Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › AIO-3399C› 信頼できる-最高のWorkday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習 ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] 信頼できる-最高のWorkday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本試験-試験の準備方法Workday-Pro-Integrations参考資料

arthurr144

130

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
130

【General】 信頼できる-最高のWorkday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本試験-試験の準備方法Workday-Pro-Integrations参考資料

Posted at yesterday 05:42      View：8 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
ちなみに、GoShiken Workday-Pro-Integrationsの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gnmaqtJqTZcu1aLvuA5OwKh7hSh7Oepk
GoShikenは客様の要求を満たせていい評判をうけいたします。たくさんのひとは弊社の商品を使って、Workday-Pro-Integrations試験に順調に合格しました。
業界の人気トレンドの変化と最新の社会的見解を注視し、時代に対応し、クライアントに最新のWorkday-Pro-Integrations学習教材リソースを提供します。私たちのサービス哲学と信条は、お客様が私たちの神であり、お客様のWorkday-Pro-Integrationsガイド資料に対する満足が私たちの幸福の最大のリソースであるということです。なぜあなたはまだheしたのですか？今すぐWorkday-Pro-Integrationsガイドの質問を購入してください。 Workday-Pro-Integrationsラーニングガイドを使用すると、Workday-Pro-Integrations試験に問題なく合格できます。
Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations試験を完璧なWorkday Workday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本で合格する学生時代に出てから、私たちはもっと多くの責任を持って勉強する時間は少なくなりました。IT業界で発展したいなら、WorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations試験のような国際的な試験に合格するのは重要です。我々GoShikenはITエリートの皆さんの努力であなたにWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations試験に速く合格する方法を提供します。PDF、オンライン、ソフトの3つのバーションのWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations試験の資料は独自の長所があってあなたは我々のデモを利用してから自分の愛用する版を選ぶことができます。
Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam 認定 Workday-Pro-Integrations 試験問題 (Q58-Q63):質問 # 58
Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below. Your integration has the following runs in the integration events report (Date format of MM/DD/YYYY):
Run #1
* Core Connector: Worker Integration System was launched on May 15, 2024 at 3:00:00 AM.
* As of Entry Moment: 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/15/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/01/2024
Run #2
* Core Connector: Worker Integration System was launched on May 31, 2024 at 3:00:00 AM.
* As of Entry Moment: 05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/31/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/15/2024 On May 13, 2024 Brian Hill receives a salary increase. The new salary amount is set to $90,000.00 with an effective date of April 30,2024. Which of these runs will include Brian Hill's compensation change?
  • A. Brian Hill will be included in both integration runs.
  • B. Brian Hill will only be included in the first integration run.
  • C. Brian Hill will only be included in the second integration run.
  • D. Brian Hill will be excluded from both integration runs.
正解：D
解説：
The scenario involves a Core Connector: Worker integration with two runs detailed in the integration events report. The goal is to determine whether Brian Hill's compensation change, effective April 30, 2024, and entered on May 13, 2024, will be included in either of the runs based on their date launch parameters. Let's analyze each run against the change details to identify the correct answer.
In Workday, the Core Connector: Worker integration in incremental mode (as indicated by the presence of
"Last Successful" parameters) processes changes based on the Transaction Log, filtering them by theEntry Moment(when the change was entered) andEffective Date(when the change takes effect). The integration captures changes where:
* TheEntry Momentfalls between theLast Successful As of Entry Momentand theAs of Entry Moment, and
* TheEffective Datefalls between theLast Successful Effective Dateand theEffective Date.
Brian Hill's compensation change has:
* Entry Moment:05/13/2024 (time not specified, so we assume it occurs at some point during the day, before or up to 11:59:59 PM).
* Effective Date:04/30/2024.
Analysis of Run #1
* Launch Date:05/15/2024 at 3:00:00 AM
* As of Entry Moment:05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM - The latest point for when changes were entered.
* Effective Date:05/15/2024 - The latest effective date for changes.
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment:05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM - The starting point for entry moments.
* Last Successful Effective Date:05/01/2024 - The starting point for effective dates.
