Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › ROC-RK3566-PC› XSIAM-Engineerコンポーネント、XSIAM-Engineer最新受験 ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] XSIAM-Engineerコンポーネント、XSIAM-Engineer最新受験攻略

danmill129

142

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
142

【General】 XSIAM-Engineerコンポーネント、XSIAM-Engineer最新受験攻略

Posted at yesterday 07:54      View：18 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
さらに、JPNTest XSIAM-Engineerダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kpqysnhIoQCeZMFQ3F8hEpq5nrIKowMg
私たちが直面するプレッシャーはあらゆる面からもたらされます。社会情勢が変化するにつれて、これらの圧力は増加する一方です。 私たちは外部環境を変えることはできませんが、自分の能力を向上させることができます。だから私たちのXSIAM-Engineer練習問題をお勧めます。私たちのXSIAM-Engineer試験問題を勉強すれば、あなたが憧れているXSIAM-Engineer認定試験資格証明書を得るだけでなく、より良いものになることもできます。
JPNTestクライアントにXSIAM-Engineer学習資料の3つのバージョンを提供し、PDFバージョン、PCバージョン、APPオンラインバージョンが含まれます。 異なるバージョンは、Palo Alto Networks独自の利点とメソッドの使用を後押しします。 XSIAM-Engineer試験トレントの内容は同じですが、クライアントごとに異なるバージョンが適しています。 たとえば、PCバージョンのXSIAM-Engineer学習教材は、Windowsシステムを搭載したコンピューターをサポートします。その利点には、実際の操作試験環境をシミュレートし、試験をシミュレートでき、期間限定試験に参加できることです。 そして、バージョンが何であれ、ユーザーは自分の喜びでXSIAM-EngineerのPalo Alto Networks XSIAM Engineerガイド急流を学ぶことができます。 タイトルと回答は同じであり、コンピューターまたは携帯電話またはラップトップで製品を使用できます。
素晴らしいXSIAM-Engineerコンポーネント一回合格-一番優秀なXSIAM-Engineer最新受験攻略審査中、XSIAM-Engineer試験トレントに問題がある場合は、アフターセールスにお問い合わせください。彼らは常にあなたを24時間365日お手伝いします。これらのサービスにより、損失を回避できます。また、XSIAM-Engineer練習教材の合格率はこれまでに98〜100％に達しているため、この機会を逃すことはできません。また、XSIAM-Engineer試験トレントの無料アップデートが1年間無料でメールボックスに送信されます。練習資料の使用中に素晴らしい経験ができることを願っています。
Palo Alto Networks XSIAM-Engineer 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • Content Optimization: This section of the exam measures skills of Detection Engineers and focuses on refining XSIAM content and detection logic. It includes deploying parsing and data modeling rules for normalization, managing detection rules based on correlation, IOCs, BIOCs, and attack surface management, and optimizing incident and alert layouts. Candidates must also demonstrate proficiency in creating custom dashboards and reporting templates to support operational visibility.
トピック 2
  • Integration and Automation: This section of the exam measures skills of SIEM Engineers and focuses on data onboarding and automation setup in XSIAM. It covers integrating diverse data sources such as endpoint, network, cloud, and identity, configuring automation feeds like messaging, authentication, and threat intelligence, and implementing Marketplace content packs. It also evaluates the ability to plan, create, customize, and debug playbooks for efficient workflow automation.
トピック 3
  • Planning and Installation: This section of the exam measures skills of XSIAM Engineers and covers the planning, evaluation, and installation of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM components. It focuses on assessing existing IT infrastructure, defining deployment requirements for hardware, software, and integrations, and establishing communication needs for XSIAM architecture. Candidates must also configure agents, Broker VMs, and engines, along with managing user roles, permissions, and access controls.
トピック 4
  • Maintenance and Troubleshooting: This section of the exam measures skills of Security Operations Engineers and covers post-deployment maintenance and troubleshooting of XSIAM components. It includes managing exception configurations, updating software components such as XDR agents and Broker VMs, and diagnosing data ingestion, normalization, and parsing issues. Candidates must also troubleshoot integrations, automation playbooks, and system performance to ensure operational reliability.

