Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › EC-A3288C› 100% Pass Quiz 2026 High Hit-Rate Plat-Arch-204: Sal ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] 100% Pass Quiz 2026 High Hit-Rate Plat-Arch-204: Salesforce Certified Platform I

sidwest552

136

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
136

【General】 100% Pass Quiz 2026 High Hit-Rate Plat-Arch-204: Salesforce Certified Platform I

Posted at 6 hour before      View：4 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
To make sure your situation of passing the certificate efficiently, our Plat-Arch-204 practice materials are compiled by first-rank experts. So the proficiency of our team is unquestionable. They help you review and stay on track without wasting your precious time on useless things. They handpicked what the Plat-Arch-204 Study Guide usually tested in exam recent years and devoted their knowledge accumulated into these Plat-Arch-204 actual tests. We are on the same team, and it is our common wish to help your realize it. So good luck!
Nowadays in this information-based world the definition of the talents has changed a lot and the talents mean that the personnel boost both the knowledge in Plat-Arch-204 area and the practical abilities now. With our Plat-Arch-204 exam braindumps, you can get what you want. Our Plat-Arch-204 Study Materials are easy to be mastered and boost varied functions. We compile Our Plat-Arch-204 preparation questions elaborately and provide the wonderful service to you thus you can get a good learning and preparation for the exam.
100% Pass Quiz 2026 Salesforce Marvelous Plat-Arch-204: Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Test TutorialsWhen preparing to take the Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps, knowing where to start can be a little frustrating, but with TorrentVCE Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 practice questions, you will feel fully prepared. Using our Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 practice test software, you can prepare for the increased difficulty on Plat-Arch-204 Exam day. Plus, we have various question types and difficulty levels so that you can tailor your Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps preparation to your requirements.
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.
Topic 2
  • Evaluate the Current System Landscape: This domain covers analyzing existing technical environments to understand current systems, their standards, protocols, limitations, and boundaries, while identifying constraints and authentication
  • authorization requirements.
Topic 3
  • Design Integration Solutions: This domain centers on selecting integration patterns, designing complete solutions with appropriate components, understanding trade-offs and limitations, choosing correct Salesforce APIs, and determining required standards and security mechanisms.
Topic 4
  • Evaluate Business Needs: This domain addresses gathering functional and non-functional requirements, classifying data by sensitivity, identifying CRM success factors, and understanding how business growth and regulations impact integration choices.
Topic 5
  • Build Solution: This domain covers implementing integrations including API design considerations, choosing outbound methods, building scalable solutions, implementing error handling, creating security solutions, and ensuring resilience during system updates.

Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q129-Q134):NEW QUESTION # 129
An enterprise customer with more than 10 million customers has a landscape including an Enterprise Billing System (EBS), a Document Management System (DMS), and Salesforce CRM. Customer Support needs seamless access to customer billing information from the EBS and generated bills from the DMS. Which authorization and authentication need should an integration consultant consider while integrating the DMS and EBS with Salesforce?
  • A. Consider Enterprise security needs for access to DMS and EBS.
  • B. Consider options to migrate DMS and EBS into Salesforce.
  • C. Identify options to maintain DMS and EBS authentication and authorization details in Salesforce.
Answer: A
Explanation:
When integrating Salesforce with high-security enterprise systems like an Enterprise Billing System (EBS) and a Document Management System (DMS), the primary architectural concern is respecting the Enterprise security needs for access control. These systems often contain highly sensitive financial data and are governed by strict regulatory requirements (e.g., PCI-DSS or GDPR).
The integration consultant must evaluate how to extend existing enterprise identity and authorization policies to Salesforce users. This often involves a Identity Federation strategy using protocols like SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect. Instead of maintaining separate credentials in Salesforce (which Option A suggests and is generally an "anti-pattern" for 10 million records), the consultant should consider using a central Identity Provider (IdP).
By considering enterprise security needs, the architect ensures that when a support agent clicks a link in Salesforce to view a bill, the request is authenticated against the enterprise's security gateway. This allows for Single Sign-On (SSO) while ensuring that authorization (who can see what) remains mastered in the source systems or the central IdP. Migration (Option C) is physically and technically unfeasible for systems handling 10 million customers' historical bills and real-time processing. The focused objective is to build a "window" into these systems from Salesforce while maintaining the integrity of the enterprise's existing security perimeter.

