Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › ROC-RK3328-PC› Mule-Arch-201復習過去問、Mule-Arch-201認定資格
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Mule-Arch-201復習過去問、Mule-Arch-201認定資格

jimshaw961

128

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
128

【General】 Mule-Arch-201復習過去問、Mule-Arch-201認定資格

Posted at 9 hour before      View：13 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
GoShikenは、最新のMule-Arch-201試験トレントが能力を強化し、Mule-Arch-201試験に合格して認定を取得するのに非常に役立つと深く信じています。嫌がらせから抜け出すために、Mule-Arch-201学習教材は高品質で高い合格率を備えています。ほとんどの時間インターネットにアクセスできない場合、どこかに行く必要がある場合はオフライン状態ですが、Mule-Arch-201試験のために学習したい場合。当社のウェブサイトは、優れたMule-Arch-201試験問題の助けを借りて問題の解決に役立ちます。
テストが来るのを静かに待っている場合は、目を覚まして、別の方法でMule-Arch-201試験を受ける準備ができている必要があります。最近のMule-Arch-201ガイド急流の効果が資格試験を通じて受験者の秘密兵器になったことを示した後、Mule-Arch-201トレーニング資料を勉強して「テストデータ」を書くことがあなたの選択に最適です。 Mule-Arch-201ガイドトレントのユーザーは、Mule-Arch-201試験で予期しない結果を得ることができます。
便利なMule-Arch-201復習過去問一回合格-信頼的なMule-Arch-201認定資格弊社の理想はお客様の皆様の利益を保証してお客様のあなたに最高のサービスを提供して、我々の商品を利用してお客様は全員でSalesforceのMule-Arch-201試験に合格できることです。今まで、弊社はこの目的にずっと努力しています。弊社の頼もしい商品を利用してお客様のほとんどはMule-Arch-201試験に合格しました。弊社の専門家たちの努力とお客様のレビューがありますからこそ、我々はこのように自信があります。
Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect 認定 Mule-Arch-201 試験問題 (Q25-Q30):質問 # 25
Which of the following sequence is correct?
  • A. API Client implementes logic to call an API >> API Consumer requests access to API >> API routes the request to >> API Implementation
  • B. API Consumer requests access to API >> API Client implementes logic to call an API >> API routes the request to >> API Implementation
  • C. API Consumer implementes logic to call an API >> API Client requests access to API >> API Implementation routes the request to >> API
  • D. API Client implementes logic to call an API >> API Consumer requests access to API >> API Implementation routes the request to >> API
正解：B
解説：
Correct Answe r: API Consumer requests access to API >> API Client implementes logic to call an API >> API routes the request to >> API Implementation
*****************************************
>> API consumer does not implement any logic to invoke APIs. It is just a role. So, the option stating "API Consumer implementes logic to call an API" is INVALID.
>> API Implementation does not route any requests. It is a final piece of logic where functionality of target systems is exposed. So, the requests should be routed to the API implementation by some other entity. So, the options stating "API Implementation routes the request to >> API" is INVALID
>> The statements in one of the options are correct but sequence is wrong. The sequence is given as "API Client implementes logic to call an API >> API Consumer requests access to API >> API routes the request to >> API Implementation". Here, the statements in the options are VALID but sequence is WRONG.
>> Right option and sequence is the one where API consumer first requests access to API on Anypoint Exchange and obtains client credentials. API client then writes logic to call an API by using the access client credentials requested by API consumer and the requests will be routed to API implementation via the API which is managed by API Manager.

質問 # 26
To minimize operation costs, a customer wants to use a CloudHub 1.0 solution. The customer's requirements are:
* Separate resources with two Business groups
* High-availability (HA) for all APIs
* Route traffic via Dedicated load balancer (DLBs)
* Separate environments into production and non-production
Which solution meets the customer's needs?
  • A. One production and one non-production Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) per Business group.
    Minimize CIDR aligning with projected application total.
    Divide availability zones during deployment of APIs for HA.
  • B. One production and one non-production Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).
    Use availability zones to differentiate between Business groups.
    Allocate maximum CIDR per VPCs to ensure HA across availability zones
  • C. One production and one non-production Virtual Private Claud (VPC).
    Configure subnet to differentiate between business groups.
    Allocate maximum CIDR per VPCs to make it easier to add Child groups.
    Span VPC to cover three availability zones.
  • D. One production and one non-production Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) per Business group.
    Minimize CIDR aligning with projected application total.
    Choose a MuleSoft CloudHub 1.0 region with multiple availability zones.
    Deploy multiple workers for HA,
正解：D
解説：
Understanding the Requirements:
Business Groups: The solution must support two business groups, which typically require separate VPCs for logical separation.
High Availability (HA): Requires deploying resources across multiple availability zones.
Dedicated Load Balancer (DLB): Traffic should be routed via DLBs, which operate within VPCs on CloudHub.
Separate Environments: There needs to be separation between production and non-production environments.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: Using a single production and non-production VPC and differentiating business groups via availability zones is not ideal as it does not provide full separation for each business group, and using maximum CIDR allocation is wasteful.
Option B (Correct Answer): Creating separate production and non-production VPCs per business group with minimized CIDR blocks, multiple availability zones, and multiple workers per application for HA meets all requirements effectively.
Option C: While this option separates VPCs per business group, it does not fully address the requirement for HA across availability zones by specifying multi-zone deployment only during API deployment, which may not guarantee redundancy.
Option D: Configuring subnets to differentiate business groups within a single production and non-production VPC does not fully separate the business groups, which is a requirement.
Conclusion:
Option B is the best choice as it meets the requirements for high availability, business group separation, and cost efficiency by using minimized CIDR allocations and deploying multiple workers across availability zones.
For further reference, refer to MuleSoft's documentation on VPC configuration and high availability deployment strategies.

