Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Core Board › Core-3566JD4› Valid Dumps Plat-Arch-204 Ebook & Unlimited Plat-A ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

Valid Dumps Plat-Arch-204 Ebook & Unlimited Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice

stevewh617

126

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
126

Valid Dumps Plat-Arch-204 Ebook & Unlimited Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice

Posted at yesterday 12:45      View：18 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
Our study materials have enough confidence to provide the best Plat-Arch-204 exam torrent for your study to pass it. With many years work experience, we have fast reaction speed to market change and need. In this way, we have the latest Plat-Arch-204 guide torrent. You don’t worry about that how to keep up with the market trend, just follow us. We can say that our Plat-Arch-204 Test Questions are the most suitable for examinee to pass the exam, you will never regret to buy it.
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Build Solution: This domain covers implementing integrations including API design considerations, choosing outbound methods, building scalable solutions, implementing error handling, creating security solutions, and ensuring resilience during system updates.
Topic 2
  • Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.
Topic 3
  • Translate Needs to Integration Requirements: This domain involves converting business needs into technical specifications by documenting systems and patterns, evaluating constraints, defining security requirements, and determining performance needs like volumes, response times, and latency.

Unlimited Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice, New Plat-Arch-204 Dumps EbookIf you want to know our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions before your coming exam, you can just visit our website. And it is easy and convenient to free download the demos of our Plat-Arch-204 study guide, you just need to click on it. Then you wil find that all points of the Plat-Arch-204 Learning Materials are predominantly related with the exam ahead of you. Every page is full of well-turned words for your reference related wholly with the Plat-Arch-204 training prep.
Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q108-Q113):NEW QUESTION # 108
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to use Shield Platform Encryption to encrypt social security numbers in order to meet a business requirement. Which action should an integration architect take prior to the implementation of Shield Platform Encryption?
  • A. Review Shield Platform Encryption configurations and functional limitations.
  • B. Encrypt all the data so that it is secure.
  • C. Encrypt the data using the most current key.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Prior to implementing Shield Platform Encryption, the most critical step for an Integration Architect is to perform a comprehensive Review of Shield Platform Encryption configurations and their impact on existing platform functionality. Encryption at rest is not a "set-and-forget" feature; it changes how the Salesforce database interacts with various features, and failing to review these limitations beforehand can lead to significant business disruption.
Salesforce documentation emphasizes that encryption affects several core areas:
SOQL/SOSL Limitations: Encrypted fields have restricted capabilities in WHERE, GROUP BY, and ORDER BY clauses.1 For example, if Social Security Numbers (SSNs) are encrypted using Probabilistic Encryption, they cannot be filtered or sorted in a query.2 This could break existing integrations or reports that rely on finding specific records by SSN.
Search Functionality: While Salesforce supports searching for encrypted data, there are specific behaviors to consider regarding how search indexes are built and updated.
AppExchange and Managed Packages: If the SSN field is used by a third-party app or a managed package, encrypting it might cause those external tools to fail if they are not designed to handle encrypted data types.
Field Attributes: Encrypted fields cannot be used as Unique or External IDs if using the probabilistic scheme, which is a vital consideration for data synchronization architectures.3 Therefore, the architect must first conduct a Business Impact Analysis. This includes identifying where the sensitive data (SSNs) is used in Apex code, Flows, validation rules, and reports. By reviewing the configurations and functional limitations first, the architect can decide between Probabilistic (higher security) and Deterministic (allows filtering) encryption strategies.4 Option A is a step taken during or after implementation (Background Encryption), and Option C is an anti-pattern, as encrypting "everything" leads to unnecessary performance overhead and massive functional loss. Only after a thorough review can the architect safely proceed with the technical implementation of Shield.

NEW QUESTION # 109
The director of customer service at Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to capture and trend specific business events that occur in Salesforce in real time. The metrics will be accessed in an ad-hoc manner using an external analytics system. The events include product exchanges, authorization clicks, subscription cancellations, and refund initiations via Cases. Which solution should meet these business requirements?
  • A. Case Trigger after insert, after update to publish the platform event
  • B. Case Workflow Rule that sends an Outbound Message
  • C. Case after insert Trigger that executes a callout
Answer: A
Explanation:
To meet a requirement for real-time event capture that supports an external analytics system, the arc14hitect must choose a pattern that is scalable, decoupled, and reliable. Platform Events are the modern standard for this use case.
By using a Case Trigger to publish a specific Platform Event, NTO creates a highly decoupled Publish/Subscribe architecture. The external analytics system (or a middleware layer feeding it) acts as a subscriber to the event channel. This is superior to standard callouts or outbound messaging for several reasons:
Durability: Platform Events offer a 72-hour retention window. If the analytics system is momentarily offline, it can use the Replay ID to retrieve missed events.
Atomic Transactions: Triggers can be configured to publish events only after the database transaction successfully commits ("ublish After Commit"), ensuring the analytics system doesn't receive data for transactions that were eventually rolled back.
Event Volume: Platform Events are designed to handle much higher volumes of real-time messages than standard synchronous callouts.
Option A (Apex Callouts) is a point-to-point, synchronous pattern that would block Case processing and risk hitting "Concurrent Long-Running Request" limits. Option B (Outbound Messaging) is reliable but is limited to a single object per message and uses a rigid SOAP format that is less flexible for ad-hoc external analytics than the modern JSON/CometD/gRPC structures used by the event bus. By implementing Option C, the architect ensures that every specific business milestone (refund, exchange, cancellation) is broadcasted immediately, providing the customer service director with the accurate, real-time visibility required for trending and metrics.

