Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › iHC-3308GW› PSM-III学習体験談 & PSM-III的中率
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] PSM-III学習体験談 & PSM-III的中率

hughtat281

128

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
128

【General】 PSM-III学習体験談 & PSM-III的中率

Posted at 1/25/2026 02:34:42      View：60 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
PSM-III試験のダンプでは、鮮明な例と正確なチャートを追加して、直面する可能性のある例外的なケースを刺激します。 PSM-IIIガイドTorrentは、試験資料の世界有数のプロバイダーの1つとして知られています。 PSM-IIIテストの質問は、さらなるパートナーシップのために1年半の価格で無料で更新されます。
専門的な学習資料なしでPSM-III試験の準備をするのは時間がかかり、疲れる場合があります。そのため、PSM-III学習ツールを学習パートナーとして選択するのが最善の決断です。また、PSM-III学習ツールは、多数の受験者に実際の試験に関するより良い視点を提供します。 PSM-IIIの最新の練習資料の研究に特化してきた今、私たちは無限の努力で多数の顧客を処理し、PSM-III試験ガイドがあなたの満足に浸透すると信じています。
素敵なPSM-III学習体験談 & 合格スムーズPSM-III的中率 | 効果的なPSM-III認定資格試験数年間でのIT認定試験資料向けの研究分析によって、我々社はこの業界のリーダーにだんだんなっています。弊社のチームは開発される問題集はとても全面で、受験生をScrum PSM-III試験に合格するのを良く助けます。周知のように、Scrum PSM-III資格認定があれば、IT業界での発展はより簡単になります。
Scrum Professional Scrum Master level III (PSM III) 認定 PSM-III 試験問題 (Q22-Q27):質問 # 22
The Product Owner asks the Development Team to pick up a very urgent item late in Sprint that was not forecasted, nor is itrelated to the Sprint Goal. The Development Team believes it can pick this up, as it is close to meeting the Sprint Goal. But, thiswould involve not meeting their process improvement goal agreed upon during the last Sprint Retrospective. The ProductOwner argues that, as it's the highest priority to satisfy the customer, the needs of the customer have a higher priority than theprocess improvement goal for the team.
What is your view on this as a Scrum Master?
正解：
解説：
From a Scrum Master's perspective, this situation must be approached by balancingrespect for Scrum accountabilities,protection of empiricism, andlong-term value delivery, rather than reacting solely to short- term urgency.
First, it is important to reaffirm that theDevelopment Team owns the Sprint Backlog. According to the Scrum Guide, once the Sprint has started, changes to the Sprint Backlog are negotiatedonly between the Product Owner and the Development Team, and the Development Team has thefinal sayon whether additional work can be taken on. Therefore, the Product Owner cannot unilaterally force the urgent item into the Sprint, even if it represents the highest customer priority. If the Development Team believes it can incorporate the item without jeopardizing the Sprint Goal, it may choose to do so-but this remains their decision.
Second, the Scrum Master should help the Product Owner understand thatnot all priorities are equal within a Sprint. The Sprint Goal provides focus and stability, and work that is not related to the Sprint Goal introduces risk. While satisfying the customer is important, Scrum explicitly valuessustainable improvement and learning. The process improvement goal agreed upon during the Sprint Retrospective represents a deliberate investment in the team's effectiveness. Sacrificing this improvement for short-term delivery may create a local optimization thatharms long-term customer value.
Third, the Scrum Master should coach both the Product Owner and the Development Team on thesystemic impact of slowing process improvements. Continuous improvement is a core expectation of Scrum, and the Scrum Guide states that the Scrum Team should plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness. When improvement goals are repeatedly deprioritized, delivery predictability, quality, and morale eventually decline-directly affecting customers. Therefore, the Product Owner's argument that customer needs always outweigh improvement work reflects ashort-term mindsetthat the Scrum Master should challenge through education and coaching.
Fourth, this situation should beinspected during the Sprint Retrospective. The team should reflect on why urgent, unplanned work appears late in the Sprint, whether it represents a recurringpattern, and how this impacts Sprint Goals and improvement commitments. The Scrum Master should facilitate this discussion to ensure transparency and learning, rather than blame.
Finally, if this behavior becomes a pattern, the Scrum Master must take a more active stance. This includes teaching and reminding the Scrum Team that at least one improvement from the Sprint Retrospective should be planned into the upcoming Sprint. This protects the intent of the Retrospective and ensures that improvement is not treated as optional or expendable work.