For Run #1 to include Brian's change:
* TheEntry Moment(05/13/2024) must be between 05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM and 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM. Since 05/13/2024 falls within this range (assuming the change was entered before 3:00:00 AM on
05/15/2024, which is reasonable unless specified otherwise), this condition is met.
* TheEffective Date(04/30/2024) must be between 05/01/2024 (Last Successful Effective Date) and 05
/15/2024 (Effective Date). However, 04/30/2024 isbefore05/01/2024, so this condition isnot met.
Since the effective date of Brian's change (04/30/2024) precedes theLast Successful Effective Date(05/01
/2024), Run #1 will not include this change. In incremental mode, Workday excludes changes with effective dates prior to the last successful effective date, as those are assumed to have been processed in a prior run (before Run #1's baseline of 05/01/2024).
Analysis of Run #2
* Launch Date:05/31/2024 at 3:00:00 AM
* As of Entry Moment:05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM - The latest point for when changes were entered.
* Effective Date:05/31/2024 - The latest effective date for changes.
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment:05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM - The starting point for entry moments.
* Last Successful Effective Date:05/15/2024 - The starting point for effective dates.
For Run #2 to include Brian's change:
* TheEntry Moment(05/13/2024) must be between 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM and 05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM. However, 05/13/2024 isbefore05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM, so this condition isnot met.
* TheEffective Date(04/30/2024) must be between 05/15/2024 (Last Successful Effective Date) and 05
/31/2024 (Effective Date). Since 04/30/2024 isbefore05/15/2024, this condition is alsonot met.
In Run #2, theEntry Moment(05/13/2024) precedes theLast Successful As of Entry Moment(05/15/2024 3:
00:00 AM), meaning the change was entered before the starting point of this run's detection window.
Additionally, theEffective Date(04/30/2024) is well before theLast Successful Effective Date(05/15/2024).
Both filters exclude Brian's change from Run #2.
Conclusion
* Run #1:Excluded because the effective date (04/30/2024) is before the Last Successful Effective Date (05/01/2024).
* Run #2:Excluded because the entry moment (05/13/2024) is before the Last Successful As of Entry Moment (05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM) and the effective date (04/30/2024) is before the Last Successful Effective Date (05/15/2024).
Brian Hill's change would have been processed in an earlier run (prior to May 1, 2024) if the integration was running incrementally before Run #1, as its effective date (04/30/2024) predates both runs' baselines. Given the parameters provided, neither Run #1 nor Run #2 captures this change, makingD. Brian Hill will be excluded from both integration runsthe correct answer.
Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide References
* Workday Integrations Study Guide: Core Connector: Worker- Section on "Incremental Processing" explains how changes are filtered based on entry moments and effective dates relative to the last successful run.
* Workday Integrations Study Guide: Launch Parameters- Details how "Last Successful As of Entry Moment" and "Last Successful Effective Date" define the starting point for detecting new changes, excluding prior transactions.
* Workday Integrations Study Guide: Change Detection- Notes that changes with effective dates before the last successful effective date are assumed processed in earlier runs and are skipped in incremental mode.

質問 # 59
You need the integration file to generate the date format in the form of "31/07/2025" format
* The first segment is day of the month represented by two characters.
* The second segment is month of the year represented by two characters.
* The last segment is made up of four characters representing the year
How will you use Document Transformation (OT) to do the transformation using XTT?
  • A.
  • B.
  • C.
  • D.
正解：D
解説：
The requirement is to generate a date in "31/07/2025" format (DD/MM/YYYY) using Document Transformation with XSLT, where the day and month are two characters each, and the year is four characters. The provided options introduce a xtt:dateFormat attribute, which appears to be an XTT-specific extension in Workday for formatting dates without manual string manipulation. XTT (XML Transformation Toolkit) is an enhancement to XSLT in Workday that simplifies transformations via attributes like xtt:dateFormat.
