Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › ITX-3588J› 実際的なThe Open Group OGEA-103試験問題集 &合格ス ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[Hardware] 実際的なThe Open Group OGEA-103試験問題集 &合格スムーズOGEA-103復習テキスト |最高のOGEA-103対応内容

seanpar678

137

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
137

【Hardware】 実際的なThe Open Group OGEA-103試験問題集 &合格スムーズOGEA-103復習テキスト |最高のOGEA-103対応内容

Posted at 2 hour before      View：4 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
2026年CertShikenの最新OGEA-103 PDFダンプおよびOGEA-103試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1faykElz5kXgI9cCHBVk2kUYFwXXYXHWa
我々のOGEA-103問題集はIT認定試験に関連する豊富な経験を持っているIT専門家によって研究された最新バージョンの試験参考書です。この問題集は全面的で的中率が超高いです。我々のOGEA-103問題集はThe Open Groupのリーダーです。そのほかに、我々はお客様の立場で商品を開発するという目的を持っていますから、あなたに利便性をもたらすために、我々は大好評を博しているOGEA-103問題集を開発しました。
OGEA-103認定試験は、エンタープライズアーキテクチャの知識と専門知識を実証したい専門家向けに設計されています。この試験では、エンタープライズアーキテクチャの概念、原則、プラクティスなど、幅広いトピックをカバーしています。また、コンポーネント、アーキテクチャ開発方法（ADM）、アーキテクチャコンテンツフレームワークなど、TOGAFフレームワークもカバーしています。認定試験は、エンタープライズアーキテクト、ITアーキテクト、およびエンタープライズアーキテクチャの開発と管理のスキルと知識を向上させたい他のIT専門家に最適です。
素晴らしいOGEA-103試験問題集 & 合格スムーズOGEA-103復習テキスト | 効率的なOGEA-103対応内容あなたはOGEA-103試験に不安を持っていますか？OGEA-103参考資料をご覧下さい。私たちのOGEA-103参考資料は十年以上にわたり、専門家が何度も練習して、作られました。あなたに高品質で、全面的なOGEA-103参考資料を提供することは私たちの責任です。私たちより、OGEA-103試験を知る人はいません。
オープングループは、エンタープライズテクノロジーアーキテクチャの基準、認定、およびベストプラクティスの開発に焦点を当てたグローバルコンソーシアムです。最も人気のある認定の1つは、TOGAFエンタープライズアーキテクチャ（EA）認定です。 TOGAF EA認定は、パート1とパート2の2つの部分に分割されます。ただし、1つの試験で両方のパートを取得したい人の場合、オープングループはOGEA-103（TOGAFエンタープライズアーキテクチャパート1とパート2を組み合わせて）を提供します。 。
The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam 認定 OGEA-103 試験問題 (Q116-Q121):質問 # 116
Consider the illustration.

What are the items labelled A, B and C?
  • A. A-Architecture Vision, B-Business Architecture, C-Information Systems Architecture
  • B. A-Enterprise Continuum, B-Architecture Continuum, C-Solutions Continuum
  • C. A-Enterprise Architecture, B-Architecture Building Blocks, C-Solutions Building Blocks
  • D. A-Enterprise Strategic Architecture, B-Segment Architecture, C-Solutions Architecture
正解：B
解説：
The illustration shows the relationship between the Enterprise Continuum, the Architecture Continuum, and the Solutions Continuum, which are key concepts in the TOGAF framework. The Enterprise Continuum is a view of the Architecture Repository that shows how generic foundation architectures can be leveraged and specialized to support the requirements of an individual organization. The Architecture Continuum specifies a structured classification for architectural artifacts, such as models, patterns, and descriptions, that can be reused and adapted across different domains and levels of abstraction. The Solutions Continuum identifies implemented solutions that support various stages of business and IT capability evolution, such as common systems, industry solutions, and organization-specific solutions. The illustration also shows how the architecture context and requirements are influenced by external factors, such as business drivers, stakeholders, and standards, and how they shape the generic and specific architectures and solutions. The illustration also shows how the deployed solutions become part of the architecture context for future iterations of the architecture development cycle. References:
*TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, Part II: Architecture Development Method, Chapter 6: Architecture Repository, Section 6.2 Enterprise Continuum.
*TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, Part IV: Architecture Content Framework, Chapter 35: Enterprise Continuum and Tools, Section 35.1 Introduction.