質問 # 23
One of the Scrum events is the Sprint Review. How does the Sprint Review enable empiricism? What would the impact be if some members of the development team were not present?
正解：
解説：
TheSprint Reviewis a key Scrum Event that directly enablesempiricism, which is the foundation of Scrum.
Empiricism is based on making decisions using what is known, observed, and learned, supported by the pillars oftransparency, inspection, and adaptation. The Sprint Review operationalizes these pillars at the product level.
How the Sprint Review Enables Empiricism
First, the Sprint Review createstransparencyby making the current state of the product visible. During the event, the Scrum Team presents a"Done" Product Incrementthat meets the Definition of Done. Stakeholders can see and often use the actual product rather than relying on reports or assumptions. This shared visibility ensures that discussions are grounded in reality.
Second, the Sprint Review enablesinspection. The Scrum Team and stakeholders jointly inspect the Increment and assess progress toward product goals. The Developers provide context about what was delivered, what was not, and what challenges were encountered. This inspection is focused on outcomes and value, not individual performance.
Third, the Sprint Review supportsadaptation. Based on the inspection and feedback, new insights emerge about customer needs, market conditions, risks, and opportunities. The Product Owner uses this information to adapt the Product Backlog, reordering items, adding new work, or refining existing items. This completes the empirical feedback loop by ensuring future decisions are based on the latest evidence.
Impact of Development Team Members Not Attending the Sprint Review
If some Developers are not present at the Sprint Review, empiricism is weakened.
First,transparency decreases. Developers possess critical, first-hand knowledge about implementation details, technical trade-offs, constraints, and risks. Without their presence, stakeholders receive an incomplete picture of the Increment and its implications.
Second,inspection becomes less effective. Stakeholders may ask questions about behavior, limitations, or quality that only Developers can accurately answer. The absence of Developers limits meaningful dialogue and reduces the quality of inspection.
Third,adaptation suffers. Decisions about what to do next-such as changes to scope, priorities, or technical direction-depend on accurate understanding. Without Developers participating, adaptations to the Product Backlog may be based on assumptions rather than evidence, increasing the risk of poor decisions.
Finally, excluding Developers underminesScrum Values, particularlyRespect and Openness, by treating the Sprint Review as a reporting event rather than a collaborative working session. This can lead to disengagement and reduced shared ownership of product outcomes.

質問 # 24
How can leadership of an agile organization help self-organizing teams get the most out of Scrum?
正解：
解説：
Leadership plays a critical role in enabling self-organizing teams to succeed with Scrum. While Scrum Teams are self-managing, organizational leadership must create the conditions in which Scrum can thrive. This support is expressed through behaviors that reinforce empiricism, accountability, and continuous improvement, rather than through command-and-control practices.
First, leadership can help by actively supporting self-organization and Scrum adoption. This includes trusting teams to decide how they do their work, resisting the urge to micromanage, and reinforcing Scrum practices and values across the organization. Leaders who understand and support Scrum help protect teams from external pressure that undermines self-management.
Second, leaders should learn about Agile and Scrum and understand how to interact with Scrum Teams effectively. This knowledge enables leadership to engage in ways that are helpful rather than disruptive-for example, collaborating through Scrum events instead of bypassing the Product Owner or directly assigning work to Developers. Informed interaction strengthens alignment while preserving team autonomy.
Third, leadership must respect Scrum accountabilities, especially the authority of the Product Owner.
Respecting Product Owner decisions on ordering the Product Backlog ensures clear accountability for maximizing value. When leadership overrides or bypasses the Product Owner, it undermines transparency, focus, and trust within the Scrum Team.
Fourth, leadership can significantly support teams by removing impediments that are beyond the team's control. These may include organizational policies, structural constraints, tooling limitations, or conflicting incentives. By actively addressing such impediments, leadership enables teams to improve their effectiveness and deliver value more consistently.
Finally, leadership should provide a clear organizational vision and strategy. A compelling vision and coherent strategy give Scrum Teams a sense of purpose and direction, helping them understand how their work contributes to broader organizational goals. This clarity supports better decision-making, alignment, and motivation at the team level without prescribing detailed solutions.

