-WAN (Instant-On Network) architecture, the "Secure Fabric" is a key feature that simplifies VPN orchestration through automation. When an ION device is deployed at a site and associated with a specific role, the Prisma SD-WAN Controller automatically manages the establishment of encrypted VPN tunnels without requiring manual IPsec configuration.
The most fundamental tunnel type is Branch gateway to data center (Option B). By default, the system follows a hub-and-spoke model where every branch ION device automatically attempts to build secure tunnels to all available Data Center clusters within its domain. This ensures that branch locations have immediate, redundant connectivity to centralized corporate resources and applications as soon as they are brought online.
Additionally, Prisma SD-WAN supports automated Branch gateway to branch gateway connectivity (Option C). Unlike traditional architectures that backhaul all traffic through a central hub, the Prisma SD- WAN fabric can dynamically establish "spoke-to-spoke" tunnels between branch gateways to facilitate direct communication. This is particularly useful for latency-sensitive applications like Voice over IP (VoIP) or video conferencing. While this can be configured as a "full mesh" where all sites build tunnels to all other sites, the controller intelligently manages these connections based on the defined site roles and domain configurations to optimize resource usage and performance. Options A and D are incorrect because the fabric orchestration logic is primarily focused on the functional roles of the gateways (Branch vs. Data Center) rather than "domains" in the context of tunnel initiation.

質問 # 39
Which configuration requirement must be met to allow two branch ION devices to automatically establish a direct Dynamic VPN (branch-to-branch) connection for traffic flow, bypassing the Data Center?
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
Dynamic VPNs (also known as ION-to-ION or Branch-to-Branch VPNs) allow Prisma SD-WAN devices to establish direct, on-demand secure tunnels between branch sites to optimize latency for peer-to-peer traffic (e.
g., VoIP calls between offices).
To enable this capability, the primary architectural requirement is the configuration of VPN Clusters.
A VPN Cluster defines a logical group of devices that are authorized to communicate with one another.
* By default, or if devices are in different clusters without peering, the topology typically defaults to Hub- and-Spoke, where branches only talk to the Data Center.
* When two branch ION devices are placed into the same VPN Cluster (or peered clusters), the controller shares the necessary reachability and cryptographic information between them.
Once in the same cluster, the ION devices monitor traffic. If a user at Branch A tries to contact a server at Branch B, the ION devices detect this interest. If a direct path is available (e.g., via public internet), they will dynamically negotiate a direct VPN tunnel, bypassing the Data Center hub. This offloads the hub and reduces latency. Option B is incorrect because SD-WAN eliminates manual GRE config. Option C is incorrect because dynamic VPNs are a performance feature, not just a disaster recovery feature.

質問 # 40
A network administrator is troubleshooting a critical SaaS application, "SuperSaaSApp", that is experiencing connectivity issues. Initially, the configured active and backup paths for the application were reported as completely down at Layer 3. The Prisma SD-WAN system attempted to route traffic for the application over an L3 failure path that was explicitly configured as a Standard VPN to Prisma Access.
However, users are still reporting a complete outage for the application and monitoring tools show application flows being dropped when attempting to use the Standard VPN L3 failure path, even though the tunnel itself appears to be up. The administrator suspects a policy misconfiguration related to how the Standard VPN path interacts with destination groups.
What is the most likely reason for flows being dropped when attempting to use the Standard VPN L3 failure path?
正解：C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
According to Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN administrator documentation regarding Path Policy configuration, specific rules apply when utilizing Standard VPNs (IPSec tunnels to non-ION devices, such as Prisma Access or third-party firewalls) as an L3 Failure Path.
When a Path Policy rule is configured, the administrator defines Active Paths, Backup Paths, and L3 Failure Paths. The L3 Failure Path is a "last resort" mechanism used when all Active and Backup paths are unavailable (Layer 3 down).
If Standard VPN is selected as the L3 Failure Path type, the system explicitly requires that the administrator also associates it with a specific Standard Services and DC Group within that same policy rule.
The ION device uses the Standard Services and DC Group to identify the specific remote endpoint (tunnel destination) where the traffic should be routed. Unlike a "Direct" (Internet) path which can simply route out to the WAN, a Standard VPN represents a logical tunnel. If the policy rule designates "Standard VPN" as the failure path but leaves the "Standard Services and DC Group" field empty or unselected, the ION effectively has a directive to "use a VPN" but lacks the instruction on which VPN group to use for this specific application context. Consequently, even if the IPSec tunnel to Prisma Access is physically up and stable, the policy engine cannot resolve the next hop for the "SuperSaaSApp" traffic, resulting in the packets being dropped. To resolve this, the administrator must edit the Path Policy rule to ensure the specific Standard Service/DC Group representing Prisma Access is checked/selected for the L3 Failure Path.

質問 # 41
A network installer is attempting to claim a new ION device using the "Claim Code" method. The device is connected to the internet, but the status in the portal remains stuck at "Claimed" and does not transition to
"Online". The installer connects a laptop to the LAN port of the ION and can successfully browse the internet, confirming the uplink is active.
What is the most likely cause of the device failing to reach the "Online" state?
正解：C

質問 # 42
......
JPNTestのSD-WAN-Engineer問題集はあなたを楽に試験の準備をやらせます。それに、もし最初で試験を受ける場合、試験のソフトウェアのバージョンを使用することができます。これは完全に実際の試験雰囲気とフォーマットをシミュレートするソフトウェアですから。このソフトで、あなたは事前に実際の試験を感じることができます。そうすれば、実際のSD-WAN-Engineer試験を受けるときに緊張をすることはないです。ですから、心のリラックスした状態で試験に出る問題を対応することができ、あなたの正常なレベルをプレイすることもできます。
SD-WAN-Engineer最新関連参考書: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/SD-WAN-Engineer-mondaishu
さらに、JPNTest SD-WAN-Engineerダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Vo2zhlhH0a-kki1V4TNE7gXco7C0e4k8




Welcome Firefly Open Source Community (https://bbs.t-firefly.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1