Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › EC-R3588SPC› Quiz Palo Alto Networks - Useful SecOps-Pro - Palo A ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[Hardware] Quiz Palo Alto Networks - Useful SecOps-Pro - Palo Alto Networks Security Operat

raykell780

133

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
133

【Hardware】 Quiz Palo Alto Networks - Useful SecOps-Pro - Palo Alto Networks Security Operat

Posted at yesterday 21:40      View：13 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
In compliance with syllabus of the exam, our SecOps-Pro practice materials are determinant factors giving you assurance of smooth exam. Our SecOps-Pro practice materials comprise of a number of academic questions for your practice, which are interlinked and helpful for your exam. So, they are specified as one of the most successful SecOps-Pro practice materials in the line. They can renew your knowledge with high utility with Favorable prices. So, they are reliably rewarding SecOps-Pro practice materials with high utility value.
In order to let customers understand our Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional exam dumps better, our company will provide customers with a trail version. All customers have the opportunity to download our trail version. More importantly, the trail version is free for customers. The trail version will offer demo to customers, it means customers can study the demo of our SecOps-Pro exam torrent for free. If you use our SecOps-Pro test quiz, we believe you will know fully well that our product is of superior quality, other products can’t be compared with it. If you are hesitating to buy our SecOps-Pro Test Quiz, if you are anxious about whether our product is suitable for you or not, we think you can download the trail version. We believe our Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional exam dumps will help you make progress and improve yourself.
Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro Exam Dumps - Get Success BraindumpsIT Minimal EffortOur qualified team of Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional study material to improve the quality and to match the changes in the syllabus and pattern shared by SecOps-Pro. Our desktop Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro Practice Exam software is designed for all those candidates who want to learn and practice in the actual Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro exam environment.
Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional Sample Questions (Q275-Q280):NEW QUESTION # 275
A major cloud service provider announces a critical zero-day vulnerability in their identity access management (IAM) solution. As a Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional managing Cortex XSIAM, you need to implement a proactive playbook that automatically checks your cloud environment for specific misconfigurations related to this vulnerability and remediates them if found. This requires querying cloud provider APIs, parsing complex JSON responses, and issuing remediation commands. Which of the following approaches best demonstrates the advanced use of Cortex XSIAM Playbooks, including scripting and conditional logic, to handle such a scenario?
  • A. A simple playbook that sends a Slack message to the cloud security team, notifying them of the vulnerability, and relies on manual remediation.
  • B. A playbook with a custom Python script task that makes authenticated API calls to the cloud provider (e.g., AWS IAM API), parses the JSON response for specific configuration values, uses conditional logic to identify vulnerable configurations, and then executes another custom script task to call the remediation API, all within the playbook flow.
  • C. A playbook that triggers an automated penetration test against the IAM solution, which might take hours or days to complete, and then remediates based on the penetration test findings.
  • D. A playbook utilizing a pre-built 'Cloud Misconfiguration Scan' integration, assuming it specifically covers this zero-day, which then triggers a 'Remediate Cloud Resource' action without any conditional checks.
  • E. The playbook should only be used to collect forensic data from affected cloud instances and store it in an S3 bucket for post-incident analysis.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Option C is the most robust and advanced solution. For a zero-day in a cloud IAM, pre-built integrations might not exist or be updated immediately. A custom Python script within a playbook task allows for granular control: making direct API calls, parsing complex JSON responses, implementing precise conditional logic to identify the exact vulnerability, and then programmatically calling remediation APIs. This ensures immediate, targeted, and automated remediation for a novel threat. Option A is too reactive and manual. Option B is limited by pre-built integration coverage and lacks conditional checks. Option D is an investigation step, not a proactive remediation. Option E is too slow for a zero- day.

NEW QUESTION # 276
A recent zero-day exploit targeting a widely used VPN client has been reported. Your organization uses Cortex XSIAM for security operations. The XSIAM threat intelligence feed has been updated with Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) related to this zero-day. As a proactive measure, how would you leverage XSIAM's capabilities to hunt for potential compromise within your environment, even before specific alerts are generated?
  • A. Run a vulnerability scan on all VPN clients to identify unpatched versions, as XSIAM's primary role is vulnerability management.
  • B. Manually inspect each VPN client's log files on individual endpoints using local tools, as XSIAM can only detect known threats.
  • C. Configure new
  • D. Perform an
  • E. Rely solely on XSIAM's out-of-the-box
Answer: D
Explanation:
This question focuses on proactive threat hunting for a zero-day using XSIAM. Option B provides the most comprehensive and effective approach. An XQL hunt is essential for searching historical and real-time data against known IOCs. Furthermore, creating custom behavioral detections is crucial for zero-days because traditional signature-based detection might not exist yet. These behavioral detections can look for atypical process creation, network connections, or file modifications associated with the exploit, even if the specific IOCs aren't present. Option A is reactive, waiting for an alert. C is inefficient and impractical at scale. D is a preventative measure, not a threat hunting one. E, while XSIAM ML models are powerful, relying solely on them for a newly reported zero-day without custom hunting is insufficient.

