Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › AIO-3566JD4› High Effective AWS Certified Security - Specialty Te ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

High Effective AWS Certified Security - Specialty Test Braindumps Make the Most

billhil895

126

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
126

High Effective AWS Certified Security - Specialty Test Braindumps Make the Most

Posted at 16 hour before      View：19 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
We know that the standard for most workers become higher and higher; so we also set higher goal on our SCS-C03 guide questions. Our training materials put customers' interests in front of other points, committing us to the advanced SCS-C03 learning materials all along. Until now, we have simplified the most complicated SCS-C03 Guide questions and designed a straightforward operation system, with the natural and seamless user interfaces of SCS-C03 exam question grown to be more fluent, we assure that our practice materials provide you a total ease of use.
I believe that after you use our SCS-C03 study materials for a while, we will understand why we have a 99% pass rate. Our company has been pursuing the quality of our products. And our professional experts are the most specialized people in this career to help us pass the SCS-C03 Exam. They have studied and done reseach on the design of our SCS-C03 practice guide for over ten years. So every detail of our SCS-C03 exam questions is perfect.
SCS-C03 Actual Dump & SCS-C03 Well PrepIf you are still struggling to get the Amazon SCS-C03 exam certification, TestkingPDF will help you achieve your dream. TestkingPDF's Amazon SCS-C03 exam training materials is the best training materials. We can provide you with a good learning platform. How do you prepare for this exam to ensure you pass the exam successfully? The answer is very simple. If you have the appropriate time to learn, then select TestkingPDF's Amazon SCS-C03 Exam Training materials. With it, you will be happy and relaxed to prepare for the exam.
Amazon AWS Certified Security - Specialty Sample Questions (Q130-Q135):NEW QUESTION # 130
A company uses AWS Organizations and has an SCP at the root that prevents sharing resources with external accounts. The company now needs to allow only the marketing account to share resources externally while preventing all other accounts from doing so. All accounts are in the same OU. Which solution will meet these requirements?
  • A. Create a new SCP in the marketing account to explicitly allow sharing.
  • B. Use a permissions boundary in the marketing account.
  • C. Edit the existing SCP to add a condition that excludes the marketing account.
  • D. Edit the SCP to include an Allow statement for the marketing account.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Service control policies (SCPs) define the maximum available permissions for accounts and are evaluated as guardrails. AWS Certified Security - Specialty documentation states SCPs are typically used to apply organization-wide restrictions, and exceptions are commonly handled by using conditions (for example, excluding specific accounts) or by structuring OUs differently.
Because all accounts are in the same OU and the company must continue blocking external sharing for everyone except one account, modifying the existing SCP to exclude the marketing account is the most direct solution. An SCP attached at the root affects all accounts unless conditions narrow its scope. Adding a condition that excludes the marketing account allows that account to retain the ability to share resources externally while the SCP continues to block sharing for other accounts. Option A is not feasible because account-level SCPs cannot override a deny applied by a parent SCP; explicit denies always win. Option C misunderstands SCP behavior because SCPs do not grant permissions; they only limit. Option D is an IAM control that cannot override an organization-level deny. Therefore, the only secure, scalable option is to modify the existing SCP with an exception condition for the marketing account.

NEW QUESTION # 131
A company hosts its public website on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The website is experiencing a global DDoS attack by a specific IoT device brand that has a unique user agent.
A security engineer is creating an AWS WAF web ACL and will associate the web ACL with the ALB. The security engineer must implement a rule statement as part of the web ACL to block the requests. The rule statement must mitigate the current attack and future attacks from these IoT devices without blocking requests from customers.
Which rule statement will meet these requirements?
  • A. Use a string match rule statement that includes details of the IoT device brand from the user agent.
  • B. Use a geographic match rule statement. Configure the statement to block countries that the IoT devices are located in.
  • C. Use a rate-based rule statement. Set a rate limit that is equal to the number of requests that are coming from the IoT devices.
  • D. Use an IP set match rule statement that includes the IP address for IoT devices from the user agent.
Answer: A
Explanation:
AWS WAF allows security engineers to create string match rule statements that inspect specific parts of web requests, including HTTP headers such as the User-Agent header. According to the AWS Certified Security - Specialty Study Guide and AWS WAF documentation, string match rules are ideal for blocking requests that contain known malicious identifiers, such as a distinctive user agent associated with a specific bot or IoT device brand.
In this scenario, the attack originates from a specific IoT device brand that uses a unique user agent. A string match rule that inspects the User-Agent header can precisely block malicious requests while allowing legitimate customer traffic to continue uninterrupted. This approach provides targeted mitigation for both current and future attacks originating from the same device signature.