Palo Alto Networks XSIAM Engineer 認定 XSIAM-Engineer 試験問題 (Q350-Q355):質問 # 350
An e-commerce company is evaluating its existing incident response (IR) procedures and tooling against XSIAM's capabilities. Their current IR process is largely manual, relying on disparate logs from multiple point solutions (SIEM, EDR, Firewall logs) and manual correlation. They use a separate ticketing system (Jira) for incident tracking. How does XSIAM's XDR/SIEM/SOAR convergence benefit this company in improving its IR posture, and what specific steps should be taken during the XSIAM planning phase to maximize these benefits?
  • A. Benefits: XSIAM is a pure SIEM, offering only enhanced log aggregation. Planning: Focus solely on ingesting more log sources into XSIAM for better historical analysis.
  • B. Benefits: XSIAM provides an executive dashboard for security metrics. Planning: Configure executive reports to display security posture improvements.
  • C. Benefits: XSIAM is only for network-based threats. Planning: Ensure all network devices are Palo Alto Networks NGFWs for full compatibility.
  • D. Benefits: XSIAM replaces Jira and all existing security tools. Planning: Immediately decommission all legacy systems and migrate incident data to XSIAM.
  • E. Benefits: XSIAM centralizes telemetry, automates correlation, and provides integrated response actions. Planning: (1 ) Map existing IR playbooks to XSIAM's XSOAR capabilities, identifying automation opportunities. (2) Define data ingestion requirements for all relevant security tools (endpoints, network, cloud, identity) to feed (3) Plan for API integrations with existing systems like Jira for bi-directional updates, rather than full replacement.
正解：E
解説：
XSIAM's strength lies in its convergence of XDR, SIEM, and SOAR capabilities. For a company with manual IR, this translates to significant benefits: Centralized Telemetry & Automated Correlation: XSIAM ingests diverse data sources (endpoint, network, cloud, identity, applications) and uses AI/ML to automatically correlate events across these domains, reducing manual effort and improving detection accuracy. Integrated Response Actions (SOAR): XSIAM incorporates XSOAR's orchestration and automation engine, allowing security teams to define and execute automated playbooks for enrichment, containment, and remediation directly from an alert or incident. During planning, to maximize these benefits: 1. Playbook Mapping: Review existing manual IR procedures and map them to XSOAR's automation capabilities. Identify which steps can be fully automated, partially automated, or require human intervention, and design playbooks accordingly. 2. Data Ingestion Strategy: Ensure all critical security telemetry (endpoint logs from Cortex XDR, network logs, cloud logs, identity logs) are properly configured for ingestion into XSIAM. This provides the comprehensive data needed for XSIAM's analytics. 3. API Integrations: Rather than attempting a full replacement of existing systems like Jira, plan for robust API integrations. This allows XSIAM to automatically create or update tickets in Jira, and potentially receive updates from Jira back into XSIAM, maintaining workflow continuity and avoiding disruption during the transition. This allows the organization to leverage XSIAM's capabilities while integrating with established operational tools.

質問 # 351
A Cortex XSIAM engineer at a SOC downgrades a critical threat intelligence content pack from the Cortex Marketplace while performing routine maintenance. As a result, the SOC team loses access to the latest threat intelligence data.
Which action will restore the functionality of the content pack to its previously installed version?
  • A. Back up the current configuration and data, then revert to the previously installed version.
  • B. Remove all integrations and playbooks associated with the content pack, then revert to the previously installed version.
  • C. Contact Palo Alto Networks Support to create an exception to revert to the previously installed version.
  • D. Directly reinstall the previously installed version over the current one.
正解：D
解説：
To restore the content pack to its previously installed version, the engineer can directly reinstall the desired version from the Cortex Marketplace. Content packs support version management, allowing rollback or upgrade without requiring support intervention or removing existing configurations.

質問 # 352
During the planning phase for XSIAM deployment, a security architect identifies a critical requirement: certain sensitive incident data (e.g., related to executive compromise) should only be accessible by a select group of 'Elite Responders' within the SOC, even if other 'Incident Responders' have general access to incidents. How can XSIAM's role-based access control (RBAC) be leveraged to enforce this data segmentation effectively, without creating separate XSIAM instances?
  • A. Utilize XSIAM's Multi-Tenancy feature to create a separate tenant for sensitive incidents, assigning 'Elite Responders' to this tenant.
  • B. Create a custom role for 'Elite Responders' with 'Incident - View' and 'Incident - Edit' permissions, and for other 'Incident Responders', only grant 'Incident - View' access.
  • C. Apply context-based access control (CBAC) policies on the incident fields, restricting viewing rights for specific fields based on user group membership.
  • D. Implement data filtering rules at the data source ingestion level to tag sensitive data, then create a custom role for 'Elite Responders' that explicitly grants access only to incidents with that specific tag.
  • E. XSIAM's RBAC does not support granular data segmentation within a single instance; a workaround involving external data masking or separate security tools would be required.
正解：D
解説：
XSIAM allows for granular control beyond just module access. By tagging sensitive data at ingestion (or through automation rules after ingestion), you can then create custom roles that use these tags as conditions for access. This is a common and effective way to achieve data segmentation within a single XSIAM instance. Option B (Multi-Tenancy) is for complete separation of environments, not just data within a single SOC'S view. Option C doesn't address the data sensitivity, only the action permissions. Option D (CBAC) is more about field-level access, not incident-level access based on sensitivity. Option E is incorrect as XSIAM does support this level of granularity.

