Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Core Board › Core-1808-JD4› Pdf Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Files, Plat-Arch-204 La ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Pdf Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Files, Plat-Arch-204 Latest Material

hughsco482

125

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
125

【General】 Pdf Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Files, Plat-Arch-204 Latest Material

Posted at yesterday 21:51      View：8 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
Are you satisfied with your present job? Are you satisfied with what you are doing? Do you want to improve yourself? To master some useful skills is helpful to you. Now that you choose to work in the IT industry, you must register IT certification test and get the IT certificate which will help you to upgrade yourself. What's more important, you can prove that you have mastered greater skills. And then, to take Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam can help you to express your desire. Don't worry. VCE4Plus will help you to find what you need in the exam and our dumps must help you to obtain Plat-Arch-204 certificate.
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Translate Needs to Integration Requirements: This domain involves converting business needs into technical specifications by documenting systems and patterns, evaluating constraints, defining security requirements, and determining performance needs like volumes, response times, and latency.
Topic 2
  • Design Integration Solutions: This domain centers on selecting integration patterns, designing complete solutions with appropriate components, understanding trade-offs and limitations, choosing correct Salesforce APIs, and determining required standards and security mechanisms.
Topic 3
  • Build Solution: This domain covers implementing integrations including API design considerations, choosing outbound methods, building scalable solutions, implementing error handling, creating security solutions, and ensuring resilience during system updates.
Topic 4
  • Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.
Topic 5
  • Evaluate the Current System Landscape: This domain covers analyzing existing technical environments to understand current systems, their standards, protocols, limitations, and boundaries, while identifying constraints and authentication
  • authorization requirements.

2026 High Pass-Rate Pdf Plat-Arch-204 Files Help You Pass Plat-Arch-204 EasilyMany candidates find the Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam preparation difficult. They often buy expensive study courses to start their Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) certification exam preparation. However, spending a huge amount on such resources is difficult for many Salesforce exam applicants. The latest Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Dumps are the right option for you to prepare for the Plat-Arch-204 certification test at home. VCE4Plus has launched the Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps with the collaboration of world-renowned professionals.
Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Sample Questions (Q24-Q29):NEW QUESTION # 24
Universal Containers (UC) is currently managing a custom monolithic web service that runs on an on-premise server. This monolithic web service is responsible for Point-to-Point (P2P) integrations between Salesforce and a legacy billing application, a cloud-based ERP, and a data lake. UC has found that the tight interdependencies are causing failures. What should an integration architect recommend to decouple the systems and improve performance?
  • A. Use the Salesforce Bulk API when integrating back into Salesforce.
  • B. Move the custom monolithic web service from on-premise to a cloud provider.
  • C. Leverage modular design by breaking up the web service into smaller pieces for a microservice architecture.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The primary architectural flaw in UC's current landscape is the reliance on a monolithic P2P integration layer. In such designs, any failure in one integration thread or a surge in volume for one system can monopolize resources (CPU, memory, threads), causing the entire service-and thus all other integrations-to fail. This lack of isolation leads to the "tight interdependencies" described.
To effectively decouple these systems, the architect should recommend a Microservices Architecture. By breaking the monolithic service into smaller, independent, and modular components, each integration (Billing, ERP, Data Lake) becomes its own isolated service. This approach provides several key architectural benefits:
Isolation of Failure: If the connection to the legacy billing application fails or times out, it no longer impacts the ERP or Data Lake integrations.
Independent Scalability: If the Data Lake integration requires high throughput, that specific microservice can be scaled horizontally without wasting resources on the others.
Technology Agility: Each microservice can be updated or patched independently, allowing for faster maintenance cycles.
Furthermore, moving a "monolithic" service to the cloud (Option B) is simply a "lift and shift" that preserves the underlying fragility. While the Bulk API (Option A) is excellent for high-volume data loading, it does not solve the fundamental problem of system interdependency and orchestration failure. Transitioning to a modular, service-oriented design allows UC to implement modern integration patterns, such as asynchronous queuing between the microservices, which significantly improves the overall resilience and performance of the Salesforce-to-back-office landscape.

