Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] 최신ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor유효한공ዳ

126

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
126

【General】 최신ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor유효한공ዳ

Posted at yesterday 08:53      View:7 | Replies:0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
BONUS!!! PassTIP ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제집 전체 버전을 무료로 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HOmVz-RZY3EyFqAIJiA6wH0uwN3AeCB4
PassTIP는 IT인증자격증을 취득하려는 IT업계 인사들의 검증으로 크나큰 인지도를 가지게 되었습니다. 믿고 애용해주신 분들께 감사의 인사를 드립니다. PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor덤프도 다른 과목 덤프자료처럼 적중율 좋고 통과율이 장난이 아닙니다. 덤프를 구매하시면 퍼펙트한 구매후 서비스까지 제공해드려 고객님이 보유한 덤프가 항상 시장에서 가장 최신버전임을 약속해드립니다. PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor덤프만 구매하신다면 자격증 취득이 쉬워져 고객님의 밝은 미래를 예약한것과 같습니다.
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험요강:
주제소개
주제 1
  • AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
  • IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.
주제 2
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.
주제 3
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프자료 - ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor최고품질 인증시험공부자료저희 PassTIP는 국제공인 IT자격증 취득을 목표를 하고 있는 여러분들을 위해 적중율 좋은 시험대비 덤프를 제공해드립니다. PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하려는 분은 저희 사이트에서 출시한ECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor덤프의 문제와 답만 잘 기억하시면 한방에 시험패스 할수 있습니다. 해당 과목 사이트에서 데모문제를 다운바다 보시면 덤프품질을 검증할수 있습니다.결제하시면 바로 다운가능하기에 덤프파일을 가장 빠른 시간에 받아볼수 있습니다.
최신 AI management system (AIMS) ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 무료샘플문제 (Q88-Q93):질문 # 88
Scenario 8 (continued):
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, the audit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample,acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics including sampling uncertainty, timelines for corrections, and complaint/appeals procedures.
Question:
Based on Scenario 8, was the concluding meeting comprehensive in addressing all essential components of the audit?
  • A. No, it should not have involved the assessment of audit findings
  • B. No, it should not have involved the post-audit activities of the certification body
  • C. Yes, it addressed all necessary aspects
정답:C
설명:
The closing meeting covered:
* Uncertainty due to sampling
* Timeline for corrective actions
* Complaint and appeal procedures
* Findings and their classificationThese areall required elementsof the closing meeting.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.7requires the audit team to present a summary of findings and next steps during the closing meeting.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.12further includes communication of audit conclusions, clarification of nonconformities, and how findings will be managed post-audit.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.7; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.12.

질문 # 89
What did the audit team use to assess the implementation of AI-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements? Refer to Scenario 6
  • A. Observation checklist
  • B. Evidence collection analysis
  • C. Evidence collection tools
  • D. Evidence collection procedures
정답:C
설명:
In Scenario 6, it is clearly stated:
"They also used sampling and technical verification to assess the implementation of AI-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements." Sampling and technical verification are considered evidence collection tools used during audits. These tools enable auditors to validate the effectiveness of implemented controls by selectively reviewing samples, performing walkthroughs, and technically verifying how AI systems function in real-life scenarios.
According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.5, audit evidence may be obtained through tools such as:
* Interviews
* Observations
* Technical testing
* Sampling
* Documentation review
This confirms that the audit team used "evidence collection tools" - specifically sampling and technical verification - to perform their assessments.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.5 - Audit methods and tools
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Collection of objective evidence
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Section: Evidence Collection Tools in AI Audits
===========
Certainly! Below are the responses to Questions 51 through 54 from Scenario 7, presented in your requested format, with verified explanations aligned with ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 19011:
2018, and the PECB Lead Auditor Study Guide.
-

질문 # 90
Question:
DenSolutions, a financial institution, is seeking to certify its AIMS. The certification body appointed Sarah as the audit team leader, who previously provided consultancy services regarding the AIMS. Can Sarah audit the AIMS of DenSolutions?
  • A. Yes, if the auditor does not directly audit any component of the AIMS they consulted on and only oversees the audit process
  • B. Yes, if a minimum of two years have passed following the end of the consultancy
  • C. No - auditors who contribute to the design, implementation, and maintenance of the AIMS cannot participate in AIMS audits
  • D. Yes, with approval from the auditee
정답:C
설명:
Sarahcannot auditbecause auditors who have contributed to the design, implementation, or maintenance of a management systemmust not audit that same systemto avoid conflict of interest.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5clearly states:"ersonnel who have provided management system consultancy, including those acting in a managerial capacity, shall not be used to conduct audits."
* TheLead Auditor Guideexplains:"Maintaining impartiality requires that individuals with consultancy roles be excluded from auditing the systems they helped create." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Training Material, Conflict of Interest Management.

질문 # 91
How are auditors expected to handle conflicts of interest during an audit?
  • A. By assigning an external auditor to handle the conflict
  • B. By disclosing any potential conflicts and avoiding auditing the affected area
  • C. By excluding the affected area from the audit scope
  • D. By ignoring conflicts to maintain impartiality
정답:B
설명:
The correct practice is:disclose any potential conflicts and avoid auditing the affected area.
ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 5.3 and Clause 6.3.2require auditors todeclare conflicts of interestand take steps topreserve impartiality. Failure to do so compromises the integrity andindependence of the audit.
According to thePECB Lead Auditor Guide, auditors shouldimmediately report any situation where their objectivity may be questioned, including past relationships, financial ties, or personal bias.

질문 # 92
Question:
Which of the following does NOT represent the purpose of managing and maintaining auditprogram records?
  • A. To focus on the competence and performance evaluation of the audit team members
  • B. To address information security and confidentiality needs for audit records
  • C. To demonstrate the implementation of the audit program
정답:A
설명:
Thepurpose of maintaining audit recordsis to demonstrate effective management of the audit program, ensure information security, and show evidence of conformity - not directly to evaluate auditor competence.
* ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 5.5.6states:"Audit records provide evidence of the implementation of the audit program and must address confidentiality and security considerations."
* Auditor competence evaluation is managed separately undercompetence management processes(ISO
/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2).
Reference:ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 5.5.6; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.

질문 # 93
......
근 몇년간IT산업이 전례없이 신속히 발전하여 IT업계에 종사하는 분들이 여느때보다 많습니다. 경쟁이 이와같이 치열한 환경속에서 누구도 대체할수 없는 자기만의 자리를 찾으려면 IT인증자격증취득은 무조건 해야 하는것이 아닌가 싶습니다. PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험은 IT인증시험중 가장 인기있는 시험입니다. PassTIP에서는 여러분이ECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험을 한방에 패스하도록 실제시험문제에 대비한ECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor덤프를 발췌하여 저렴한 가격에 제공해드립니다.시험패스 못할시 덤프비용은 환불처리 해드리기에 고객님께 아무런 페를 끼치지 않을것입니다.
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프자료: https://www.passtip.net/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-pass-exam.html
참고: PassTIP에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2026 PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HOmVz-RZY3EyFqAIJiA6wH0uwN3AeCB4
Reply

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list