Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › EC-A3399ProC› Sie können so einfach wie möglich - SAA-C0 ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Sie können so einfach wie möglich - SAA-C03 bestehen!

zacksto996

124

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
124

【General】 Sie können so einfach wie möglich - SAA-C03 bestehen!

Posted at yesterday 19:13      View：9 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
Laden Sie die neuesten Fast2test SAA-C03 PDF-Versionen von Prüfungsfragen kostenlos von Google Drive herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=123ZtUHegvLyD72_Y0YtWziIqFIaYfTnA
Wenn Sie sich auf Amazon SAA-C03 Prüfung vorbereiten, ist es nicht eine gute Weise für Sie, alle Kenntnisse für die Prüfungen ziellos auswendig zu lernen. Tatsächlich gibt es die Lernmethode, die Amazon SAA-C03 Prüfung leichter zu bestehen. Wenn Sie die guten Geräte benutzen, können Sie weniger Zeit verwenden. Und Es ist auch die Garantie, die Amazon SAA-C03 Prüfung zu bestehen. Was ist das Gerät? Natürlich ist die Amazon SAA-C03 Dumps von Fast2test.
Das Bestehen der Amazon SAA-C03-Prüfung erfordert ein gründliches Verständnis der AWS-Dienste und ihrer Architektur. Es ist eine anspruchsvolle Prüfung, die die Fähigkeit des Kandidaten testet, skalierbare und zuverlässige Lösungen auf der AWS-Plattform zu entwerfen und umzusetzen. Kandidaten, die die Prüfung bestehen, erhalten die AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate-Zertifizierung, die weltweit anerkannt wird und Fachleuten helfen kann, in der Cloud-Computing-Branche voranzukommen.
Die Amazon SAA-C03 (Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate) Prüfung ist eine Zertifizierungsprüfung von Amazon Web Services (AWS), welche das Wissen und die Fähigkeiten von Einzelpersonen im Entwurf und der Bereitstellung von skalierbaren, hochverfügbaren und fehlertoleranten Systemen auf AWS testet. Diese Zertifizierung ist für Personen gedacht, die Erfahrung im Entwurf und der Bereitstellung von Anwendungen auf AWS haben sowie für diejenigen, die sich für das Erlernen verschiedener AWS-Dienste und ihrer Best Practices interessieren.
Die SAA-C03 Zertifizierungsprüfung besteht aus 65 Multiple-Choice- und Multiple-Response-Fragen, die innerhalb von 130 Minuten beantwortet werden müssen. Die Prüfung umfasst verschiedene Themen wie AWS-Infrastruktur, Sicherheit, Netzwerke, Datenbanken, Speicherung und Kostenoptimierung. Um die Prüfung zu bestehen, müssen die Kandidaten ihre Fähigkeit demonstrieren, skalierbare, hochverfügbare und fehlertolerante Systeme auf der AWS-Plattform zu entwerfen und bereitzustellen. Erfolgreiche Kandidaten erhalten die AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate Zertifizierung, die weltweit anerkannt ist und ihre Expertise im Entwurf und in der Bereitstellung von Cloud-basierten Lösungen auf der AWS-Plattform demonstriert.
SAA-C03 Prüfungsguide: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate & SAA-C03 echter Test & SAA-C03 sicherlich-zu-bestehenChancen gehören zu den Leuten, wer gut vorbereitet hat. Wenn unsere Chance vor uns vorhanden ist, können wir sie erfolgreich greifen? Die Amazon SAA-C03 exam Fragen können die Garantie für Sie sein, SAA-C03 Prüfung abzulegen. Mit diesen Dumps können Sie viel Zeit sparen und hohe Effektivität haben. Sie können ihre Besonderheit und hohe Qualität kennen, wenn sie die echten Fragen und Antworten von Fast2test benutzen. Es ist wirklich ein kürzester Weg zu Ihrem Erfolg. Damit können Sie sich auf Amazon SAA-C03 Exam voll vorbereiten.
Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q430-Q435):430. Frage
An accounting application uses an RDS database configured with Multi-AZ deployments to improve availability.
What would happen to RDS if the primary database instance fails?
  • A. The canonical name record (CNAME) is switched from the primary to standby instance.
  • B. The IP address of the primary DB instance is switched to the standby DB instance.
  • C. The primary database instance will reboot.
  • D. A new database instance is created in the standby Availability Zone.
Antwort: A
Begründung:
In Amazon RDS, failover is automatically handled so that you can resume database operations as quickly as possible without administrative intervention in the event that your primary database instance goes down. When failing over, Amazon RDS simply flips the canonical name record (CNAME) for your DB instance to point at the standby, which is in turn promoted to become the new primary.