NEW QUESTION # 25
A large consumer goods manufacturer operating in multiple countries is planning to implement Salesforce for its sales and support operations globally. The Manufacturer has the following security requirements:
Internal users from each country have to be authenticated with their local active directory.
Customers can create their own login or use Google login.
Partners have to be authenticated through a central system which is to be determined.
Internal users will have access to the central Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with their credentials maintained in the ERP system.
Additional internal systems will be integrated with Salesforce for sales and support business processes.
Which requirement should the integration architect evaluate while designing the integration needs of this project?
  • A. Evaluate Salesforce native authentication mechanism for all users including customers and partners.
  • B. Evaluate the build of a custom authentication mechanism for users in each country and support for customers and partners.
  • C. Consider a third-party single sign-on (SSO) solution supporting all user authentication including customer and partner.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Managing identity across a global enterprise with diverse user personas (Employees, Customers, Partners) requires a centralized Identity and Access Management (IAM) strategy. In a landscape involving multiple local Active Directories, social logins (Google), and a central ERP system, attempting to manage authentication natively within Salesforce or through custom-built local silos would result in high technical debt and security vulnerabilities.
The architect should recommend a third-party Single Sign-On (SSO) solution, acting as a central Identity Provider (IdP). This IdP serves as the orchestration layer for all authentication requests.
For Internal Users: The IdP can federate with the various local Active Directories, allowing users to log in with their existing corporate credentials.
For Customers: The IdP can handle "Social Sign-On" (OpenID Connect) with Google and manage self-registration.
For Partners: It provides the "central system" required for their authentication.
By using a central SSO solution, Salesforce acts as a Service Provider (SP). When a user attempts to access Salesforce, the request is redirected to the IdP via the SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect protocol. Once the IdP validates the user against the appropriate backend (AD, Google, or its own directory), it sends a secure assertion back to Salesforce to grant access.
Furthermore, this central IdP can facilitate access to the ERP system and other internal systems. If these systems support SAML, the same SSO session used for Salesforce can be extended to them, providing a true single sign-on experience. This architecture centralizes security auditing, simplifies user de-provisioning (the "kill switch" effect), and ensures a consistent user experience across the global manufacturing landscape. Implementing a thir2d-party IdP is the industry-standard approach for complex integrations where security, scalabi3lity, and multi-protocol support are primary requirements.

NEW QUESTION # 26
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has an affiliate company that would like immediate notifications of changes to opportunities in the NTO Salesforce instance. The affiliate company has a CometD client available.
Which solution is recommended in order to meet the requirement?
  • A. Create a connected app in the affiliate org and select "Accept CometD API Requests".
  • B. Create a PushTopic update event on the Opportunity object to allow the subscriber to react to the streaming API.
  • C. Implement a polling mechanism in the client that calls the SOAP API getUpdated method to get the ID values of each updated record.
Answer: B
Explanation:
To provide "immediate notifications" to a client that already supports CometD, the architect must utilize Salesforce's Streaming API. PushTopic Events are the classic Streaming API implementation for broadcasting changes to specific records.
A PushTopic is a definition that includes a SOQL query and a set of trigger events (Create, Update, Delete). When an Opportunity in NTO's instance is updated and matches the query, Salesforce automatically pushes a notification to the topic's channel. The affiliate's CometD client, having subscribed to this channel, receives the data payload instantly.12 Option A (Polling) is the architectural opposite of "immediate notifications". Polling is inefficient, consumes API limits, and int13roduces latency between the actual record change and the client's discovery of that change. Option C is incorrect as there is no "Accept CometD" setting in a Connected App; while a Connected App is used for OAuth authentication, the PushTopic is the mechanism that actually defines and delivers the stream. By using PushTopic, NTO provides a decoupled, event-driven architecture that fulfills the requirement for real-time visibility while minimizing the technical burden on the affiliate's infrastructure.

