Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › ROC-RK3328-PC› NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題

gusbell205

138

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
138

【General】 NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題

Posted at 3 hour before      View：11 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
無料でクラウドストレージから最新のJpshiken NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6 PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_ngmpVNb06_H0ycNVd22Ttt5EOCARs9R
JpshikenはNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6受験生の皆様に最も良いかつ便利なサービスを提供できるようにずっと一生懸命頑張っています。現在の時代で高効率は避けられない話題ですから、速いスピードと高効率が我々の目標です。NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6受験の皆さんは速く知識を理解して高い点数を取得できるようにJpshikenは効率的なトレーニング資料をデザインしてさしあげます。皆さんは節約した時間とエネルギーを利用してもっと多くの金銭を稼ぐことができます。
Jpshikenは、魅力的なキャラクターで世界中の試験受験者を招きます。当社の専門家は彼らの卓越性に大きく貢献しました。したがって、試験をシミュレートするNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6が最良であると率直に言うことができます。 NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6学習教材のコンテンツを作成する取り組みは、学習ガイドの開発につながり、完成度を高めます。そのため、模擬試験は間違いなくレビューの耐久性を高めています。関心を集め、いくつかの難しい点を簡素化するために、当社の専門家は、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験の合格に役立つように、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6学習教材の設計に最善を尽くしています。
実際的な-権威のあるNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間試験-試験の準備方法NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題時間が経つとともに、Jpshikenはより多くの受験生から大好評を博します。弊社のNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資料は99％の成功率を持っていますから、弊社のFortinetのNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6練習問題を利用したら、最もよい結果を得ることができます。弊社のNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6練習問題さえ使用すれば試験の成功までもっと近くなります。
Fortinet NSE 7 - Security Operations 7.6 Architect 認定 NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6 試験問題 (Q40-Q45):質問 # 40
Refer to the exhibits.

You have a playbook that, depending on whether an analyst deems the alert to be a true positive, could reference a child playbook. You need to pass variables from the parent playbook to the child playbook.
Place the steps needed to accomplish this in the correct order.

正解：
解説：

Explanation:
1. Create a parameter in the child playbook.
2. Apply the parameter to the Disable User Account connector action.
3. Map data to the parameter in the Reference a playbook step in the parent playbook.
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From FortiSOAR 7.6., FortiSIEM 7.3 Exact Extract study guide:
InFortiSOAR 7.6, the methodology for passing data between playbooks-specifically from a parent to a
"Referenced" (child) playbook-follows a strict data flow hierarchy:
* Step 1: Create a parameter in the child playbook.Before a parent can send data, the child playbook must be configured to receive it. This is done by adding "Input Parameters" in theStartstep of the child playbook (configured as a "Referenced" trigger). These parameters act as the "inbox" for external data.
* Step 2: Apply the parameter to the connector action.Once the child playbook has the parameter defined (e.g., user_id), you must use a Jinja expression like {{vars.input.params.user_id}} within the child's action steps (such as theActive Directory: Disable User Accountconnector) so that the child playbook actually utilizes the data it receives.
* Step 3: Map data to the parameter in the parent playbook.Finally, in the parent playbook, when you add theReference a Playbookstep and select the child playbook, FortiSOAR automatically displays the parameters created in Step 1. You then map existing variables from the parent's environment (e.g., from a previous "Search by SamAccountName" step) into these fields to complete the hand-off.
Why other options are excluded:
* Create a manual trigger and assign the user to a new variable:While manual triggers capture data, they are not the mechanism forpassingdata between nested playbooks; they are for user-to-system interaction.
* Create a parameter in the parent playbookarameters in a parent playbook are used to receive data fromoutside(like an external API or manual input), not to send datadownto a child. The child defines what it needs; the parent simply provides it in the Reference step.

質問 # 41
Which three end user logs does FortiAnalyzer use to identify possible IOC compromised hosts? (Choose three answers)
  • A. Application filter logs
  • B. Email filter logs
  • C. DNS filter logs2
  • D. IPS logs
  • E. Web filter logs1
正解：C、D、E
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From FortiSOAR 7.6., FortiSIEM 7.3 Exact Extract study guide:
In the context of the Fortinet Security Fabric,FortiAnalyzerperforms Indicator of Compromise (IOC) detection by correlating various security logs against a threat intelligence database.3The IOC engine specifically analyzes the following logs of each end user to identify potentially compromised hosts:
* Web Filter Logs (A):The engine parses web filtering logs to identify access attempts to blacklisted URLs, malicious domains, or IPs associated with known malware distribution sites.4If a match is found in the threat database, the host is flagged as compromised.
* DNS Filter Logs (C)NS requests are a primary indicator of a compromise. The engine monitors these logs for queries directed at known Command and Control (C2) servers or domains generated by Domain Generation Algorithms (DGA).5
* IPS Logs (E):Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) logs provide critical data on signature matches for known attacks. In newer Security Operations (SOC) curricula, IPS logs are used alongside Web and DNS logs to provide a high-fidelity assessment of whether a host is currently infected and attempting to communicate with an external threat actor.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Email Filter Logs (B):While important for detecting phishing attempts (Initial Access), email logs are generally used for content filtering and antispam rather than being a primary source for the IOC engine's behavioral "calling home" detection in the FortiAnalyzer Compromised Hosts view.
* Application Filter Logs (D):Application control logs provide visibility into software usage but are less commonly used by the core IOC engine for identifying blacklisted network destinations compared to Web and DNS filtering.

