Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › ROC-RK3566-PC› 2V0-15.25合格記 & 2V0-15.25試験勉強過去問
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] 2V0-15.25合格記 & 2V0-15.25試験勉強過去問

lucaspe710

135

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
135

【General】 2V0-15.25合格記 & 2V0-15.25試験勉強過去問

Posted at yesterday 18:21      View：6 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
ご存知のように、2V0-15.25証明書は、グローバル市場で非常に高い評価を得ており、大きな影響力を持っています。 しかし、VMware証明書を取得する方法は多くの人々にとって頭痛の種になりました。 2V0-15.25学習教材はあなたに機会を提供します。 2V0-15.25試験の実施を選択すると、あらゆる思いやりのあるサービスを提供できるように最善を尽くします。 当社の製品はお客様の観点から設計されており、採用した専門家が変化する傾向に応じて2V0-15.25のVMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Support学習教材を更新し、2V0-15.25学習教材の高品質を確保します。
Japancertは、2V0-15.25試験資料によって2V0-15.25試験に合格することを心から願っています。私たちの責任ある行動は、本能的な目的と信条です。長年この分野に専念することにより、私たちは2V0-15.25学習問題に関する問題を確固たる自信をもって解決するために全能です。そして、2V0-15.25試験問題で勉強する限り、2V0-15.25学習ガイドは、99％〜100％の優れた品質と高い合格率を得るのに最適であることがわかります。
2V0-15.25試験勉強過去問 & 2V0-15.25模擬資料一回だけでVMwareの2V0-15.25試験に合格したい？Japancertは君の欲求を満たすために存在するのです。Japancertは君にとってベストな選択になります。ここには、私たちは君の需要に応じます。JapancertのVMwareの2V0-15.25問題集を購入したら、私たちは君のために、一年間無料で更新サービスを提供することができます。もし不合格になったら、私たちは全額返金することを保証します。
VMware 2V0-15.25 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • Troubleshoot and Optimize the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This domain focuses on troubleshooting VCF deployment, upgrades, conversions, workload domains, fleet operations (certificates, passwords, identity), licensing, compute resources, storage (vSAN, supplemental storage), networking (VDS, NSX), VCF Operations tools, Identity Broker automation, and HCX workload migrations.
トピック 2
  • VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section focuses on understanding VMware by Broadcom's virtualization and cloud infrastructure platform for managing modern enterprise workloads.
トピック 3
  • Install, Configure, Administrate the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This area covers installing, configuring, and managing VMware solutions including VCF Fleet deployment, expansion, and reduction operations.
トピック 4
  • IT Architectures, Technologies, Standards: This domain covers fundamental frameworks, tools, and best practices for building scalable, secure, and interoperable enterprise IT systems.
トピック 5
  • Plan and Design the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This domain addresses architectural planning and design principles for creating scalable, secure virtual environments aligned with business requirements.

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Support 認定 2V0-15.25 試験問題 (Q38-Q43):質問 # 38
An administrator is responsible for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) fleet. The administrator has been tasked with commissioning four ESX hosts for a new workload domain that uses vSAN Express Storage Architecture (ESA) as the primary storage solution.
During the host validation stage in vSphere client, the process fails with the following errors:
esx-l.wld.vcf.local. Failed to validate vSAN HCL status.
esx-2.wld.vcf. local. Failed to validate vSAN HCL status.
esx-3.wld.vcf.local. Failed to validate vSAN HCL status.
esx~4.wid.vcf. local. Failed to validate vSAN HCL status.
What Is the cause of the errors?
  • A. The RAID controller in each ESX host needs to be reconfigured to use Tri-mode.
  • B. The ESX hosts are not using vSAN ESA certified storage devices.
  • C. The ESX hosts must have internet access to validate vSAN ESA compatibility.
  • D. The RAID controller in each ESX host is not configured to use RAID-O/Passthrough.
正解：B
解説：
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 requires strict vSAN ESA hardware compatibility when creating a workload domain that uses vSAN Express Storage Architecture (ESA). During host validation, SDDC Manager and vSphere Client check whether each ESXi host meets ESA requirements, including CPU generation, storage controller type, and-most importantly-ESA-certified NVMe storage devices. The validation errors provided:
"Failed to validate vSAN HCL status" for every host
indicate that the hosts do not meet the vSAN ESA HCL requirements.
VCF 9.0 documentation states that ESA uses a next-generation log-structured filesystem requiring certified NVMe devices only, with no RAID controller dependencies. Unlike OSA, ESA eliminates disk groups, but it requires certified devices listed on the vSAN ESA HCL to pass host validation. If non-certified or unsupported NVMe/SAS devices are present, validation fails exactly as described.
Option A is incorrect because RAID pass-through settings apply to OSA, not ESA.
Option C is incorrect because ESA compatibility validation is performed offline using the SDDC Manager BOM, not via internet lookup.
Option D is incorrect because ESA does not use tri-mode RAID controllers.
Therefore, the documented and verified cause is B: hosts are not using vSAN ESA certified storage devices.