The option that says: The IP address of the primary DB instance is switched to the standby DB instance is incorrect since IP addresses are per subnet, and subnets cannot span multiple AZs.
The option that says: The primary database instance will reboot is incorrect since in the event of a failure, there is no database to reboot with.
The option that says: A new database instance is created in the standby Availability Zone is incorrect since with multi-AZ enabled, you already have a standby database in another AZ.
References:
https://aws.amazon.com/rds/details/multi-az/
https://aws.amazon.com/rds/faqs/
Amazon RDS Overview:
https://youtu.be/aZmpLl8K1UU
Check out this Amazon RDS Cheat Sheet:
https://tutorialsdojo.com/amazon ... service-amazon-rds/

431. Frage
A company has a social media application that is experiencing rapid user growth. The current architecture uses t-family Amazon EC2 instances. The current architecture struggles to handle the increasing number of user posts and images. The application experiences performance slowdowns during peak usage times.
A solutions architect needs to design an updated architecture that will resolve the performance issues and scale as usage increases.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
  • A. Use an Amazon API Gateway REST API and AWS Lambda functions to process requests. Store account information in Amazon DynamoDB. Use Amazon S3 to store posts and images.
  • B. Deploy multiple EC2 instances in the same family. Use an Application Load Balancer to distribute traffic. Use a shared file system to store account information and to store posts and images.
  • C. Use the largest Amazon EC2 instance in the same family to host the application. Install a relational database on the instance to store all account information and to store posts and images.
  • D. Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to buffer incoming posts. Use a larger EC2 instance in the same family to host the application. Store account information in Amazon DynamoDB. Store posts and images in the local EC2 instance file system.
Antwort: A
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Amazon Web Services (AWS) Architect documents:
This question focuses on scalability, operational overhead, and performance during unpredictable workloads.
API Gateway + AWS Lambda enables serverless compute, which scales automatically based on the number of requests. It requires no provisioning, maintenance, or patching of servers - eliminating operational overhead.
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database optimized for high-throughput workloads with single-digit millisecond latency.
Amazon S3 is designed for high availability and durability, and is ideal for storing unstructured content such as user-uploaded images.
By leveraging these fully managed and scalable services, the architecture meets the requirement of supporting rapid user growth while minimizing operational complexity. This solution aligns with the Performance Efficiency and Operational Excellence pillars in the AWS Well-Architected Framework.
Reference:
Serverless Web Application Architecture
Using DynamoDB with Lambda
Best Practices for API Gateway

432. Frage
A company is running a batch job on an EC2 instance inside a private subnet. The instance gathers input data from an S3 bucket in the same region through a NAT Gateway. The company is looking for a solution that will reduce costs without imposing risks on redundancy or availability.
Which solution will accomplish this?
  • A. Replace the NAT Gateway with a NAT instance hosted on a burstable instance type.
  • B. Remove the NAT Gateway and use a Gateway VPC endpoint to access the S3 bucket from the instance.
  • C. Deploy a Transit Gateway to peer connection between the instance and the S3 bucket.
  • D. Re-assign the NAT Gateway to a lower EC2 instance type.
Antwort: B
Begründung:
A gateway endpoint is a gateway that you specify in your route table to access Amazon S3 from your VPC over the AWS network. Interface endpoints extend the functionality of gateway endpoints by using private IP addresses to route requests to Amazon S3 from within your VPC, on-premises, or from a different AWS Region. Interface endpoints are compatible with gateway endpoints. If you have an existing gateway endpoint in the VPC, you can use both types of endpoints in the same VPC.


There is no additional charge for using gateway endpoints. However, standard charges for data transfer and resource usage still apply.
Hence, the correct answer is: Remove the NAT Gateway and use a Gateway VPC endpoint to access the S3 bucket from the instance.
The option that says: Replace the NAT Gateway with a NAT instance hosted on burstable instance type is incorrect. This solution may possibly reduce costs, but the availability and redundancy will be compromised.
The option that says: Deploy a Transit Gateway to peer connection between the instance and the S3 bucket is incorrect. Transit Gateway is a service that is specifically used for connecting multiple VPCs through a central hub.
The option that says: Re-assign the NAT Gateway to a lower EC2 instance type is incorrect. NAT Gateways are fully managed resources. You cannot access nor modify the underlying instance that hosts it.
References:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Amaz ... face-endpoints.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/ ... k/vpce-gateway.html
Amazon VPC Overview:
https://youtu.be/oIDHKeNxvQQ
Check out this Amazon VPC Cheat Sheet:
https://tutorialsdojo.com/amazon-vpc/

