Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › EC-A3288C› ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Dumps Demo - ISO-IEC ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Dumps Demo - ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Tes

jayward523

127

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
127

【General】 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Dumps Demo - ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Tes

Posted at yesterday 14:14      View：3 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
DOWNLOAD the newest ExamBoosts ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Tb24vNRCU3dy4gpsBflcJresj8Ioirea
It is acknowledged that there are numerous ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning questions for candidates for the exam, however, it is impossible for you to summarize all of the key points in so many materials by yourself. But since you have clicked into this website for ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice materials you need not to worry about that at all because our company is especially here for you to solve this problem. With our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions, you will pass your exam just in one go for we are the most professional team in this career for over ten years.
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
Topic 2
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
Topic 3
  • AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
  • IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

2026 Perfect ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Dumps Demo | ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam 100% Free Exam TestkingExamBoosts is one of the leading platforms that has been helping ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam exam candidates for many years. Over this long time period we have helped ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam candidates in their preparation. They got help from ExamBoosts ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Practice Questions and easily got success in the final ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam certification exam. You can also trust ExamBoosts ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps and start preparation with complete peace of mind and satisfaction.
PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q125-Q130):NEW QUESTION # 125
Based on Scenario 8, did Sharona and the audit team address all essential aspects during the closing meeting?
Scenario 8: VeridicAI. based in San Francisco. USA, specializes in market research using Al technologies to analyze customer behavior. Founded in 2023, the company employs natural language processing, machine learning, and predictive analytics to provide real time insights to a range of businesses. VeridicAI has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 to manage its Al technologies effectively. The AIMS scope includes select departments within the company, for which it has received a four-year certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Committed to transparency. VeridicAI publicly shares details of this certification.
As the certification nears its end, VeridicAI is preparing for an audit to renew its certification.
The audit process was led by Sharona, the audit team leader, who is a full-time employee of the certification body. Sharona and the audit team undertook all planned audit activities. Afterward, they organized the closing meeting with VeridicAl's management. During the meeting, Sharona and the team made a recap on audit objectives and scope, presented the audit findings and conclusions, presented identified nonconformities, and organized a session for questions and answers for the auditee.
VeridicAI received a conditional recommendation for certification, underscoring its compliance with the industry's standards. Sharona confirmed that the company met the essential requirements but noted some identified minor nonconformities. In response, VeridicAI compiled and submitted a comprehensive action plan that addresses all identified nonconformities within a designated timeframe. Because of the comprehensive action plan, Sharona did not see the need for an additional on- site visit to verify the effectiveness of the action plan.
Sharona played an integral role in the certification decision process. Her thorough understanding of VeridicAI's operations, gained from the audit, guided the certification body towards a well-informed certification decision.
  • A. No, they should not have involved information on technical experts and guides
  • B. No, they should have included information on the limitations of the audit
  • C. Yes, they addressed all necessary aspects
Answer: C
Explanation:
Sharona and the team presented the audit objectives, scope, findings, conclusions, and nonconformities and conducted a Q&A session. According to ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.10 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 auditing practice guidance, these are all essential elements of an audit closing meeting. Although limitations of the audit may sometimes be stated, it is not mandatory unless explicitly requested or if the audit scope was constrained.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.10 - Conducting the closing meeting
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Best practices on audit finalization
===========

NEW QUESTION # 126
Question:
A software development company values collaborative decision-making. The CEO often gathers input from employees but retains final decision authority.
Which type of leadership does the CEO most closely embody?
  • A. Laissez-faire
  • B. Autocratic
  • C. Democratic
Answer: C
Explanation:
This describes aDemocratic leadershipstyle - where input from employees is welcomed, and participation is encouraged, but final authority still lies with leadership.
* TheISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide (Annex on Leadership Models)identifiesdemocratic leadershipas:"Involving teams in decision-making while the leader retains ultimate authority."
* Clause 5.1of ISO/IEC 42001 emphasizestop management leadership and commitment, including engagement and consultation with relevant roles across the organization.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 5.1; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide, Section 5 ("Leadership Styles").