質問 # 39
A user wishes to publish a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Operations Orchestrator workflow to their VCF Automation project catalog, but Is blocked from publishing any workflows.
The following information has been provided:
* In the VCF Automation Organization portal, the user cannot see the Workflows option under Content Hub.
* The organization is not a Provider Consumption Organization.
Which are the two likely causes of this issue? (Choose two.)
  • A. The user is logged in with Project User rights.
  • B. An embedded VCF Operations Orchestrator is not integrated with their Organization.
  • C. The user is logged in with Project Administrator rights.
  • D. The user is logged in the Project Advanced User rights
  • E. An external VCF Operations Orchestrator is not integrated with their Organization.
正解：B、E
解説：
In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, publishing aVCF Operations Orchestratorworkflow to aVCF Automation project catalogrequires that the Organization has a valid integration withVCF Operations Orchestrator. The question states that the usercannot see the Workflows option under Content Hub, and theorganization is not a Provider Consumption Organization (PCO). According to the VCF 9.0 documentation, only organizations withVCF Operations Orchestrator integrationare allowed to publish workflows into the catalog. Both embedded and external orchestrator integrations must be configured depending on the environment. Ifno orchestrator (embedded or external)is integrated with the organization, workflows cannot be listed or published. This aligns with the documented VCF Automation and VCF Operations Orchestrator design requirements, which specify that workflow publishing is only available when the orchestrator instance is properly registered.
Additionally, user role permission issues could prevent workflow visibility, but the key blockers described in the scenario are the missing workflow section and the organization type. Because the organization isnot a PCO, advanced provider features-including workflow publishing-are disabled unless a proper orchestrator integration exists. Therefore, the two most likely causes are:
* A:An external VCF Operations Orchestrator is not integrated with their Organization.
* D:An embedded VCF Operations Orchestrator is not integrated with their Organization.
These two conditions directly match the documented behavior in VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.

質問 # 40
An administrator is automating the deployment of a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) fleet using VCF Installer. The VCF fleet must include VCF Automation being deployed in a simple deployment model.
The administrator creates a JSON file, but during the installation attempt the VCF Installer returns an error indicating that the JSON validation has failed.
What is the cause of the errors?
  • A. NSX Manager size was defined as large.
  • B. A separate distributed switch was defined for vSAN traffic.
  • C. VCF components binaries are not downloaded.
  • D. Second IP address for VCF Automation is not specified.
正解：D
解説：
In VCF 9.0, when deployingVCF Automationusing the VCF Installer in aSimple Deployment Model, the appliance requirestwo IP addresses:
* Primary IP- Management interface
* Secondary IP- Required for service separation and internal routing for Automation services VMware's JSON schema for VCF Installer enforces this requirement. If the second IP is missing, incorrectly formatted, or placed under the wrong JSON section, the installer validation will fail immediately with a JSON schema error before deployment begins.
This is one of themost common causesof validation failure for VCF Automation deployment.
Option A (component binaries missing) produces abundle downloaderror, not JSON schema failure.
Option C (NSX Manager size = large) is allowed and does not break JSON validation.
Option D (separate vDS for vSAN) is allowed if defined correctly and also does not cause JSON schema failure.