質問 # 117
Complete the sentence. The architecture domains that are considered by the TOGAF standard as subsets of an overall enterprise architecture are Business, Technology,
  • A. Information and Data
  • B. Logical and Physical
  • C. Capability and Segment
  • D. Application and Data
正解：D
解説：
These domains provide a consistent way to describe and understand the architecture from different perspectives, such as business, information, and technology12. Each domain has its own set of concepts, models, views, and artifacts that define the structure and behavior of the architecture within that domain12.
The other options are incorrect because:
*Logical and Physical are not architecture domains, but rather levels of abstraction that can be applied to any domain. Logical architecture describes the functionality and behavior of the system, while physical architecture describes the implementation and deployment of the system3.
*Information and Data are not distinct architecture domains, but rather aspects of the same domain.
Information architecture describes the meaning and context of the data, while data architecture describes the structure and format of the data4.
*Capability and Segment are not architecture domains, but rather levels of granularity that can be applied to any domain. Capability architecture describes the current and desired states of a specific business capability, while segment architecture describes a subdivision of the enterprise that has a clear business focus5.
References: 1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Definitions 2: TOGAF® Standard - Introduction - Definitions 3: [Logical vs Physical Architecture] 4: [Information Architecture vs Data Architecture] 5: [The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Applying the ADM Across the Architecture Landscape]

質問 # 118
Which of the following is included as part of Architecture Governance1?
  • A. Interacting with the CxO level on Enterprise Architecture
  • B. Ensuring compliance with internal and external standards and regulatory obligations
  • C. Creating and maintaining the Statement of Architecture Work though out the ADM cycle
  • D. Managing Stakeholders and their requirements
正解：B
解説：
Ensuring compliance with internal and external standards and regulatory obligations is one of the activities included as part of Architecture Governance. Architecture Governance is the practice and orientation by which enterprise architectures and other architectures are managed and controlled at an enterprise-wide level. It involves establishing processes, roles, responsibilities, policies, and standards to ensure that architectures are aligned with the enterprise's strategy and objectives, and meet the quality and performance requirements. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.3.6 Architecture Governance.

質問 # 119
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are the Chief Enterprise Architect at a large food service company specializing in sales to trade and wholesale, for example, restaurants and other food retailers.
One of your company's competitors has launched a revolutionary product range and is running a very aggressive marketing campaign. Your company's resellers are successively announcing that they are not interested in your company's products and will sell your competitor's.
The CEO has stated there must be significant change to address the situation. He has made it clear that new markets must be found for the company's products, and that the business needs to pivot, and address the retail market as well as the existing wholesale market.
A consideration is the company's ability and willingness to change its business model, and if it is a temporary or permanent change. An additional risk factor is one of culture. The company has been used to a stable business with a reasonably well known and settled client base - all with its own local understandings and practices.
The CEO is the sponsor of the EA program within the company. You have been engaged with the sales, logistics, production, and marketing teams, enabling the architecture activity to start. An Architecture Vision, Architecture Principles, and Requirements have all been agreed. As you move forward to develop a possible Target Architecture you have identified that some of the key stakeholders' preferences are incompatible. The incompatibilities are focused primarily on time-to-market, cost savings, and the need to bring out a fully featured product range, but there are additional factors.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked how you will address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
  • A. You would seek to understand value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders. You would develop alternative Target Architectures, highlighting the gaps between current state and the alternatives. You would consider combining features from one or more alternatives in collaboration with the stakeholders. A formal stakeholder review should then be held to decide which alternative is fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. You will then secure the funding required.
  • B. You would review the Stakeholder Map and ensure that you have addressed and represented the concerns of all department heads. You will involve them in resolving the incompatibilities. The Communications Plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture with and how incompatibilities were resolved to reflects the stakeholders' requirements. You will check with each key stakeholder they are satisfied with how the incompatibilities have been resolved.
  • C. You recommend that since the CEO has stated that the company must pivot, it is better to compromise on a full product range rather than time-to-market. You would develop just enough of the Target Architecture to demonstrate fitness of the proposed approach. You would limit the description to just where there is a gap between the current baseline. You would seek approval by the stakeholders to move forward with developing the Target Architecture in detail.
  • D. You would use the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements to define a set of criteria for alternatives and create a set of architecture views to illustrate the impact of the alternative Target Architectures. You would identify the impact on planned projects. You would understand the strengths and weaknesses of the alternatives. You would conduct a formal stakeholder review to decide which alternative to move forward with. You will determine the funding required.
正解：D
解説：
Explanation
According to the TOGAF standard, the Target Architecture is the description of a future state of the architecture being developed for an organization. It should be aligned with the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements that have been agreed with the stakeholders. To address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences, the TOGAF standard recommends creating and evaluating multiple alternative Target Architectures that meet different sets of criteria. These criteria should reflect the value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders, as well as the business drivers and objectives. The alternative Target Architectures should be illustrated using a set of architecture views that show the impact of each alternative on the business, data, application, and technology domains. The impact on planned projects should also be identified and analyzed. The strengths and weaknesses of each alternative should be understood and documented. A formal stakeholder review should then be conducted to decide which alternative is the most fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. The funding required for implementing the chosen alternative should also be determined and secured. References:
The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase B: Business Architecture - The Open Group The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase C: Information Systems Architectures - The Open Group
[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase D: Technology Architecture - The Open Group]
[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions - The Open Group]
[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase F: Migration Planning - The Open Group]

