Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › EC-A3288C› SPLK-2002 Trainingsunterlagen - SPLK-2002 Zertifikat ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] SPLK-2002 Trainingsunterlagen - SPLK-2002 Zertifikatsdemo

rickgre288

127

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
127

【General】 SPLK-2002 Trainingsunterlagen - SPLK-2002 Zertifikatsdemo

Posted at yesterday 16:51      View：14 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
BONUS!!! Laden Sie die vollständige Version der PrüfungFrage SPLK-2002 Prüfungsfragen kostenlos herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KcawFF2jh1V64xekVKEvJL4K8LeAZYyR
Wir PrüfungFrage sind eine professionelle Website. Wir bieten jedem Teilnehmer guten Service, sowie Vor-Sales-Service und Nach-Sales-Service. Wenn Sie Splunk SPLK-2002 Zertifizierungsunterlagen von PrüfungFrage wollen, können Sie zuerst das kostlose Demo benutzen. Sie können sich fühlen, ob die Unterlagen sehr geeignet sind. Damit können Sie die Qualität unserer Splunk SPLK-2002 Prüfungsunterlagen überprüfen und dann sich entscheiden für den Kauf. Falls Sie dabei durchgefallen wären, geben wir Ihnen voll Geld zurück. Oder Sie können wieder einjährige kostlose Aktualisierung auswählen.
Die SPLK-2002-Prüfung validiert das Wissen des Kandidaten in verschiedenen Bereichen wie Daten-Onboarding, Datenmanagement, Suchverarbeitungssprache, Splunk-Architektur und Bereitstellung. Die Kandidaten müssen ihre Fähigkeit zur Gestaltung und Implementierung von Splunk-Bereitstellungen unter Beweis stellen, die den Geschäftsanforderungen entsprechen und eine optimale Leistung gewährleisten.
Die Splunk SPLK-2002-Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine wesentliche Voraussetzung für Personen, die ihre Karriere als Splunk-Profi vorantreiben möchten. Die Zertifizierung bietet verschiedene Vorteile wie erhöhte Beschäftigungsmöglichkeiten, ein höheres Gehalt und Anerkennung in der Branche. Die Zertifizierung ist auch für Organisationen von Vorteil, die Splunk verwenden, da sie zeigt, dass ihre Mitarbeiter über die Fähigkeiten und das Wissen verfügen, die erforderlich sind, um die Plattform effektiv zu nutzen.
SPLK-2002 Zertifikatsdemo & SPLK-2002 Deutsch PrüfungsfragenMachen Sie sich noch Sorgen um die Splunk SPLK-2002 (Splunk Enterprise Certified Architect) Zertifizierungsprüfung? Haben Sie schon mal gedacht, sich an einem entsprechenden Kurs teilzunehmen? Gute Prüfungsmaterialien zu wählen, wird Ihnen helfen, Ihre Fachkenntnisse zu konsolidieren und sich gut auf die Splunk SPLK-2002 Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten. Das Expertenteam von PrüfungFrage hat endlich die neuesten zielgerichteten Schulungsunterlagen, die Ihnen beim Vorbereiten der Prüfung helfen, nach ihren Erfahrungen und Kenntnissen erforscht. Die Splunk SPLK-2002 Schulungsunterlagen von PrüfungFrage ist Ihre optimale Wahl.
Die Splunk SPLK-2002 Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine wertvolle Zertifizierung für erfahrene Splunk-Profis, die ihre Fähigkeiten im Design und der Implementierung von Splunk Enterprise-Umgebungen demonstrieren möchten. Die Zertifizierung wird in der Technologiebranche hoch angesehen und weltweit anerkannt. Kandidaten können sich auf die Prüfung vorbereiten, indem sie offizielle Schulungskurse, Prüfungsübungen und Online-Studienführer absolvieren.
Splunk Enterprise Certified Architect SPLK-2002 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q202-Q207):202. Frage
(An admin removed and re-added search head cluster (SHC) members as part of patching the operating system. When trying to re-add the first member, a script reverted the SHC member to a previous backup, and the member refuses to join the cluster. What is the best approach to fix the member so that it can re-join?)
  • A. Clean the Raft metadata using splunk clean raft.
  • B. Review splunkd.log for configuration changes preventing the addition of the member.
  • C. Delete the [shclustering] stanza in server.conf and restart Splunk.
  • D. Force the member add by running splunk edit shcluster-config -force.
Antwort: A
Begründung:
According to the Splunk Search Head Clustering Troubleshooting Guide, when a Search Head Cluster (SHC) member is reverted from a backup or experiences configuration drift (e.g., an outdated Raft state), it can fail to rejoin the cluster due to inconsistent Raft metadata. The Raft database stores the SHC's internal consensus and replication state, including knowledge object synchronization, captain election history, and peer membership information.
If this Raft metadata becomes corrupted or outdated (as in the scenario where a node is restored from backup), the recommended and Splunk-supported remediation is to clean the Raft metadata using:
splunk clean raft
This command resets the node's local Raft state so it can re-synchronize with the current SHC captain and rejoin the cluster cleanly.
The steps generally are:
* Stop the affected SHC member.
* Run splunk clean raft on that node.
* Restart Splunk.
* Verify that it successfully rejoins the SHC.
Deleting configuration stanzas or forcing re-addition (Options B and C) can lead to further inconsistency or data loss. Reviewing logs (Option A) helps diagnose issues but does not resolve Raft corruption.
References (Splunk Enterprise Documentation):
* Troubleshooting Raft Metadata Corruption in Search Head Clusters
* splunk clean raft Command Reference
* Search Head Clustering: Recovering from Backup and Membership Failures
* Splunk Enterprise Admin Manual - Raft Consensus and SHC Maintenance

