Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Development Kit › Intelligent IoT Development Kit› Free PDF 2026 Databricks Trustable Databricks-Genera ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Free PDF 2026 Databricks Trustable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate T

zoereed359

126

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
126

【General】 Free PDF 2026 Databricks Trustable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate T

Posted at 9 hour before      View：3 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
BONUS!!! Download part of DumpsValid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XoU3Bf8d_kMEZSnPLdrlSkh6tYj9EPma
If you have the certification the exam, you can enter a better company, and your salary will also be doubled. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training materials can help you pass the exam and obtain corresponding certification successfully. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials are edited by experienced experts, and they possess the professional knowledge for the exam, and you can use it with ease. We have online and offline chat service, they possess the professional knowledge for the exam, and you can consult them any questions that bothers you. We offer you free update for one year for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps, and our system will send the latest version to you automatically.
Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
  • licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 2
  • Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 3
  • Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.
Topic 4
  • Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

Books Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF | Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test ForumThe result of your exam is directly related with the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning materials you choose. So our company is of particular concern to your exam review. Getting the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certificate of the exam is just a start. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice materials may bring far-reaching influence for you. Any demands about this kind of exam of you can be satisfied by our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training quiz. So our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice materials are of positive interest to your future. Such a small investment but a huge success, why are you still hesitating?
Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q43-Q48):NEW QUESTION # 43
A Generative AI Engineer is building a Generative AI system that suggests the best matched employee team member to newly scoped projects. The team member is selected from a very large team. Thematch should be based upon project date availability and how well their employee profile matches the project scope. Both the employee profile and project scope are unstructured text.
How should the Generative Al Engineer architect their system?
  • A. Create a tool for finding available team members given project dates. Embed team profiles into a vector store and use the project scope and filtering to perform retrieval to find the available best matched team members.
  • B. Create a tool for finding available team members given project dates. Embed all project scopes into a vector store, perform a retrieval using team member profiles to find the best team member.
  • C. Create a tool to find available team members given project dates. Create a second tool that can calculate a similarity score for a combination of team member profile and the project scope. Iterate through the team members and rank by best score to select a team member.
  • D. Create a tool for finding team member availability given project dates, and another tool that uses an LLM to extract keywords from project scopes. Iterate through available team members' profiles and perform keyword matching to find the best available team member.
Answer: A
Explanation:
* Problem Context: The problem involves matching team members to new projects based on two main factors:
* Availability: Ensure the team members are available during the project dates.
* Profile-Project Match: Use the employee profiles (unstructured text) to find the best match for a project's scope (also unstructured text).
The two main inputs are theemployee profilesandproject scopes, both of which are unstructured. This means traditional rule-based systems (e.g., simple keyword matching) would be inefficient, especially when working with large datasets.
* Explanation of Options: Let's break down the provided options to understand why D is the most optimal answer.
* Option Asuggests embedding project scopes into a vector store and then performing retrieval using team member profiles. While embedding project scopes into a vector store is a valid technique, it skips an important detail: the focus should primarily be on embedding employee profiles because we're matching the profiles to a new project, not the other way around.
* Option Binvolves using a large language model (LLM) to extract keywords from the project scope and perform keyword matching on employee profiles. While LLMs can help with keyword extraction, this approach is too simplistic and doesn't leverage advanced retrieval techniques like vector embeddings, which can handle the nuanced and rich semantics of unstructured data. This approach may miss out on subtle but important similarities.
* Option Csuggests calculating a similarity score between each team member's profile and project scope. While this is a good idea, it doesn't specify how to handle the unstructured nature of data efficiently. Iterating through each member's profile individually could be computationally expensive in large teams. It also lacks the mention of using a vector store or an efficient retrieval mechanism.
* Option Dis the correct approach. Here's why:
* Embedding team profiles into a vector store: Using a vector store allows for efficient similarity searches on unstructured data. Embedding the team member profiles into vectors captures their semantics in a way that is far more flexible than keyword-based matching.
* Using project scope for retrieval: Instead of matching keywords, this approach suggests using vector embeddings and similarity search algorithms (e.g., cosine similarity) to find the team members whose profiles most closely align with the project scope.
* Filtering based on availability: Once the best-matched candidates are retrieved based on profile similarity, filtering them by availability ensures that the system provides a practically useful result.
This method efficiently handles large-scale datasets by leveragingvector embeddingsandsimilarity search techniques, both of which are fundamental tools inGenerative AI engineeringfor handling unstructured text.
* Technical References:
* Vector embeddings: In this approach, the unstructured text (employee profiles and project scopes) is converted into high-dimensional vectors using pretrained models (e.g., BERT, Sentence-BERT, or custom embeddings). These embeddings capture the semantic meaning of the text, making it easier to perform similarity-based retrieval.
* Vector stores: Solutions likeFAISSorMilvusallow storing and retrieving large numbers of vector embeddings quickly. This is critical when working with large teams where querying through individual profiles sequentially would be inefficient.
* LLM Integration: Large language models can assist in generating embeddings for both employee profiles and project scopes. They can also assist in fine-tuning similarity measures, ensuring that the retrieval system captures the nuances of the text data.
* Filtering: After retrieving the most similar profiles based on the project scope, filtering based on availability ensures that only team members who are free for the project are considered.
This system is scalable, efficient, and makes use of the latest techniques inGenerative AI, such as vector embeddings and semantic search.