NEW QUESTION # 277
An enterprise is planning to implement Cortex XDR agent deployment for their containerized workloads running on Kubernetes clusters in AWS EKS. They aim for 'shift-left' security, meaning security should be integrated as early as possible in the development lifecycle and automated. The security team needs to ensure that newly provisioned pods automatically receive Cortex XDR protection without manual intervention, and that the agent scales dynamically with the cluster. Which combination of deployment strategies and Cortex XDR features would best achieve this, considering the ephemeral nature of containers and the need for seamless integration with Kubernetes orchestration?
  • A. Utilize a privileged DaemonSet to deploy the Cortex XDR agent on each Kubernetes node. This agent operates at the host level, inspecting traffic and processes across all pods on that node, effectively providing protection without requiring agents within individual pods.
  • B. Implement an Admission Controller in Kubernetes that injects a Cortex XDR agent container into every new pod manifest upon creation, ensuring mandatory deployment, and manage agent updates via Helm charts.
  • C. Deploy the Cortex XDR agent as a DaemonSet across the Kubernetes cluster, ensuring one agent instance runs on each node, and configure a Kubernetes Init Container within application pods to install the agent into the pod's filesystem before the main application starts.
  • D. Bake the Cortex XDR agent into custom Docker images used for applications, ensuring the agent is part of the image layer. Configure the agent to report to a specific XDR endpoint group for containerized workloads.
  • E. Integrate Cortex XDR agent deployment into the CIICD pipeline using a Kubernetes Operator that automatically deploys and manages Cortex XDR agents as sidecar containers within application pods, leveraging the XDR API for registration.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Protecting containerized workloads with a host-based agent like Cortex XDR typically involves running the agent on the underlying host, not inside every ephemeral container. C: Privileged DaemonSet on each Kubernetes node: This is the standard and most effective approach for deploying host-based security agents like Cortex XDR in Kubernetes. A DaemonSet ensures that one instance of the agent runs on every node in the cluster. By running with necessary privileges (e.g., host PID, host network), the agent can monitor and protect all containers and processes running on that node, effectively covering all pods without needing an agent inside each ephemeral pod. This aligns with the 'shift-left' and automation goals as it integrates with Kubernetes' native deployment mechanisms. A: DaemonSet + Init Container: While a DaemonSet handles the node, installing agents within individual pods via an Init Container is generally not recommended for host- based agents. It adds overhead to every pod, complicates lifecycle management, and increases image size, contrary to container best practices for ephemeral workloads. B: Kubernetes Operator + Sidecar: An Operator for agent deployment is a good concept for automation, but deploying the XDR agent as a sidecar in every application pod is problematic for the same reasons as A. Cortex XDR is a host-level agent, not designed for per-pod deployment. D: Bake into custom Docker images: This is highly inefficient and creates significant image bloat. Every application image would need to be rebuilt for agent updates, and it conflicts with the ephemeral, immutable nature of containers. E: Admission Controller + Inject agent: Similar to B, injecting a full Cortex XDR agent container into every pod is not the architectural intent of a host-level EDR solution. It would introduce significant overhead and management complexity.

