Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › AIO-3288C› CT-UT日本語試験対策 & CT-UT日本語独学書籍
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] CT-UT日本語試験対策 & CT-UT日本語独学書籍

michael633

133

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
133

【General】 CT-UT日本語試験対策 & CT-UT日本語独学書籍

Posted at 12 hour before      View：23 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
無料でクラウドストレージから最新のPassTest CT-UT PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mDfzAcxpG58Wu0OXbUuBIEVfrpk-RkX3
試験に関する最新情報を入手することで、すべてのお客様がCT-UT試験に簡単に合格できると信じています。教材を購入すると、CT-UT試験に関する最新情報を入手できます。さらに重要なことは、当社の更新システムはすべてのお客様に無料で提供されることです。弊社のCT-UTトレーニング資料を購入して使用することに決めた場合、間違いなく試験に合格することは非常に簡単です。当社のCT-UT最新の質問により、近い将来にあなたの夢を実現できることを心から願っています。
ISTQBさまざまな種類の候補者がCT-UT認定を取得する方法を見つけるために、多くの研究が行われています。 シラバスの変更および理論と実践の最新の進展に応じて、CT-UTテストトレントを修正および更新します。 CT-UT認定トレーニングは、厳密な分析による近年のテストと業界動向に基づいています。 したがって、お客様のISTQB Certified Tester Usability Testerのために、より多くの選択肢が用意されています。試験のためにCT-UT試験問題を選択することをお勧めします。
試験の準備方法-実際的なCT-UT日本語試験対策試験-一番優秀なCT-UT日本語独学書籍常にISTQB CT-UT試験に参加する予定があるお客様は「こちらの問題集には、全部で何問位、掲載されておりますか？」といった質問を提出しました。心配なくて我々PassTestのISTQB CT-UT試験問題集は実際試験のすべての問題種類をカバーします。70％の問題は解説がありますし、試験の内容を理解しやすいと助けます。
ISTQB CT-UT 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • Basic Concepts: This section measures the skills of Usability Analysts and covers fundamental definitions and ideas related to usability, user experience, and accessibility. It explains what usability means in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction within software products. User experience concepts related to emotions, perceptions, and responses before, during, and after use are included. It also addresses accessibility, focusing on usage by people with diverse abilities.
トピック 2
  • User Surveys: This part assesses the ability of Usability Test Analysts to design and use surveys to gather user feedback on software usability. It describes how to prepare user surveys, select appropriate questionnaires, and analyze survey responses to measure user satisfaction and other quality attributes from the user’s perspective.
トピック 3
  • Usability Testing: This section measures the practical knowledge of Usability Testers in planning, conducting, analyzing, and reporting formal usability test sessions with users. It outlines test preparation activities including writing test plans, test scripts, and tasks, as well as considerations for test locations and pilot sessions. It explains how to moderate sessions, analyze findings, classify problems by severity, and communicate results effectively to stakeholders.
トピック 4
  • Risks in Usability, User Experience and Accessibility: This domain assesses the ability of Risk Analysts to identify and analyze common risks that can affect usability, user experience, and accessibility. It differentiates between product risks—such as users being unable to use a product effectively—and project risks, including lack of expertise or insufficient usability evaluation processes. Understanding these risks helps in planning effective usability testing and evaluation.
トピック 5
  • Usability Reviews: This domain evaluates the skills of Usability Testers in conducting reviews of software interfaces without user involvement. It differentiates informal reviews from expert reviews and introduces heuristic evaluation as a structured method. The section describes step-by-step approaches to preparing for and conducting reviews, emphasizing the importance of consensus and clear communication of findings.
トピック 6
  • Selecting Appropriate Methods: This domain helps Test Managers make decisions on which usability evaluation methods to apply depending on project context, resources, and maturity. It discusses criteria for selecting usability, user experience, and accessibility evaluation methods suited to different stages of development and organizational needs, including agile development scenarios.

ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester 認定 CT-UT 試験問題 (Q29-Q34):質問 # 29
Your project manager asked you for your advice. A recent project failed because the users were not satisfied with the final product, although your project manager claimed that she followed the human-centered design process. She interviewed users at the start of the project, created a first prototype and evaluated that prototype.
Which part of the human-centered design process did she miss?
  • A. The "analyze"-part
  • B. The "evaluate"-part
  • C. The "iterate"-part
  • D. The "design"-part
正解：C
解説：
The human-centered design process emphasizes iterative development-testing and refining designs through multiple cycles. In the scenario, the project manager interviewed users and evaluated a prototype but did not iterate based on feedback. Skipping iteration likely resulted in unmet user needs. Human-centered design, per ISO 9241-210, includes: understanding context of use, specifying requirements, producing design solutions, and evaluating-repeated iteratively. Hence, option D ("iterate") is correct.
References:
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Human-Centered Design Processes
Usability.gov: Human-Centered Design Activities
Nielsen Norman Group: Iterative Design in UX
#######################################################