NEW QUESTION # 127
Scenario 9:
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and uphold its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
During an AIMS audit at a cybersecurity company, the team found a major nonconformity - ineffective access controls for sensitive data.
Question:
Given this situation, what is the appropriate next step?
  • A. Promptly revoke the auditee's certification without further examination
  • B. Conduct another full audit of the auditee's entire AIMS
  • C. Conduct an audit follow-up before the company is recommended for certification
Answer: C
Explanation:
Major nonconformities require follow-upbefore recommending certification.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.4requires that for major nonconformities:"Certification shall only be granted after verification of the effective implementation of corrective actions, typically through an on-site follow-up audit."
* Immediate revocation or full re-audit is not necessary unless systemic failure is evident.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.4; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2.

NEW QUESTION # 128
An audit team member is tasked with evaluating a sophisticated AI system used for autonomous driving. They lack the necessary expertise but proceed without consulting a specialist. Which principle is being neglected in this scenario?
  • A. Confidentiality
  • B. Integrity
  • C. Independence
  • D. Due Professional Care
Answer: D
Explanation:
The principle being neglected isDue Professional Care.
According toISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f), auditors are expected to applydiligence, competence, and judgmentduring audit activities. If an auditor proceeds with an auditwithout the required expertise, especially for a high-risk system like autonomous driving, this violates the principle of due care.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3clearly states that in complex technical environments (such as AI or autonomous systems), auditors mustseek assistance from domain specialistswhen they lack direct experience.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f): "Due professional care"
PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Auditor Competence and Responsibilities"

NEW QUESTION # 129
Did Samuel consider all the necessary factors while reviewing documented information during the stage 1 audit? Refer to Scenario 6.
Scenario 6: AfrinovAl, based in Nairobi, Kenya, develops Al tools to improve agriculture in Africa. The company uses Al to address challenges faced by African farmers, offering tools for analyzing satellite images to monitor crop health, predicting pest and disease outbreaks, and automating irrigation to use water more efficiently.
AfrinovAl has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001, reflecting its commitment to ethical and effective management practices in its Al solutions.
AfrinovAl is undergoing a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Samuel, an expert in Al technologies and management systems, is heading the audit team. Before initiating the audit process, Samuel reviewed and approved the audit plan, which served as a basis for the agreement between the certification body and the auditee.
During the stage 1 audit, the audit team focused on a detailed evaluation of AfrinovAI's documented information, critically assessing both their format and content.
Samuel held a meeting with his team to prepare for the stage 2 audit. During this meeting, responsibilities were allocated among team members, assigning specific processes, functions, sites, areas, or activities based on each auditor's expertise and the audit requirements. He also assigned auditing roles to technical experts to leverage their specialized knowledge in specific areas.
In the stage 2 audit, Samuel and his team held an opening meeting during which Samuel explained how the audit activities will be undertaken. AfrinovAI's also participated in the meeting. Afterward, the audit team conducted on-site activities to closely inspect the physical locations of the audited processes. The interviewed individuals from the auditee's personnel regarding the AIMS and observed some of the operations of the auditee. They also used sampling and technical verification to assess the implementation of Al-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements. They skipped the review of documented information related to the AIMS since some documents had already been reviewed during the stage 1 audit. This comprehensive approach ensured a thorough evaluation of AfrinovAI's AIMS against the ISO/IEC 42001.
  • A. Yes, documented information must be validated based on two criteria, i.e., content and format
  • B. No, Samuel should also ensure that there is a process in place for reviewing and approving documented information for suitability and adequacy
  • C. Yes, if the information is archived in a secure system
  • D. No, Samuel should only check if documented information has been stored in the appropriate media
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (Clause 7.5), an organization must establish processes for creating, reviewing, updating, and approving documented information to ensure its adequacy and suitability.
While format and content are important, the auditor must also assess whether there are established procedures for control of documentation - including version control, approval mechanisms, and traceability.
Samuel's review during Stage 1 would be incomplete if it did not assess this broader requirement.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 7.5 - Documented Information
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.3.4 - Review of documentation
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Documented Information Evaluation

NEW QUESTION # 130
......
Our website provides you the latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice test with best quality that will lead you to success in obtaining the certification exam. The test engine is more efficient way for anyone to practice our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam PDF and get used to the atmosphere of the formal test. We can guarantee you high passing score once you bought our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor real questions and remember the correct answers.
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Testking: https://www.examboosts.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ExamBoosts: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Tb24vNRCU3dy4gpsBflcJresj8Ioirea
https://www.actualtestsquiz.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list