質問 # 120
Scenario
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a technology company.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the sponsor of the activity. The EA practice uses an iterative approach for its architecture development. This has enabled the decision-makers to gain valuable insights into the different aspects of the business.
The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is the company's major asset and is highly confidential. The company employees travel a lot for work and need to communicate over public infrastructure. They use message encryption, secure internet connections using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and other standard security measures. The company has provided computer security awareness training for all its staff. However, despite good education and system security, there is still a need to rely on third-party suppliers for infrastructure and software.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education and support, the company could be a victim of a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their important data.
A risk assessment has been completed, and the company has looked for cyber insurance that covers ransomware. The price for this insurance is very high. The CTO recently saw a survey that said 1 out of 4 businesses that paid ransoms could not get their data back, and almost thesame number were able to recover the data without paying. The CTO has decided not to get cyber insurance to cover ransom payment.
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to strengthen the current architecture to improve data protection.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
  • A. You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company's ability to respond to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.
  • B. You would assess business continuity requirements and analyze the current Enterprise Architecture for gaps. You would recommend changes to address the situation and create a change request. You would engage the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved, you would create a new Request for Architecture Work to begin an ADM cycle to implement the changes.
  • C. You would monitor for technology updates from your existing suppliers that could enhance the company's capabilities to detect, react, and recover from an IT security incident. You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.
  • D. You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised, you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The scenario highlights significant risks due to ransomware attacks and the need to strengthen the company's Enterprise Architecture to improve data protection and resilience. TOGAF emphasizes the Architecture Compliance Review as a mechanism for ensuring the architecturemeets its objectives and addresses specific concerns such as security, resilience, and compliance with organizational goals.
The organization has already conducted a risk assessment but requires actionable steps to:
Address ransomware attack risks.
Increase the resilience of the Technology Architecture.
Ensure proper alignment with governance and compliance frameworks.
Option Analysis
Option A:
Strengths:
Highlights the need for up-to-date processes for managing changes in the Enterprise Architecture.
Recognizes the importance of governance through the Architecture Board and change management techniques.
Weaknesses:
The approach focuses solely on the Technology Architecture baseline but does not address the need for specific steps such as compliance review, gap analysis, or tailored resilience measures for ransomware risks.
It provides a broad and generic approach rather than a targeted plan for ransomware and data protection issues.
Conclusion: Incorrect. While it adheres to governance processes, it lacks specific actions to improve resilience and address the immediate security concerns.
Option B:
Strengths:
Proposes an Architecture Compliance Review, which is a core TOGAF process used to evaluate architecture implementation against defined objectives, ensuring it is fit for purpose.
Involves identifying stakeholders (departments) and tailoring checklists specific to ransomware resilience.
Emphasizes issue identification and resolution through structured review processes.
Weaknesses:
Does not explicitly address longer-term updates to the Enterprise Architecture, but this can be inferred as a next step following compliance recommendations.
Conclusion: Correct. This is the most suitable approach based on TOGAF principles, as it uses an established process to evaluate and improve the architecture's resilience.
Option C:
Strengths:
Includes monitoring for updates from suppliers to enhance detection and recovery capabilities, which is relevant to addressing ransomware risks.
Proposes a gap analysis to identify shortcomings in the current Enterprise Architecture and recommends addressing gaps through change requests.
Incorporates disaster recovery planning exercises, which are useful for testing resilience.
Weaknesses:
While thorough, the approach lacks the Architecture Compliance Review process, which is a more structured way to ensure the architecture meets resilience requirements.
Monitoring suppliers and running disaster recovery exercises are operational steps rather than strategic architectural improvements.
Conclusion: Incorrect. While it includes valid activities, it does not adhere to TOGAF's structured approach for architecture assessment and compliance.
Option D:
Strengths:
Proposes analyzing business continuity requirements and assessing the architecture for gaps, which is relevant to the scenario.
Suggests initiating an ADM cycle to address gaps, which aligns with TOGAF principles.
Weaknesses:
Focusing on initiating a new ADM cycle may be premature, as the immediate priority is to evaluate the existing architecture and address specific resilience concerns.
Does not mention compliance review or tailored resilience measures for ransomware attacks, which are central to the scenario.
Conclusion: Incorrect. It proposes a broader approach that may not adequately address the immediate concerns highlighted by the CSO.
TOGAF References
Architecture Compliance Review: A structured process used to evaluate whether an architecture meets the stated goals, objectives, and requirements (TOGAF 9.2, Chapter 19). It is particularly useful for identifying and addressing resilience requirements in scenarios involving security risks.
Stakeholder Engagement: Identifying and involving stakeholders (e.g., departments) is a critical part of architecture governance and compliance review (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
Change Management: The Architecture Compliance Review supports identifying necessary changes, which are then managed through governance and change management processes (TOGAF 9.2, Section 21.6).
By choosing Option B, you align with TOGAF's structured approach to compliance, resilience, and addressing security concerns.

質問 # 121
......
OGEA-103復習テキスト: https://www.certshiken.com/OGEA-103-shiken.html
さらに、CertShiken OGEA-103ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1faykElz5kXgI9cCHBVk2kUYFwXXYXHWa
https://www.itdumpskr.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list