NEW QUESTION # 278
A sophisticated adversary group known for leveraging DNS tunneling for data exfiltration has targeted your organization. Your threat intelligence feed provides specific DNS query patterns (e.g., unusually long subdomain names, specific character sets, high entropy) and a list of resolver IPs they commonly use for exfiltration. Which combination of Palo Alto Networks firewall features, precisely tuned with this threat intelligence, would be most effective in detecting and preventing this advanced exfiltration technique?
  • A. Implement a custom Threat Prevention (IPS) signature using PCRE to detect the long, high-entropy subdomain patterns in DNS queries and apply a Security Profile that utilizes DNS Security's DGA detection.
  • B. Deploy a custom Application Override for DNS tunneling and set up a QOS policy to deprioritize high-volume DNS traffic.
  • C. Utilize an External Dynamic List (EDL) for the resolver IPs in a Security Policy and configure WildFire to inspect all DNS traffic for suspicious patterns.
  • D. Create an Anti-Spyware profile with a custom DNS signature for the resolver IPs and deploy a custom Data Filtering profile to block any DNS queries exceeding a specific length.
  • E. Enable DNS Sinkholing for the resolver IPs and configure a custom URL Filtering profile to block high-entropy domains.
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question requires a deep understanding of Palo Alto Networks features and how to combine them effectively against a specific, advanced threat (DNS tunneling) using precise threat intelligence.
Option B provides the most direct and effective combination:
Custom Threat Prevention (IPS) signature with PCRE: This is crucial for detecting the specific patterns within DNS queries (long subdomain names, specific character sets, high entropy) that indicate tunneling. PCRE allows for highly granular matching against the DNS packet payload, which is where the exfiltrated data or C2 commands reside.
DNS Security's DGA detection (as part of a Security Profile): While DGA typically refers to C2, DNS tunneling often involves dynamically generated domains. Palo Alto's DNS Security service (which includes DGA detection) can identify suspicious DNS queries that deviate from normal patterns, complementing the custom IPS signature by leveraging Palo Alto's advanced analytics.
Let's analyze why other options are less optimal for this specific threat:
A (DNS Sinkholing + URL Filtering): Sinkholing is for known malicious domains/lPs, but doesn't detect the tunneling pattern . URL filtering applies to HTTP/HTTPS, not raw DNS queries directly for content analysis.
C (Custom Anti-Spyware DNS signature + Data Filtering): Anti-Spyware DNS signatures are primarily for blocking known malicious domains, not for pattern matching within the query itself. Data Filtering is for sensitive data exiting the network, not for detecting the method of exfiltration (DNS tunneling) by analyzing query structure. Blocking by length is too blunt and prone to false positives.
D (EDL for resolver IPs + WildFire on DNS traffic): EDL is good for blocking known bad IPs, but DNS tunneling can use many resolvers. WildFire typically focuses on file analysis and domain reputation, not deep packet inspection of DNS query structure for tunneling.
E (Custom Application Override + QOS): Application Override is for classifying unknown apps, not detecting malicious content within protocols. QOS deprioritizes traffic; it doesn't prevent or detect the tunneling.

NEW QUESTION # 279
A threat hunter is investigating a potential Living Off The Land (LOTL) attack where adversaries are suspected of using legitimate system tools for malicious purposes, specifically executing PowerShell scripts to establish persistence. The Palo Alto Networks firewall is configured to log process information from endpoints via Cortex XDR, and these logs are ingested into a SIEM (Splunk). The hunter wants to identify instances where 'cmd.exe' spawns 'powershell.exe' with suspicious command-line arguments, potentially encoding malicious scripts. Which of the following Splunk queries, utilizing Cortex XDR endpoint data, would be most effective in surfacing these hidden or encoded malicious activities?
  • A.
  • B.
  • C.
  • D.
  • E.
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
This question targets detection of encoded PowerShell commands, a common LOTL technique. Both C and D are highly effective. Option C uses 'eval' with 'case' and 'like' for flexible pattern matching, specifically looking for common indicators of obfuscation C- EncodedCommancf, FromBase64String', 'IEX'). This is a robust way to create a boolean flag for suspicious activity and then filter. Option D uses 'lower()' to ensure case-insensitivity, which is crucial for command-line arguments, and 'match()' with OR conditions for the suspicious keywords. This is also a very efficient and robust approach. Option A uses SIN' with wildcards, which can be less precise and might miss variations. Option B uses 'regex' which is powerful but the regex is less precise for '-e' etc., as it might match legitimate short flags. Option E relies on an undefined macro.

NEW QUESTION # 280
......
In the modern world, obtaining SecOps-Pro certification is essential. With the growing popularity of Palo Alto Networks, the demand for professionals holding this Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional (SecOps-Pro) certification holders has increased significantly. Unfortunately, many candidates fail to pass the SecOps-Pro Exam due to outdated Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional (SecOps-Pro) exam study material. Such failure can lead to the loss of time, money, and confidence.
Latest SecOps-Pro Exam Discount: https://www.braindumpsit.com/SecOps-Pro_real-exam.html
Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro Complete Exam Dumps No matter which way you choose, you have embraced a promising future, If you have interest in our Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro study guide you can provide email address to us, you will have priority to coupons, FREE SecOps-Pro DUMPS PDF DEMO, Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro Complete Exam Dumps Firstly, we are a legal professional enterprise, Our Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional (SecOps-Pro) exam practice test engine will help you gauge your progress, identify areas of weakness, and master the material.
Ours works essentially the same as `Session`, allowing the storage SecOps-Pro of select variables for a user session on the server, Once there is a good opportunity you will have vital advantages and stand out.
100% Pass-Rate SecOps-Pro Complete Exam Dumps Spend Your Little Time and Energy to Pass SecOps-Pro exam one timeNo matter which way you choose, you have embraced a promising future, If you have interest in our Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro Study Guide you can provide email address to us, you will have priority to coupons.
FREE SecOps-Pro DUMPS PDF DEMO, Firstly, we are a legal professional enterprise, Our Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional (SecOps-Pro) exam practice test engine will help you gauge your progress, identify areas of weakness, and master the material.
https://www.exam4tests.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list