Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Core Board › Core-1684JD4› 100% Pass 2026 Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro: The Be ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[Hardware] 100% Pass 2026 Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro: The Best Palo Alto Networks Securi

joejenk970

131

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
131

【Hardware】 100% Pass 2026 Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro: The Best Palo Alto Networks Securi

Posted at 10 hour before      View：16 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
If you buy our SecOps-Pro training quiz, you will find three different versions are available on our test platform. According to your need, you can choose the suitable version for you. The three different versions of our SecOps-Pro study materials include the PDF version, the software version and the online version. We can promise that the three different versions are equipment with the high quality. If you purchase our SecOps-Pro Preparation questions, it will be very easy for you to easily and efficiently find the exam focus and pass the SecOps-Pro exam.
If you face any problem while using the offline or online software Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional (SecOps-Pro) practice exam of itPass4sure, contact our customer service team. Our team of experts is available 24/7 for your assistance while using updated SecOps-Pro Exam Prep material. Many takers of the Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional (SecOps-Pro) practice test suffer from money loss because it introduces new changes in the content of the test.
SecOps-Pro Latest Exam Practice & New SecOps-Pro Real ExamSince it is obvious that different people have different preferences, we have prepared three kinds of different versions of our SecOps-Pro practice test, PDF, Online App and software version. Last but not least, our customers can accumulate SecOps-Pro exam experience as well as improving their exam skills in the mock exam. What's more, our software version of SecOps-Pro practice materials can best simulate the real exam, but it can only be operated under the Windows operation system. I strongly believe that you can find the version you want in multiple choices of our SecOps-Pro practice test.
Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional Sample Questions (Q194-Q199):NEW QUESTION # 194
During an incident response exercise, a security analyst identifies a phishing email successfully delivered to a user's inbox, containing a malicious attachment. The user has not yet opened the attachment. In the 'Containment, Eradication, and Recovery' phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan, which sequence of actions, specifically utilizing Palo Alto Networks security features, would be most effective and appropriate?
  • A. Isolate the user's endpoint using Cortex XDR's Live Terminal, then perform a network-wide antivirus scan, and finally notify the user to delete the email.
  • B. Perform a full forensic analysis of the user's hard drive, identify the attacker's IP, and then block that IP on the perimeter firewall.
  • C. Disable the user's network access, reimage their machine, and then conduct a user awareness training session.
  • D. Report the incident to law enforcement and await their instructions before taking any action.
  • E. Block the sender's email address on the email gateway, delete the email from the user's inbox (if possible via email security solution), and then initiate a WildFire analysis of the attachment to update threat intelligence.
Answer: E
Explanation:
The 'Containment, Eradication, and Recovery' phase aims to stop the spread, remove the root cause, and restore services. Blocking the sender and deleting the email (B) are immediate containment and eradication steps for an un-opened malicious email. Initiating WildFire analysis is crucial for updating threat intelligence and preventing similar future attacks, aligning with eradication and future prevention. Isolating the endpoint (A) is a containment step, but a network-wide scan might be too broad at this stage without confirmed compromise, and notifying the user to delete is less effective than forced deletion. Reimaging (C) is overkill if the attachment wasn't opened. Forensic analysis (D) is typically part of eradication/post-incident analysis once the immediate threat is contained. Reporting to law enforcement (E) is a post-incident activity, not an immediate containment step.