Analysis of Options
Assuming the source date (e.g., psosition_Data/ps:Availability_Date) is in Workday's ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD, e.g., "2025-07-31"), we need XSLT that applies the "dd/MM/yyyy" format. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A:
xml
<xsl:template match="psosition">
<Record xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy">
<Availability_Date>
<xsl:value-of select="psosition_Data/ps:Availability_Date"/>
</Availability_Date>
</Record>
</xsl:template>
Analysis:
The xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy" attribute is applied to the <Record> element, suggesting that all date fields within this element should be formatted as DD/MM/YYYY.
<xsl:value-of select="psosition_Data/ps:Availability_Date"/> outputs the raw date value (e.g., "2025-07-31"), and the xtt:dateFormat attribute transforms it to "31/07/2025".
This aligns with Workday's XTT functionality, where attributes can override default date rendering.
Verdict: Correct, assuming xtt:dateFormat on a parent element applies to child date outputs.
Option A (Second Part):
xml
<Record>
<Availability_Date xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy">
<xsl:value-of select="psosition_Data/ps:Availability_Date"/>
</Availability_Date>
</Record>
Analysis:
Here, xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy" is on the <Availability_Date> element directly, which is more precise and explicitly formats the date output by <xsl:value-of>.
This is a valid alternative and likely the intended "best practice" for targeting a specific field.
Verdict: Also correct, but since the question implies a single answer, we'll prioritize the first part of A unless specified otherwise.
Option B:
xml
<xsl:template match="psosition">
</xsl:template>
Analysis:
Incomplete (lines 2-7 are blank). No date transformation logic is present.
Verdict: Incorrect due to lack of implementation.
Option C:
xml
<xsl:template match="psosition">
<Record>
<Availability_Date>
<xsl:value-of xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy" select="psosition_Data/ps:Availability_Date"/>
</Availability_Date>
</Record>
</xsl:template>
Analysis:
Places xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy" directly on <xsl:value-of>, which is syntactically valid in XTT and explicitly formats the selected date to "31/07/2025".
This is a strong contender as it directly ties the formatting to the output instruction.
Verdict: Correct and precise, competing with A.
Option C (Second Part):
xml
<Record>
<Availability_Date>
<xsl:value-of select="psosition_Data/ps:Availability_Date"/>
</Availability_Date>
</Record>
Analysis:
No xtt:dateFormat, so it outputs the date in its raw form (e.g., "2025-07-31").
Verdict: Incorrect for the requirement.
Option D:
xml
<xsl:template xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy" match="psosition">
</xsl:template>
Analysis:
Applies xtt:dateFormat to the <xsl:template> element, but no content is transformed (lines 2-7 are blank).
Even if populated, this would imply all date outputs in the template use DD/MM/YYYY, which is overly broad and lacks specificity.
Verdict: Incorrect due to incomplete logic and poor scoping.
Decision
A vs. C: Both A (first part) and C (first part) are technically correct:
A: <Record xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy"> scopes the format to the <Record> element, which works if Workday's XTT applies it to all nested date fields.
C: <xsl:value-of xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy"> is more precise, targeting the exact output.
Chosen answer: A is selected as the verified answer because:
The question's phrasing ("integration file to generate the date format") suggests a broader transformation context, and A's structure aligns with typical Workday examples where formatting is applied at a container level.
In multiple-choice tests, the first fully correct option is often preferred unless specificity is explicitly required.
However, C is equally valid in practice; the choice may depend on test conventions.
Final XSLT in Context
Using Option A:
xml
<xsl:template match="ps:Position">
<Record xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy">
<Availability_Date>
<xsl:value-of select="ps:Position_Data/ps:Availability_Date"/>
</Availability_Date>
</Record>
</xsl:template>
Input: <ps:Availability_Date>2025-07-31</ps:Availability_Date>
Output: <Record><Availability_Date>31/07/2025</Availability_Date></Record> Notes XTT Attribute: xtt:dateFormat is a Workday-specific extension, not standard XSLT 1.0. It simplifies date formatting compared to substring() and concat(), which would otherwise be required (e.g., <xsl:value-of select="concat(substring(., 9, 2), '/', substring(., 6, 2), '/', substring(., 1, 4))"/>).