203. Frage
A Splunk architect has inherited the Splunk deployment at Buttercup Games and end users are complaining that the events are inconsistently formatted for a web sourcetype. Further investigation reveals that not all web logs flow through the same infrastructure: some of the data goes through heavy forwarders and some of the forwarders are managed by another department.
Which of the following items might be the cause for this issue?
  • A. The forwarders managed by the other department are an older version than the rest.
  • B. The indexers may have different configurations than the heavy forwarders.
  • C. The data inputs are not properly configured across all the forwarders.
  • D. The search head may have different configurations than the indexers.
Antwort: A

204. Frage
Which of the following is a good practice for a search head cluster deployer?
  • A. The deployer must distribute configurations to search head cluster members to be valid configurations.
  • B. The deployer must be used to distribute non-replicable configurations to search head cluster members.
  • C. The deployer only distributes configurations to search head cluster members when they "phone home".
  • D. The deployer only distributes configurations to search head cluster members with splunk apply shcluster-bundle.
Antwort: B
Begründung:
The following is a good practice for a search head cluster deployer: The deployer must be used to distribute non-replicable configurations to search head cluster members. Non-replicable configurations are the configurations that are not replicated by the search factor, such as the apps and the server.conf settings. The deployer is the Splunk server role that distributes these configurations to the search head cluster members, ensuring that they have the same configuration. The deployer does not only distribute configurations to search head cluster members when they "phone home", as this would cause configuration inconsistencies and delays.
The deployer does not distribute configurations to search head cluster members to be valid configurations, as this implies that the configurations are invalid without the deployer. The deployer does not only distribute configurations to search head cluster members with splunk apply shcluster-bundle, as this would require manual intervention by the administrator. For more information, see Use the deployer to distribute apps and configuration updates in the Splunk documentation.

205. Frage
When should a dedicated deployment server be used?
  • A. When there are more than 50 apps to deploy to deployment clients.
  • B. When there are more than 50 search peers.
  • C. When there are more than 50 server classes.
  • D. When there are more than 50 deployment clients.
Antwort: D
Begründung:
A dedicated deployment server is a Splunk instance that manages the distribution of configuration updates and apps to a set of deployment clients, such as forwarders, indexers, or search heads. A dedicated deployment server should be used when there are more than 50 deployment clients, because this number exceeds the recommended limit for a non-dedicated deployment server. A non-dedicated deployment server is a Splunk instance that also performs other roles, such as indexing or searching. Using a dedicated deployment server can improve the performance, scalability, and reliability of the deployment process. Option C is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because the number of search peers does not affect the need for a dedicated deployment server. Search peers are indexers that participate in a distributed search. Option B is incorrect because the number of apps to deploy does not affect the need for a dedicated deployment server.
Apps are packages of configurations and assets that provide specific functionality or views in Splunk. Option D is incorrect because the number of server classes does not affect the need for a dedicated deployment server. Server classes are logical groups of deployment clients that share the same configuration updates and apps12
1: https://docs.splunk.com/Document ... outdeploymentserver 2: https://docs.
splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.1.2/Updating/Whentousedeploymentserver

206. Frage
An indexer cluster is being designed with the following characteristics:
* 10 search peers
* Replication Factor (RF): 4
* Search Factor (SF): 3
* No SmartStore usage
How many search peers can fail before data becomes unsearchable?
  • A. Three peers can fail.
  • B. Zero peers can fail.
  • C. One peer can fail.
  • D. Four peers can fail.
Antwort: A
Begründung:
Three peers can fail. This is the maximum number of search peers that can fail before data becomes unsearchable in the indexer cluster with the given characteristics. The searchability of the data depends on the Search Factor, which is the number of searchable copies of each bucket that the cluster maintains across the set of peer nodes1. In this case, the Search Factor is 3, which means that each bucket has three searchable copies distributed among the 10 search peers. If three or fewer search peers fail, the cluster can still serve the data from the remaining searchable copies. However, if four or more search peers fail, the cluster may lose some searchable copies and the data may become unsearchable. The other options are not correct, as they either underestimate or overestimate the number of search peers that can fail before data becomes unsearchable. Therefore, option C is the correct answer, and options A, B, and D are incorrect.
1: Configure the search factor

207. Frage
......
SPLK-2002 Zertifikatsdemo: https://www.pruefungfrage.de/SPLK-2002-dumps-deutsch.html
Außerdem sind jetzt einige Teile dieser PrüfungFrage SPLK-2002 Prüfungsfragen kostenlos erhältlich: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KcawFF2jh1V64xekVKEvJL4K8LeAZYyR
https://www.actual4cert.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list