質問 # 30
Which of the following is a key activity in a usability test session?
  • A. Moderate the usability test
  • B. Test the set up and modify the test script if needed
  • C. Extract usability findings and recommendations
  • D. Talk to the participant during the completion of a task
正解：A
解説：
Moderating the usability test is a core activity during the actual usability test session. The moderator guides participants through tasks, ensures the session stays on track, and avoids introducing bias. Option A (testing the setup) happens before the session, during preparation. Option C (extracting findings) occurs during analysis, after the test. Option D (talking during task execution) should be minimized unless necessary, to avoid influencing user behavior. Therefore, option B is the only correct answer aligned with best practices in usability testing.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: Role of the Usability Test Moderator
ISO 25062:2006 - Usability Test Documentation
Usability.gov: Conducting a Usability Test
#######################################################

質問 # 31
Which of the following is the correct distinction between formative and summative usability evaluation?
  • A. Summative evaluations focus on improvement, formative evaluations assess the outcome
  • B. Summative evaluations assess the outcome, formative evaluations focus on improvement
  • C. Summative evaluations mostly rely on experts, formative evaluations require users
  • D. Summative evaluations mostly rely on user tests, formative evaluations require experts
正解：B
解説：
Formative usability evaluation is conducted during the development process to identify usability problems and improve the product iteratively. It is diagnostic and improvement-focused. Summative evaluation, on the other hand, is done after development to assess the final product's usability, measuring how well it meets defined usability goals. Therefore, the correct distinction is that formative evaluation focuses on improvement, and summative evaluation assesses the outcome. This distinction aligns with widely accepted models such as those defined by ISO 9241-210 and usability.gov.
References:
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems
Usability.gov: Usability Evaluation Basics
Nielsen Norman Group: Formative vs Summative Usability Testing
#######################################################

質問 # 32
Your last 20-pages usability test report wasn't received well by the developers; only two of the 25 usability problems have been fixed. This time, you want to stick to the best practices in order to obtain better acceptance by the development team.
What are you going to do differently this time?
  • A. Add the low-priority findings you didn't include in the first report
  • B. Include positive findings in the report, not only usability problems
  • C. Make the report more detailed and longer
  • D. Include contact details of the test participants so that the development team can contact them in case they have questions
正解：B
解説：
Usability test reports are more effective when they are balanced and include not only problems but also what worked well. Including positive findings increases credibility, encourages the development team, and helps them understand what should remain unchanged. Option B violates privacy and ethical standards. Option C may dilute focus, and D could worsen the problem by making the report less accessible. Thus, the best practice supported by usability.gov and Nielsen Norman Group is to include both positive and negative findings.
References:
Usability.gov: Reporting Usability Findings
Nielsen Norman Group: Writing Usability Reports that Developers Will Read ISO 25062 - Usability Test Report Format
#######################################################

質問 # 33
In the last project, the usability tests substantially exceeded the budget of the test plan. Which quality control task could have been used to avoid this?
  • A. Check consumed resources regularly and compare with the estimates
  • B. Check that findings are communicated to the stakeholders
  • C. Check whether the usability test report conforms to the best practices
  • D. Check that the usability test plan has been properly reviewed
正解：A
解説：
To prevent usability testing from exceeding budget, active monitoring and control of project resources are critical. The best practice is to regularly check consumed time, costs, and effort against the original estimates, allowing timely adjustments to scope or resources. This is a classic quality control practice aligned with ISO
9001 principles and standard project management methodologies. Option A relates to test preparation, option C concerns reporting and communication, and option D applies after test execution. Only option B deals directly with budget control during the test.
References:
* ISO 9001:2015 - Quality Management Systems
* ISTQB: Usability Testing Guidelines
* Nielsen Norman Group: Budgeting for Usability Testing
#######################################################

質問 # 34
......
ISTQB　CT-UT認定資格試験が難しいので、弊社のCT-UT問題集はあなたに適当する認定資格試験問題集を見つけるし、本当の試験問題の難しさを克服することができます。弊社はISTQB　CT-UT認定試験の最新要求に従って関心を持って、全面的かつ高品質な模擬試験問題集を提供します。また、購入する前に、無料でCT-UTのPDF版デモをダウンロードでき、信頼性を確認することができます。
CT-UT日本語独学書籍: https://www.passtest.jp/ISTQB/CT-UT-shiken.html
2026年PassTestの最新CT-UT PDFダンプおよびCT-UT試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mDfzAcxpG58Wu0OXbUuBIEVfrpk-RkX3
https://www.getcertkey.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list