Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
12
New Topic

Ubuntu Graphics Acceleration

65

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
65
Posted at 3/8/2017 17:21:13     
Hi,

I am running Firefly-rk3288_Ubuntu_1604_ 2016_1018 and I found that the graphics is very slow. When I run the browser, scrolling is noticeably lagging. When I run glxgears, the FPS is about 72-82 FPS.

Can I know if GPU acceleration is working under Ubuntu for 3288?
Reply

Use props Report

450

Credits

10

Prestige

0

Contribution

intermediate

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Credits
450
Posted at 3/8/2017 23:14:14     
With 2D acelaration you justa have Debian.

Firefly Post: http://bbs.t-firefly.com/forum.p ... mp;highlight=debian
Latest from ROCKCHIP: http://rockchip.wikidot.com/debian

we don't have any Linux disto in ARM rk3288 with graphics working well
Reply

Use props Report

65

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
65
Posted at 3/9/2017 14:14:07     
Hi,
Does it mean that Ubuntu support for graphics is still very poor? And I should use Debian?
Reply

Use props Report

450

Credits

10

Prestige

0

Contribution

intermediate

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Credits
450
Posted at 3/9/2017 16:59:31     
Last edited by psycmos In 3/9/2017 22:29 Editor

Yes ubuntu just have 3D graphics. Not have 2D so interface is totally lag. Try debian and test it. Have a lot of bugs too. Firefly have no OS working perfect... even android released by firefly team not work very well. Have some micro stutters in video playback. I'm trying create one webserver with my box, ... but try Debian!
Reply

Use props Report

65

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
65
Posted at 3/10/2017 20:53:00     
That is really sad to hear. From the website, it seems that the "powerful GPU". I guess the "hardware" is powerful, but honestly, what is the point of a super powerful hardware without supporting software / OS? I will try out Debian... if that still doesn't work, I might have to return it.
Reply

Use props Report

450

Credits

10

Prestige

0

Contribution

intermediate

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Credits
450
Posted at 3/11/2017 06:01:10     
Yes it have powerfull graphics but no support. If you want small device for ubuntu do not buy ARM devices. This will not work 2D graphics and will have a lot of bugs and limitations. Buy other box for this propose.
Cheers
Reply

Use props Report

65

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
65
Posted at 3/12/2017 22:38:41     
Thanks for the advice. I do need good 2D graphics as I using it for digital signage. Do you have any recommendations for similar hardware?
Reply

Use props Report

191

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
191
Posted at 3/26/2017 11:25:43     
kfchoong Posted at 3/12/2017 22:38
Thanks for the advice. I do need good 2D graphics as I using it for digital signage. Do you have any ...

id recommend hard kernel's odroid boards. they have very decent performance with both cpu+gpu, decent priced and very well supported software wise so there shouldn't be any real issues with 2d/3d acceleration, at least none I've noticed on my boards. the other bonus is that they have a very active forum that should help you out should you have any issues etc that you need help/advice with in relation to their products

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php
Reply

Use props Report

450

Credits

10

Prestige

0

Contribution

intermediate

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Credits
450
Posted at 3/27/2017 06:09:49     
Yes, but i have one Odroid ux4 and 2D graphics are not working 100% too. The most perfect OS is:

http://dev.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=26172

Very very hardwork inside!
Reply

Use props Report

191

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
191
Posted at 3/29/2017 07:15:28     
not sure what issues you have with the xu4, but I've got an xu3 and  C1 that both seem to run 2D/3D fine, so unless I'm not aware of something (and thats quite possible) then any of those boards should do what he needs to do without to much hassle. the main thing to point out is that Hardkernel have a very active forum community as well as a monthly magazine s there is decent support. the same cannot be said about firefly.
the other option he has would be to get a small x86 dev board that uses an atom of similar low spec cpu, these will outperform most arm boards that are available however the downside is that an x86 board is going to cost way more.
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
12
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list