Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › AIO-3399J› Valid Exam MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Braindum ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Valid Exam MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Braindumps & Interactive MuleSof

zachary853

136

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
136

【General】 Valid Exam MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Braindumps & Interactive MuleSof

Posted at 11 hour before      View：15 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
2026 Latest TestKingIT MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I PDF Dumps and MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1njSwmFixuny6KCKdwe1RW8a58wm45JL0
The online version of our MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I exam questions can apply to all kinds of eletronic devices, such as the IPAD, phone and laptop. And this version of our MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I training guide is convenient for you if you are busy at work and traffic. Wherever you are, as long as you have an access to the internet, a smart phone or an I-pad can become your study tool for the MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam. Isn't it a good way to make full use of fragmentary time?
Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Designing Integration Solutions to Meet Persistence Requirements: It addresses the usage of VM queues and connectors, object stores and services, and stateful components configured with object stores.
Topic 2
  • Designing Integration Solutions to Meet Reliability Requirements: It includes selecting alternatives to traditional transactions, recognizing the purpose of various scopes and strategies, differentiating disaster recovery and high availability, and using local and XA transactions.
Topic 3
  • Designing Architecture Using Integration Paradigms: This topic focuses on creating high-level integration architectures using various paradigms. It includes API-led connectivity, web APIs and HTTP, event-driven APIs, and message brokers, and designing Mule application using messaging patterns and technologies.
Topic 4
  • Designing and Developing Mule Applications: It includes selecting application properties, using fundamental features, designing with core routers, understanding the Salesforce Connector, and leveraging core connectors.
Topic 5
  • Applying DevOps Practices and Operating Integration Solutions: Its sub-topics are related to designing CI
  • CD pipelines with MuleSoft plugins, automating interactions with Anypoint Platform, designing logging configurations, and identifying Anypoint Monitoring features.
Topic 6
  • Designing Integration Solutions to Meet Security Requirements: This topic emphasizes securing access to the Anypoint Platform and APIs, using Anypoint Security, counteracting security vulnerabilities, and understanding audit logging capabilities.
Topic 7
  • Designing Automated Tests for Mule Applications: This topic covers unit test suites, and scenarios for integration and performance testing.

Free PDF Quiz Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Unparalleled Valid Exam BraindumpsThe TestKingIT MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I exam practice test questions provide a way to assess your understanding of the material, identify areas for improvement, and build confidence and test-taking skills. The TestKingIT MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I exam practice test questions are real and verified by Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I (MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I) exam trainers. They work collectively and strive hard to ensure the top standard of Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I (MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I) exam practice questions all the time.
Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I Sample Questions (Q225-Q230):NEW QUESTION # 225
An application deployed to a runtime fabric environment with two cluster replicas is designed to periodically trigger of flow for processing a high-volume set of records from the source system and synchronize with the SaaS system using the Batch job scope After processing 1000 records in a periodic synchronization of 1 lakh records, the replicas in which batch job instance was started went down due to unexpected failure in the runtime fabric environment What is the consequence of losing the replicas that run the Batch job instance?
  • A. A new placement replica will be available and will take or processing the remaining 99,000 records
  • B. A new replacement replica will be available and will be process all 1,00,000 records from scratch leading to duplicate record processing
  • C. The remaining 99000 records will be lost and left and processed
  • D. The second replicas will take over processing the remaining
    99000 records
Answer: D

NEW QUESTION # 226
One of the backend systems involved by the API implementation enforces rate limits on the number of request a particle client can make.
Both the back-end system and API implementation are deployed to several non-production environments including the staging environment and to a particular production environment. Rate limiting of the back-end system applies to all non-production environments.
The production environment however does not have any rate limiting.
What is the cost-effective approach to conduct performance test of the API implementation in the non- production staging environment?
  • A. Conduct scaled-down performance tests in the staging environment against rate-limiting back-end system. Then upscale performance results to full production scale
  • B. Including logic within the API implementation that bypasses in locations of the back-end system in the staging environment and invoke a Mocking service that replicates typical back-end system responsesThen conduct performance test using this API implementation
  • C. Create a Mocking service that replicates the back-end system'sproduction performance characteristicsThen configure the API implementation to use the mockingservice and conduct the performance test
  • D. Use MUnit to simulate standard responses from the back-end system.Then conduct performance test to identify other bottlenecks in the system
Answer: C
Explanation:
To conduct performance testing in a non-production environment where rate limits are enforced, the most cost-effective approach is:
C). Create a Mocking service that replicates the back-end system's production performance characteristics.
Then configure the API implementation to use the mocking service and conduct the performance test.
* Mocking Service: Develop a mock service that emulates the performance characteristics of the production back-end system. This service should mimic the response times, data formats, and any relevant behavior of the actual back-end system without imposing rate limits.
* Configuration: Modify the API implementation to route requests to the mocking service instead of the actual back-end system. This ensures that the performance tests are not impacted by the rate limits imposed in the non-production environment.
* Performance Testing: Conduct the performance tests using the API implementation configured with the mocking service. This approach allows you to assess the performance under expected production load conditions without being constrained by non-production rate limits.
This method ensures that performance testing is accurate and reflective of the production environment without additional costs or constraints due to rate limiting in staging environments.
References:
MuleSoft Documentation: Mocking Services
MuleSoft Documentation: Performance Testing