質問 # 353
A global enterprise uses XSIAM for centralized security monitoring. They've discovered that highly critical but extremely noisy network device logs (e.g., connection resets, high-volume legitimate traffic) are consuming excessive Data Lake storage and impacting query performance, even after initial parsing. These logs contain useful metadata (source/dest IP, port, protocol) but most of the raw message content is irrelevant for long-term retention or immediate security analysis, yet is still stored. To optimize storage, reduce ingestion costs, and improve query efficiency without losing critical metadata, which Data Flow content optimization strategy is best?
  • A. Filter out these noisy logs entirely at the Data Collector level using a drop rule based on event type or source, losing all metadata.
  • B. Transform the raw log message content into a more compact, compressed format (e.g., Base64 encoded) before storing it in the Data Lake, and decompress it during XQL queries.
  • C. Configure a retention policy on the Data Lake specific to these log types, setting a very short retention period (e.g., 7 days) to limit storage consumption.
  • D. Use XSIAM's 'Summarization' feature to aggregate these logs into summary events, losing individual log details but retaining counts and basic statistics.
  • E. Implement a project() operation early in the Data Flow to remove the large, irrelevant raw message field (e.g., event.message) after extracting all necessary metadata, ensuring only optimized fields are stored in the Data Lake.
正解：E
解説：
Option B is the most effective content optimization strategy for this scenario. By using a operation (or an implicit projection project ( ) by only keeping the fields you want), you explicitly select which fields are retained in the Data Lake. If the raw field is large and event . message largely irrelevant after parsing, removing it after extracting all necessary metadata (like source/dest IP, port, protocol) directly reduces storage consumption and improves query performance because XSIAM has less data to index and retrieve. This is content optimization at its core, as you're optimizing the content that is actually stored. Option A leads to data loss. Option C manages retention post-ingestion but doesn't optimize the ingested data itself. Option D might be useful for certain analytics but loses granular details required for specific threat hunting. Option E adds complexity and query overhead for decompression.

質問 # 354
An organization is performing a hardware sizing exercise for a Palo Alto Networks XSIAM deployment, anticipating 250,000 security events per second (EPS) on average, with potential spikes to 500,000 EPS during security incidents. The security team also expects to run complex analytical queries that involve joining data from multiple sources over a 3-month period, often requiring custom aggregations. Which of the following hardware characteristics would be the most critical to prioritize for the XSIAM cluster nodes to handle this workload effectively?
  • A. High clock speed CPUs (e.g., 3.0+ GHz) with a moderate number of cores (e.g., 16-24) to optimize single-thread performance for parsing and normalization.
  • B. Extremely fast network interfaces (e.g., 200 GbE) to handle the massive ingress rate, even if CPU and RAM specifications are slightly lower.
  • C. Maximum possible RAM capacity per node (e.g., 768 GB - 1 TB+) to keep larger datasets in memory for faster query execution.
  • D. A balance of high core count CPUs (e.g., 32-64 cores) and large amounts of high-speed RAM (e.g., 512 GB+) to facilitate parallel processing for both ingestion and complex analytical queries.
  • E. NVMe SSDs with the highest possible IOPS and lowest latency, even if it means sacrificing some CPU and RAM capacity.
正解：D
解説：
This scenario describes both high ingestion rates (requiring processing power) and complex analytical queries (requiring significant computational resources and memory). XSIAM leverages distributed computing for these tasks. Therefore, a balance of high core count CPUs (for parallel processing of ingestion and queries) and large amounts of high-speed RAM (to hold working sets for complex aggregations and joins) is paramount (C). While high clock speed CPUs (A) are good for some tasks, the sheer volume and complexity necessitate parallelization provided by more cores. Maximum RAM (B) is beneficial but insufficient without adequate CPU. Extremely fast network interfaces (D) are important for ingress but useless if the cluster can't process the data. NVMe SSDs (E) are crucial for I/O but don't address the computational and memory demands of complex analytics.

質問 # 355
......
お客様にXSIAM-Engineer試験ダンプをよりよく理解していただくために、当社はお客様に試用版を提供します。また、トレイルバージョンは無料です。トレイルバージョンはお客様にデモを提供します。つまり、お客様はXSIAM-Engineer試験トレントのデモを無料で学習できます。 XSIAM-Engineerテストクイズを使用する場合、当社の製品は優れた品質であり、他の製品と比較することはできないことを十分に知っていると思われます。 躊躇しないで、XSIAM-Engineerテストクイズを購入してください！
XSIAM-Engineer最新受験攻略: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/XSIAM-Engineer-mondaishu
P.S. JPNTestがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいXSIAM-Engineerダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kpqysnhIoQCeZMFQ3F8hEpq5nrIKowMg
https://www.jpshiken.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list