433. Frage
A company is running a batch application on Amazon EC2 instances. The application consists of a backend with multiple Amazon RDS databases. The application is causing a high number of leads on the databases. A solutions architect must reduce the number of database reads while ensuring high availability.
What should the solutions architect do to meet this requirement?
  • A. Use Amazon Route 53 DNS caching
  • B. Use Amazon ElastCache for Redis
  • C. Add Amazon RDS read replicas
  • D. Use Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached
Antwort: C
Begründung:
Explanation
This solution meets the requirement of reducing the number of database reads while ensuring high availability for a batch application that consists of a backend with multiple Amazon RDS databases. Amazon RDS read replicas are copies of the primary database instance that can serve read-only traffic. You can create one or more read replicas for a primary database instance and connect to them using a special endpoint. Read replicas can improve the performance and availability of your application by offloading read queries from the primary database instance.
Option B is incorrect because using Amazon ElastiCache for Redis can provide a fast, in-memory data store that can cache frequently accessed data, but it does not support replication from Amazon RDS databases.
Option C is incorrect because using Amazon Route 53 DNS caching can improve the performance and availability of DNS queries, but it does not reduce the number of database reads. Option D is incorrect because using Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached can provide a fast, in-memory data store that can cache frequently accessed data, but it does not support replication from Amazon RDS databases.
References:
* https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Amaz ... /USER_ReadRepl.html

434. Frage
A company is developing a new application that uses a relational database to store user data and application configurations. The company expects the application to have steady user growth. The company expects the database usage to be variable and read-heavy, with occasional writes.
The company wants to cost-optimize the database solution. The company wants to use an AWS managed database solution that will provide the necessary performance.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
  • A. Deploy the database on Amazon Aurora Serveriess to automatically scale the database capacity based on actual usage to accommodate the workload.
  • B. Deploy the database on Amazon RDS Use magnetic storage and use read replicas to accommodate the workload
  • C. Deploy the database on Amazon RDS. Use Provisioned IOPS SSD storage to ensure consistent performance for read and write operations.
  • D. Deploy the database on Amazon DynamoDB. Use on-demand capacity mode to automatically scale throughput to accommodate the workload.
Antwort: A
Begründung:
Amazon Aurora Serverless is a cost-effective, on-demand, autoscaling configuration for Amazon Aurora. It automatically adjusts the database's capacity based on the current demand, which is ideal for workloads with variable and unpredictable usage patterns. Since the application is expected to be read-heavy with occasional writes and steady growth, Aurora Serverless can provide the necessary performance without requiring the management of database instances.
* Cost-Optimization: Aurora Serverless only charges for the database capacity you use, making it a more cost-effective solution compared to always running provisioned database instances, especially for workloads with fluctuating demand.
* Scalability: It automatically scales database capacity up or down based on actual usage, ensuring that you always have the right amount of resources available.
* Performance: Aurora Serverless is built on the same underlying storage as Amazon Aurora, providing high performance and availability.
* Why Not Other Options?:
* Option A (RDS with Provisioned IOPS SSD): While Provisioned IOPS SSD ensures consistent performance, it is generally more expensive and less flexible compared to the autoscaling nature of Aurora Serverless.
* Option C (DynamoDB with On-Demand Capacity): DynamoDB is a NoSQL database and may not be the best fit for applications requiring relational database features.
* Option D (RDS with Magnetic Storage and Read Replicas): Magnetic storage is outdated and generally slower. While read replicas help with read-heavy workloads, the overall performance might not be optimal, and magnetic storage doesn't provide the necessary performance.
AWS References:
* Amazon Aurora Serverless - Information on how Aurora Serverless works and its use cases.
* Amazon Aurora Pricing - Details on the cost-effectiveness of Aurora Serverless.

435. Frage
......
Wenn Sie deprimiert sind, sollen Sie am besten etwas lernen. Lernen werden Sie unbesiegbar machen. Die Fragenkataloge zur Amazon SAA-C03 Zertifizierungsprüfung von Fast2test werden Sie sicher unbesiegbar machen. Mit diesen Fragenkataloge können Sie sicher das internationale akzeptierte Amazon SAA-C03 Zertifikat bekommen. Sie können deshalb viel Geld verdienen und Ihre Lebensumstände werden sicher gründlich verbessert. Werden Sie noch deprimiert? Nein, Sie werden sicher stolz darauf. Sie sollen Fast2test danken, die Ihnen so gute Fragenkataloge bietet. Fast2test hilft Ihnen, wenn Sie deprimiert sind. Er hilft Ihnen, Ihre Qualität zu verbessern und Ihren perfekten Lebenswert zu repräsentieren.
SAA-C03 Zertifizierungsprüfung: https://de.fast2test.com/SAA-C03-premium-file.html
P.S. Kostenlose und neue SAA-C03 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von Fast2test verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=123ZtUHegvLyD72_Y0YtWziIqFIaYfTnA
https://www.koreadumps.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list