Namespace: ps: likely represents a Position schema in Workday; adjust to wd: if the actual namespace differs.
:
Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide: "Configure Integration System - TRANSFORMATION" section, mentioning XTT attributes like xtt:dateFormat for simplified formatting.
Workday Documentation: "Document Transformation Connector," noting XTT enhancements over raw XSLT for date handling.
Workday Community: Examples of xtt:dateFormat="dd/MM/yyyy" in EIB transformations, confirming its use for DD/MM/YYYY output.

質問 # 60
Your manager has asked for a value on their dashboard for how many days away the birthdays are of their direct reports. The format of the output should be [Worker's Name]'s birthday is in [X] days, where you must calculate the number of days until a Worker's next birthday. An example output is "Logan McNeil's birthday is in 103 days." Which calculated field functions do you need to accomplish this?
  • A. Build Date, Format Date, Extract Single Instance, Format Text
  • B. Format Date, Increment or Decrement Date, Extract Single Instance, Format Text
  • C. Date Difference, Format Number, Text Constant, Concatenate Text
  • D. Increment or Decrement Date, Format Number, Text Constant, Concatenate Text
正解：C
解説：
Implementation:
D). Increment or Decrement Date, Format Number, Text Constant, Concatenate Text: Incorrect. Increment or Decrement Date can't directly calculate days to a future birthday without additional complexity; Date Difference is more appropriate.
Use Date Difference to calculate days from today to the next birthday (adjusting the year dynamically with additional logic if needed).
Apply Format Number to ensure the result is a clean integer.
Use Text Constant for static text ("'s birthday is in " and " days").
Use Concatenate Text to combine Worker Name, static text, and the formatted number.
Reference from Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide:
Workday Calculated Fields: Section on "Date Functions" explains Date Difference for calculating time spans.
Report Writer Fundamentals: Covers Concatenate Text and Text Constant for string building in reports.
Explanation:
The requirement is to create a calculated field for a dashboard that displays a worker's name and the number of days until their next birthday in the format "[Worker's Name]'s birthday is in [X] days" (e.g., "Logan McNeil's birthday is in 103 days"). This involves calculating the difference between today's date and the worker's next birthday, then formatting the output as a text string. Let's break down the necessary functions:
Date Difference:To calculate the number of days until the worker's next birthday, you need to determine the difference between the current date and the worker's birthdate in the current or next year (whichever is upcoming). The Date Difference function calculates the number of days between two dates. In this case:
Use the worker's "Date of Birth" field (from the Worker business object).
Adjust the year of the birthdate to the current year or next year (if the birthday has already passed this year) using additional logic.
Calculate the difference from today's date to this adjusted birthday date. For example, if today is February 21, 2025, and Logan's birthday is June 4 (adjusted to June 4, 2025), Date Difference returns 103 days.
Format Number:The result of Date Difference is a numeric value (e.g., 103). To ensure it displays cleanly in the output string (without decimals or unnecessary formatting), Format Number can be used to convert it to a simple integer string (e.g., "103").
Text Constant:To build the output string, static text like "'s birthday is in " and " days" is needed. The Text Constant function provides fixed text values to include in the final concatenated result.
Concatenate Text:The final step is to combine the worker's name (e.g., "Logan McNeil"), the static text, and the calculated days into one string. Concatenate Text merges multiple text values into a single output, such as "Logan McNeil" + "'s birthday is in " + "103" + " days".
Option Analysis:
A . Format Date, Increment or Decrement Date, Extract Single Instance, Format Text: Incorrect. Format Date converts dates to strings but doesn't calculate differences. Increment or Decrement Date adjusts dates but isn't suited for finding days until a future event. Extract Single Instance is for multi-instance fields, not relevant here. Format Text adjusts text appearance, not numeric calculations.
B . Build Date, Format Date, Extract Single Instance, Format Text: Incorrect. Build Date creates a date from components, useful for setting the next birthday, but lacks the difference calculation. Format Date and Extract Single Instance don't apply to the core need.