質問 # 27
What is a best practice when building System APIs?
  • A. Expose to API clients all technical details of the API implementation's interaction wifch the backend system
  • B. Model all API resources and methods to closely mimic the operations of the backend system
  • C. Build an Enterprise Data Model (Canonical Data Model) for each backend system and apply it to System APIs
  • D. Document the API using an easily consumable asset like a RAML definition
正解：B
解説：
Correct Answe r: Model all API resources and methods to closely mimic the operations of the backend system.
*****************************************
>> There are NO fixed and straight best practices while opting data models for APIs. They are completly contextual and depends on number of factors. Based upon those factors, an enterprise can choose if they have to go with Enterprise Canonical Data Model or Bounded Context Model etc.
>> One should NEVER expose the technical details of API implementation to their API clients. Only the API interface/ RAML is exposed to API clients.
>> It is true that the RAML definitions of APIs should be as detailed as possible and should reflect most of the documentation. However, just that is NOT enough to call your API as best documented API. There should be even more documentation on Anypoint Exchange with API Notebooks etc. to make and create a developer friendly API and repository..
>> The best practice always when creating System APIs is to create their API interfaces by modeling their resources and methods to closely reflect the operations and functionalities of that backend system.

質問 # 28
A company has started to create an application network and is now planning to implement a Center for Enablement (C4E) organizational model. What key factor would lead the company to decide upon a federated rather than a centralized C4E?
  • A. When there are a large number of existing common assets shared by development teams
  • B. When the majority of the applications in the application network are cloud based
  • C. When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups
  • D. When various teams responsible for creating APIs are new to integration and hence need extensive training
正解：C
解説：
Correct Answe r: When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups
*****************************************
>> It would require lot of process effort in an organization to have a single C4E team coordinating with multiple already organized development teams which are into several independent initiatives. A single C4E works well with different teams having at least a common initiative. So, in this scenario, federated C4E works well instead of centralized C4E.

質問 # 29
An API implementation is deployed to CloudHub.
What conditions can be alerted on using the default Anypoint Platform functionality, where the alert conditions depend on the end-to-end request processing of the API implementation?
  • A. When a particular API client invokes the API too often within a given time period
  • B. When the response time of API invocations exceeds a threshold
  • C. When the API receives a very high number of API invocations
  • D. When the API is invoked by an unrecognized API client
正解：B
解説：
Correct Answe r: When the response time of API invocations exceeds a threshold
*****************************************
>> Alerts can be setup for all the given options using the default Anypoint Platform functionality
>> However, the question insists on an alert whose conditions depend on the end-to-end request processing of the API implementation.
>> Alert w.r.t "Response Times" is the only one which requires end-to-end request processing of API implementation in order to determine if the threshold is exceeded or not.

質問 # 30
......
我々は販売者とお客様の間の信頼が重要でもらい難いのを知っています。我々はSalesforceのMule-Arch-201ソフトであなたに専門と高効率を示して、最全面的な問題集と詳しい分析であなたに助けてSalesforceのMule-Arch-201試験に合格して、最高のサービスであなたの信頼を得ています。あなたが試験に合格するのは我々への一番よい評価です。
Mule-Arch-201認定資格: https://www.goshiken.com/Salesforce/Mule-Arch-201-mondaishu.html
何万人ものお客様が弊社の試験資料の恩恵を受け、Mule-Arch-201試験に簡単に合格しました、当社SalesforceのMule-Arch-201テストトレントを通じて、さらなる開発のための高効率の学習態度を構築するのに役立つこのような効率的な学習計画を設計する予定です、Mule-Arch-201をシミュレートする実践がすべての責任を負い、予測可能な結果を​​もたらす可能性があり、私たちを確実に信じることを後悔することはありません、競争がますます激しいIT業種では、SalesforceのMule-Arch-201試験の認定は欠くことができない認証です、Salesforce Mule-Arch-201復習過去問 近い将来、あなたの学習パートナーになることを楽しみにしています、Salesforce Mule-Arch-201復習過去問 うちの学習教材の高い正確性は言うまでもありません。
各役職のための部屋がいくつもある、それはその人だけでなく何人となく皆同じことを言ったそうで、少将さんは今どうすればいいかと煩悶（はんもん）をしておられます、何万人ものお客様が弊社の試験資料の恩恵を受け、Mule-Arch-201試験に簡単に合格しました。
認定する-高品質なMule-Arch-201復習過去問試験-試験の準備方法Mule-Arch-201認定資格当社SalesforceのMule-Arch-201テストトレントを通じて、さらなる開発のための高効率の学習態度を構築するのに役立つこのような効率的な学習計画を設計する予定です、Mule-Arch-201をシミュレートする実践がすべての責任を負い、予測可能な結果を​​もたらす可能性があり、私たちを確実に信じることを後悔することはありません。
競争がますます激しいIT業種では、SalesforceのMule-Arch-201試験の認定は欠くことができない認証です、近い将来、あなたの学習パートナーになることを楽しみにしています。
https://www.validbraindumps.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list