質問 # 42
Refer to the exhibits.

You configured a custom event handler and an associated rule to generate events whenever FortiMail detects spam emails. However, you notice that the event handler is generating events for both spam emails and clean emails.
Which change must you make in the rule so that it detects only spam emails?
  • A. In the Trigger an event when field, select Within a group, the log field Spam Name (snane) has 2 or more unique values.
  • B. In the Log Type field, select Anti-Spam Log (spam)
  • C. In the Log filter by Text field, type type==spam.
  • D. Disable the rule to use the filter in the data selector to create the event.
正解：B
解説：
* Understanding the Custom Event Handler Configuration:
* The event handler is set up to generate events based on specific log data.
* The goal is to generate events specifically for spam emails detected by FortiMail.
* Analyzing the Issue:
* The event handler is currently generating events for both spam emails and clean emails.
* This indicates that the rule's filtering criteria are not correctly distinguishing between spam and non-spam emails.
* Evaluating the Options:
* Option A:Selecting the "Anti-Spam Log (spam)" in the Log Type field will ensure that only logs related to spam emails are considered. This is the most straightforward and accurate way to filter for spam emails.
* Option B:Typing type==spam in the Log filter by Text field might help filter the logs, but it is not as direct and reliable as selecting the correct log type.
* Option Cisabling the rule to use the filter in the data selector to create the event does not address the issue of filtering for spam logs specifically.
* Option D:Selecting "Within a group, the log field Spam Name (snane) has 2 or more unique values" is not directly relevant to filtering spam logs and could lead to incorrect filtering criteria.
* Conclusion:
* The correct change to make in the rule is to select "Anti-Spam Log (spam)" in the Log Type field. This ensures that the event handler only generates events for spam emails.
References:
Fortinet Documentation on Event Handlers and Log Types.
Best Practices for Configuring FortiMail Anti-Spam Settings.

質問 # 43
Refer to the exhibits.
What can you conclude from analyzing the data using the threat hunting module?
  • A. FTP is being used as command-and-control (C&C) technique to mine for data.
  • B. Reconnaissance is being used to gather victim identity information from the mail server.
  • C. Spearphishing is being used to elicit sensitive information.
  • D. DNS tunneling is being used to extract confidential data from the local network.
正解：D
解説：
* Understanding the Threat Hunting Data:
* The Threat Hunting Monitor in the provided exhibits shows various application services, their usage counts, and data metrics such as sent bytes, average sent bytes, and maximum sent bytes.
* The second part of the exhibit lists connection attempts from a specific source IP (10.0.1.10) to a destination IP (8.8.8.8), with repeated "Connection Failed" messages.
* Analyzing the Application Services:
* DNS is the top application service with a significantly high count (251,400) and notable sent bytes (9.1 MB).
* This large volume of DNS traffic is unusual for regular DNS queries and can indicate the presence of DNS tunneling.
* DNS Tunneling:
* DNS tunneling is a technique used by attackers to bypass security controls by encoding data within DNS queries and responses. This allows them to extract data from the local network without detection.
* The high volume of DNS traffic, combined with the detailed metrics, suggests that DNS tunneling might be in use.
* Connection Failures to 8.8.8.8:
* The repeated connection attempts from the source IP (10.0.1.10) to the destination IP (8.8.8.8) with connection failures can indicate an attempt to communicate with an external server.
* Google DNS (8.8.8.8) is often used for DNS tunneling due to its reliability and global reach.
* Conclusion:
* Given the significant DNS traffic and the nature of the connection attempts, it is reasonable to conclude that DNS tunneling is being used to extract confidential data from the local network.
* Why Other Options are Less Likely:
* Spearphishing (A): There is no evidence from the provided data that points to spearphishing attempts, such as email logs or phishing indicators.
* Reconnaissance (C): The data does not indicate typical reconnaissance activities, such as scanning or probing mail servers.
* FTP C&C (D): There is no evidence of FTP traffic or command-and-control communications using FTP in the provided data.
SANS Institute: "DNS Tunneling: How to Detect Data Exfiltration and Tunneling Through DNS Queries" SANS DNS Tunneling OWASP: "DNS Tunneling" OWASP DNS Tunneling By analyzing the provided threat hunting data, it is evident that DNS tunneling is being used to exfiltrate data, indicating a sophisticated method of extracting confidential information from the network.