C . Date Difference, Format Number, Text Constant, Concatenate Text: Correct. These functions cover calculating the days, formatting the number, adding static text, and building the final string.

質問 # 61
You have successfully configured an ISU and an ISSG with the correct security policies and have assigned them to an EIB.
What task do you need to run before you can launch the EIB?
  • A. Assign the ISSG to only one security policy
  • B. Activate Pending Security Policy Changes
  • C. View Security for Securable Item
  • D. Maintain Integration Security Policies
正解：B
解説：
In Workday, after configuring an Integration System User (ISU) and an Integration System Security Group (ISSG) with the appropriate security policies and assigning them to an Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) integration, there is a critical step required before the EIB can be launched successfully. This step ensures that all security configurations and permissions assigned to the ISSG take effect in the Workday tenant. Let's analyze the question and evaluate each option systematically to determine the correct task, ensuring the answer aligns with Workday's documented processes and the Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide.
Context of the Scenario
You've completed the following:
Created an ISU and configured it (e.g., with "Do Not Allow UI Sessions" checked for web service-only access).
Set up an ISSG and assigned the ISU to it.
Defined the necessary security policies (e.g., domain security policies with "Get" and/or "ut" access) for the ISSG to support the EIB's operations.
Assigned the ISU and ISSG to the EIB integration system.
The question now is what must be done before launching the EIB to ensure it functions as intended. In Workday, changes to security policies-such as adding permissions to an ISSG-do not take effect immediately. They remain in a "pending" state until activated, which is a key aspect of Workday's security administration process.
Evaluation of Options
Option A: Activate Pending Security Policy ChangesIn Workday, whenever you modify security policies (e.g., granting domain permissions like "Integration Build" or "Custom Report Creation" to an ISSG), these changes are staged as "pending." To apply them to the tenant and make them active, you must run the "Activate Pending Security Policy Changes" task. This task reviews all pending security updates, allows you to add a comment for audit purposes, and, upon confirmation, activates the changes. Without this step, the ISSG will not have the effective permissions required for the EIB to access data or execute its operations, potentially causing the launch to fail due to insufficient authorization. This aligns directly with the scenario, as security policies have been configured and assigned, but not yet activated.
Option B: View Security for Securable ItemThe "View Security for Securable Item" report is a diagnostic tool in Workday that allows you to inspect the security configuration for a specific object (e.g., a web service operation, report, or task). It shows which security groups have access and what permissions (e.g., "Get," "ut," "View," "Modify") are granted. While this is useful for verifying that the ISSG has the correct policies assigned, it is a passive report-it does not modify or activate anything. Running this task would not enable the EIB to launch, as it doesn't affect the pending security changes. Thus, it's not the required step before launching the EIB.
Option C: Assign the ISSG to only one security policyThis option suggests limiting the ISSG to a single security policy, but this is neither a standard Workday requirement nor a task that exists as a standalone action. ISSGs can and often do have multiple security policies assigned (e.g., permissions for various domains like "Integration Build," "Custom Report Access," etc.), depending on the integration's needs. Moreover, the question states that the ISSG has already been configured with the "correct security policies" and assigned to the EIB, implying this step is complete. Restricting the ISSG to one policy after the fact would require editing permissions again, triggering more pending changes, and still necessitate activation-making this option illogical and incorrect.
Option D: Maintain Integration Security PoliciesThere is no specific task in Workday called "Maintain Integration Security Policies." This option seems to be a misnomer or a conflation of other tasks, such as "Maintain Domain Permissions for Security Group" (used to assign permissions to an ISSG) or broader security maintenance activities. However, the question indicates that the security policies are already correctly configured and assigned. If this option intended to imply further configuration, it would still result in pending changes requiring activation via Option A. As a standalone action, it does not represent a valid or necessary task to enable the EIB launch.
Why Option A is Correct
The "Activate Pending Security Policy Changes" task is a mandatory step in Workday's security workflow after modifying security policies, such as those assigned to an ISSG for an EIB. Workday's security model uses a pending changes queue to ensure that updates are reviewed and deliberately applied, maintaining control and auditability. Without activating these changes:
The ISSG will lack the effective permissions needed for the EIB to access required domains or perform its operations (e.g., retrieving data from a custom report or delivering a file).