質問 # 25
A fellow Scrum Master asks for your input. His team members see no value in defining a Sprint goal and he has trouble explaining its use to them. What would you tell this Scrum Master?
正解：
解説：
If team members see no value in defining a Sprint Goal, this indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of Scrum. As a Scrum Master, I would explain to my fellow Scrum Master that theSprint Goal is a core element of Scrumand is essential for alignment, commitment, and empiricism.
First, the Sprint Goal explainswhy the Scrum Team is doing the work in the Sprint. According to the Scrum Guide, the Sprint Goal is the single objective for the Sprint and provides coherence to the Sprint Backlog. Without a clear "why," Sprint work becomes a collection of unrelated tasks rather than a purposeful effort to deliver value. The Sprint Goal helps the team understand the intent behind the selected Product Backlog Items and aligns daily decisions with that intent.
Second, the Sprint Goal represents acommitment by the Scrum Team. The team commits to doing everything in its power to achieve the Sprint Goal, even though the specific scope may evolve. This commitment fosters focus and shared accountability. Instead of optimizing for individual tasks, the team optimizes for achieving the Sprint Goal as a whole.
Third, the Sprint Goal actuallycreates flexibility rather than restricting it. When new discoveries, risks, or opportunities emerge during the Sprint, the team can adapt the Sprint Backlog as long as those changes do not endanger the Sprint Goal. This allows the team to respond to change while maintaining stability of purpose.
Without a Sprint Goal, change becomes arbitrary and increases the risk of losing focus.
Fourth, the Sprint Goal enables effectiveinspection and adaptation. During the Daily Scrum, the team inspects progress toward the Sprint Goal and adapts their plan accordingly. Similarly, at the Sprint Review, stakeholders can inspect whether the Sprint Goal was met. Without a Sprint Goal, there is no meaningful benchmark for inspection.
Finally, it is important to be clear thatwithout a Sprint Goal, Scrum is not being practiced as intended.
The Sprint Goal is a required element of Scrum, and removing it undermines transparency and weakens the empirical foundation of the framework.

