Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Core Board › Core-3588J› Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice Guide is Highest Quality ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice Guide is Highest Quality Plat-Arch-204 Test Material

samrose268

128

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
128

【General】 Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice Guide is Highest Quality Plat-Arch-204 Test Material

Posted at yesterday 20:11      View：15 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
Plat-Arch-204 certification has great effect in this field and may affect your career even future. Plat-Arch-204 real questions files are professional and high passing rate so that users can pass the exam at the first attempt. High quality and pass rate make us famous and growing faster and faster. Many candidates compliment that Plat-Arch-204 Study Guide materials are best assistant and useful for qualification exams, they have no need to purchase other training courses or books to study, and only by practicing our Plat-Arch-204 Salesforce Certified Administrator exam braindumps several times before exam, they can pass exam in short time easily.
Latest Plat-Arch-204 test questions are verified and tested several times by our colleagues to ensure the high pass rate of our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 study guide. We are popular not only because our outstanding Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 practice dumps, but also for our well-praised after-sales service. After purchasing our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 practice materials, the free updates will be sent to your mailbox for one year long if our experts make any of our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 guide materials.
Plat-Arch-204 Exam Questions without being overloaded with unnecessary detailsOur IT professionals have made their best efforts to offer you the latest Plat-Arch-204 study guide in a smart way for the certification exam preparation. With the help of our Plat-Arch-204 dumps collection, all level of candidates can grasp the key content of the real exam and solve the difficulty of Plat-Arch-204 Real Questions easily. The most important is that our test engine enables you practice Plat-Arch-204 exam pdf on the exact pattern of the actual exam.
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Evaluate Business Needs: This domain addresses gathering functional and non-functional requirements, classifying data by sensitivity, identifying CRM success factors, and understanding how business growth and regulations impact integration choices.
Topic 2
  • Evaluate the Current System Landscape: This domain covers analyzing existing technical environments to understand current systems, their standards, protocols, limitations, and boundaries, while identifying constraints and authentication
  • authorization requirements.
Topic 3
  • Design Integration Solutions: This domain centers on selecting integration patterns, designing complete solutions with appropriate components, understanding trade-offs and limitations, choosing correct Salesforce APIs, and determining required standards and security mechanisms.
Topic 4
  • Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.

Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q93-Q98):NEW QUESTION # 93
What is the first thing an integration architect should validate if a callout from a Lightning web component (LWC) to an external endpoint is failing?
  • A. The endpoint domain has been added to Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS).
  • B. The endpoint URL has been added to Content Security Policies (CSP).
  • C. The endpoint URL has been added to Remote Site Settings.
Answer: B
Explanation:
When an integration initiated from the client-side (the browser) fails, the architect must first look at the browser's security policies. In Salesforce, Lightning Web Components are subject to the Lightning Component framework's Content Security Policy (CSP).
CSP is a security layer that prevents cross-site scripting (XSS) and other code injection attacks by restricting which domains the browser is allowed to communicate with. If an LWC attempts to make a fetch() call to an external REST endpoint, the browser will block the request unless that specific domain is whitelisted in CSP Trusted Sites.
Option B (Remote Site Settings) is a common distractor; these settings are strictly for server-side Apex callouts and have no effect on client-side JavaScript requests. Option A (CORS) is also a browser security mechanism, but it must be configured on the external server to allow Salesforce to access its resources. While CORS is necessary, the first thing to validate within the Salesforce environment for a failing LWC callout is the CSP Trusted Site entry. Without this whitelisting, the request will be terminated by the browser before it even leaves the client, regardless of how the external server is configured.

NEW QUESTION # 94
Northern Trail Outfitters needs a low-code, near real-time REST integration to an ERP when an Order is created. They have limited development resources. Which option should fulfill the use case requirements?
  • A. Implement a Workflow Rule with Outbound Messaging to send SOAP messages to the designated endpoint.
  • B. Use Lightning Flow to create a platform event, selecting the record type as the platform event name on insert of record.
  • C. Implement Change Data Capture on the Order object and leverage the replay ID in the middleware solution.
Answer: B
Explanation:
For a team with limited development resources and a low-code requirement, Lightning Flow (Flow Builder) is the primary declarative engine for modern integrations.
In this scenario, creating a Platform Event via a record-triggered flow provides a highly scalable, near real-time "Fire-and-Forget" signal to the middleware. This is considered low-code because it can be built entirely using point-and-click tools within Salesforce. Once the Order is created, the flow publishes the event to the bus. The middleware, acting as a subscriber, receives the event and orchestrates the REST call to the ERP.
Option C (Outbound Messaging) is also a low-code tool, but it natively sends messages in SOAP format. Since the ERP requires a REST endpoint, using Outbound Messaging would necessitate additional transformation logic in the middleware, making it a less efficient architectural choice than using a Flow to trigger an event or an External Service. Option B (Change Data Capture) is a powerful tool but often requires more advanced "pro-code" configuration on the subscriber/middleware side to handle Replay IDs and Bayeux protocols, which might exceed the "limited resources" constraint of the Salesforce team.

