Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › Firefly-RK3128› Forescout FSCP過去問無料 & FSCP模擬試験問題集
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Forescout FSCP過去問無料 & FSCP模擬試験問題集

bengree317

137

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
137

【General】 Forescout FSCP過去問無料 & FSCP模擬試験問題集

Posted at yesterday 20:33      View：1 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
弊社が行った一連のFSCP措置は、最も専門的な製品と最も専門的なサービスをお客様に提供することでもあります。 FSCP学習教材に加えて、さまざまな製品も使用していると思います。 FSCPトレーニングエンジンでどのようなサービスがプロフェッショナルと見なされるかは、ご自身の判断で判断してください。しかし、私たちの製品研究教材は、あなたが使用したFSCP試験シミュレーションの中で最も専門的でなければならないことを言いたいと思います。そして、FSCP試験問題は時間とお金に見合う価値があることがわかります。
Forescout Certified Professional Examテストの準備は、主に当社のクライアントは、FSCP試験に合格するのを助けると認証を得ることができます。この認証は、クライアントに大きなメリットをもたらします。クライアントは大企業に参入し、高給を稼ぐことができます。 FSCP試験に合格すると、給与を2倍にすることができます。認定資格を所有している場合、FSCPクイズトレントを十分にマスターし、優れた能力を所有していることを証明し、会社または工場で尊敬されます。あなたの仕事を変えたいなら、それはあなたにとっても良いことです。
FSCP模擬試験問題集 & FSCP勉強方法どのようにすればもっと楽にForescoutのFSCP認定試験に合格することができるかについて考えたことがありますか。試験に合格する秘密を見つけましたか。それを行う方法がわからない場合、私は教えてあげましょう。実際には、認定試験に合格できる方法が多くあります。試験に関連する知識を一生懸命習得することがただ一つの方法です。今はそのようにしていますか。しかし、これが一番時間を無駄にして、望ましい効果を得られない方法です。それに、毎日仕事で忙しいあなたは、恐らく試験に準備する充分な時間がないでしょう。では、Xhs1991のFSCP問題集を試しましょう。この試験参考書はきっとあなたに思えぬ良い結果を与えられます。
Forescout Certified Professional Exam 認定 FSCP 試験問題 (Q64-Q69):質問 # 64
Which two of the following are main uses of the User Directory plugin? (Choose Two)
  • A. Query user details
  • B. Populate the Dashboard
  • C. Perform Radius authorization
  • D. Verify authentication credentials
  • E. Define authentication traffic
正解：A、D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout User Directory Plugin documentation, the two main uses of the User Directory plugin are: Verify authentication credentials (A) and Query user details (D).
Main Functions of User Directory Plugin:
According to the official documentation:
"The User Directory plugin resolves endpoint user details and performs user authentication via configured internal and external directory servers." The plugin's two primary functions are:
* Authenticate Users - Verify/validate authentication credentials
* Resolve User Information - Query and retrieve user details from directory servers Verifying Authentication Credentials:
According to the documentation:
The User Directory plugin:
* Validates user credentials against configured directory servers (Active Directory, LDAP, etc.)
* Performs authentication for:
* Endpoint user authentication
* Console login authentication
* Guest user registration
* RADIUS authentication
Querying User Details:
According to the documentation:
The User Directory plugin:
* Resolves endpoint user information including:
* User name and identity
* Group membership
* User properties and attributes
* Department and organizational unit information
* Retrieves details via LDAP queries when "Use as directory" is enabled Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* B. Define authentication traffic - The plugin doesn't define traffic; it queries authentication servers for user information
* C. Perform Radius authorization - This is the function of the RADIUS Plugin, not the User Directory plugin (though they work together)
* E. Populate the Dashboard - Dashboard population is not a primary function of the User Directory plugin User Directory vs. RADIUS Plugin:
According to the documentation:
Function
User Directory
RADIUS
Authenticate credentials
#Yes
#Yes (primary)
Query user details
#Yes (primary)
#No
802.1X authentication
#No
#Yes
Authorization
Partial
#Yes (primary)
Referenced Documentation:
* User Directory plugin overview
* About the User Directory Plugin
* Initial Setup - User Directory