The EIB launch could fail with errors like "Insufficient Privileges" or "Access Denied." Running this task ensures that the security configuration is live, allowing the ISU (via the ISSG) to authenticate and execute the EIB successfully. This is a standard practice in Workday integration setup, as emphasized in the Workday Pro Integrations curriculum.
Practical Steps to Perform Option A
Log into the Workday tenant with a security administrator role.
Search for and select the "Activate Pending Security Policy Changes" task.
Review the list of pending changes (e.g., new permissions added to the ISSG).
Enter a comment (e.g., "Activating security for EIB launch - ISSG permissions").
Check the "Confirm" box and click "OK" to activate the changes.
Once completed, the security policies are live, and the EIB can be launched.
Verification with Workday Documentation
The Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide and related training materials confirm that activating pending security policy changes is a prerequisite after configuring security for integrations. This step ensures that all permissions are in effect, enabling the ISU and ISSG to support the EIB's functionality. Community resources and implementation guides also consistently highlight this task as the final step before launching integrations that rely on updated security settings.
Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide Reference
Section: Integration Security Configuration - Explains the process of assigning security policies to ISSGs and the need to activate changes to operationalize them.
Section: Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) - Notes that security updates for EIBs must be activated before launching to ensure proper access.
Section: Security Administration - Details the "Activate Pending Security Policy Changes" task as the mechanism to apply pending security modifications across the tenant.

質問 # 62
This is the XML file generated from a Core Connector; Positions integration.

When performing an XSLT Transformation on the Core Connector: Positions XML output file, you want to show a hyperlink of positions that are not available for hiring as an entry in the Message tab.
What are all the needed ETV items to meet the above requirements?
  • A.
  • B.
  • C.
  • D.
正解：A
解説：
In Workday integrations, the Extension for Transformation and Validation (ETV) framework is used within XSLT transformations to apply validation and formatting rules to XML data, such as the output from a Core Connector (e.g., Positions integration). In this scenario, you need to perform an XSLT transformation on the Core Connector: Positions XML output file to display a hyperlink for positions that are not available for hiring as an entry in the Message tab. This requires configuring ETV attributes to ensure the data is present and correctly targeted for the hyperlink.
Here's why option B is correct:
* Requirement Analysis: The requirement specifies showing a hyperlink for positions "not available for hiring." In the provided XML, the ps:Available_For_Hire field under ps:Position_Data indicates whether a position is available for hire (e.g., <ps:Available_For_Hire>true</ps:Available_For_Hire>).
For positions where this is false, you need to create a message (hyperlink) in the Message tab, which typically requires linking to a Workday ID (WID) or other identifier.
* ETV Attributes:
* etv:required="true": This ensures that the ps:WID value under ps:Additional_Information is mandatory for the transformation. If the WID is missing, the transformation will fail or generate an error, ensuring that the hyperlink can be created only for valid positions with an associated WID.
* etv:target="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]": This specifies that the target of the transformation (e.g., the hyperlink) should be the WID value found at ps:Additional_Information
/ps:WID in the XML. This WID can be used to construct a hyperlink to the position in Workday, meeting the requirement to show a hyperlink for positions not available for hiring.
* Context in XML: The XML shows ps:Additional_Information containing ps:WID (e.g., <ps:
WID>73bd4d8562e04b1820f55818467905b</ps:WID>), which is a unique identifier for the position.
By targeting this WID with etv:target, you ensure the hyperlink points to the correct position record in Workday when ps:Available_For_Hire is false.
Why not the other options?
* A.
* etv:minLength="0"
* etv:targetWID="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]"
* etv:minLength="0" allows the WID to be empty or have zero length, which contradicts the need for a valid WID to create a hyperlink. It does not ensure the data is present, making it unsuitable.
Additionally, etv:targetWID is not a standard ETV attribute; the correct attribute is etv:target, making this option incorrect.
* C.