NEW QUESTION # 195
A SOC is migrating from a traditional SIEM to a cloud-native Security Operations Platform, specifically evaluating the integration capabilities of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The primary objective is to automate repetitive incident response tasks, such as enriching alerts with threat intelligence, containing compromised endpoints, and generating incident reports. Which of the following Python code snippets, when integrated into a custom playbook in Cortex XSOAR, would exemplify the automation of enriching an alert with threat intelligence from a external API, assuming 'demisto' is the global object for XSOAR functions and 'incident' is the current incident object?
  • A.
  • B.
  • C.
  • D.
  • E.
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
This is a multiple-response question requiring knowledge of SOAR automation and Palo Alto Networks XSOAR specifics. Option C (Correct): This snippet correctly demonstrates how a Python script within Cortex XSOAR (using 'demisto.executeCommand') would call a pre-configured integration (e.g., VirusTotal) to enrich an indicator, then 'demisto.resultS and 'demisto.setContext' to make the data available within the incident. This directly addresses the 'enriching alerts with threat intelligence' part of the question. Option E (Correct): This snippet correctly demonstrates how XSOAR would be used to automate the 'containing compromised endpoints' task by calling an action from an integrated EDR solution (like Cortex XDR) via This is a core SOAR capability. Option A: This uses 'requests' directly, which is generally not how XSOAR's built-in integrations or playbooks would interact with external APIs. XSOAR prefers demisto.executeCommand' for integration interactions. Option B: This uses 'subprocess.run' to execute shell commands, which is highly system-dependent and not the standard, secure, or portable way to interact with network devices via a SOAR platform; XSOAR would use specific firewall integrations for this. Option D: This only generates a report header, not the full report and doesn't involve any enrichment or containment automation. While report generation is a SOAR function, this code snippet is too simplistic and doesn't address the primary automation objectives. The question asks for automating repetitive incident response tasks like enrichment and containment, and generating incident reports (not just headers).

NEW QUESTION # 196
During an incident response engagement, a forensic investigator discovers a persistent threat actor using a custom command-and- control (C2) protocol over port 53 (DNS). The existing SIEM logs show only generic DNS queries. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the adversary's TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures), including their C2 infrastructure, exploit development, and motivation, and to proactively block future attacks, which combination of resources would be most beneficial?
  • A. Passive DNS reconnaissance and WHOIS lookups for the C2 domains.
  • B. WildFire for malware detonation and real-time signature generation, coupled with extensive Unit 42 research reports and adversary playbooks.
  • C. Employing a commercial Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution without integrating threat intelligence feeds.
  • D. VirusTotal for file hash lookups and open-source intelligence blogs for general threat trends.
  • E. Deep packet inspection of all network traffic and manual reverse engineering of all suspicious binaries.
Answer: B
Explanation:
WildFire is excellent for understanding the technical aspects of malware, including its C2 communication. However, for a holistic view of the adversary's TTPs, motivations, and broader campaigns, Unit 42's detailed threat research, adversary playbooks, and intelligence reports are invaluable. Unit 42 focuses on in-depth analysis of threat actors, their campaigns, and the broader threat landscape, providing strategic and tactical intelligence that complements WildFire's technical output. This combination allows for both technical understanding of the attack and strategic intelligence on the adversary.

NEW QUESTION # 197
A security operations center (SOC) wants to automate the enrichment of IP addresses and domain names found in security alerts using multiple open-source and commercial threat intelligence sources (e.g., VirusTotal, Shodan, Whois, AbuselPDB). Some sources require API keys, others are unauthenticated. The enrichment process must be efficient and consolidate results. Which XSOAR integration design pattern is most suitable for this scenario, and what XSOAR features would be key to its implementation?
  • A. Develop a single custom Python script that aggregates all API calls internally, then exposes one command to XSOAR. Key features: Custom Python integration, External Scripts.
  • B. A single 'Generic API' integration for all sources, with complex conditional logic in a playbook. Key features: Playbook tasks, 'Conditional' steps.
  • C. Separate dedicated integrations for each threat intelligence source (e.g., VirusTotal integration, Shodan integration). Utilize XSOAR's 'Indicator Enrichment' playbook sub-playbooks or tasks, and the 'DBot Score' for consolidated reputation. Key features: Integrations, Playbooks, Sub-playbooks, DBot Score, Indicator fields.
  • D. Manually query each source via the XSOAR War Room and copy-paste results into indicator fields. Key features: War Room, Manual Tasks.
  • E. Use XSOAR's 'Data Collection' module to import CSVs from each source. Key features: Data Collection, File Feed.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Option B is the most robust and idiomatic XSOAR approach for this scenario. Creating separate, dedicated integrations for each threat intelligence source leverages XSOAR's modularity and simplifies maintenance (each integration manages its own API key, rate limits, and parsing). XSOAR's built-in 'Indicator Enrichment' playbooks or sub-playbooks are designed for this exact purpose, allowing parallel execution of enrichment commands. The 'DBot Score' is critical for consolidating the reputation from multiple sources into a single, actionable score on the indicator, and custom indicator fields can store granular details from each source. Option A is less modular. Option C centralizes too much logic within a single script, making it less manageable. Options D and E are manual or not suitable for real-time, on-demand enrichment.