NEW QUESTION # 44
A Generative AI Engineer is developing an LLM application that users can use to generate personalized birthday poems based on their names.
Which technique would be most effective in safeguarding the application, given the potential for malicious user inputs?
  • A. Implement a safety filter that detects any harmful inputs and ask the LLM to respond that it is unable to assist
  • B. Ask the LLM to remind the user that the input is malicious but continue the conversation with the user
  • C. Increase the amount of compute that powers the LLM to process input faster
  • D. Reduce the time that the users can interact with the LLM
Answer: A
Explanation:
In this case, the Generative AI Engineer is developing an application to generate personalized birthday poems, but there's a need to safeguard againstmalicious user inputs. The best solution is to implement asafety filter (option A) to detect harmful or inappropriate inputs.
* Safety Filter Implementation:Safety filters are essential for screening user input and preventing inappropriate content from being processed by the LLM. These filters can scan inputs for harmful language, offensive terms, or malicious content and intervene before the prompt is passed to the LLM.
* Graceful Handling of Harmful Inputs:Once the safety filter detects harmful content, the system can provide a message to the user, such as "I'm unable to assist with this request," instead of processing or responding to malicious input. This protects the system from generating harmful content and ensures a controlled interaction environment.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B (Reduce Interaction Time): Reducing the interaction time won't prevent malicious inputs from being entered.
* C (Continue the Conversation): While it's possible to acknowledge malicious input, it is not safe to continue the conversation with harmful content. This could lead to legal or reputational risks.
* D (Increase Compute Power): Adding more compute doesn't address the issue of harmful content and would only speed up processing without resolving safety concerns.
Therefore, implementing asafety filterthat blocks harmful inputs is the most effective technique for safeguarding the application.

NEW QUESTION # 45
A Generative Al Engineer has built an LLM-based system that will automatically translate user text between two languages. They now want to benchmark multiple LLM's on this task and pick the best one. They have an evaluation set with known high quality translation examples. They want to evaluate each LLM using the evaluation set with a performant metric.
Which metric should they choose for this evaluation?
  • A. ROUGE metric
  • B. BLEU metric
  • C. RECALL metric
  • D. NDCG metric
Answer: B
Explanation:
The task is to benchmark LLMs for text translation using an evaluation set with known high-quality examples, requiring a performant metric. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: ROUGE metric
* ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) measures overlap between generated and reference texts, primarily for summarization. It's less suited for translation, where precision and word order matter more.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is commonly used for summarization, not translation evaluation"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option B: BLEU metric
* BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) evaluates translation quality by comparing n-gram overlap with reference translations, accounting for precision and brevity. It's widely used, performant, and appropriate for this task.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU is a standard metric for evaluating machine translation, balancing accuracy and efficiency"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: NDCG metric
* NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) assesses ranking quality, not text generation.
It's irrelevant for translation evaluation.
* Databricks Reference:"NDCG is suited for ranking tasks, not generative output scoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: RECALL metric
* Recall measures retrieved relevant items but doesn't evaluate translation quality (e.g., fluency, correctness). It's incomplete for this use case.
* Databricks Reference: No specific extract, but recall alone lacks the granularity of BLEU for text generation tasks.
Conclusion: Option B (BLEU) is the best metric for translation evaluation, offering a performant and standard approach, as endorsed by Databricks' guidance on generative tasks.

