Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › AIO-3588JQ› Plat-Arch-204復習解答例、Plat-Arch-204的中率
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[Hardware] Plat-Arch-204復習解答例、Plat-Arch-204的中率

madison867

135

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
135

【Hardware】 Plat-Arch-204復習解答例、Plat-Arch-204的中率

Posted at yesterday 19:05      View：3 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204認定試験と言ったら、人々は迷っています。異なる考えがありますが、要約は試験が大変難しいことです。SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204認定試験は確かに難しい試験ですが、ShikenPASS を選んだら、これは大丈夫です。ShikenPASSのSalesforceのPlat-Arch-204試験トレーニング資料は受験生としてのあなたが欠くことができない資料です。それは受験生のために特別に作成したものですから、１００パーセントの合格率を保証します。信じないになら、ShikenPASSのサイトをクリックしてください。購入する人々が大変多いですから、あなたもミスしないで速くショッピングカートに入れましょう。
２１世紀の情報時代の到着に伴い、SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204試験の認定はIT業種で不可欠な認定になっています。初心者にしても、サラリーマンにしても、ShikenPASSは君のために特別なSalesforceのPlat-Arch-204問題集を提供します。君は他の人の一半の努力で、同じSalesforceのPlat-Arch-204認定試験を簡単に合格できます。ShikenPASSはあなたと一緒に君のITの夢を叶えるために頑張ります。まだなにを待っていますか。
SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204の試験のベストの問題集を無料でダウンロード多くの人は結果が大丈夫で過程だけ重要ですって言いますが。SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204試験にとってはそうではない。SalesforceのPlat-Arch-204試験に合格するのはIT業界で働いているあなたに利益をもらわせることができます。もしあなたが試験に合格する決心があったら、我々のSalesforceのPlat-Arch-204ソフトを利用するのはあなたの試験に成功する有効な保障です。我々のSalesforceのPlat-Arch-204ソフトのデモをダウンロードしてみて我々ShikenPASSのあなたに合格させる自信を感じられます。
Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • 現在のシステム ランドスケープの評価: このドメインでは、既存の技術環境を分析して、現在のシステム、その標準、プロトコル、制限、境界を理解し、制約と認証
  • 承認の要件を特定します。
トピック 2
  • 統合の維持: このドメインは、統合パフォーマンスの監視、エラー処理および回復手順の定義、エスカレーション プロセスの実装、継続的な統合の健全性監視のレポート ニーズの確立に重点を置いています。
トピック 3
  • 統合ソリューションの設計: このドメインは、統合パターンの選択、適切なコンポーネントを使用した完全なソリューションの設計、トレードオフと制限の理解、適切な Salesforce API の選択、必要な標準とセキュリティ メカニズムの決定に重点を置きます。
トピック 4
  • ビジネス ニーズを評価する: この領域では、機能要件と非機能要件の収集、機密性によるデータの分類、CRM の成功要因の特定、ビジネスの成長と規制が統合の選択にどのように影響するかの理解について説明します。
トピック 5
  • ソリューションの構築: このドメインでは、API 設計の考慮事項、アウトバウンド メソッドの選択、スケーラブルなソリューションの構築、エラー処理の実装、セキュリティ ソリューションの作成、システム更新時の復元力の確保などの統合の実装について説明します。

Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect 認定 Plat-Arch-204 試験問題 (Q109-Q114):質問 # 109
A company's security assessment noted vulnerabilities on the unmanaged packages in its Salesforce orgs; notably, secrets that are easily accessible and in plain text, such as usernames, passwords, and OAuth tokens used in callouts from Salesforce. Which persistence mechanisms should an integration architect require to be used to ensure that secrets are protected from deliberate or inadvertent exposure?
  • A. Protected Custom Metadata Types and Named Credentials
  • B. Named Credentials and Protected Custom Settings
  • C. Encrypted Custom Fields and Protected Custom Settings
正解：A
解説：
The scenario highlights vulnerabilities in unmanaged packages where secrets (usernames, passwords, OAuth tokens) are stored in plain text and easily accessible. The goal is to protect these secrets from exposure in callouts, especially in unpackaged or unmanaged code contexts.
Why A (Protected Custom Metadata Types and Named Credentials)?
Named Credentials is the primary Salesforce-recommended mechanism for securely storing authentication details (including passwords, tokens, and secrets) for HTTP callouts. Secrets are encrypted, not visible in debug logs, and Salesforce handles authentication without exposing them in Apex code.
However, in Named Credentials, admins with "Customize Application" permission can view/edit the secrets.
To further protect secrets (e.g., hide them completely from admins or in packaged scenarios), use Protected Custom Metadata Types (preferably in a managed package). These allow Apex code in the same namespace/package to access the secrets while hiding them from users, API queries, or subscriber orgs.
This combination addresses both standard callouts (via Named Credentials) and cases needing maximum obfuscation (via Protected Custom Metadata), directly mitigating plain-text exposure in unmanaged packages.
Why not B (Encrypted Custom Fields and Protected Custom Settings)?
Encrypted Custom Fields are suitable for sensitive data like PII (e.g., credit cards, SSNs) but explicitly not recommended for storing authentication secrets or credentials used in callouts (per Salesforce Secure Coding guidelines).
Protected Custom Settings offer similar protection to Protected Custom Metadata but are less preferred for configuration-like data (secrets are configuration). Custom Metadata is deployable as metadata, better for packaging and migrations.
Why not C (Named Credentials and Protected Custom Settings)?
While Named Credentials are ideal, pairing with Protected Custom Settings is valid but suboptimal. Salesforce documentation and Trailhead modules favor Protected Custom Metadata Types over Custom Settings for secret storage due to better deployability, caching, and metadata API support.
This aligns with Salesforce Trailhead ("Securely Store Secrets with Salesforce Features") and secure coding guidelines, emphasizing Named Credentials for callouts and Protected Custom Metadata for high-security secret storage in packages. For unmanaged code vulnerabilities, migrating to these mechanisms (ideally with packaging) prevents exposure.

質問 # 110
UC has an API-led architecture with three tiers. Requirement: return data to systems of engagement (mobile, web, Salesforce) in different formats and enforce different security protocols. What should the architect recommend?
  • A. Implement an API Gateway that all systems of engagement must interface with first.
  • B. Enforce separate security protocols and return formats at the first tier of the API-led architecture.
正解：B
解説：
In a standard API-led connectivity model, the First Tier (Experience APIs) is responsible for tailoring data for specific systems of engagement.
The Experience APIs take the core data from the lower tiers and transform it into the specific return formats (e.g., JSON for mobile, XML for legacy web) and security protocols (e.g., OAuth for Salesforce, API Keys for web) required by each consumer. Option B correctly identifies that these transformations and security enforcements should happen at this outer layer. While an API Gateway (Option A) can provide generic security and rate limiting, it is the Experience API layer that provides the functional transformation and specific protocol requirements defined by the business needs of the engagement systems.

質問 # 111
The goals for implementing Salesforce include a 360-degree view, leveraging CRM for marketing, sales, and service, and reusing enterprise quoting/order management. Which three systems from the current landscape can be retired?
  • A. Order Management, Case Management, and Email Marketing
  • B. Email Marketing, Sales Activity, and Case Management
  • C. Sales Activity, Order Management, and Case Management
正解：B
解説：
When implementing Salesforce to achieve a 360-degree view of the customer, the platform replaces legacy "siloed" applications that perform core CRM functions. Based on the business goals provided, Salesforce will be the master for Marketing, Sales, and Service.
The systems to be retired are those whose functionality is natively subsumed by Salesforce:
Email Marketing: Replaced by Salesforce Marketing Cloud or native marketing features.
Sales Activity: Replaced by Sales Cloud, which masters lead management, opportunity tracking, and activity logging.
Case Management: Replaced by Service Cloud, which provides the tools for customer support agents to resolve inquiries.
Order Management and Quoting are specifically noted as "Enterprise capabilities" that the business wants to reuse. This means these systems will stay in the landscape and be integrated with Salesforce, rather than being retired. Therefore, any option containing "Order Management" (A and C) is incorrect. Retiring the marketing, sales activity, and service systems allows the organization to consolidate its customer data into a single platform, fulfilling the primary goal of the Salesforce transformation.