NEW QUESTION # 198
A new junior security analyst has joined the incident response team and is struggling to keep up with the real-time communication and complex data within a rapidly evolving phishing incident in Cortex XSOAR's War Room. They often miss critical updates or struggle to find relevant information quickly. What specific War Room functionalities should they be advised to utilize to enhance their situational awareness and information retrieval, considering the dynamic nature of the incident?
  • A. The analyst should exclusively rely on the 'Journal' tab for all incident updates, as it provides a chronological record. For specific data, they should manually scroll through the entire War Room feed.
  • B. The analyst should enable 'Automatic Scrolling' in the War Room settings to ensure they always see the latest entries and bookmark critical entries for quick access later.
  • C. The analyst should utilize the 'Canvas' view to visualize the incident flow and rely on automated 'War Room Summaries' generated by playbooks at regular intervals.
  • D. The analyst should actively use the War Room's 'Search' bar to filter entries by keywords, user, or entry type (e.g., 'Evidence', 'Note', 'Command Output'). They should also subscribe to 'Notifications' for specific types of entries or critical updates from senior analysts.
  • E. The analyst should primarily focus on 'Collaborators' list to see who is active and directly message them for updates. Data retrieval should be done by reviewing the 'Incident Fields' tab only.
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
Options B and E are crucial for a junior analyst. The 'Search' bar (B) is fundamental for efficiently sifting through large volumes of War Room data, allowing them to quickly find specific information, commands, or evidence. Subscribing to 'Notifications' (B) ensures they are alerted to critical updates without constant manual checking. 'Automatic Scrolling' (E) helps them stay updated with real-time communication, and 'bookmarking critical entries' (E) allows for quick navigation back to important information. While other options have some utility, they don't directly address the core problem of real-time awareness and efficient information retrieval in a dynamic environment as effectively as B and E combined.

NEW QUESTION # 199
......
itPass4sure has designed a customizable Web-based Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro practice test software. You can set the time and type of Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional SecOps-Pro test questions before starting to take the Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional SecOps-Pro Practice Exam. It works with all operating systems like Linux, Windows, Android, Mac, and IOS, etc.
SecOps-Pro Latest Exam Practice: https://www.itpass4sure.com/SecOps-Pro-practice-exam.html
But our SecOps-Pro guide tests can solve these problems perfectly, because our study materials only need little hours can be grasped, itPass4sure SecOps-Pro Latest Exam Practice is very powerful company which was established so many years and gained a lot of good comments about SecOps-Pro Latest Exam Practice - Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional test questions and dumps in this field, That is the also the reason why we play an active role in making our Security Operations Generalist SecOps-Pro exam training material into which we operate better exam materials to help you live and work.
This allows us to create a controller hierarchy that mirrors SecOps-Pro our views, Can you tell me about the books you've written on the subject  what makes them different?
But our SecOps-Pro Guide tests can solve these problems perfectly, because our study materials only need little hours can be grasped, itPass4sure is very powerful company which was established so many SecOps-Pro Latest Exam Practice years and gained a lot of good comments about Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional test questions and dumps in this field.
100% Valid Palo Alto Networks SecOps-Pro PDF Dumps and SecOps-Pro Exam QuestionsThat is the also the reason why we play an active role in making our Security Operations Generalist SecOps-Pro exam training material into which we operate better exam materials to help you live and work.
Online APP version, Up to now, there are three versions of SecOps-Pro exam materials for your reference.
https://www.passsureexam.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list