NEW QUESTION # 130
Salesforce is the system of record for Leads, Contacts, Accounts, and Cases. Customer data also exists in an ERP, ticketing system, and data lake, each with unique identifiers. Middleware is used to update systems bidirectionally. Which solution should be recommended to handle this?
  • A. Design an MDM solution that maps external IDs to the Salesforce record ID.
  • B. Locally cache external IDs at the middleware layer.
  • C. Use Change Data Capture to update downstream systems accordingly.
Answer: A
Explanation:
In a complex landscape where multiple systems contain overlapping customer data, each with its own primary key, the core architectural challenge is Identity Management. To ensure that an update in Salesforce (the System of Record) correctly updates "Customer A" in the ERP and "Customer A" in the Data Lake, a Master Data Management (MDM) strategy is required.
An MDM solution creates a Cross-Reference (X-Ref) Table or a "Golden Record" that maps the unique identifiers from all systems. In the Salesforce record, the architect should implement External ID fields for each corresponding system (e.g., ERP_ID__c, Ticket_System_ID__c).
Why this is the superior recommendation:
Bidirectional Integrity: When the middleware receives an update from the ERP, it uses the ERP_ID__c to perform an "upsert" in Salesforce, ensuring no duplicates are created.
Traceability: It allows for easy auditing of data lineage across the enterprise.
Decoupling: Salesforce doesn't need to know the internal logic of the ERP; it simply holds the reference key.
Option B (CDC) is a delivery mechanism, not an identity management strategy; it tells you that something changed, but not which record in the ERP it corresponds to without the ID mapping. Option C (Local caching in middleware) is an "anti-pattern" because it makes the middleware stateful; if the middleware cache is lost or out of sync, the entire integration breaks. By designing an MDM-based mapping solution directly within the data model, the architect ensures a robust, scalable, and transparent identity framework for the entire enterprise.

NEW QUESTION # 131
A company that is a leading provider of courses and training delivers courses using third-party trainers. The trainer for the company has to be verified by 10 different training accreditation verification agencies before providing training for the company. Each training accreditation agency has its own response time, which means it could take days to confirm a trainer. The company decided to automate the trainer accreditation verification process by integrating it with the agency's web service1s. What is the recommended approach to automa2te this process?3456
  • A. Use Salesforce External Service to make the callout; Salesforce External Service should check the verification agencies until the result is verified. Then, update the trainer status to "verified".
  • B. Make an Apex callout using @future annotation to make the callout to all different agencies.
  • C. Use middleware to handl7e the callout to the 10 different verific8ation services; the middleware will handle the business logic of con9solidating the verification resu10lt from the 10 services. Then, make a call-in to Salesforce and update the verification status to "verified".
Answer: C
Explanation:
In this scenario, the primary architectural challenge is managing high-latency, multi-step orchestration involving 10 disparate external systems. Each agency has a varying response time that can span several days, making a synchronous "Request-Reply" pattern within Salesforce technically impossible due to transaction timeout limits (maximum 120 seconds).
The recommended approach is to leverage Middleware as the orchestration and state-management layer. Middleware (such as an ESB or iPaaS) is specifically designed for Process Choreography. Salesforce initiates a single "Fire and Forget" request to the middleware. The middleware then takes responsibility for:
Sequential or Parallel Callouts: Initiating the requests to all 10 verification agencies.
Callback Management: Handling the asynchronous responses from each agency as they arrive over a period of days.
Aggregation Logic: Consolidating the results and determining when the "Business Process" is complete (e.g., all 10 agencies have approved).
Once the consolidation logic is satisfied, the middleware performs a Remote Call-In to the Salesforce REST API to update the trainer's record. This pattern keeps Salesforce "clean" by moving complex, long-running orchestration logic off-platform, preventing the consumption of excessive Apex CPU time and ensuring that Salesforce only receives a single, final status update.
Option B (External Services) is unsuitable for a multi-day asynchronous process as it is designed for real-time, synchronous Flow actions. Option C (@future) is restricted by the same 120-second timeout and cannot handle the "waiting" state required for days of verification. Using middleware provides the necessary Quality of Service (QoS), durability, and error handling required for such a critical enterprise compliance process.