質問 # 112
A large enterprise customer is implementing Salesforce. Current systems include ERP for invoicing/fulfillment and a Marketing solution for email. Associates need to view and log interactions in Salesforce. Which system should be the system of record for customers and prospects?
  • A. ERP with all prospect data from Marketing and Salesforce
  • B. New Custom Database for customers and prospects
  • C. Salesforce with relevant Marketing and ERP information
正解：C
解説：
To achieve a "Customer 360" view where sales and service associates have the context needed for daily interactions, Salesforce is the logical System of Record (SoR) for customer and prospect engagement.
While the ERP remains the master for financial transactions (invoices) and the Marketing tool masters campaign analytics, Salesforce should house the core "Golden Record" of the customer. This is achieved by integrating relevant data from the ERP (order status, invoice history) and Marketing (lead source, email engagement) into Salesforce. This strategy (Option A) empowers associates to log interactions and view history in one place, fulfilling the primary goal of the CRM implementation while avoiding the complexity of a new custom database (Option B) or trying to force prospect-level engagement data into a rigid ERP (Option C).

質問 # 113
Universal Containers (UC) is planning to implement Salesforce as its CRM system. Currently, UC has a marketing system for leads, Microsoft Outlook for contacts and emails, and an ERP for billing and payments. The proposed CRM should provide a single customer view. What should an integration architect consider to support this strategy?
  • A. Propose a middleware system that can support interface between systems with Salesforce.
  • B. Explore out-of-the-box Salesforce connectors for integration with ERP, Marketing, and Microsoft Outlook systems.
  • C. Evaluate current and future data and system usage, and then identify potential integration requirements to Salesforce
正解：C
解説：
The foundational step in a CRM transformation project is to understand the business context and data landscape before selecting technical tools or middleware.
Before proposing a technical solution, an architect must evaluate current and future data and system usage to identify specific integration requirements. This includes documenting business processes, mapping data flows between the Marketing system, Outlook, and the ERP, and identifying which system will serve as the "System of Record" for each data entity. For example, the architect needs to determine if lead data from the Marketing system should flow unidirectionally to Salesforce or if activities from Outlook need bidirectional synchronization to maintain a "360-degree view".
While out-of-the-box connectors (Option B) and middleware (Option C) are valuable, they are implementation tactics that follow the discovery phase. Jumping directly to connectors may overlook unique business processes that require custom integration logic, while proposing middleware prematurely can lead to unnecessary costs if native tools or point-to-point connections are sufficient. A thorough evaluation ensures that the integration architecture is scalable, avoids data corruption, and aligns with UC's strategic goal of breaking down information silos to provide sales and support staff with meaningful, unified customer insights.

質問 # 114
......
Salesforceお客様にさまざまな種類のPlat-Arch-204練習用トレントを提供して学習させ、知識の蓄積と能力の向上を支援したいと考えています。また、Plat-Arch-204学習ガイドを使用して、すべてのユーザーの質問に最短時間で専門家が回答できることを保証します。もう1つ、散発的な時間を最大限に活用して知識と情報を吸収するお手伝いをします。つまり、Plat-Arch-204試験対策を目指している他の類似企業と比較して、Plat-Arch-204試験問題のサービスと品質は、お客様と潜在的なクライアントから高く評価されています。
Plat-Arch-204的中率: https://www.shikenpass.com/Plat-Arch-204-shiken.html
https://www.briandumpsprep.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list