NEW QUESTION # 95
Northern Trail Outfitters submits orders to a manufacturing system web service that has experienced multi-day outages. Which solution should an integration architect recommend to handle errors during these types of outages?
  • A. Use middleware queuing and buffering to insulate Salesforce from system outages.
  • B. Use Platform Event replayId and custom scheduled Apex process to retrieve missed events.
  • C. Use Outbound Messaging to automatically retry failed service calls.
Answer: A
Explanation:
When a target system experiences prolonged outages (lasting "several days"), point-to-point integration solutions built within Salesforce are likely to fail or reach their retry limits. For example, Salesforce Outbound Messaging (Option B) only retries for up to 24 hours before dropping the message.
The architecturally robust solution is to introduce a Middleware layer (ESB or iPaaS) that provides queuing and buffering. In this model, Salesforce sends the order to the middleware. The middleware immediately acknowledges receipt (preserving Salesforce performance). If the manufacturing system is offline, the middleware stores the message in a persistent queue.
Middleware is designed for this high level of Quality of Service (QoS). It can be configured with custom retry logic-such as waiting 30 minutes between attempts-and can hold millions of messages for days or even weeks. This effectively "insulates" Salesforce from the manufacturing system's instability. Option C is overly complex and requires custom development in both the event bus and Apex, whereas middleware provides this functionality as a native capability. By using middleware, the architect ensures that no orders are lost during extended manufacturing downtime and that the integration is decoupled and resilient.

NEW QUESTION # 96
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to improve the quality of callouts from Salesforce to its REST APIs by adhering to RAML (REST API Markup Language) specifications. The RAML specs serve as interface contracts. Which design specification should the integration architect include to ensure that Apex REST API Clients' unit tests confirm adherence to the RAML specs?
  • A. Call the HttpCalloutMock implementation from the Apex REST API Clients.
  • B. Require the Apex REST API Clients to implement the HttpCalloutMock.
  • C. Call the Apex REST API Clients in a test context to get the mock response.
Answer: B
Explanation:
In Salesforce, you cannot perform real HTTP callouts during unit tests. To test integration logic, developers must use the HttpCalloutMock interface to simulate the API's response. To ensure that the Apex code adheres to the RAML contract, the architect should require that the test mock implementation strictly follows the RAML specifications.
By requiring the Apex REST API Clients to implement the HttpCalloutMock (or more specifically, creating a mock class that implements it), the developer creates a controlled testing environment. The mock class should be coded to return a payload that matches the RAML-defined structure (fields, data types, and status codes). When the test runs, the Apex client receives this "contract-compliant" response. The unit test then uses assertions to verify that the Apex code correctly parses and handles this specific data structure.
Option B is technically imprecise; you don't "call" the mock from the client, you provide the mock to the test runtime using Test.setMock(). Option C describes the general process of testing but does not address the "design specification" needed to ensure contract adherence. By mandating a mock implementation that mirrors the RAML contract, the architect ensures that if the API contract changes in the RAML file, the unit tests will fail if the Apex code is not updated to match, thereby maintaining high integration quality and preventing runtime errors.

NEW QUESTION # 97
Northern Trail Outfitters is in the final stages of merging two Salesforce orgs, but needs to keep the retiring org available for a short period of time for lead management as it is connected to multiple public website forms. The sales department has requested that new leads are available in the new Salesforce instance within 30 minutes. Which approach requires the least amount of development effort?
  • A. Use the Composite REST API to aggregate multiple leads in a single call.
  • B. Use the Tooling API with Process Builder to insert leads in real time.
  • C. Call the Salesforce REST API to insert the lead into the target system.
Answer: C
Explanation:
In an org merger scenario, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must often design interim solutions that balance speed of delivery with minimal development overhead. The requirement here is for leads to be synced within a 30-minute window. This is a relatively low-latency requirement that does not strictly necessitate a real-time, event-driven architecture, which typically requires more complex infrastructure like Platform Events or middleware.
Option A, calling the Salesforce REST API to insert leads into the target system, represents the standard, most straightforward approach. Since both systems are Salesforce orgs, the retiring org can be configured to make an outbound REST call to the new org's standard Lead endpoint. This can be achieved with a small amount of Apex code (such as a trigger or an invocable method called by a Flow). This approach is considered the "least development effort" because it leverages the standard REST API, which is already enabled and authenticated via a Connected App in the target org. It requires no custom API development in the target system and uses standard JSON payloads.
Option B is incorrect because the Tooling API is intended for managing metadata, system settings, and developer tools, not for standard transactional data movement like Lead insertion. Option C, using the Composite REST API, is an optimization technique designed to group multiple requests into a single call to save on API limits. While efficient for high-volume scenarios, it introduces additional development complexity regarding payload construction and bulk error handling that exceeds the "least effort" requirement for a simple Lead sync. Therefore, a standard REST call is the most direct path to meeting the 30-minute SLA with minimal coding.

NEW QUESTION # 98
......
PrepPDF is a wonderful study platform that contains our hearty wish for you to pass the exam by our Plat-Arch-204 exam materials. So our responsible behaviors are our instinct aim and tenet. By devoting in this area so many years, we are omnipotent to solve the problems about the Plat-Arch-204 learning questions with stalwart confidence. we can claim that only studing our Plat-Arch-204 study guide for 20 to 30 hours, then you will pass the exam for sure.
Latest Plat-Arch-204 Braindumps Pdf: https://www.preppdf.com/Salesforce/Plat-Arch-204-prepaway-exam-dumps.html
https://www.prepawayete.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list