質問 # 26
You have been appointed the Scrum Master for a brand new product your organization is planning to develop.
A ProductOwner has also been appointed. Initially, fifteen developers will work on the product. What approaches are common forforming teams for this product, and how do they likely benefit or hinder the Product Development effort?
正解：
解説：
When starting development of a brand new product with fifteen developers, forming effective teams is a critical early decision that significantly influences the success of product development. From a Scrum Master' s perspective, multiple approaches are commonly used in practice. Each approach offers distinct benefits and drawbacks when evaluated against Scrum principles such asself-organization, cross-functionality, and value delivery.
1. Facilitating Teams to Self-Organize
One common approach is tofacilitate the developers in forming teams themselves. This approach aligns strongly with Scrum, as the Scrum Guide states that Scrum Teams areself-managingand decide internally how best to accomplish their work.
Benefits:
Allowing teams to self-organize promotesempowerment, ownership, and accountability. Developers can use their existing knowledge of each other's strengths, weaknesses, and working styles to form balanced teams. This often increases motivation and psychological safety, both of which support high performance.
Hindrances:
For a new product, this process can bemessy and time-consuming, especially if developers lack experience in forming effective teams. Teams may optimize for comfort or familiarity rather than cross-functionality, potentially leading to skill gaps or imbalanced teams.
2. Forming Two or Three Cross-Functional Feature Teams
Another common approach is to deliberately formtwo or three cross-functional feature teams, each containing all the skills necessary to deliver working product increments.
Benefits:
This approach closely matches how Scrum describes teams.Cross-functional feature teamscan independently deliverintegrated, "Done" Incrementsof the product, improving flow, reducing dependencies, and supporting empiricism. All necessary skills are available within the team, enabling faster inspection and adaptation.
Hindrances:
In the context of a brand new product, teams may not yet knowwhich skills are actually required, making it difficult to form truly balanced teams upfront. Additionally, specialists may feel isolated and lose regular interaction with peers who share the same expertise across teams.
3. Forming Teams Based on Specialization (Component Teams)
A third approach is to organize teams according totechnical specialization, such as front-end and back-end teams. These are often referred to ascomponent teams.
Benefits:
This structure allows specialists to work closely together, enablingfast knowledge sharing, technical consistency, and deep expertisein specific components of the system. It can feel efficient, especially in the early stages of development.
Hindrances:
From a Scrum perspective, this approach significantly hindersvalue delivery. Component teams struggle to deliver complete, integrated features independently and introduce dependencies and handoffs. This makes it harder to produce a usable Increment each Sprint and isnot how Scrum describes teams, even though it remains a commonly used strategy in many organizations.
Scrum Master Perspective and Conclusion
As a Scrum Master, my role is not to mandate a single team structure, but tocoach and facilitatethe organization toward structures that best enable Scrum. While all three approaches are seen in practice, Scrum clearly favorsself-organizing, cross-functional feature teamsbecause they maximize learning, transparency, and the ability to deliver value each Sprint.

質問 # 27
......
大方の人は成功への近道がないとよく言われますけど、IT人材にとって、私達のPSM-III問題集はあなたの成功へショートカットです。Pass4TestのPSM-III問題集を通して、他の人が手に入れない資格認証を簡単に受け取ります。早めによりよい仕事を探しできて、長閑な万元以上の月給がある生活を楽しみます。
PSM-III的中率: https://www.pass4test.jp/PSM-III.html
Scrum PSM-III学習体験談 その後、障害を見つけて克服できます、Scrum PSM-III学習体験談 受信した後、あなたは、添付ファイルをダウンロードして、材料を使用することができます、今には、我々のPSM-III本当の質問の指導の下で、あなたは自分でそのように体験することができます、PSM-III勉強資料を手に入れる前のサービスであれば、アフタサービスであれば、弊社は良いサービスを提供するには、皆様の質問をすぐに返答できて準備しています、試験のPSM-IIIテスト問題を学習して準備するのに必要な時間は20〜30時間だけで、時間とエネルギーを節約できます、それはPass4Test PSM-III的中率がすごく便利で、広い通用性があるからです。
大智君らしくないなぁ そ、そう、ファウストはマナフレアを集めつつ、床でびしょ濡PSM-IIIれになっ えっ、僕がですか ルーファス、その後、障害を見つけて克服できます、受信した後、あなたは、添付ファイルをダウンロードして、材料を使用することができます。
コンプリートScrum PSM-III: Professional Scrum Master level III (PSM III)学習体験談 - よくできたPass4Test PSM-III的中率今には、我々のPSM-III本当の質問の指導の下で、あなたは自分でそのように体験することができます、PSM-III勉強資料を手に入れる前のサービスであれば、アフタサービスであれば、弊社は良いサービスを提供するには、皆様の質問をすぐに返答できて準備しています。
試験のPSM-IIIテスト問題を学習して準備するのに必要な時間は20〜30時間だけで、時間とエネルギーを節約できます。
https://www.dumpkiller.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list