NEW QUESTION # 132
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to secure an integration with an external Microsoft Azure API Gateway. Which integration security mechanism should be employed?
  • A. Configure a connected app with an authorization endpoint of the API Gateway and configure OAuth settings.
  • B. Use an API-only user profile and implement an external identity provider with federated API access.
  • C. Configure mutual server authentication with two-way SSL using certification authority (CA) signed certificates.
Answer: C
Explanation:
For outbound integrations from Salesforce to an external cloud gateway like Microsoft Azure API Gateway, securing the communication at the transport layer is a fundamental requirement. While standard SSL provides one-way encryption where the client (Salesforce) verifies the server (Azure), Mutual Server Authentication (Two-Way SSL/TLS) ensures that both parties are verified before data is exchanged.
In this architecture, Salesforce presents a digital certificate to the Azure API Gateway during the TLS handshake. For production environments, Salesforce architects recommend using certificates signed by a Certification Authority (CA) rather than self-signed certificates to establish a trusted chain of identity that complies with enterprise security standards. This mechanism prevents unauthorized clients from connecting to the Azure endpoint, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and unauthorized data exfiltration.
While a Connected App and OAuth (Option B) are essential for inbound requests where external systems call Salesforce, they do not natively secure the point-to-point connection when Salesforce acts as the client. Similarly, a federated API access model (Option A) focuses on user identity but does not address the transport layer security between the two cloud platforms. By configuring two-way SSL, Northern Trail Outfitters ensures that the Azure API Gateway only processes requests originating from a trusted, authenticated Salesforce instance, fulfilling the high security and trust requirements of modern integration architecture.

NEW QUESTION # 133
A customer is migrating from an old legacy system to Salesforce. As part of the modernization effort, the customer would like to integrate all existing systems that currently work with its legacy application with Salesforce. Which constraint/pain-point should an integration architect consider when choosing the integration pattern/mechanism?
  • A. Reporting and usability requirements
  • B. System types APIs, File systems, Email
  • C. Multi-language and multi-currency requirement
Answer: B
Explanation:
When migrating from a legacy landscape to a modern platform like Salesforce, the most immediate technical hurdle is the diversity of system types and communication protocols used by the existing systems.
In a legacy environment, integrations are often not standardized. An architect may encounter systems that communicate via modern REST/SOAP APIs, but they will also likely find older systems that rely on Flat File exchanges (FTP/SFTP), Email-based triggers, or direct Database connections. These "System Types" are a fundamental constraint because they dictate the choice of integration middleware. For example, Salesforce cannot natively poll a file system or read an on-premise database; therefore, an architect must identify these constraints to justify the need for an ETL or ESB tool that can bridge these legacy protocols with Salesforce's API-centric architecture.
While reporting (Option B) and multi-currency (Option C) are important functional requirements for the Salesforce implementation, they do not dictate the integration pattern (e.g., Request-Reply vs. Batch) as much as the technical interface of the source/target systems does. By evaluating the APIs, file systems, and email capabilities of the legacy landscape first, the architect ensures that the chosen integration mechanism-whether it be the Streaming API, Bulk API, or middleware orchestration-is technically capable of actually communicating with the legacy debt.

NEW QUESTION # 134
......
Dear customers, if you are prepared to take the exam with the help of excellent Plat-Arch-204 learning materials on our website, the choice is made brilliant. Our Plat-Arch-204 training materials are your excellent choices, especially helpful for those who want to pass the exam without bountiful time and eager to get through it successfully. Let us take a try of our amazing Plat-Arch-204 Exam Questions and know the advantages first!
Test Plat-Arch-204 Questions Pdf: https://www.torrentvce.com/Plat-Arch-204-valid-vce-collection.html
https://www.real4dumps.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list