NEW QUESTION # 132
A company has an AWS account that hosts a production application. The company receives an email notification that Amazon GuardDuty has detected an Impact:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior finding in the account. A security engineer needs to run the investigation playbook for this security incident and must collect and analyze the information without affecting the application. Which solution will meet these requirements MOST quickly?
  • A. Log in to the AWS account by using read-only credentials. Review the GuardDuty finding for details about the IAM credentials that were used. Use the IAM console to add a DenyAll policy to the IAM principal.
  • B. Log in to the AWS account by using read-only credentials. Review the GuardDuty finding to determine which API calls initiated the finding. Use AWS CloudTrail Insights and AWS CloudTrail Lake to review the API calls in context.
  • C. Log in to the AWS account by using read-only credentials. Review the GuardDuty finding to determine which API calls initiated the finding. Use Amazon Detective to review the API calls in context.
  • D. Log in to the AWS account by using administrator credentials. Review the GuardDuty finding for details about the IAM credentials that were used. Use the IAM console to add a DenyAll policy to the IAM principal.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Amazon GuardDuty findings provide high-level detection of suspicious activity but are not designed for deep investigation on their own. The AWS Certified Security - Specialty documentation explains that Amazon Detective is purpose-built to support rapid investigations by automatically collecting, correlating, and visualizing data from GuardDuty, AWS CloudTrail, and VPC Flow Logs. Detective enables security engineers to analyze API calls, user behavior, and resource interactions in context without making any changes to the environment.
Using read-only credentials ensures that the investigation does not impact the production application. Amazon Detective allows investigators to pivot directly from a GuardDuty finding into a detailed activity graph, showing which IAM user made anomalous calls, what resources were accessed, and how behavior deviated from the baseline. This significantly accelerates incident investigation.
Options A and C involve applying DenyAll policies, which are containment actions and could affect application availability. Option D requires manual analysis and setup and is slower than using Amazon Detective, which is designed for immediate investigative workflows.
AWS incident response guidance recommends using Detective for rapid, non-intrusive analysis after GuardDuty findings.

NEW QUESTION # 133
A company is using AWS Organizations with nested OUs to manage AWS accounts. The company has a custom compliance monitoring service for the accounts. The monitoring service runs as an AWS Lambda function and is invoked by Amazon EventBridge Scheduler.
The company needs to deploy the monitoring service in all existing and future accounts in the organization.
The company must avoid using the organization's management account when the management account is not required.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
  • A. Configure a delegated administrator account for AWS CloudFormation. Create a CloudFormation StackSet in the delegated administrator account targeting the organization root with automatic deployment enabled.
  • B. Create a CloudFormation stack set in the organization's management account and manually add new accounts.
  • C. Use Systems Manager delegated administration and Automation to deploy the Lambda function and schedule.
  • D. Create a Systems Manager Automation runbook in the management account and share it to accounts.
Answer: A
Explanation:
AWS Organizations and CloudFormation StackSets provide an organizational deployment mechanism for consistent infrastructure across accounts. AWS Certified Security - Specialty guidance emphasizes minimizing use of the management account and using delegated administrator capabilities where available for centralized governance while reducing blast radius. By configuring a delegated administrator account for AWS CloudFormation, the company can create and manage StackSets without performing day-to-day deployment operations from the management account. Targeting the organization root ensures the StackSet deploys to all existing accounts. Enabling automatic deployment ensures that any future accounts that join the organization (or move into targeted OUs, depending on configuration) automatically receive the monitoring service without manual intervention. This directly meets the requirement to deploy to all existing and future accounts with minimal effort. Option A requires ongoing manual updates when accounts are added, increasing operational overhead. Options C and D rely on Systems Manager Automation, which can work but introduces additional operational complexity and is not the standard AWS mechanism for organization-wide infrastructure rollout compared to StackSets with auto-deployment. StackSets also provide consistent change control, drift detection, and centralized update mechanisms, which align with governance expectations for compliance tooling.
Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:
AWS Certified Security - Specialty Official Study Guide
AWS Organizations Delegated Administration
AWS CloudFormation StackSets for Multi-Account Governance