質問 # 41
An administrator has created an alarm for an object in VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Operations. The alert does not show up In the alert pane despite being configured on the object.
Parameters:
* Symptom definition: Read Latency (ms) is higher than 1 ms.
* Alert definition: Alert is triggered as soon as the latency is higher than the 1 ms defined in the symptom definition.
* Object type: Virtual Machine.
What is the reason the alert does not show up in the alert view?
  • A. This type of alert must be forwarded from VMware Cloud Foundation Operations for Logs.
  • B. The metric used in the symptom definition does not apply to this object type.
  • C. The administrator is missing the privileges to view alerts for this object.
  • D. The alert is not enabled in the policy.
正解：D
解説：
In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, VCF Operations (vROps-based) usespoliciesto control which alerts, symptoms, and metrics are evaluated for a given object. Creating an alert definition and symptom alone is not sufficient; the alert must beassociated with and enabled in a policythat is actively applied to the target object (in this case, a Virtual Machine). The documentation shows that when you create an alert definition, there is an explicitPolicies step, where you select the policy (for example, the default policy) so that the alert becomes active for objects governed by that policy.
The metric "Read Latency (ms)" is valid for virtual-machine-related objects: VCF Operations documents Read Latency metrics at the VM disk and VM-datastore link level (for Disk and Datastore metrics on Virtual Machines). Therefore, option B (metric not applicable) is incorrect. No requirement exists that such a performance alert must be forwarded from VCF Operations for Logs (D); log-based alerts are a separate alert type.
If the alert definition is not enabled in the effective policy for that VM, VCF Operations will not evaluate the symptom or generate the alert, and it will not appear in the alert pane-even though the definition technically exists. This matches optionCexactly.

質問 # 42
An administrator is troubleshooting a vSAN issue. As part of the initial investigation, the following observations were identified:
* vSAN cluster capacity is decreased.
* Some virtual machine components are marked as degraded.
* Component rebuild process started automatically.
What is the cause of this issue?
  • A. VM migration to another cluster is in progress.
  • B. vSAN license capacity is too small.
  • C. Physical disk failure.
  • D. Too many virtual machines were created in the vSAN cluster.
正解：C
解説：
The symptoms described-reduced cluster capacity,degraded virtual machine components, andautomatic component rebuild operations-are classic indicators of avSAN disk failure or disk group degradation.
vSAN continuously monitors the health of disks, disk groups, and network paths. When a physical disk or disk group becomes unavailable, vSAN will:
* Mark affected components as degradedbecause the required number of replicas or witnesses cannot be maintained.
* Trigger automatic repair/rebuild operations, provided there are enough healthy disks remaining in the cluster to satisfy the storage policy (e.g., FTT=1, RAID1/5/6).
* Reduce available storage capacitybecause the failed device is removed from contributing to the vSAN datastore.
These behaviors align directly with documented vSAN failure-response logic, which states thatcomponent rebuilds begin automatically after a disk failure, assuming the cluster still has adequate resources.
The other options do not match the symptoms:
* A. VM migration to another cluster# does not reduce vSAN capacity nor trigger component rebuilds.
* B. vSAN license capacity too small# restricts features, not component state or capacity changes.
* C. Too many VMs created# may cause capacity pressure but doesnotmark components degraded or trigger automated rebuilds.
Onlyphysical disk failureaccurately explains all three observations simultaneously.

質問 # 43
......
この分野には多くの専門家や教授がいます。すべての人々の要求を満たすために、当社のこれらの優秀な専門家および教授は昼夜を問わず働いています。彼らはすべての人々のために当社から最高の2V0-15.25認定トレーニング教材を設計するために最善を尽くしました。学習資料により、すべての人がより効率的な方法で2V0-15.25試験の準備をすることができます。 2V0-15.25学習教材がすべての人々に適し、学生、労働者、主婦などすべての人々の要求を満たすことを保証できます。
2V0-15.25試験勉強過去問: https://www.japancert.com/2V0-15.25.html
https://www.examtorrent.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list