Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Core Board › Core-1808-JD4› COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Online Version, COBI ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Online Version, COBIT-Design-and-Implementation

alanhil594

130

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
130

【General】 COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Online Version, COBIT-Design-and-Implementation

Posted at yesterday 19:48      View：18 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
BONUS!!! Download part of PrepPDF COBIT-Design-and-Implementation dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MsjDWHv348E38V0O50UG7Nrzo1KazLNa
Having COBIT-Design-and-Implementation training materials of PrepPDF is equal to have success. If you buy our COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam dumps, we will offer one year-update service. The passing rate of COBIT-Design-and-Implementation test of PrepPDF is 100%, if the COBIT-Design-and-Implementation VCE Dumps and training materials have any problems or you fail the COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam with our COBIT-Design-and-Implementation braindumps, we will refund fully.
ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Design Factors for a Governance System: This domain targets IT strategists, enterprise architects, and governance advisors. It assesses their keen ability to identify and dissect critical design factors that hold significant influence over the development and deployment of a thriving governance system. Their expertise ensures the system is tailored to the organization's distinct requirements.
Topic 2
  • Implementing & Optimizing I&T Governance Overview: Senior IT leaders, governance directors, and consultants step into the spotlight here. The exam assesses their profound expertise in establishing and refining IT governance practices across the entire enterprise landscape. Their proficiency in ensuring strategic alignment, facilitating sound decision-making, and maximizing value is vital.
Topic 3
  • Key Topics Decision Matrix: IT governance analysts, advisors, and consultants showcase their proficiency in employing a decision matrix as a tool. They exhibit their skill in evaluating and prioritizing key topics, making well-informed choices that ultimately enhance the implementation and ongoing improvement of robust governance systems.
Topic 4
  • The Governance System Design Workflow: The exam zeroes in on IT architects, designers, and consultants as the primary audience. This section evaluates their prowess in crafting effective governance systems. These professionals will exhibit their talent for creating streamlined workflow processes, defining clear governance structures, and customizing governance frameworks to perfectly suit the unique needs of their organizations.
Topic 5
  • COBIT Basic Concepts: IT professionals, managers, and those immersed in governance practices will encounter this section, which tests their grasp of COBIT fundamentals. This includes understanding the Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies framework, along with the core principles that guide effective governance of enterprise IT.
Topic 6
  • Impact of Design Factors: Management consultants, IT strategists, and governance specialists take center stage as they delve into understanding the far-reaching impact of design factors. They assess how these factors influence the effectiveness of governance systems, processes, and the attainment of strategic objectives. Their insight ensures the optimization of governance practices.

COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Sample Test Online & Valid Dumps COBIT-Design-and-Implementation EbookAlthough at this moment, the pass rate of our ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam braindumps can be said to be the best compared with that of other exam tests, our experts all are never satisfied with the current results because they know the truth that only through steady progress can our ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Preparation materials win a place in the field of exam question making forever.
ISACA COBIT Design and Implementation Certificate Sample Questions (Q124-Q129):NEW QUESTION # 124
In which of the following phases should long-term targets be adjusted based on experience?
  • A. How do we get there?
  • B. What needs to be done?
  • C. Where are we now?
  • D. Did we get there?
Answer: D
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 implementation lifecycle, the phase where long-term targets should be adjusted based on experience is the evaluation phase, known as "Did we get there?". This phase involves assessing the results of the implemented governance and management practices to determine if the objectives have been met and to identify areas for improvement.
Detailed Explanation with References:
* How do we get there? (Option A):
* This phase focuses on developing and executing the plan to achieve the governance objectives. It involves identifying the steps, resources, and timeline needed to reach the desired state. While important for planning, this phase is more about action and implementation rather than evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets.
* Where are we now? (Option B):
* This phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system, identifying gaps, and understanding the baseline. It provides the foundational information needed to plan improvements but does not involve adjusting long-term targets.
* What needs to be done? (Option C):
* This phase is concerned with identifying the specific actions and initiatives required to address the gaps and achieve the governance objectives. It involves planning and prioritizing activities but not the evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets based on experience.
* Did we get there? (Option D):
* In this phase, the enterprise evaluates the outcomes of the implemented governance system against the set objectives and targets. It involves assessing whether the desired goals were achieved and analyzing the effectiveness of the governance practices. Based on this evaluation, the organization can adjust long-term targets to better align with practical experience, new insights, and evolving business needs. This phase is critical for continuous improvement and ensuring that the governance system remains relevant and effective over time.
* According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, this phase includes reviewing performance metrics, stakeholder feedback, and lessons learned from the implementation process. These insights are then used to refine and adjust long-term targets to improve future performance and outcomes.
Conclusion:The correct answer isD. Did we get there?. This phase involves evaluating the results of the governance implementation, learning from the experience, and making necessary adjustments to long-term targets to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with the enterprise's goals.
References:
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.