NEW QUESTION # 46
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with improving the RAG quality by addressing its inflammatory outputs.
Which action would be most effective in mitigating the problem of offensive text outputs?
  • A. Restrict access to the data sources to a limited number of users
  • B. Curate upstream data properly that includes manual review before it is fed into the RAG system
  • C. Inform the user of the expected RAG behavior
  • D. Increase the frequency of upstream data updates
Answer: B
Explanation:
Addressing offensive or inflammatory outputs in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system is critical for improving user experience and ensuring ethical AI deployment. Here's whyDis the most effective approach:
* Manual data curation: The root cause of offensive outputs often comes from the underlying data used to train the model or populate the retrieval system. By manually curating the upstream data and conducting thorough reviews before the data is fed into the RAG system, the engineer can filter out harmful, offensive, or inappropriate content.
* Improving data quality: Curating data ensures the system retrieves and generates responses from a high-quality, well-vetted dataset. This directly impacts the relevance and appropriateness of the outputs from the RAG system, preventing inflammatory content from being included in responses.
* Effectiveness: This strategy directly tackles the problem at its source (the data) rather than just mitigating the consequences (such as informing users or restricting access). It ensures that the system consistently provides non-offensive, relevant information.
Other options, such as increasing the frequency of data updates or informing users about behavior expectations, may not directly mitigate the generation of inflammatory outputs.

NEW QUESTION # 47
A Generative Al Engineer is using an LLM to classify species of edible mushrooms based on text descriptions of certain features. The model is returning accurate responses in testing and the Generative Al Engineer is confident they have the correct list of possible labels, but the output frequently contains additional reasoning in the answer when the Generative Al Engineer only wants to return the label with no additional text.
Which action should they take to elicit the desired behavior from this LLM?
  • A. Use zero shot chain-of-thought prompting to prevent a verbose output format
  • B. Use few snot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
  • C. Use zero shot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
  • D. Use a system prompt to instruct the model to be succinct in its answer
Answer: D
Explanation:
The LLM classifies mushroom species accurately but includes unwanted reasoning text, and the engineer wants only the label. Let's assess how to control output format effectively.
* Option A: Use few shot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
* Few-shot prompting provides examples (e.g., input: description, output: label). It can work but requires crafting multiple examples, which is effort-intensive and less direct than a clear instruction.
* Databricks Reference:"Few-shot prompting guides LLMs via examples, effective for format control but requires careful design"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option B: Use zero shot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
* Zero-shot prompting relies on a single instruction (e.g., "Return only the label") without examples. It's simpler than few-shot but may not consistently enforce succinctness if the LLM's default behavior is verbose.
* Databricks Reference:"Zero-shot prompting can specify output but may lack precision without examples"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Use zero shot chain-of-thought prompting to prevent a verbose output format
* Chain-of-Thought (CoT) encourages step-by-step reasoning, which increases verbosity-opposite to the desired outcome. This contradicts the goal of label-only output.
* Databricks Reference:"CoT prompting enhances reasoning but often results in detailed responses"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Use a system prompt to instruct the model to be succinct in its answer
* A system prompt (e.g., "Respond with only the species label, no additional text") sets a global instruction for the LLM's behavior. It's direct, reusable, and effective for controlling output style across queries.
* Databricks Reference:"System prompts define LLM behavior consistently, ideal for enforcing concise outputs"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
Conclusion: Option D is the most effective and straightforward action, using a system prompt to enforce succinct, label-only responses, aligning with Databricks' best practices for output control.

NEW QUESTION # 48
......
If you want to purchase reliable & professional exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study guide materials, you go to right website. We DumpsValid only provide you the latest version of professional actual test questions. We provide free-worry shopping experience for customers. Our high pass rate of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions is famous in this field so that we can grow faster and faster so many years and have so many old customers. Choosing our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions you don't need to spend too much time on preparing for your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam and thinking too much.
Books Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF: https://www.dumpsvalid.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-still-valid-exam.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of DumpsValid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XoU3Bf8d_kMEZSnPLdrlSkh6tYj9EPma
https://www.it-passports.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list