質問 # 65
What is the best practice for order of sub rules?
  • A. Last rule should capture the highest number of endpoints
  • B. Second rule should capture the highest number of endpoints
  • C. Last rule should not use a catch all
  • D. First rule should capture the lowest number of endpoints
  • E. First rule should capture the highest number of endpoints
正解：D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout Administration Guide and RADIUS Plugin Configuration Guide, the best practice for ordering sub-rules is that the first rule should capture the lowest number of endpoints.
Sub-Rule Evaluation Order:
According to the documentation:
"Endpoints are inspected against each sub-rule in the order listed. When an endpoint matches a sub-rule, subsequent sub-rules are not evaluated for that endpoint." This sequential evaluation means that sub-rule order is critical to policy behavior.
Best Practice - Specific to General:
According to the guidelines:
The correct approach is to order sub-rules from most specific to least specific:
* First Sub-Rules (Most Specific) - Should capture the lowest number of endpoints
* Very specific criteria
* Narrow scope
* Handles edge cases and special conditions
* Middle Sub-Rules - Broader criteria
* More endpoints matched
* General conditions
* Last Sub-Rule (Most General) - Catch-all sub-rule
* Lowest specificity
* Highest number of endpoints
* Handles remaining unmatched endpoints
Why Specific Rules First:
According to the documentation:
"When an endpoint is found to match a sub-rule, no subsequent rules are evaluated for the endpoint." This "first match wins" behavior requires:
* Most specific rules first - Ensure special cases are handled correctly
* General rules last - Catch remaining endpoints that don't match specific criteria
* Avoid premature matches - If a general rule appears first, specific rules never execute Example Sub-Rule Ordering:
According to the RADIUS documentation:
text
Sub-Rule 1 (Most Specific, Lowest Count):
Condition: Windows 7 AND Antivirus NOT Running AND Not Encrypted
Lowest number of endpoints - specific conditions
Sub-Rule 2 (More General, Moderate Count):
Condition: Windows Endpoint AND Missing Patches
More endpoints - broader criteria
Sub-Rule 3 (Least Specific, Highest Count - Catch-All):
Condition: Windows Endpoint (Any)
Highest number - captures all remaining Windows endpoints
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. Last rule should capture the highest number - While the last rule may capture many endpoints, the key best practice is about the FIRST rule capturing the LOWEST
* C. Second rule should capture the highest number - Sub-rule order is specific to general, not based on position 2
* D. Last rule should not use a catch-all - Best practice is that the LAST rule should be the catch-all
* E. First rule should capture the highest number - This is the OPPOSITE of correct practice Referenced Documentation:
* Forescout RADIUS Plugin Configuration Guide v4.3 - Sub-Rules section
* Defining Forescout Platform Policy Sub-Rules
* Sub-Rule Advanced Options