NEW QUESTION # 110
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to improve the quality of callouts from Salesforce to its REST APIs. For this purpose, NTO will require all API Clients/consumers to adhere to REST API Markup Language (RAML) specifications that include the field-level definition of every API request and response Payload. The RAML specs serve as interface contracts that Apex REST API Clients can rely on. Which design specification should the integration architect include in the integration architecture to ensure that Apex REST API Clients' unit tests confirm Adherence to the RAML specs?
  • A. Implement HttpCalloutMock to return responses per RAML specification.
  • B. Call the HttpCalloutMock Implementation from the Apex REST API Clients.
  • C. Require the Apex REST API Clients to implement the HttpCalloutMock
Answer: A
Explanation:
In a contract-first integration strategy using RAML (RESTful API Modeling Language), the specification defines the exact structure of requests and responses. Because Salesforce unit tests cannot perform actual network callouts, the platform requires d1evelopers to use the HttpCalloutMock interface to simulate responses.
To ensure that the integration code strictly adheres to the established RAML contract, the integration architect must mandate that the HttpCalloutMock implementation returns responses that mirror the RAML specification. This means the mock must include all required fields, correct data types, and the expected HTTP status codes (e.g., 200 OK, 201 Created) as defined in the contract. By doing this, the unit tests verify that the Apex client code can successfully parse and process the specific JSON or XML payloads defined in the RAML spec.
Option A and B are technically imprecise. The Apex client does not "implement" the mock; rather, the test class provides a separate mock implementation to the runtime via Test.setMock(). The value of the integration architecture lies in the content of that mock. If the mock is designed to return contract-compliant data, then any change to the RAML that breaks the Apex code's ability to process it will be caught immediately during the testing phase. This "Mock-as-a-Contract" approach provides a safety net, ensuring that Salesforce remains compatible with external services even as those services evolve, provided the RAML is kept up to date.

NEW QUESTION # 111
Northern Trail Outfitters has had an increase in requests from other business units to integrate opportunity information with other systems from Salesforce. The developers have started writing asynchronous @future callouts directly into the target systems. The CIO is concerned about the viability of this approach and scaling for future growth. What should be done to mitigate the CIO's concerns?
  • A. Implement an extract, transform11, load (ETL) tool and perform nightly batch data loads to reduce network traffic.
  • B. Refactor the existing @future methods to use Enhanced External Services, import Open API 2.0 schemas, and update flows to use services instead of Apex.78
  • C. Implement an Enterprise Service Bus for service o9rchestration, mediation, routing, and decouple dependencies across systems.10
Answer: C
Explanation:
The CIO's concern regarding "viability" and "scaling" is rooted in the risks associated with tightly coupled, point-to-point integrations. Using @future methods for direct callouts creates a "spaghetti" architecture where Salesforce must manage the specific endpoints, authentication, and error logic for every external system.
The architect should recommend implementing an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). An ESB acts as a centralized middleware layer that provides mediation, routing, and orchestration. By moving the integration logic to an ESB, Salesforce only needs to send a single message to the bus. The ESB then takes responsibility for delivering that data to multiple business units and external systems. This decouples Salesforce from the downstream systems; if a target system changes its API or is replaced, only the ESB configuration needs to be updated, not the Salesforce Apex code.
While External Services (Option A) provide a low-code way to call APIs, they still represent point-to-point connections and do not solve the broader orchestration and scaling challenges. ETL tools (Option C) are designed for bulk data movement and would not satisfy the need for the near real-time updates that the existing callout logic likely supports. An ESB provides the "quality of service" features-such as guaranteed delivery, retries, and protocol transformation-that are necessary for a growing enterprise to maintain a stable and scalable integration landscape.

NEW QUESTION # 112
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has an affiliate company that would like immediate notifications of changes to opportunities in the NTO Salesforce Instance. The affiliate company has a CometD client available. Which solution is recommended in order to meet the requirement?
  • A. Implement a polling mechanism in the client that calls the SOAP API getUpdated method to get the ID values of each updated record.
  • B. Create a connected app in the affiliate org and select "Accept CometD API Requests".
  • C. Create a Push Topic update event on the Opportunity object to allow the subscriber to react to the streaming API.
Answer: C
Explanation:
To provide near real-time notifications to a client that already supports CometD, an Integration Architect should leverage the Streaming API. While Platform Events are a modern alternative, PushTopic Events are specifically designed to stream changes to Salesforce records based on a defined SOQL query.
A PushTopic event is triggered when a record is created, updated, deleted, or undeleted. By creating a PushTopic on the Opportunity object, NTO defines the criteria (fields and record states) that should trigger a message to the 1subscriber. The affiliate's CometD client can then subscribe to this topic's channel (e.g., /topic/OpportunityUpdates) to receive the data payload instantly.
Option A is incorrect because "Accept CometD API Requests" is not a standard checkbox or configuration within a Connected App; authentication is handled via standard OAuth flows, but the streaming channel must still be defined. Option C describes a Polling mechanism, which is the architectural opposite of the requested "immediate notification" and would unnecessarily consume SOAP API limits while introducing latency. By using a PushTopic, NTO ensures a decoupled, event-driven architecture that scales effectively for notification-only use cases while respecting the technical capabilities of the affiliate's existing CometD-compatible infrastructure.

NEW QUESTION # 113
......
Our Plat-Arch-204 exam prep can bring you high quality learning platform to pass the variety of exams. Plat-Arch-204 guide dumps are elaborately composed with major questions and answers. Plat-Arch-204 test question only needs 20 hours to 30 hours to practice. There is important to get the Plat-Arch-204 Certification as you can. There is a fabulous product to prompt the efficiency--the Plat-Arch-204 exam prep, as far as concerned, it can bring you high quality learning platform to pass the variety of exams.
Unlimited Plat-Arch-204 Exam Practice: https://www.examstorrent.com/Plat-Arch-204-exam-dumps-torrent.html
https://www.latestcram.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list