NEW QUESTION # 134
A security engineer is responding to an incident that is affecting an AWS account. The ID of the account is
123456789012. The attack created workloads that are distributed across multiple AWS Regions.
The security engineer contains the attack and removes all compute and storage resources from all affected Regions. However, the attacker also created an AWS KMS key. The key policy on the KMS key explicitly allows IAM principal kms:* permissions.
The key was scheduled to be deleted the previous day. However, the key is still enabled and usable. The key has an ARN of arn:aws:kms:us-east-2:123456789012:key/mrk-0bb0212cd9864fdea0dcamzo26efb5670.
The security engineer must delete the key as quickly as possible.
Which solution will meet this requirement?
  • A. Identify the other Regions where the KMS key ID is present and schedule the key for deletion in 7 days.
  • B. Disable the KMS key. Re-issue the deletion request for the KMS key in 30 days.
  • C. Update the IAM principal to allow kms:* permissions on the KMS key ARN. Re-issue the deletion request for the KMS key with a waiting period of 7 days.
  • D. Log in to the account by using the account root user credentials. Re-issue the deletion request for the KMS key with a waiting period of 7 days.
Answer: D
Explanation:
AWS KMS enforces amandatory minimum waiting period of 7 daysbefore a customer managed key can be deleted. According to AWS Certified Security - Specialty incident response guidance,no method exists to immediately delete a KMS key. The fastest possible deletion is achieved by scheduling deletion with the minimum 7-day waiting period.
In this scenario, although deletion was previously scheduled, the key remains enabled and usable. The most authoritative and reliable method to regain control and reissue deletion immediately is touse the AWS account root user, which has implicit permissions to manage KMS keys regardless of compromised IAM principals.
Option B is incorrect because KMS keys are regional resources; multi-Region keys require coordinated deletion but do not shorten the waiting period. Option C is unnecessary because the key policy already allows kms:*. Option D increases the deletion waiting period to 30 days, which violates the requirement to delete the key as quickly as possible.
AWS documentation clearly states thatroot user access is the ultimate authority for KMS key management and that7 days is the minimum deletion window, making this the fastest valid option.
* AWS Certified Security - Specialty Official Study Guide
* AWS Key Management Service Developer Guide
* AWS Incident Response Best Practices

NEW QUESTION # 135
......
TestkingPDF offers highly designed Amazon SCS-C03 exam questions and online SCS-C03 practice test engine to help you successfully clear the Amazon exam. Their study materials cover all the basic to advanced required SCS-C03 Exam Questions material that you need to know to pass the SCS-C03 Exam. These two simple, easy, and accessible learning formats will boost your confidence.
SCS-C03 Actual Dump: https://www.testkingpdf.com/SCS-C03-testking-pdf-torrent.html
Amazon Mock SCS-C03 Exam There's no need for you to test several times, TestkingPDF has assisted a lot of professionals in passing their SCS-C03 test, Almost everyone is trying to get AWS Certified Security - Specialty (SCS-C03) certification to update their CV or get the desired job, Our SCS-C03 test prep is renowned for free renewal in the whole year, Amazon Mock SCS-C03 Exam It is an important exam so you should study well and be confident as you tackle it.
Running ethereal or some other analyzer) at least three times SCS-C03 a day, every day, and saving the capture file will give you a much clearer idea of how things normally work.
With random address assignment, you might end up wasting groups of addresses because of addressing conflicts, There's no need for you to test several times, TestkingPDF has assisted a lot of professionals in passing their SCS-C03 test.
Free Updates For Amazon SCS-C03 PDF QuestionsAlmost everyone is trying to get AWS Certified Security - Specialty (SCS-C03) certification to update their CV or get the desired job, Our SCS-C03 test prep is renowned for free renewal in the whole year.
It is an important exam so you SCS-C03 Actual Dump should study well and be confident as you tackle it.
https://www.itdumpskr.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list