NEW QUESTION # 227
An API client makes an HTTP request to an API gateway with an Accept header containing the value'' application''.
What is a valid HTTP response payload for this request in the client requested data format?
  • A. <status>healthy</status>
  • B. status('healthy")
  • C. status: healthy
  • D. {"status" "healthy"}
Answer: D

NEW QUESTION # 228
A company is planning to extend its Mule APIs to the Europe region. Currently all new applications are deployed to Cloudhub in the US region following this naming convention{API name}-{environment}. for example, Orders-SAPI-dev, Orders-SAPI-prod etc.
Considering there is no network restriction to block communications between API's, what strategy should be implemented in order to apply the same new API's running in the EU region of CloudHub as well to minimize latency between API's and target users and systems in Europe?
  • A. Set region property to Europe (eu-de) in runtime manager for all the mule application Change the naming convention to {API name}-{environment}-{region} and communicate this change to the consuming applications and users
  • B. Set region property to Europe (eu-de) in runtime manager for all the mule application No need to change the naming convention
  • C. Set region property to Europe (eu-de) in API manager for all the mule application No need to change the naming convention
  • D. Set region property to Europe (eu-de) in API manager for all the mule application Change the naming convention to {API name}-{environment}-{region} and communicate this change to the consuming applications and users
Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 229
An organization needs to enable access to their customer data from both a mobile app and a web application, which each need access to common fields as well as certain unique fields. The data is available partially in a database and partially in a 3rd-party CRM system. What APIs should be created to best fit these design requirements?

  • A. One set of APIs (Experience API, Process API, and System API) for the web app, and another set for the mobile app.
  • B. A common Experience API used by both the web and mobile apps, but separate Process APIs for the web and mobile apps that interact with the database and the CRM System.
  • C. A Process API that contains the data required by both the web and mobile apps, allowing these applications to invoke it directly and access the data they need thereby providing the flexibility to add more fields in the future without needing API changes.
  • D. Separate Experience APIs for the mobile and web app, but a common Process API that invokes separate System APIs created for the database and CRM system
Answer: D
Explanation:
Lets analyze the situation in regards to the different options available Option : A common Experience API but separate Process APIs Analysis : This solution will not work because having common experience layer will not help the purpose as mobile and web applications will have different set of requirements which cannot be fulfilled by single experience layer API Option : Common Process API Analysis : This solution will not work because creating a common process API will impose limitations in terms of flexibility to customize API;s as per the requirements of different applications. It is not a recommended approach.
Option : Separate set of API's for both the applications Analysis : This goes against the principle of Anypoint API-led connectivity approach which promotes creating reusable assets. This solution may work but this is not efficient solution and creates duplicity of code.
Hence the correct answer is: Separate Experience APIs for the mobile and web app, but a common Process API that invokes separate System APIs created for the database and CRM system

Lets analyze the situation in regards to the different options available Option : A common Experience API but separate Process APIs Analysis : This solution will not work because having common experience layer will not help the purpose as mobile and web applications will have different set of requirements which cannot be fulfilled by single experience layer API Option : Common Process API Analysis : This solution will not work because creating a common process API will impose limitations in terms of flexibility to customize API;s as per the requirements of different applications. It is not a recommended approach.
Option : Separate set of API's for both the applications Analysis : This goes against the principle of Anypoint API-led connectivity approach which promotes creating reusable assets. This solution may work but this is not efficient solution and creates duplicity of code.
Hence the correct answer is: Separate Experience APIs for the mobile and web app, but a common Process API that invokes separate System APIs created for the database and CRM system


NEW QUESTION # 230
......
Download the free MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I pdf demo file of TestKingIT brain dumps. Checking the worth of the MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I exam questions and learns the format of questions and answers. A few moments are enough to introduce you to the excellent of the MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Brain Dumps and the authenticity and relevance of the information contained in them.
Interactive MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Questions: https://www.testkingit.com/Salesforce/latest-MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I-exam-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest TestKingIT MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1njSwmFixuny6KCKdwe1RW8a58wm45JL0
https://www.exams4collection.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list