NEW QUESTION # 27
Northern Trail Outfitters is creating a distributable Salesforce package. The package needs to call into a custom Apex REST endpoint in the central org. The security team wants to ensure a specific integration account is used in the central org that they will authorize after installation of the package. Which item should an architect recommend to secure the integration?
  • A. Create a connected app in the central org and add the callback URL for each org in the package it is installed in to redirect after a successful authentication.
  • B. Use an encrypted field to store the password.
  • C. Contact Salesforce Support and create a case to temporarily enable API access for managed packages.
Answer: A
Explanation:
To securely integrate a distributed package with a central "Hub" org, the architect should utilize the OAuth 2.0 Web Server Flow. In this model, a Connected App is created in the central org to act as the identity and access provider.1 A critical component of this setup is the Callback URL (Redirect URI). When a user in the "Subscriber" org (where the packag2e is installed) initiates the connection, Salesforce redirects them to the central org to authorize the access. After successful authentication, the central org needs the correct callback URL to return the authorization code to the specific subscriber org.
Using this flow satisfies the security team's requirement for a specific integration account. The administrator in the central org can pre-authorize specific profiles or permission sets to use the Connected App, ensuring that only the designated integration user's credentials are used to fulfill requests. Option A is a security "anti-pattern" (storing passwords in fields), and Option C is unnecessary as API access is a standard feature. This OAuth-based approach provides a secure, revocable, and standardized way to manage cross-org communication in a multi-tenant environment.

NEW QUESTION # 28
The director of customer service at Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to capture and trend specific business events that occur in Salesforce in real time. The metrics will be accessed in an ad-hoc manner using an external analytics system. The events include product exchanges, authorization clicks, subscription cancellations, and refund initiations via Cases. Which solution should meet these business requirements?
  • A. Case Trigger after insert, after update to publish the platform event
  • B. Case after insert Trigger that executes a callout
  • C. Case Workflow Rule that sends an Outbound Message
Answer: A
Explanation:
To meet a requirement for real-time event capture that supports an external analytics system, the arc14hitect must choose a pattern that is scalable, decoupled, and reliable. Platform Events are the modern standard for this use case.
By using a Case Trigger to publish a specific Platform Event, NTO creates a highly decoupled Publish/Subscribe architecture. The external analytics system (or a middleware layer feeding it) acts as a subscriber to the event channel. This is superior to standard callouts or outbound messaging for several reasons:
Durability: Platform Events offer a 72-hour retention window. If the analytics system is momentarily offline, it can use the Replay ID to retrieve missed events.
Atomic Transactions: Triggers can be configured to publish events only after the database transaction successfully commits ("ublish After Commit"), ensuring the analytics system doesn't receive data for transactions that were eventually rolled back.
Event Volume: Platform Events are designed to handle much higher volumes of real-time messages than standard synchronous callouts.
Option A (Apex Callouts) is a point-to-point, synchronous pattern that would block Case processing and risk hitting "Concurrent Long-Running Request" limits. Option B (Outbound Messaging) is reliable but is limited to a single object per message and uses a rigid SOAP format that is less flexible for ad-hoc external analytics than the modern JSON/CometD/gRPC structures used by the event bus. By implementing Option C, the architect ensures that every specific business milestone (refund, exchange, cancellation) is broadcasted immediately, providing the customer service director with the accurate, real-time visibility required for trending and metrics.

NEW QUESTION # 29
......
At this time, you will stand out in the interview among other candidates with the Plat-Arch-204 certification. Constant improvement is significant to your career development. Your current achievements cannot represent your future success. Never stop advancing. Come to study our Plat-Arch-204 Learning Materials. Stick to the end, victory is at hand. Action always speaks louder than words. With the help of our Plat-Arch-204 study questions, you can reach your dream in the least time.
Plat-Arch-204 Latest Material: https://www.vce4plus.com/Salesforce/Plat-Arch-204-valid-vce-dumps.html
https://www.testpdf.net
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list