質問 # 44
Refer to the exhibit.
Assume that all devices in the FortiAnalyzer Fabric are shown in the image.
Which two statements about the FortiAnalyzer Fabric deployment are true? (Choose two.)
  • A. FortiGate-B1 and FortiGate-B2 are in a Security Fabric.
  • B. There is no collector in the topology.
  • C. FAZ-SiteA has two ADOMs enabled.
  • D. All FortiGate devices are directly registered to the supervisor.
正解：A、C
解説：
* Understanding the FortiAnalyzer Fabric:
* The FortiAnalyzer Fabric provides centralized log collection, analysis, and reporting for connected FortiGate devices.
* Devices in a FortiAnalyzer Fabric can be organized into different Administrative Domains (ADOMs) to separate logs and management.
* Analyzing the Exhibit:
* FAZ-SiteAandFAZ-SiteBare FortiAnalyzer devices in the fabric.
* FortiGate-B1andFortiGate-B2are shown under theSite-B-Fabric, indicating they are part of the same Security Fabric.
* FAZ-SiteAhas multiple entries under it:SiteAandMSSP-Local, suggesting multiple ADOMs are enabled.
* Evaluating the Options:
* Option A:FortiGate-B1 and FortiGate-B2 are underSite-B-Fabric, indicating they are indeed part of the same Security Fabric.
* Option B:The presence of FAZ-SiteA and FAZ-SiteB as FortiAnalyzers does not preclude the existence of collectors. However, there is no explicit mention of a separate collector role in the exhibit.
* Option C:Not all FortiGate devices are directly registered to the supervisor. The exhibit shows hierarchical organization under different sites and ADOMs.
* Option D:The multiple entries underFAZ-SiteA(SiteA and MSSP-Local) indicate that FAZ-SiteA has two ADOMs enabled.
* Conclusion:
* FortiGate-B1 and FortiGate-B2 are in a Security Fabric.
* FAZ-SiteA has two ADOMs enabled.
References:
Fortinet Documentation on FortiAnalyzer Fabric Topology and ADOM Configuration.
Best Practices for Security Fabric Deployment with FortiAnalyzer.

質問 # 45
......
数万人の顧客は私たちのNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6問題集を利用したら、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験に合格しました。もちろん、私たちのNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6問題集を利用したら、唯一の収穫は試験に合格することではなく、自分の仕事またライフスタイルを変えることもできます。NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6問題集のメリットはなんですか？いろいろありますよ。例えば、覚えやすい、便利、時間を節約するということなどです。
NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題: https://www.jpshiken.com/NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6_shiken.html
自信の源は、素晴らしいNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験問題です、あなたの利用しているFortinetのNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験のソフトが最新版のを保証しています、この種のサービスは、当社のNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6学習教材に関する自信と実際の強さを示しています、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験のAPPテストエンジンは、いつでもどこでも使用できると考える人がいます、Fortinet NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間 、PDF版、ソフト版、オンライン版三つの版から、あなたの愛用する版を選択します、Fortinet NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間 電話、iPadなどで使用できます、Fortinet NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間 そのため、メールアドレスにメールを送信することをお勧めします、Jpshiken NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題は君に対して特別の訓練を提供しています。
優馬の怪我がおおごとでないのは何よりだが、病院にいるから家庭教師の授業に間に合わないというのは未生にはなんの関係もないことだ、その声に何を感じたか、吾妻の肩がびくりと跳ねる、自信の源は、素晴らしいNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験問題です。
試験の準備方法-最新のNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験時間試験-正確的なNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6資格関連題あなたの利用しているFortinetのNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験のソフトが最新版のを保証しています、この種のサービスは、当社のNSE7_SOC_AR-7.6学習教材に関する自信と実際の強さを示しています、NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6試験のAPPテストエンジンは、いつでもどこでも使用できると考える人がいます。
、PDF版、ソフト版、オンライン版三つの版から、あなたの愛用する版を選択します。
ちなみに、Jpshiken NSE7_SOC_AR-7.6の一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_ngmpVNb06_H0ycNVd22Ttt5EOCARs9R
https://www.passexamdumps.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list