Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › ITX-3568JQ› Upgrade ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps, ISO-IEC-27 ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Upgrade ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Learning Mo

billtay356

132

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
132

【General】 Upgrade ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Learning Mo

Posted at yesterday 12:06      View：22 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by BraindumpStudy: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12gRRFv3P6PsPuMlj09Orjz9U6B1fhjVy
By virtue of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice materials, many customers get comfortable experiences of Whole Package of Services and of course passing the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study guide successfully. Our company conducts our business very well rather than unprincipled company which just cuts and pastes content from others and sell them to exam candidates.All candidate are desperately eager for useful ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Actual Exam, our products help you and we are having an acute shortage of efficient ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions.
The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification program is designed for professionals who have a deep understanding of information security management systems and audit principles. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam covers various topics, including information security management system standards, audit techniques, risk management, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam also tests the candidate's ability to plan, conduct, report, and follow up on an audit of an ISMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 27001 standards.
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Learning Mode, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam QuestionsAccording to the needs of all people, the experts and professors in our company designed three different versions of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification training materials for all customers. The three versions are very flexible for all customers to operate. You can choose the version for yourself which is most suitable, and all the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Training Materials of our company can be found in the three versions. It is very flexible for you to use the three versions of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor latest questions to preparing for your ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam.
Achieving the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification can lead to various benefits for individuals and organizations. It demonstrates a high level of competence and professionalism in auditing ISMS, which can improve an individual’s career prospects and increase the credibility of their organization. Additionally, organizations can benefit from having certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditors who can effectively assess and improve their information security management systems.
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q360-Q365):NEW QUESTION # 360
Scenario 9: Techmanic is a Belgian company founded in 1995 and currently operating in Brussels. It provides IT consultancy, software design, and hardware/software services, including deployment and maintenance. The company serves sectors like public services, finance, telecom, energy, healthcare, and education. As a customer-centered company, it prioritizes strong client relationships and leading security practices.
Techmanic has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified for a year and regards this certification with pride. During the certification audit, the auditor found some inconsistencies in its ISMS implementation. Since the observed situations did not affect the capability of its ISMS to achieve the intended results, Techmanic was certified after auditors followed up on the root cause analysis and corrective actions remotely During that year, the company added hosting to its list of services and requested to expand its certification scope to include that area The auditor in charge approved the request and notified Techmanic that the extension audit would be conducted during the surveillance audit Techmanic underwent a surveillance audit to verify its iSMS's continued effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. The surveillance audit aimed to ensure that Techmanic's security practices, including the recent addition of hosting services, aligned seamlessly with the rigorous requirements of the certification The auditor strategically utilized the findings from previous surveillance audit reports in the recertification activity with the purpose of replacing the need for additional recertification audits, specifically in the IT consultancy sector. Recognizing the value of continual improvement and learning from past assessments. Techmanic implemented a practice of reviewing previous surveillance audit reports. This proactive approach not only facilitated identifying and resolving potential nonconformities but also aimed to streamline the recertification process in the IT consultancy sector.
During the surveillance audit, several nonconformities were found. The ISMS continued to fulfill the ISO/IEC 27001*s requirements, but Techmanic failed to resolve the nonconformities related to the hosting services, as reported by its internal auditor. In addition, the internal audit report had several inconsistencies, which questioned the independence of the internal auditor during the audit of hosting services. Based on this, the extension certification was not granted. As a result. Techmanic requested a transfer to another certification body. In the meantime, the company released a statement to its clients stating that the ISO/IEC 27001 certification covers the IT services, as well as the hosting services.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What action should be taken regarding Techmanic's certification?
  • A. Withdraw the certification because they failed to resolve nonconformities related to hosting services
  • B. Suspend the certification because they used the certification out of its scope
  • C. Transfer the certification because they were not granted the extension certification
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct answer:
Techmanic misrepresented its certification scope, which is a violation of ISO certification rules.
Suspension allows time for corrective action before withdrawal is considered.
B . Incorrect:
Certification withdrawal is only necessary if corrective actions fail after suspension.
C . Incorrect:
Transfer does not resolve misrepresentation issues.
Relevant Standard Reference:

NEW QUESTION # 361
Scenario 9: Techmanic is a Belgian company founded in 1995 and currently operating in Brussels. It provides IT consultancy, software design, and hardware/software services, including deployment and maintenance. The company serves sectors like public services, finance, telecom, energy, healthcare, and education. As a customer-centered company, it prioritizes strong client relationships and leading security practices.
Techmanic has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified for a year and regards this certification with pride. During the certification audit, the auditor found some inconsistencies in its ISMS implementation. Since the observed situations did not affect the capability of its ISMS to achieve the intended results, Techmanic was certified after auditors followed up on the root cause analysis and corrective actions remotely During that year, the company added hosting to its list of services and requested to expand its certification scope to include that area The auditor in charge approved the request and notified Techmanic that the extension audit would be conducted during the surveillance audit Techmanic underwent a surveillance audit to verify its iSMS's continued effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. The surveillance audit aimed to ensure that Techmanic's security practices, including the recent addition of hosting services, aligned seamlessly with the rigorous requirements of the certification The auditor strategically utilized the findings from previous surveillance audit reports in the recertification activity with the purpose of replacing the need for additional recertification audits, specifically in the IT consultancy sector. Recognizing the value of continual improvement and learning from past assessments. Techmanic implemented a practice of reviewing previous surveillance audit reports. This proactive approach not only facilitated identifying and resolving potential nonconformities but also aimed to streamline the recertification process in the IT consultancy sector.
During the surveillance audit, several nonconformities were found. The ISMS continued to fulfill the ISO/IEC 27001*s requirements, but Techmanic failed to resolve the nonconformities related to the hosting services, as reported by its internal auditor. In addition, the internal audit report had several inconsistencies, which questioned the independence of the internal auditor during the audit of hosting services. Based on this, the extension certification was not granted. As a result. Techmanic requested a transfer to another certification body. In the meantime, the company released a statement to its clients stating that the ISO/IEC 27001 certification covers the IT services, as well as the hosting services.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, what is the purpose of surveillance audits?
  • A. To evaluate the financial performance of the organization
  • B. To assess compliance and grant initial certification
  • C. To maintain confidence in the certified management system between audits
Answer: C
Explanation:
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.6.2 (Purpose of Surveillance Audits)

NEW QUESTION # 362
You are carrying out your first third-party ISMS surveillance audit as an Audit Team Leader. You are presently in the auditee's data centre with another member of your audit team.
Your colleague seems unsure as to the difference between an information security event and an information security incident. You attempt to explain the difference by providing examples.
Which three of the following scenarios can be defined as information security incidents?
  • A. A hard drive is used after its recommended replacement date
  • B. The organisation's marketing data is copied by hackers and sold to a competitor
  • C. An unhappy employee changes payroll records without permission
  • D. The organisation's malware protection software prevents a virus
  • E. The organisation receives a phishing email
  • F. An employee fails to clear their desk at the end of their shift
  • G. A contractor who has not been paid deletes top management ICT accounts
  • H. The organisation fails a third-party penetration test
Answer: B,C,G
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27000:2018, which provides an overview and vocabulary of information security management systems, an information security event is an identified occurrence of a system, service or network state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, or a previously unknown situation that may be security relevant1. An information security incident is a single or a series of unwanted or unexpected information security events that have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security1. Therefore, based on this definition, three examples of information security incidents are:
* A contractor who has not been paid deletes top management ICT accounts: This is an example of an unwanted or unexpected information security event that has a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it may result in loss of access, data, or functionality for the top management.
* An unhappy employee changes payroll records without permission: This is an example of an unwanted or unexpected information security event that has a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it may result in financial fraud, legal liability, or reputational damage for the organization.
* The organisation's marketing data is copied by hackers and sold to a competitor: This is an example of an unwanted or unexpected information security event that has a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it may result in loss of confidentiality, competitive advantage, or customer trust for the organization.
The other options are not examples of information security incidents, but rather information security events that may or may not lead to incidents depending on their impact and severity. For example:
* The organisation's malware protection software prevents a virus: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a system state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, as it is prevented by the malware protection software.
* A hard drive is used after its recommended replacement date: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a system state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless it fails or causes other problems.
* The organisation receives a phishing email: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a network state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless it is opened or responded to by the recipient.
* An employee fails to clear their desk at the end of their shift: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a service state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless the desk contains sensitive or confidential information that is accessed by unauthorized persons.
* The organisation fails a third-party penetration test: This is an example of an identified occurrence of a system state indicating a possible breach of information security policy or failure of safeguards, but it does not have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security, unless the penetration test reveals serious vulnerabilities that are exploited by malicious actors.
References: ISO/IEC 27000:2018 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Overview and vocabulary

