Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] CT-UTテスト問題集、CT-UT対応問題集

133

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
133

【General】 CT-UTテスト問題集、CT-UT対応問題集

Posted at 1/25/2026 02:39:31      View:58 | Replies:0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
ちなみに、GoShiken CT-UTの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TYTKhVby3eoveWAQJT_IkDwFdOQTpJz4
ここで無料にGoShikenが提供したISTQBのCT-UT試験の部分練習問題と解答をダウンロードできて、一度GoShikenを選ばれば、弊社は全力に貴方達の合格を頑張ります。貴方達の試験に合格させることができないと、すぐに全額で返金いたします。
ISTQB CT-UT 認定試験の出題範囲:
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • 適切な手法の選択:この領域は、プロジェクトの状況、リソース、成熟度に応じて、テストマネージャーがどのユーザビリティ評価手法を適用するかを決定するのに役立ちます。アジャイル開発シナリオを含む、開発のさまざまな段階や組織のニーズに適したユーザビリティ、ユーザーエクスペリエンス、アクセシビリティの評価手法を選択するための基準について説明します。
トピック 2
  • ユーザビリティとアクセシビリティの標準:このパートでは、コンプライアンス担当者がユーザビリティとアクセシビリティを管理する標準とガイドラインに関して必要とする知識を扱います。ISO 9241-110やISO 9241-171などのISO標準、主要プラットフォームのメーカーガイドライン、WCAGなどのWebアクセシビリティガイドラインを紹介します。また、英国平等法や米国障害者法など、アクセシビリティ要件に関連する法律についても触れています。
トピック 3
  • ユーザビリティレビュー:この領域では、ユーザビリティテスターがユーザーの介入なしにソフトウェアインターフェースのレビューを実施するスキルを評価します。非公式レビューと専門家によるレビューを区別し、構造化された手法としてのヒューリスティック評価を紹介します。このセクションでは、レビューの準備と実施に関する段階的なアプローチを説明し、合意形成と結果の明確な伝達の重要性を強調します。

CT-UT対応問題集 & CT-UT基礎訓練GoShikenがISTQBのCT-UTのサンプルの問題のダウンロードを提供して、あなはリスクフリーの購入のプロセスを体験することができます。これは試用の練習問題で、あなたにインタフェースの友好、問題の質と購入する前の価値を見せます。弊社はGoShikenのISTQBのCT-UTのサンプルは製品の性質を確かめるに足りて、あなたに満足させると信じております。あなたの権利と利益を保障するために、GoShikenは一回で合格しなかったら、全額で返金することを約束します。弊社の目的はあなたが試験に合格することに助けを差し上げるだけでなく、あなたが本物のIT認証の専門家になることを願っています。あなたが仕事を求める競争力を高めて、自分の技術レベルに合わせている技術職を取って、気楽にホワイトカラー労働者になって高い給料を取ることをお祈りします。
ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester 認定 CT-UT 試験問題 (Q32-Q37):質問 # 32
Which of the following statements about usability test scripts is wrong?
  • A. It is a checklist used by the moderator of a usability test.
  • B. It contains answers to the test questions.
  • C. It contains post-session interview questions.
  • D. It contains pre-session interview questions.
正解:B
解説:
A usability test script is a structured document used by the moderator to ensure consistency across test sessions. It typically includes pre-session briefing text, pre- and post-session interview questions, and the specific usability tasks to be performed. However, it does not include answers to the test questions, as usability tests focus on observing user behavior and performance-not testing users' knowledge. Providing answers would bias results and invalidate findings. Thus, option D is incorrect and the best choice.
References:
Usability.gov: Creating a Test Script
Nielsen Norman Group: Usability Testing Tools and Documentation
ISO 25062 - Guidelines for Usability Reporting
#######################################################