* etv:minLength="0"
* etv:target="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]"
* Similar to option A, etv:minLength="0" allows the WID to be empty, which does not meet the requirement for a mandatory WID to create a hyperlink. This makes it incorrect, as the hyperlink would fail if the WID is missing.
* D.
* etv:required="true"
* etv:targetWID="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]"
* While etv:required="true" ensures the WID is present, etv:targetWID is not a standard ETV attribute. The correct attribute is etv:target, making this option syntactically incorrect and unsuitable for the transformation.
To implement this in XSLT for a Workday integration:
* Use the ETV attributes from option B (etv:required="true" and etv:target="[ps:Additional_Information
/ps:WID]") within your XSLT template to validate and target the ps:WID for positions where ps:
Available_For_Hire is false. This ensures the transformation generates a valid hyperlink in the Message tab, linking to the position's WID in Workday.
Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide: Section on "ETV in XSLT Transformations" - Details the use of ETV attributes like required and target for validating and targeting data in Workday XML, including handling identifiers like WID for hyperlinks.
Workday Core Connector and EIB Guide: Chapter on "XML Transformations" - Explains how to use ETV attributes in XSLT to process position data, including creating messages or hyperlinks based on conditions like Available_For_Hire.
Workday Integration System Fundamentals: Section on "ETV for Message Generation" - Covers applying ETV attributes to generate hyperlinks in the Message tab, ensuring data integrity and correct targeting of Workday identifiers like WID.

質問 # 63
......
当社Workdayは、Workday-Pro-Integrations試験問題を編集するために、この分野で多くの主要な専門家を採用しています。 当社のチームベースの作業システムは、次世代の最高のWorkday-Pro-Integrations試験トレントがGoShiken最終的に形を成し遂げる精神と手を携える人材を最大限に引き出すように設計されています。 当社は、優れたアフターサービスを提供し、ガイドの急流に革新をもたらした実績があります。 当社の専門家がお客様に世界クラスのWorkday-Pro-IntegrationsのWorkday Pro Integrations Certification Examガイドトレントを作成できるため、お客様の成功が保証されます。 Workday-Pro-Integrations試験に合格する必要があります。
Workday-Pro-Integrations参考資料: https://www.goshiken.com/Workday/Workday-Pro-Integrations-mondaishu.html
Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本 今日の職場では、さまざまなトレーニング資料とツールが常に混乱を招き、品質をテストするために余分な時間を費やしているため、学習に時間を浪費しています、そして、それらの有用なリソースをWorkday Workday-Pro-Integrations学習資料に追加します、Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本 我々係員は全日24時間で待っていますから、何か疑問があれば、お問い合わせを期待しています、あなたは君の初めてのWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations認定試験を受ける時に認定試験に合格したいか、Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本 顧客の許可なく、第三者と共有することができません、Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本 ウェブサイトのアフターサービスは、実践のテストに耐えることができます。
玲奈が眠ってしまったのはある意味良かったかもしれないWorkday-Pro-Integrations、手紙には特に変わりはないとしか書かれていなかったが、いつもの彼女らしくないあの日の様子がずっと気にかかっている、今日の職場では、さまざまなトレーニング資料Workday-Pro-Integrations日本語版復習指南とツールが常に混乱を招き、品質をテストするために余分な時間を費やしているため、学習に時間を浪費しています。
Workday-Pro-Integrations試験の準備方法｜ユニークなWorkday-Pro-Integrations日本語復習赤本試験｜真実的なWorkday Pro Integrations Certification Exam参考資料そして、それらの有用なリソースをWorkday Workday-Pro-Integrations学習資料に追加します、我々係員は全日24時間で待っていますから、何か疑問があれば、お問い合わせを期待しています、あなたは君の初めてのWorkdayのWorkday-Pro-Integrations認定試験を受ける時に認定試験に合格したいか。
顧客の許可なく、第三者と共有することができません。
ちなみに、GoShiken Workday-Pro-Integrationsの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gnmaqtJqTZcu1aLvuA5OwKh7hSh7Oepk
https://www.braindumpquiz.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list