NEW QUESTION # 363
You are carrying out your first third-party ISMS surveillance audit as an Audit Team Leader. You are presently in the auditee's data centre with another member of your audit team.
You are currently in a large room that is subdivided into several smaller rooms, each of which has a numeric combination lock and swipe card reader on the door. You notice two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorised electrical repairs.
You go to reception and ask to see the door access record for the client's suite. This indicates only one card was swiped. You ask the receptionist and they reply, "yes it's a common problem. We ask everyone to swipe their cards but with contractors especially, one tends to swipe and the rest simply 'tailgate' their way in" but we know who they are from the reception sign-in.
Based on the scenario above which one of the following actions would you now take?
  • A. Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier
  • B. Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined
  • C. Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times
  • D. Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV
  • E. Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities
  • F. Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.1 'security perimiters' as a secure area is not adequately protected
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The best action to take in this scenario is to determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas, such as CCTV. This action is consistent with the audit principle of evidence-based approach, which requires the auditor to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the audit findings and conclusions1. By verifying the existence and effectiveness of other security controls, the auditor can assess the extent and impact of the nonconformity observed, and determine the appropriate audit finding and recommendation.
The other options are not the best actions to take in this scenario, because they are either premature or inappropriate. For example:
*Option A is inappropriate, because it is not the auditor's role to suggest specific solutions or improvements to the auditee, but rather to report the audit findings and recommendations based on the audit criteria and objectives2. A large sign in reception may not be an effective or feasible solution to address the issue of tailgating, and it may not reflect the root cause of the problem.
*Option C is premature, because it assumes that the control A.7.1 'security perimeters' is not adequately implemented, without verifying the existence and effectiveness of other security controls that may compensate for the observed nonconformity. The auditor should not jump to conclusions based on a single observation, but rather gather sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the audit finding3.
*Option D is premature, because it assumes that the control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' is not adequately implemented, without verifying the existence and effectiveness of other security controls that may compensate for the observed nonconformity. The auditor should not jump to conclusions based on a single observation, but rather gather sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the audit finding3.
*Option E is inappropriate, because it is not related to the observed nonconformity, which is about the access control to secure areas, not the information security requirements agreed upon with the supplier. The auditor should not raise a nonconformity based on irrelevant or incorrect audit criteria4.
*Option F is inappropriate, because it is not the auditor's role to suggest specific solutions or improvements to the auditee, but rather to report the audit findings and recommendations based on the audit criteria and objectives2. Requiring contractors to be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities may not be an effective or feasible solution to address the issue of tailgating, and it may not reflect the root cause of the problem.
References: 1: ISO 19011:2018, 5.2; 2: ISO 19011:2018, 6.6; 3: ISO 19011:2018, 6.2; 4: ISO 19011:2018,
6.3; : ISO 19011:2018; : ISO 19011:2018; : ISO 19011:2018; : ISO 19011:2018

NEW QUESTION # 364
Which of the following is a preventive security measure?
  • A. Shutting down the Internet connection after an attack
  • B. Storing sensitive information in a data save
  • C. Installing logging and monitoring software
Answer: B
Explanation:
A preventive security measure is a measure that aims to prevent or deter potential incidents from occurring, or to reduce their likelihood or impact. A preventive security measure can be a policy, a procedure, a device, a technique or an action that reduces the exposure to threats and vulnerabilities. Storing sensitive information in a data safe is an example of a preventive security measure, because it protects the information from unauthorized access, disclosure, modification or destruction by physical means, such as theft, fire, flood, etc. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 defines preventive control as "control that modifies risk by avoiding an unwanted incident" (see clause 3.19). Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, [What is Preventive Security?]

NEW QUESTION # 365
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Learning Mode: https://www.braindumpstudy.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_braindumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest BraindumpStudy ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12gRRFv3P6PsPuMlj09Orjz9U6B1fhjVy
https://www.trainingdumps.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list