質問 # 66
What should be done after the Managed Windows devices are sent to a policy to determine the Windows 10 patch delivery optimization setting?
  • A. Non Windows 10 devices must be called out in sub-rules since they will not have the relevant DWORD
  • B. Push out the proper DWORD setting via GPO
  • C. Non Windows 10 devices must be called out in sub-rules so that the relevant DWORD value may be changed
  • D. Write sub-rules to check for each of the DWORD values used in patch delivery optimization
  • E. Manageable Windows devices are not required by this policy
正解：D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
After managed Windows devices are sent to a policy to determine the Windows 10 patch delivery optimization setting, the best practice is to write sub-rules to check for each of the DWORD values used in patch delivery optimization.
Windows 10 Patch Delivery Optimization DWORD Values:
Windows 10 patch delivery optimization is configured through DWORD registry settings in the following registry path:
* ComputerHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindowsDeliveryOptimization The primary DWORD value is DODownloadMode, which supports the following values:
* 0 = HTTP only, no peering
* 1 = HTTP blended with peering behind the same NAT (default)
* 2 = HTTP blended with peering across a private group
* 3 = HTTP blended with Internet peering
* 63 = HTTP only, no peering, no use of DO cloud service
* 64 = Bypass mode (deprecated in Windows 11)
Why Sub-Rules Are Required:
When implementing a policy to manage Windows 10 patch delivery optimization settings, administrators must create sub-rules for each possible DWORD configuration value because:
* Different Organizational Requirements - Different departments or network segments may require different delivery optimization modes (e.g., value 1 for some devices, value 0 for others)
* Compliance Checking - Each sub-rule verifies whether a device has the correct DWORD value configured according to organizational policy
* Enforcement Actions - Once each sub-rule identifies a specific DWORD value, appropriate remediation actions can be applied (e.g., GPO deployment, messaging, notifications)
* Granular Control - Sub-rules allow for precise identification of devices with non-compliant delivery optimization settings Implementation Workflow:
* Device is scanned and identified as Windows 10 managed device
* Policy queries the DODownloadMode DWORD registry value
* Multiple sub-rules evaluate the current DWORD value:
* Sub-rule for value "0" (HTTP only)
* Sub-rule for value "1" (Peering behind NAT)
* Sub-rule for value "2" (Peering across private group)
* Sub-rule for value "3" (Internet peering)
* Sub-rule for value "63" (No peering, no cloud)
* Matching sub-rule triggers appropriate policy actions
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. Push out the proper DWORD setting via GPO - This is what you do AFTER checking via sub-rules, not what you do after sending devices to the policy
* B. Non Windows 10 devices must be called out in sub-rules since they will not have the relevant DWORD - While non-Windows 10 devices should be excluded, the answer doesn't address the core requirement of checking each DWORD value
* C. Manageable Windows devices are not required by this policy - This is incorrect; managed Windows devices are the focus of this policy
* D. Non Windows 10 devices must be called out in sub-rules so that the relevant DWORD value may be changed - This misses the point; you check the DWORD values first, not change them in sub-rules Referenced Documentation:
* Microsoft Delivery Optimization Reference - Windows 10 Deployment
* Forescout Administration Guide - Defining Policy Sub-Rules
* How to use Group Policy to configure Windows Update Delivery Optimization

質問 # 67
What is the default recheck timer for a NAC policy?
  • A. 8 hours
  • B. 12 hours
  • C. 2 hours
  • D. 4 hours
  • E. 24 hours
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout Administration Guide - Policy Main Rule Advanced Options, the default recheck timer for a NAC policy is 8 hours.
Default Policy Recheck Timer:
According to the official documentation:
"By default, both matched endpoints and unmatched endpoints are rechecked every eight hours, and on any admission event." This 8-hour default ensures that all endpoints are periodically re-evaluated against policy conditions, regardless of whether they currently match the policy.
Recheck Configuration:
According to the documentation:
When you configure a policy's main rule advanced options:
* Default Recheck Interval: 8 hours
* Customizable Range: Can be configured from 1 hour to infinite (no recheck)
* Applies to: All endpoints in the policy scope
Recheck Triggers:
According to the administration guide:
Policies recheck when:
* Recheck Timer Expires - Every 8 hours by default
* Admission Event - When specific network events occur
* SecureConnector Event - When SC status changes
Referenced Documentation:
* Forescout Platform Policy Main Rule Advanced Options
* Main Rule Advanced Options