NEW QUESTION # 125
Which of the following BEST explains whether the design factors Threat Landscape and Compliance Requirements would differ between a military defense contractor and a pharmaceutical company developing innovative genetic cancer treatments?
  • A. It is impossible to accurately assess the threat landscape for both enterprises.
  • B. They would be very different because both enterprises are operating in completely different environments.
  • C. Each enterprise's industry sectors are very different, making meaningful comparison impossible.
  • D. They would not differ, because both enterprises are subject to extensive regulations and operate in a high threat landscape.
Answer: B
Explanation:
COBIT 2019 explicitly states that design factors are context-dependent and must be assessed individually for each enterprise. Although both a military defense contractor and a pharmaceutical company operate in regulated environments, the nature, sources, and impact of threats and compliance requirements differ significantly.
A defense contractor faces geopolitical threats, national security regulations, export controls, and classified information risks. A pharmaceutical company, particularly one engaged in genetic research, faces regulatory scrutiny related to clinical trials, patient safety, intellectual property, and ethical compliance.
The Design Guide emphasizes that enterprises operating in different environments will have different threat profiles and compliance drivers, even if both are highly regulated. This difference directly affects governance priorities, focus areas, and capability requirements.
Therefore, the correct explanation is that the design factors would be very different due to the fundamentally different operating environments.

NEW QUESTION # 126
Which of the following would BEST enable the prioritization of governance objectives?
  • A. The enterprise's risk tolerance
  • B. The IT strategic plan
  • C. A matrixed scoring methodology
  • D. Expected performance outcomes
Answer: C
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, governance system design requires a structured and objective method to translate multiple design factors-such as enterprise goals, risk profile, compliance requirements, and threat landscape-into prioritized governance and management objectives. The Design Guide explicitly describes the use of scoring models and weighted assessments when determining priorities across objectives. A matrixed scoring methodology enables enterprises to systematically evaluate and compare governance objectives against multiple criteria simultaneously.
Unlike an IT strategic plan, which provides direction but not prioritization logic, or expected performance outcomes, which are results rather than decision tools, a scoring methodology allows quantitative comparison across diverse inputs. Risk tolerance alone influences prioritization but does not provide a complete mechanism for resolving conflicts among competing objectives.
The Design Guide emphasizes that design factors should be translated into governance and management priorities, and this translation is operationalized through scoring tables and priority matrices. These matrices help enterprises visualize trade-offs, resolve conflicting demands, and ensure that the final governance system reflects enterprise context in a repeatable, auditable, and transparent manner. This makes a matrixed scoring methodology the most effective enabler for prioritization.

NEW QUESTION # 127
Which of the following components should be considered for inclusion when considering the threat landscape design factor?
  • A. Impact and probability levels
  • B. Information flows including security policy
  • C. Information security focus areas
  • D. Compliance and assurance capabilities
Answer: A
Explanation:
When considering the threat landscape design factor, impact and probability levels should be considered for inclusion. These levels help in assessing the potential consequences and likelihood of various threats, which is essential for effective risk management and governance.
In the COBIT 2019 framework, the threat landscape design factor involves understanding and evaluating the risks that an enterprise may face. Impact and probability levels are critical components of this evaluation as they provide a basis for prioritizing threats and developing appropriate responses.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2iscusses the importance of understanding the threat landscape and evaluating threats based on their impact and probability.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives:Emphasizes the need for a thorough risk assessment, which includes analyzing the impact and probability of potential threats.
Including impact and probability levels in the assessment of the threat landscape ensures a comprehensive understanding of risks, enabling the enterprise to prioritize and mitigate threats effectively.

NEW QUESTION # 128
Who is ULTIMATELY accountable for approving all IT-related principles, structures, and objectives that will be used when implementing a new IT governance function?
  • A. Portfolio management
  • B. Enterprise risk committee
  • C. Business owners
  • D. Executive committee
Answer: D
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, ultimate accountability for governance decisions lies with the governing body or executive committee:
"The executive committee or board is ultimately accountable for the approval of IT governance principles, frameworks, structures, and objectives." They ensure alignment with enterprise strategy and oversight.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives, Governance Objectives Overview

NEW QUESTION # 129
......
We hope that our COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam software can meet all your expectations including the comprehensiveness and authority of questions, and the diversity version of materials - showing three versions of COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam materials such as the PDF version, the online version and the simulation test version. Our intimate service such as the free trial demo before purchased and the one-year free update service of our COBIT-Design-and-Implementation after you have purchased both show our honest efforts to you.
COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Sample Test Online: https://www.preppdf.com/ISACA/COBIT-Design-and-Implementation-prepaway-exam-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest PrepPDF COBIT-Design-and-Implementation PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MsjDWHv348E38V0O50UG7Nrzo1KazLNa
https://www.dumpcollection.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list