質問 # 33
Which of the following is the correct distinction between formative and summative usability evaluation?
  • A. Summative evaluations assess the outcome, formative evaluations focus on improvement
  • B. Summative evaluations focus on improvement, formative evaluations assess the outcome
  • C. Summative evaluations mostly rely on user tests, formative evaluations require experts
  • D. Summative evaluations mostly rely on experts, formative evaluations require users
正解:A
解説:
Formative usability evaluation is conducted during the development process to identify usability problems and improve the product iteratively. It is diagnostic and improvement-focused. Summative evaluation, on the other hand, is done after development to assess the final product's usability, measuring how well it meets defined usability goals. Therefore, the correct distinction is that formative evaluation focuses on improvement, and summative evaluation assesses the outcome. This distinction aligns with widely accepted models such as those defined by ISO 9241-210 and usability.gov.
References:
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems
Usability.gov: Usability Evaluation Basics
Nielsen Norman Group: Formative vs Summative Usability Testing
#######################################################

質問 # 34
Which of the following is the highest WCAG conformance level, promising the most accessible content?
  • A. Single A (A)
  • B. Triple A (AAA)
  • C. Double A (AA)
  • D. Quadruple A (AAAA)
正解:B
解説:
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) define three levels of conformance for web content accessibility:
Level A (Single A) is the minimum level of compliance.
Level AA (Double A) is the standard recommended for most websites, balancing accessibility and design.
Level AAA (Triple A) is the highest and most comprehensive level of accessibility, covering the widest range of needs.
There is no such level as "Quadruple A (AAAA)," making option D invalid.
Thus, WCAG Triple A (AAA) promises the most accessible content, even though it may not always be practically achievable for all types of content.
References:
W3C: WCAG 2.1 Conformance Requirements
ISO/IEC 40500:2012 (WCAG 2.0)
W3C: How to Meet WCAG
#######################################################

質問 # 35
You're conducting a user survey and you have reached the third stage, selecting an appropriate questionnaire.
You have decided to use a standardized questionnaire as you want to benchmark against previous usability measurements.
Which of the following user questionnaires allow benchmarking against previous usability measurements?
i. SUS
ii. SUMI
iii. WAMMI
  • A. i & ii are true, iii is false
  • B. ii & iii are true, i is false
  • C. i, ii and iii are true
  • D. i is true, ii & iii are false
正解:C
解説:
SUS (System Usability Scale), SUMI (Software Usability Measurement Inventory), and WAMMI (Website Analysis and Measurement Inventory) are all validated, standardized usability questionnaires that support benchmarking. They allow comparison against known usability scores from a wide variety of systems. These instruments provide numeric scores that can be interpreted using benchmark datasets or industry standards.
Therefore, all three-i, ii, and iii-are true, making D the correct answer.
References:
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS - A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale
Kirakowski, J. (1994). SUMI Development
Here are the verified answers and detailed explanations for Questions 22 through 25, formatted in your specified structure:
#######################################################

質問 # 36
What's the difference between an informal usability review and an expert usability review?
  • A. Contrary to an expert review, an informal usability review is based on opinion
  • B. An informal review only requires one reviewer
  • C. No formal usability qualifications are required for an informal usability review
  • D. An expert usability review is a formal review, not an informal review
正解:C
解説:
An informal usability review can be conducted by anyone, including stakeholders or developers, and does not require formal usability training or qualifications. It is typically subjective and based on general impressions.
In contrast, an expert usability review (also called heuristic evaluation) is conducted by a trained usability expert who applies recognized usability principles. This is what differentiates the two approaches most clearly. Options A and C are misleading; expert reviews can be informal in format, and informal reviews aren't necessarily based solely on opinion. Option D is incorrect since both informal and expert reviews can be conducted individually or in groups.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: Heuristic Evaluation
ISO 9241-110:2020 - Interaction Principles
Usability.gov: Expert Review vs Informal Review
#######################################################

質問 # 37
......
弊社のCT-UT練習資料は、さまざまな学位の受験者に適しています。これらの受験者は、この分野の知識のレベルに関係ありません。これらのCT-UTトレーニング資料は当社にとって名誉あるものであり、お客様の目標達成を支援するための最大限の特権として扱っています。私たちの知る限り、CT-UT試験準備は何百万人もの受験者に夢を追いかけ、より効率的に学習するように動機付けました。 CT-UTの練習資料は、あなたを失望させません。
CT-UT対応問題集: https://www.goshiken.com/ISTQB/CT-UT-mondaishu.html
P.S.GoShikenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 ISTQB CT-UTダンプ:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TYTKhVby3eoveWAQJT_IkDwFdOQTpJz4
Reply

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list