質問 # 68
Based on ForeScout's recommended troubleshooting approach, where should you start the troubleshooting process?
  • A. Check that requirements are met
  • B. Review command line logs
  • C. Look at dependencies
  • D. Run fstool tech-support
  • E. Examine the GUI Logs
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout troubleshooting methodology, the recommended starting point for the troubleshooting process is to "Check that requirements are met". This foundational step must come before any detailed investigation.
Forescout Troubleshooting Approach:
The basic troubleshooting workflow consists of:
text
Step 1: CHECK THAT REQUIREMENTS ARE MET (START HERE)
## System requirements
## Software versions
## Network connectivity
## Licensing
Step 2: Look at Dependencies
## Network dependencies
## Service dependencies
## Appliance dependencies
Step 3: Gather Information from CounterACT
## GUI logs
## Properties
## Policies
Step 4: Gather Information from Command Line
## CLI logs
## Network diagnostics
Step 5: Form Hypothesis and Diagnose
## Analyze findings
## Determine root cause
Why Checking Requirements is the First Step:
According to the troubleshooting best practices:
* Foundation - Verifying requirements prevents wasting time on invalid configurations
* System Integrity - Ensures all prerequisites are met before investigating issues
* Efficiency - Many issues stem from unmet requirements; fixing these resolves the problem immediately
* Logical Flow - Without meeting requirements, no further troubleshooting will be effective Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. Run fstool tech-support - This is an advanced diagnostic tool, not the starting point
* C. Look at dependencies - Dependencies are examined AFTER confirming requirements are met
* D. Examine the GUI Logs - Logs are reviewed AFTER requirements and dependencies are checked
* E. Review command line logs - CLI logs are examined later in the process, not first Requirements Verification Includes:
According to the methodology:
* System Requirements
* Supported OS versions
* Memory and storage requirements
* CPU specifications
* Software Versions
* Forescout platform version
* Plugin/module compatibility
* Browser versions for Console
* Network Connectivity
* IP address configuration
* Network interfaces
* Firewall rules
* Licensing
* Valid licenses
* License not expired
* License for required modules
Referenced Documentation:
* Basic troubleshooting approach methodology

質問 # 69
......
「学ぶのに遅すぎることはありません」、FSCP認定の準備が一般的になりつつあります。特に今日の職場では、さまざまなトレーニング資料やツールが常に混乱を招き、品質をテストする時間を無駄にしています。実際、当社のFSCPテスト問題を完全に信じて、FSCP試験に合格することを100％保証します。 FSCPのテスト問題を使用した後、残念ながら試験に不合格になった場合、証明証明書により当社から全額返金されます。
FSCP模擬試験問題集: https://www.xhs1991.com/FSCP.html
FSCP試験を恐れることはありません、したがって、どんな種類のFSCPテストトレントを求めても、当社のアフターサービスサービススタッフは、最も専門的な方法でFSCP練習問題の問題を解決するお手伝いをします、最初は、信頼できる制作チームがあり、FSCP学習ガイドは何百人もの専門家によって改訂されています、FSCP認定試験の問題集はなぜそんなに人気がありますか、Forescout FSCP過去問無料 すべてのユーザーに即時ヘルプを提供するのは私どもの責任です、当社ForescoutのFSCP練習トレントは、99％以上のパス保証を提供します、Xhs1991 FSCP模擬試験問題集は毎日異なる受験生に様々なトレーニング資料を提供します。
外出させないどころか、すだれで囲った部屋を作り、そのなかで大事に育てた、元士界の改革により、チFSCPリの男性農民が北部新軍の強制徴用に耐え、いわゆる現代の規律の悪夢に耐えただけでなく、さまざまな費用を支払うために重い追加の税金と地代を負担しなければならなかったこの改革のコストのほとんど。
信頼できるFSCP過去問無料試験-試験の準備方法-効率的なFSCP模擬試験問題集FSCP試験を恐れることはありません、したがって、どんな種類のFSCPテストトレントを求めても、当社のアフターサービスサービススタッフは、最も専門的な方法でFSCP練習問題の問題を解決するお手伝いをします。
最初は、信頼できる制作チームがあり、FSCP学習ガイドは何百人もの専門家によって改訂されています、FSCP認定試験の問題集はなぜそんなに人気がありますか、すべてのユーザーに即時ヘルプを提供するのは私どもの責任です。
https://www.jpexam.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list